Methemoglobinemia screening and treatment in tank warfare survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Methemoglobinemia, characterized by the conversion of functional hemoglobin to methemoglobin, can significantly impede tissue oxygenation. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of methemoglobinemia are critical to optimizing clinical outcomes. Although the underlying etiology of methemoglobinemia is often attributed to a medication reaction or chemical exposure, its association with battlefield trauma remains underexplored. This case series explores the presence of methemoglobinemia in nine soldiers evacuated from tanks targeted by explosives, shedding new light on screening needs and treatment strategies. CASES DESCRIPTION: Nine combat trauma patients with methemoglobinemia were admitted to Soroka Medical Center over a two-month period. Detailed case descriptions illustrate the diverse presentations and treatment responses. Notably, the administration of methylene blue resulted in rapid methemoglobin reductions and an improvement in oxygenation without any observed side effects. DISCUSSION: This series highlights an unexpected consequence of an explosion within an armored fighting vehicle and the challenges related to standard pulse oximetry interpretation and accuracy in the presence of methemoglobinemia, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring and co-oximetry utilization. Additionally, the coexistence of carboxyhemoglobin further warrants attention due to its synergistic and deleterious effects on oxygen delivery. Collaborative efforts with military authorities should aim to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with trauma and methemoglobinemia and optimize battlefield care. CONCLUSION: This case series underscores the significance of methemoglobinemia screening in combat trauma patients, and advocates for systematic co-oximetry utilization and methylene blue availability in combat zones. Early detection and intervention of methemoglobinemia in combat soldiers are often difficult in the context of battlefield injuries but are necessary to mitigate the potentially fatal consequences of this condition.

Challenging the Interpretation of White Blood Cell Counts in Patients with Sepsis Following Packed Cell Transfusion.

Critically ill patients with sepsis often require packed cell transfusions (PCT). However, PCT may affect white blood cell (WBC) counts. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to trace changes in WBC count following PCT in critically ill patients with sepsis. We included 962 patients who received one unit of PCT while hospitalized in a general intensive care unit, and 994 matched patients who did not receive PCT. We calculated the mean values of WBC count for the 24 h before and 24 h after PCT. Multivariable analyses using a mixed linear regression model were performed. The mean WBC count decreased in both groups, but more in the non-PCT group (from 13.9 × 109/L to 12.2 × 109/L versus 13.9 × 109/L to 12.8 × 109/L). A linear regression model showed a mean decrease of 0.45 × 109/L in WBC count over the 24 h following the start of PCT. Every 1.0 × 109/L increase in the WBC count prior to PCT administration showed a corresponding decrease of 0.19 × 109/L in the final WBC count. In conclusion, among critically ill patients with sepsis, PCT causes only mild and clinically non-prominent changes in WBC count.

The Safety and Impact of Raising the Urine Culture Reporting Threshold in Hospitalized Patients.

Objective: To assess the impact of changing the reporting threshold policy of positive urine cultures in hospitalized non-pregnant adults from 104 CFU/mL to 105 CFU/mL on the unwarranted use of antibiotics and patient safety. Setting: A 1100-bed tertiary-care hospital in southern Israel. Methods: As an intervention, we changed urine culture reporting policy for patients admitted to general medical wards. If culture grew ≥105 CFU/mL, it was reported with pathogen and antibiotic susceptibility data, if it grew ≤104 CFU/mL, it was reported as "low growth". The withheld information was available upon request. We retrospectively collected data on all patients in a four-month period following the intervention and report using STROBE guidelines. Results: 7808 patients were admitted, in whom 3523 urine cultures were obtained. A total of 496 grew a pathogen, 51 were excluded (candida spp. positive, history of urinary surgery, obtained from catheter). A total of 300 were reported as positive and 145 were reported as low-growth. A higher rate of patients in the low-growth group were not treated with antibiotics 45/145(31%) vs. 56/300(18.7%) in the positive group p = 0.015 and the antibiotic duration of treatment was shorter by day 5 (IQR 0.9) vs. 6 (IQR 0.9) p = 0.015. No between-group difference was observed in recurrent admission rates, pyelonephritis within 30 days, bacteremia or all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Changing the reporting threshold of positive urine culture results from 104 CFU/mL to 105 CFU/mL in hospitalized patients reduced the number of patients who were unnecessarily treated for asymptomatic bacteriuria without negatively impacting patient safety. We urge microbiological laboratories to consider this change in threshold as part of an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Septic arthritis of the hip joint due to Bacteroides fragilis in a paraplegic patient.

Septic arthritis of native joints is a potentially life-threatening disease. The most frequently isolated pathogens are Gram-positive cocci. Bacteroides fragilis is a rare pathogen in joint infections and is usually associated with immunocompromised and debilitated patients. Most cases of B. fragilis joint infection are related to skin or local perineal infections or are secondary to B. fragilis bacteraemia from another source, for example from the gastrointestinal tract. We present a clinical case of B. fragilis septic arthritis involving a native hip joint in a previously healthy paraplegic patient.