Analysis of peripheral lymphocyte subsets and T-cell exhaustion in SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Introduction: : Immune responses against Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) may be highly complex. It has been suggested that T-cell fatigue develops due to continuous stimulation of T-cells by SARS-CoV-2 in Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). It was aimed to assess peripheral lymphocyte subsets and T-cell exhaustion in various clinical courses of the disease in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: This study included 150 patients who were assigned into the "mild-to-moderate disease" group, or "severe disease" group based on their clinical and laboratory characteristics. Peripheral lymphocyte subsets and T-cell exhaustion markers [programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (Tim-3)] were determined in the peripheral blood using flow cytometry. Result: Mean (±SD) age was 53.3 ± 14.5 years, and female to male ratio was 55/95. In the mild-to-moderate disease (MMD) group, 55 patients had pneumonia and 20 patients had COVID-19 without pneumonia. In the severe disease (SD) group, 43 patients had severe pneumoniae and 32 patients were in critical condition. Lymphocyte counts were less than 1.0 x 109/L in 69.3% of the patients in the SD group, and the difference between the MMD group and SD group was statistically significant (p= 0.001). Total T cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were significantly lower in the SD group vs. MMD group (p< 0.001, p< 0.001, p< 0.001, respectively). PD-1 expression by CD8+ and CD4 T+ cells was higher (p= 0.042, p= 0.029, respectively) and Tim-3 expression from CD4 T+ cells was lower (p= 0.000) in the SD group vs. MMD group. Serum IFN-γ levels were not statistically different in the MMD and SD groups (p= 0.2). Conclusions: T-cell counts may be significantly reduced along with an increased expression of the T-cell exhaustion marker PD-1 in severe COVID-19, but Tim-3 expression was not increased in our study patients.

Discrimination of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and meningeal inflammation/infection with internal acoustic canal enhancement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the presence and pattern of enhancement at the internal acoustic canal (IAC) could help in discriminating between leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LCa) and meningeal inflammation/infection (MMI). METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with leptomeningeal enhancement were retrospectively evaluated. MR images of the LCa group (n = 33), MMI group (n = 19) and control group (n = 33) were evaluated for the presence, type (moderate/prominent), and localization (unilateral/bilateral) of the IAC enhancement. RESULTS: The presence of IAC enhancement was significantly more common in patients with LCa (p < 0.001). In 73.7 % of patients with MMI, no contrast enhancement was observed in the IAC. In patients with contrast enhancement in the IAC, the risk of LCa in the etiology is 20 times greater than the risk of having MMI. Seventy-five percent of the IAC enhancement seen in LCa patients and 20 % of the IAC enhancements seen in MMI patients was bilateral. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Intense contrast enhancement of the IAC can be a marker for LCa.

Investigating the Effects of Trigeminal Impression and Internal Acoustic Opening Morphology Differences for Possible Surgical Applications.

PURPOSE: The exhaustive information regarding the types of trigeminal pore (TP) or trigeminal impression (TI), internal acoustic opening (IAO), and related surgical approaches is lacking in the literature. Therefore, this study is performed to further elucidate the types of TP or TI, IAO, and the relationships with critical surgical landmarks in the skull base. METHODS: Trigeminal impression (TI) and internal acoustic opening (IAO) found in 11 dry skulls, 24 right temporal bones, and 25 left temporal bones were examined on both sides to define their relationship to each other and nearby structures. The age and sex of these bones were not identified. Besides these, 77 skulls were examined by radiologic imaging methods. These skulls were identified by gender. RESULTS: According to test results, there was a significant difference between the left and right internal acoustic opening in the case of horizontal dimension (HD). The left HD-IAO is bigger than the right one. In addition, right HD-IAO, vertical dimension (VD) of right internal acoustic opening, left HD-IAO, and left VD-IAO values differed significantly in male and female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Investigating the relationship of TI and IAO with relevant structures suggests that surgical approaches involving the TP and IAO indicated that surgical approaches considering the TI and IAO variations may be used in the development of surgical processes and primary surgical interventions.

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Psychopathology and Environmental Factors in Psychiatric Diseases by Nonrecursive Modeling.

Background: In the field of psychiatry, environmental factors, disease status and severity, functionality, perceived social support, and social relations are variables that affect psychopathology. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between environmental factors, disease diagnosis and severity with psychopathology using nonrecursive models included in structural equation modeling. Methods: Within the scope of the study, 378 patients' demographic characteristics, as well as their responses to the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and Personal and Social Performance Scale were included. They were diagnosed with the International Classification of Diseases after assessment of the physician, severity of the symptoms were determined using the Clinical Global Impression Scale. The causal relationship between environmental factors and disease diagnosis with psychopathology was evaluated with the Stata program using the 3-stage least squares method within the scope of nonrecursive models. Results: The mean age of the patients participating in the study was 37.3 (SD = 11.6); 61.6% were women, 58.8% had high school or lower education, 48.7% were married, and 72.1% had an income above the minimum wage. The mean score of support perceived by individuals from the environment (family, friend, partner) was 53.9 (SD = 18.9), the mean of self-esteem score was 22.8 (SD = 5.7), and the mean of trauma they experienced in their childhood due to abuse/neglect was 44.5 (SD = 12.1). It was concluded that age and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire neglect subheadings were effective in the self-esteem score, and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire neglect and abuse subheadings were effective in perceived social support (P < .001). Conclusion: When the causality relationships between Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support scores were evaluated, childhood trauma and age were determined as significant variables for self-esteem, childhood trauma for perceived support, and disease severity and diagnosis in individual and social functionality.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Graded Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine Administration for Prevention of Post-Spinal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery.

Norepinephrine has been recently introduced for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, no data are available regarding its optimum dosing scheme. The primary objective of this study is to compare three different infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. This randomized, double-blind study was performed between February 2021 and May 2022. The study protocol was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with the identification number NCT04701190. A total of 192 parturients were enrolled into this study. Patients were assigned to three groups-Zero-Bolus High-Infusion (Group ZBHI, 0 µg/0.1 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61), Moderate-Bolus Moderate-Infusion (Group MBMI, 5 µg/0.075 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61) and High-Bolus Low-Infusion (Group HBLI, 10 µg/0.05 µg kg-1 min-1, n = 61)-according to different combinations of norepinephrine infusion and bolus doses. All patients received spinal anesthesia with 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 12.5 µg fentanyl. Immediately after cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, patients underwent a norepinephrine protocol corresponding to the randomized group. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. Secondary outcomes were post-delivery hypotension, frequency of post-spinal hypertension and bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes. The incidence of post-spinal hypotension was 11.7% in Group HBLI, 6.7% in Group ZBHI and 1.7% in Group MBMI (p = 0.1). The overall incidence of post-delivery hypotension in parturients was 41.1% (p = 0.797). The lowest frequency of post-spinal bradycardia (8.3%) and hypertension (11.7%) was seen in Group HBLI. The neonatal APGAR scores at 1st minute were higher in Group MBMI than in Group ZBHI (8.58 vs. 8.23, p = 0.001). All three infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine effectively reduced the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. However, high-dose bolus (10 µg) followed by low-dose infusion (0.05 µg kg-1 min-1) of norepinephrine can be preferred due to the reduced frequency of bradycardia and hypertension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Comparison of kinesio taping, trigger point injection, and neural therapy in the treatment of acute myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a regional painful soft-tissue disorder, characterized by trigger points (TrPs) and taut bands in the muscles. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of kinesio taping (KT), TrPs injection, and neural therapy (NT) on pain and disability in acute MPS. METHODS: 104 patients with MPS in the cervical region were allocated into three groups. Group 1 (n=35) were treated with KT, Group 2 (n=35) received local anesthetic (LA) (lidocaine of 0.5%) TrPs injection, and Group 3 (n=34) received NT with the same LA solution. Patients were assessed by means of pain, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and disability. Pain severity was measured by Visual Analog Scale. The neck pain disability scale was used for assessing disability. PPT was measured by using an algometer. Measurements were taken before and after treatment of 3rd and 7th days. RESULTS: There were improvements on pain and disability in all groups at the end of treatments at 3rd day and during follow-up period (p<0.001) and no differences were found between the groups. There was significant difference in PPT values in TrPs injection and NT groups in comparisons between all time periods, however, the change, depending on time in the KT group, was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that all these three treatment methods found to be effective on pain relief and disability in acute MPS. In terms of PPT, injection treatments seem to be superior than KT.

Validation of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 Cerebral Palsy Module (Parent Form) for use in Türkiye.

Objectives: This study was planned to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 3.0 cerebral palsy (CP) module (parent form) in children with CP. Patients and methods: In the validation study conducted between June 2007 and June 2009, 511 children (299 normal children, 212 children with CP) were assessed by the seven scales of PedsQL [daily activities (DA), school activities (SA), movement and balance (MB), pain and hurt (PH), fatigue (F), eating activities (EA), and speech and communication (SC)]. Reliability was tested by internal consistency and person separation index (PSI); internal construct validity by Rasch analysis and external construct validity by correlation with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Results: Only 13 children with CP completed the inventory by themselves and thus were excluded. Consequently, 199 children with CP (113 males, 86 females; mean age: 7.3±4.2 years; range, 2 to 18 years) and 299 normal children (169 males, 130 females; mean age: 9.4±4.0 years; range, 2 to 17 years) were included in the final analysis. Reliabilities of the seven scales of the PedsQL 3.0 CP module were adequate, with Cronbach's alphas between 0.66 and 0.96 and the PSI between 0.672 and 0.943 for the CP group. In Rasch analysis, for each scale, items showing disordered thresholds were rescored; then testlets were created to overcome local dependency. Internal construct validity of the unidimensional seven scales was good with the mean item fit of -0.107±1.149, 0.119±0.818, 0.232±1.069, -0.442±0.672, 0.221±0.554, -0.091±0.606, and -0.333±1.476 for DA, SA, MB, PH, F, EA, and SC, respectively. There was no differential item functioning. External construct validity of the instrument was confirmed by expected moderate to high correlations with WeeFIM and GMFCS (Spearman's r=0.35-0.89). Conclusion: Turkish version of the PedsQL 3.0 CP module is reliable, valid, and available for use in clinical setting to evaluate health-related quality of life of children with CP.

Picturing asthma in Turkey: results from the Turkish adult asthma registry.

INTRODUCTION: National data on asthma characteristics and the factors associated with uncontrolled asthma seem to be necessary for every country. For this purpose, we developed the Turkish Adult Asthma Registry for patients with asthma aiming to take a snapshot of our patients, thereby assigning the unmet needs and niche areas of intervention. METHODS: Case entries were performed between March 2018 and March 2022. A web-based application was used to record data. Study outcomes were demographic features, disease characteristics, asthma control levels, and phenotypes. RESULTS: The registry included 2053 patients from 36 study centers in Turkey. Female subjects dominated the group (n = 1535, 74.8%). The majority of the patients had allergic (n = 1158, 65.3%) and eosinophilic (n = 1174, 57.2%) asthma. Six hundred nineteen (32.2%) of the patients had obese asthma. Severe asthma existed in 670 (32.6%) patients. Majority of cases were on step 3-5 treatment (n: 1525; 88.1%). Uncontrolled asthma was associated with low educational level, severe asthma attacks in the last year, low FEV1, existence of chronic rhinosinusitis and living in particular regions. CONCLUSION: The picture of this registry showed a dominancy of middle-aged obese women with moderate-to-severe asthma. We also determined particular strategic targets such as low educational level, severe asthma attacks, low FEV1, and chronic rhinosinusitis to decrease uncontrolled asthma in our country. Moreover, some regional strategies may also be needed as uncontrolled asthma is higher in certain regions. We believe that these data will guide authorities to reestablish national asthma programs to improve asthma service delivery.

A study on the standard setting, validity, and reliability of a standardized patient performance rating scale - student version.

INTRODUCTION: The quality of the performances of standardized patients plays a significant role in the effectiveness of clinical skills education. Therefore, providing standardized patients with constant feedback is essential. It is especially important to get students' perspectives immediately following their encounters with standardized patients. In the literature, there is no scale for use by students to evaluate the performance of standardized patients. Thus, the three main goals of this study were to: (1) develop a scale for use by students to evaluate the performance of standardized patients, (2) examine the psychometric properties of the scale, and (3) determine a cut-off score for the scale in a standard-setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred and two medical students participated in the scale- development process, the pilot test, and the validation process, and seven educators took part in the standard-setting process. After the evaluation of content validity, construct validity was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. For the standard-setting study, the extended Angoff method was used. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale had a single-factor structure, which was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.91. The scale consists of nine items. The cut-off score was determined to be 24.11/45, which represents the minimum acceptable standard for standardized patient performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study outlined the critical steps in developing a measurement tool and produced a valid and reliable scale that allows medical students to assess the performance of standardized patients immediately following their interaction with the standardized patient. This scale constitutes an important contribution to the literature as it provides a tool for standardized patient trainers to assess standardized patients' weaknesses and help them improve their performance.KEY MESSAGESEvaluation of SP performance is essential to ensure the educational quality of clinical skills training programs.Students are the most relevant stakeholders to give feedback about SP performance immediately after encounters.The 'Standardized Patient Performance Rating Scale - Student Version' is a valid, reliable scale that can be used by students for the evaluation of standardized patients' strengths and weaknesses at individual-performance levels quickly.

Psychiatric Symptoms, Aggression, and Sexual Dysfunction Among Patients With Benign Anal Conditions.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of general psychiatric symptoms, aggression levels, and sexual dysfunction in patients with benign anorectal diseases and compare the results with those of healthy control subjects. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients who presented for treatment of benign perianal diseases and healthy control subjects between June 2017 and December 2018. All patients had either grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoidal disease or perianal fistula with active discharge who had not undergone previous anorectal surgery. We also included a control group with benign subcutaneous lumps presenting for minor surgery. We used the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Form to evaluate general psychiatric symptoms, the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) to evaluate aggression levels, and the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale to evaluate sexual dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 563 patients were assessed for eligibility; after exclusions, 94 with anal fistula, 89 with hemorrhoids, and 59 healthy control subjects were enrolled. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, and educational level. Physical and verbal aggression, anger, and total BPAQ score were significantly higher in patients with perianal fistula than in those with hemorrhoidal disease and healthy control subjects (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with perianal fistula have higher levels of aggression than healthy control subjects and those with hemorrhoidal disease. One must bear this in mind during preoperative patient evaluations and obtaining informed consent. Further studies are needed to investigate the reason for this association and potential causality.

Effect of Prehabilitation on Stoma Self-Care, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Stomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: An intestinal stoma has severe psychosocial effects on patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the effects of prehabilitation on stoma self-care, quality of life, anxiety, and depression levels. DESIGN: This study was a a randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Patients were allocated into 3 groups according to enterostomal management: group A (stoma marking and postoperative education), group B (marking and pre- and postoperative education), and group C (prehabilitation group) (marking and preoperative education with introduction of the stoma appliance preoperatively and postoperative education). A stoma care follow-up form, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a stoma-specific quality-of-life questionnaire were used for evaluation. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery and fecal diversion at the Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey, between 2011 and 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the effect of stoma prehabilitation on self-care ability. RESULTS: Two hundred forty patients were included in the study. The outcome of stoma self-care revealed that 24 patients (31.2%) in group A, 51 patients (78.5%) in group B, and 72 patients (94.7%) in group C could perform stoma care independently ( p < 0.001). Among patients with temporary stomas, group C had a better outcome than patients in groups A and B ( p < 0.001). There was no similar relationship among patients with permanent stomas. The prehabilitation group had fewer patients with anxiety and depression than the other groups. Among patients with temporary stomas, similar findings were found. No differences were found in either anxiety or depression among patients with permanent stomas. Stoma quality-of-life scores were significantly higher in the prehabilitation group ( p < 0.001). Among patients with temporary stomas, similar findings were found. There was no difference among those with permanent stoma. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study of heterogeneous groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation facilitates stoma self-care, decreases predisposition to anxiety and depression and improves quality of life in patients with stomas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B918 . CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610. EFECTO DE LA PREHABILITACIN EN EL AUTOCUIDADO, LA ANSIEDAD, LA DEPRESIN Y LA CALIDAD DE VIDA EN PACIENTES OSTOMIZADOS ENSAYO CONTROLADO ALEATORIO: ANTECEDENTES:Una estoma intestinal ejerce serios efectos psicosociales en los pacientes. La prehabilitación tiene el potencial de superar estos problemas.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo medir los efectos de la prehabilitación en el autocuidado de la estoma, la calidad de vida, la ansiedad y los niveles de depresión.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un ensayo aleatorio controlado ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610).AJUSTE:Los pacientes fueron distribuidos en 3 grupos según su manejo enterostomal: grupos A (marcación preoperatoria de la estoma, educación posoperatoria), B (marcación preoperatoria y educación preoperatoria y posoperatoria) y C (el grupo de pre habilitación con marcación preoperatoria y educación preoperatoria con introducción del paciente al aparato ostomal de manera preoperatoria y educación posoperatoria). Para la evaluación se utilizaron el formulario de seguimiento del cuidado de la estoma, la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión y un cuestionario específico de la estoma sobre la calidad de vida.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía colorrectal y derivación fecal en la Universidad de Ankara entre 2011 y 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue el efecto de la prehabilitación de la estoma sobre la capacidad de autocuidado.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en este estudio 240 pacientes. Autocuidado de la estoma: Veinticuatro (31,2%), 51 (78,5%), y 72 (94,7%) pacientes de los grupos A, B, y C, respectivamente, pudieron realizar el cuidado de la estoma de forma independiente ( p < 0,001). En el análisis de subgrupos, entre los pacientes con ostomía temporal, los pacientes del grupo de prehabilitación también fueron mejores que los pacientes de los grupos B y C ( p < 0,001); sin embargo, no hubo una relación similar entre los pacientes con ostomía permanente. HADS: El grupo de prehabilitación tuvo menos pacientes con ansiedad y depresión con respecto a los demás grupos. Entre los pacientes con estomas temporales, el grupo de prehabilitación también tuvo menos pacientes con ansiedad y depresión. No hubo diferencias con la ansiedad o depresión entre los pacientes con estomas permanentes. Estoma-QoL (calidad de vida): Las puntuaciones de QoL (calidad de vida) fueron significativamente más altas en el grupo de prehabilitación ( p < 0,001). Entre los pacientes con estoma temporal, el grupo de prehabilitación fue significativamente mejor que los otros grupos ( p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias entre los portadores de estoma permanente.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de un solo centro y grupos heterogéneos.CONCLUSIÓNES:La prehabilitación facilita el autocuidado de la estoma, disminuye la predisposición a la ansiedad y la depresión y mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes con ostomía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B918 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto )Registro de ensayos clínicos:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04692610.

The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study.

AIM: This study aimed to adapt the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument to Turkish and to determine the validity and reliability by using the Rasch model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This methodological study used forward translation, expert opinion, back translation, pilot testing, and finalization for the language adaptation of the instrument. Prior to back translation, the instrument was assessed by five experts certified in wound care nursing. Then, the comprehensibility of the instrument was tested in the pilot study. The study was conducted between March 2017 and September 2019 at one private, one state, and four university hospitals in Turkey. Eligible participants were patients 18 years of age or older, having pressure injury, and fully conscious. Data were collected from a total of 250 patients by using a demographic and clinical history form, the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief Form Turkish scale. The instrument's internal construct validity using the Rasch model, the external construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were assessed. RESULTS: The final Turkish version of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life self-report instrument differed from the original, comprising 74 items under the following ten subscales: three regarding symptoms, plus one itchiness item; four regarding physical functioning; two regarding psychological well-being, self-consciousness, and appearance; and one regarding social participation. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the PU-QOL is a valid, reliable, and widely available instrument for measuring quality of life for patients with pressure injury.

Imputation of missing values within WHODAS 2.0 data collected from low back pain patients using the response function approach.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of missing data and imputation with the response function (RF) approach on bias and precision of disability estimates as well as reliability of scale of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected by face-to-face interviews and self-report surveys from 284 respondents with low back pain. Hypothetical datasets were created by using person and item parameters of real data. A simulation study was devised to assess the ability parameters and reliability measures on incomplete and imputed datasets. Rasch model was used to evaluate latent trait levels. Imputation was carried out using the response function method. RESULTS: Almost the same level of bias and MSE was reached. While the missing rate increases, the Person separation index slightly reduced, still exceeded 0.94 and Cronbach alpha values have similar mean values of 0.99 with larger variations. After deletion of four items of "work or school activities" in domain 5, reliability measures reduced the lowest. CONCLUSION: Construct validity is preserved. Problems regarding the compliance of the items with the target group still persist. When researchers encounter missingness in data collected with WHODAS 2.0, the response function can be usefully implemented to impute missing values to improve the reliability of disability level estimates.Implications for rehabilitationThe Turkish version of the 36-item WHODAS is reliable and valid for assessing health and disability status in patients with low back pain.A critical issue is a systematic nonresponse was highly observed in items related to "work/school life activities" which are allowed to be skipped and excluded from the scoring according to WHODAS 2.0 training manual.Imputation of missing values within four items of "work or school activities" in domain 5 using the response function approach showed satisfactory reliability for the estimation of disability in adults with low back pain.This study showed missing data imputations with response function can be implemented by a statistician as contribute to a missing data management process better tailored to clinicians' interpretations.

Rasch analysis, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire.

Background/aim: Lumbar instability is an important condition that can be seen frequently in people with low back pain, affecting both the progression and the choice of appropriate exercise. The Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ) is a simple and low-cost tool for evaluating disturbed back stability in people with low back pain. The aim of this study is to develop the Turkish version of the LSIQ (LSIQ-T) and to evaluate its psychometric properties using the Rasch model. Materials and methods: One hundred participants with chronic low back pain completed the LSIQ-T. The LSIQ-T was repeated for 30 participants after 1 week to establish its test-retest reliability. While internal and external construct validity were investigated using Rasch analysis and the Spearman correlation coefficient, respectively, reliability was evaluated in terms of internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha and the Person Separation Index (PSI). Results: All items of the LSIQ-T were found to fit the Rasch model (chi-square: 34.07 (df = 15), p = 0.0033). The internal construct validity was good, the overall mean item fit residual was 0 (SD: 0.765), and the mean person fit residual was 0.322 (SD: 1.123). Internal consistency reliability was low with a PSI of 0.63 although Cronbach's alpha was acceptable (0.68). When the test-retest reliability was examined via differential item functioning (DIF) by time, none of the items showed DIF. Conclusion: The LSIQ-T is a valid unidimensional scale for the Turkish population. Although the LSIQ-T had low internal consistency, it demonstrated unidimensionality and is appropriate for use. Therefore, the LSIQ-T can be used in clinical practice and scientific research.

Effect of chronic lung diseases on mortality of prevariant COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

Background: The aim of the study is to assess the effect of chronic lung disease on mortality in patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of prevariant COVID-19 Pneumonia compared to patients without chronic lung disease. Research design and methods: A cohort of 1,549 patients admitted to the pandemic clinic with a COVID-19 Pneumonia diagnosis was analyzed. Group 1 and Group 2 were compared in terms of the treatment they received, admission to intensive care, mortality and follow-up parameters. Results: The patient group with COVID-19 and lung disease consisted of 231 participants (14.91%) (Group 1). The patient group with COVID-19 but without lung disease had 1,318 participants (85.19%). Group 1 cases were found to receive more oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation than Group 2 cases (p ≤ 0.001), Following univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses, it was determined that patients with chronic lung disease had a 25.76% higher mortality risk [OR: 25.763, 95% CI (Lower-Upper) (2.445-271.465), p = 0.007]. Conclusion: It was found that chronic lung disease contributed significantly to mortality in this study. Among chronic lung diseases, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), lung cancer and interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) were shown to be more effective than other chronic lung diseases in patients with prevariant COVID-19 population.

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale in cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: The Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB) is a multi-item balance assessment test designed to measure balance in relatively higher functioning individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the FAB (FAB-T) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the Turkish version of the Fullerton Advance Balance Scale valid and reliable in determining balance problems in children with cerebral palsy and determining the underlying cause of this condition? METHODS: Forty-six children with CP participated in this study. Rasch analysis was used to investigate item adherence. Internal consistency of the FAB-T was established using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was also evaluated. In addition, to assess concurrent validity, FAB-T scores were compared with the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The FAB-T showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha value=0.94) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.99). The FAB and the PBS exhibited concurrent positive validity (r = 0.913; p < 0.001). All items of the FAB-T were found to fit the Rasch Model (Chi-square 16.01(df=20), p = 0.716). SIGNIFICANCE: The FAB-T is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to measure balance skills and to identify the source of the problem in children with CP.

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on plantar fasciitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

The efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on chronic plantar fasciitis (PF) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remain unclear. To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ESWT in patients with PF in axSpA. In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 22 axSpA patients with PF who had heel pain above 5 according to visual analog scale (VAS) over 3 months were randomly divided into 2 groups: ESWT and sham-ESWT. Both groups received a total of three treatments at 1-week intervals. All patients were assessed by the VAS, heel pressure algometry, Foot Function Index (FFI), and plantar fascia ultrasonography (thickness and morphology) at baseline, 1 week after each session, 4th and 8th week after the last therapy. The mean ± SD ages of the ESWT and sham-ESWT groups were 43.8 ± 8.2 and 48.5 ± 7.6 years, respectively. Significant time effects between the time points were observed in both groups in terms of VAS, pressure algometry, and FFI. There was a statistically significant decrease in pain, an increase in perceived pressure algometry values, and an improvement in activity restriction in the ESWT group compared to the sham-ESWT group. There was not a change in the plantar fascia thickness before and after the intervention in both groups. No side effects were observed during the treatment and follow-up. ESWT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated physical therapy modality for improving chronic refractory heel pain due to PF in patients with axSPA. This trial was registered to The Australian New Zealand clinical trial with the registration number ACTRN12618001954213. The enrollment began in 15/12/2018 and data collection stopped in 29/05/2020.

Quality of life after colorectal surgery: A prospective study of patients compared with their spouses.

BACKGROUND: Although radical surgery for colorectal cancer improves the oncological outcomes, a significant portion of patients suffer from alterations in their quality of life (QoL). There are many studies investigating the QoL of patients who have colorectal cancer but none of these focus on the QoL of spouses. AIM: To compare the QoL of patients after colorectal surgery to the QoL of spouses. METHODS: This prospective study consisted of patients who were married and who underwent surgery at the University of Ankara, Department of Surgery between March 2006 and November 2010. Patients' spouses were also enrolled. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, and all patients provided written informed consent. The study included patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma [n = 100; abdominoperineal excision (n = 33), low anterior resection (n = 33), left hemicolectomy (n = 34)] and their spouses (n = 100). The patients and spouses completed the Medical Outcome Study 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) preoperatively and at postoperative months 15 to 18. RESULTS: During this 4.5-year study period, 273 patients with sigmoid or rectal cancer were admitted to the hospital. Of these patients, 119 were eligible and willing to participate. Eleven patients had either systemic or locally inoperable disease, three patients had a severe surgical complication, and five patients were lost to follow-up. Therefore, a total of 100 patients completed the follow-up period. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the disability scores of patients and the scores of their spouses for some of the WHODAS-II subscales, such as "self-care," "life activities," and "participation in society," as well as for the total WHODAS-II score. There was also a positive correlation between the QoL of patients and the QoL of their spouses in most of the SF-36 subscales. Statistically significant correlations were observed for the "bodily pain," "general health," "vitality," "social function," "emotion," "mental health," and mental component summary score subscales of the SF-36. When gender differences were evaluated, the QoL of male patients' spouses changed more when compared with female patients' spouses for all of the WHODAS-II subscales. Colorectal cancer surgery has a significant effect on the QoL of both patients and their spouses, these effects were more significant among male patients' spouses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative counseling regarding potential problems should therefore collectively address patient and their spouse as a couple rather than the patient alone, particularly for patients undergoing low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection procedures.

Use and detailed metric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review covering two decades.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical studies has been recognised for many years. The current study aims to describe the RA PROMs used over the past 20 years, and their performance metrics, to underpin appropriate tool selection. METHODS: The study included a systematic search for PROMs that have been in use over the period 2000-2019, with detailed documentation of their psychometric properties, and a user-friendly presentation of the extensive evidence base. RESULTS: 125 PROMs were identified with psychometric evidence available. The domains of pain, fatigue, emotional functions, mobility, physical functioning and work dominated, with self-efficacy and coping as personal factors. Domains such as stiffness and sleep were poorly served. The most frequently used PROMs included the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the EuroQoL and the Modified HAQ which, between them, appeared in more than 3500 papers. Strong psychometric evidence was found for the HAQ, and the SF-36 Physical Functioning and Vitality (fatigue) domains. Otherwise, all domains except stiffness, sleep, education and health utility, had at least one PROM with moderate level of psychometric evidence. CONCLUSION: There is a broad range of PROMs for measuring RA outcomes, but the quality of psychometric evidence varies widely. This work identifies gaps in key RA domains according to the biopsychosocial model.

Is it possible to develop a new measurement tool to assess the functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop measurement tools for assessing patients' functional status with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in terms of upper and lower extremity function and to evaluate the tools' construct validities with classical and modern psychometric approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2010 and April 2012, a total of 300 patients with RA (77 males, 223 females; mean age: 52.3±11.5 years; range, 18 to 82 years) who answered items from a range of widely used instruments were included. After examining initial dimensionality with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Rasch analysis were used to evaluate the tools' construct validities. The data-model fit was evaluated with goodness-of-fit (GoF) statistics in CFA, while the tools were examined in terms of item and person fit, unidimensionality and differential item functioning (DIF) from the perspective of Rasch analysis. RESULTS: According to EFA, two dimensions were identified and named as "self-care-mobility-household activities related to lower extremity" and "self-care-mobility-household activities related to upper extremity" taking into account the factor loadings and the clinical classifications. While the clinical classification was tested with CFA, all items were loaded on their pre-defined dimensions with the factor loadings of ≥0.40 and GoF statistics were within the acceptable ranges. When the "self-care-mobility-household activities related to upper extremity" and "self-care-mobility-household activities related to lower extremity" tools were evaluated via the Rasch analysis, both tools were found to fit the Rasch model expectations, with a mean item fit statistics of -0.528 logit (standard deviation [SD]: 1.365) and -0.213 (SD: 1.168; mean person fit statistics of -0.412 logit (SD: 1.160) and -0.303 logit (SD: 0.859), respectively. CONCLUSION: For the evaluation of a scale's construct validity, it is recommended to use the Rasch analysis in tandem with factor analytic methods, as the Rasch analysis explores a scale's construct validity in terms of item and person fit, DIF and unidimensionality which is the only aspect of the factor analysis.