A Kidney Transplant Recipient With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Utility of a Prognostication Score.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine release storm (CRS) is a potentially fatal, hyperinflammatory condition common to both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (rHLH). We present our experience with the use of a diagnostic score, developed for rHLH, in a kidney transplant recipient hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: We applied the H-Score to risk-stratify our patient to help predict his hospital course. This study was exempt from requiring specific Institutional Review Board approval, but met all the criteria required by our institution for this type of study and report including consent from the patient. RESULTS: The calculated H-Score for our patient fell below the diagnostic cut-off value for rHLH. Because rHLH is characterized by CRS, we expected him to have a milder hospital course with COVID-19. Correlating with his below cut-off H-score, the patient had a more benign than expected hospital course. CONCLUSIONS: Because this is only a single case, we plan to retrospectively review a series of patients to validate our initial experience-that a low H-Score may correlate with a milder hospital course in kidney transplant patients with COVID-19.

Gene Expression in Biopsies of Acute Rejection and Interstitial Fibrosis/Tubular Atrophy Reveals Highly Shared Mechanisms That Correlate With Worse Long-Term Outcomes.

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.

Observations on the use of cidofovir for BK virus infection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, BK virus infection can result in significant graft nephropathy and loss. While reduction in immunosuppression (IS) is considered standard therapy, adjunct agents may be warranted. Data are suggestive of a possible role of cidofovir for the management of BK. This study aims to describe the course of BK viremia (BKV) in a large cohort of renal transplant patients receiving adjunct cidofovir. METHODS: We evaluated kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients who received cidofovir combined with reduced IS for management of high-level BKV or BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). We examined the rate and timing of BKV clearance, and performed a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with long-term (>6 months) viremia. RESULTS: In total, 75 patients received a median of 13 doses of cidofovir in conjunction with reduced IS; 32 patients (43%) had short-term BKV (≤6 months), and 43 (57%) had long-term BKV. Overall, 53 of 75 patients (71%) eventually cleared BKV at a median of 4.2 months (interquartile range 2.1-9.3 months). Independent factors associated with long-term BKV included older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, P = 0.02), delayed graft function (OR 31.4, P = 0.01), and higher peak BKV (OR 12.8, P = 0.02), while BKV reduction by at least 1 log(10) copies/mL at 1 month of treatment was associated with clearance within 6 months (OR 49.3, P < 0.01). Patients with earlier clearance maintained stable graft function and no graft losses, while long-term BKV was associated with a 15% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct cidofovir resulted in preservation of renal function when viral clearance occurred within 6 months of initiation. This retrospective review defines factors predicting response to cidofovir in conjunction with reduced IS for BKVN or high-level BKV. Still, considering cost, frequency of administration, and treatment duration, a randomized trial is necessary to define the exact utility of cidofovir in the setting of BK virus infection.

Molecular classifiers for acute kidney transplant rejection in peripheral blood by whole genome gene expression profiling.

There are no minimally invasive diagnostic metrics for acute kidney transplant rejection (AR), especially in the setting of the common confounding diagnosis, acute dysfunction with no rejection (ADNR). Thus, though kidney transplant biopsies remain the gold standard, they are invasive, have substantial risks, sampling error issues and significant costs and are not suitable for serial monitoring. Global gene expression profiles of 148 peripheral blood samples from transplant patients with excellent function and normal histology (TX; n = 46), AR (n = 63) and ADNR (n = 39), from two independent cohorts were analyzed with DNA microarrays. We applied a new normalization tool, frozen robust multi-array analysis, particularly suitable for clinical diagnostics, multiple prediction tools to discover, refine and validate robust molecular classifiers and we tested a novel one-by-one analysis strategy to model the real clinical application of this test. Multiple three-way classifier tools identified 200 highest value probesets with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve for the validation cohort ranging from 82% to 100%, 76% to 95%, 76% to 95%, 79% to 100%, 84% to 100% and 0.817 to 0.968, respectively. We conclude that peripheral blood gene expression profiling can be used as a minimally invasive tool to accurately reveal TX, AR and ADNR in the setting of acute kidney transplant dysfunction.

Outcomes of living donor renal transplants with a negative cross-match and pretransplant donor-specific antibody.

INTRODUCTION: Management of renal transplant recipients with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity-antihuman globulin (CDC-AHG) cross-match and pretransplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) is controversial. We sought to compare outcomes of immunologically high-risk living donor (LD) renal transplant recipients with and without DSA. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all high immune-risk LD renal transplant recipients with a negative CDC-AHG cross-match performed between January 2008 and December 2010. Pretransplant desensitization for DSA was not utilized. Immunosuppression consisted of thymoglobulin induction, followed by tacrolimus, myeophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. DSA was assessed pretransplant and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and December 2010, 44 LD renal transplants were performed in high immune-risk recipients with a negative CDC-AHG cross-match. Outcomes of 14 recipients with pretransplant DSA were compared with 30 recipients with no DSA. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12-40), overall death-censored graft survival was 100%, with no acute rejection episodes in the DSA group and 1 antibody-mediated rejection in the non-DSA cohort. Mean serum creatinines of the DSA and non-DSA groups at 1 year post-transplant were 1.0 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/dL (P = NS), respectively. Among the pretransplant DSA cohort, 5 of the 14 (36%) developed persistent post-transplant DSA at a median of 9 months (range, 3-24) versus 2 of 30 (7%; P = .025) at a median of 12 months post-transplant in the non-DSA cohort. All recipients in the pretransplant DSA group underwent renal biopsy for persistent post-transplant DSA. Three of 5 biopsies showed C4D deposition in peritubular capillaries without glomerulopathy or arteriopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-transplant outcomes for LD recipients with a negative cross-match and pretransplant DSA were excellent. In recipients with good and stable renal function, the significance of persistent post-transplant DSA in combination with C4D deposition on biopsy is unclear at this time.

Guidelines for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in pancreas allografts-updated Banff grading schema.

The first Banff proposal for the diagnosis of pancreas rejection (Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 237) dealt primarily with the diagnosis of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ACMR), while only tentatively addressing issues pertaining to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This document presents comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of AMR, first proposed at the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology and refined by a broad-based multidisciplinary panel. Pancreatic AMR is best identified by a combination of serological and immunohistopathological findings consisting of (i) identification of circulating donor-specific antibodies, and histopathological data including (ii) morphological evidence of microvascular tissue injury and (iii) C4d staining in interacinar capillaries. Acute AMR is diagnosed conclusively if these three elements are present, whereas a diagnosis of suspicious for AMR is rendered if only two elements are identified. The identification of only one diagnostic element is not sufficient for the diagnosis of AMR but should prompt heightened clinical vigilance. AMR and ACMR may coexist, and should be recognized and graded independently. This proposal is based on our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of pancreas rejection and currently available tools for diagnosis. A systematized clinicopathological approach to AMR is essential for the development and assessment of much needed therapeutic interventions.

De novo donor specific antibodies and patient outcomes in renal transplantation.

Single antigen identification of HLA antibodies is used to detect donor specific antibodies (DSAs). However, the impact of DSA elements such as class, relative strength, duration, and longitudinal effect on graft function and survival, remains unclear. Routine DSAs (LabScreen, One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) and metabolic studies were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-transplant, and every 6 months for renal transplant recipients from 7/2007-7/2010 (n = 389). Biopsies were evaluated by updated Banff 2005 guidelines after two consecutive positive DSAs. Based on these tests, 25% of recipients developed de novo DSA. Those with DSA had increased acute rejection episodes (AR), higher creatinine (Scr), and worse graft survival. Three subgroups of these patients were identified based on duration: persistent DSA (> 1), isolated DSA, or no DSA. Persistent DSA patients were more likely to be African American, and have higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and AR rates. Persistent DSA patients, with or without AR, had elevated Scr. Recipients with DQ-only DSA had higher rates of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). From this, we conclude that routine posttransplant DSA monitoring identifies recipients at risk for graft damage or loss. Persistent de novo DSAs correlated with inferior graft outcomes and AMR. With or without AR, DSA persistence was associated with worse outcomes, possibly warranting intervention. De novo DQ-DSA may be a biomarker for chronic damage and/or AMR, while an isolated DSA determination appears clinically insignificant.

A review of the evidence for use of thymoglobulin induction in renal transplantation.

Depleting antilymphocyte, or antithymocyte antibodies, have long been an integral part of induction regimens and continue today to be used in the management of patients at risk of early rejection or those in whom the introduction of calcineurins or other immune suppressants must be delayed. Registry data demonstrate that the most commonly used depleting antibody, rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (rATG), is associated with improved outcomes following renal transplantation in high-risk patients, particularly in conjunction with steroid-avoidance regimens. Two prospective randomized trials in high-risk renal allograft patients have also demonstrated an advantage of r-ATG induction compared to the nondepleting interleukin receptor (IL2RA) antibodies. In low-immunologic-risk patients, however, r-ATG induction and IL2RA induction appear to be equivalent in terms of rejection prophylaxis and long-term function. Other studies have shown that sequential rATG-containing regimens were superior to no induction and allowed for successful late introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. The side effect profile of the depleting antibody included increased incidence of fever, hematologic abnormalities, cytomegalovirus infections when prophylaxis was not employed, and in some studies, increased incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. This review describes the evidence supporting the use of depleting ATGs in kidney transplantation.

Serial analysis of biomarkers of acute pancreas allograft rejection.

Pancreas transplant recipients experience graft loss in spite of improvements in immunosuppressant therapies and diagnostic technologies. Therefore, a method to improve detection and management of acute rejection is needed. This longitudinal study investigated the usefulness of three biomarkers, granzyme B, perforin, and human leukocyte antigen-DR alpha (HLA-DR) measured by real-time PCR on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, for their ability to detect acute rejection and its resolution in 13 recipients of pancreas allograft. Data demonstrated that pre-transplant baseline expression of biomarkers decreased following the initiation of immunosuppression. Throughout follow-up (range 3-27 months), individuals without acute rejection episodes had little variation in their biomarker levels. Recipients with biopsy-proven rejection had a significant increase in the levels of biomarkers as early as five wk before clinical rejection diagnosis. Furthermore, all seven patients with biopsy-proven rejection demonstrated a decrease in the levels of granzyme B and perforin following the increased immunosuppression for the treatment of rejection. This is the first clinical serial measurement of biomarkers in recipients of pancreas transplants. The data demonstrate that upregulation of granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells are sensitive to changes in the immune environment and could possibly be used to identify those patients at higher risk of rejection.

Banff schema for grading pancreas allograft rejection: working proposal by a multi-disciplinary international consensus panel.

Accurate diagnosis and grading of rejection and other pathological processes are of paramount importance to guide therapeutic interventions in patients with pancreas allograft dysfunction. A multi-disciplinary panel of pathologists, surgeons and nephrologists was convened for the purpose of developing a consensus document delineating the histopathological features for diagnosis and grading of rejection in pancreas transplant biopsies. Based on the available published data and the collective experience, criteria for the diagnosis of acute cell-mediated allograft rejection (ACMR) were established. Three severity grades (I/mild, II/moderate and III/severe) were defined based on lesions known to be more or less responsive to treatment and associated with better- or worse-graft outcomes, respectively. The features of chronic rejection/graft sclerosis were reassessed, and three histological stages were established. Tentative criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection were also characterized, in anticipation of future studies that ought to provide more information on this process. Criteria for needle core biopsy adequacy and guidelines for pathology reporting were also defined. The availability of a simple, reproducible, clinically relevant and internationally accepted schema for grading rejection should improve the level of diagnostic accuracy and facilitate communication between all parties involved in the care of pancreas transplant recipients.

Analgesic nephropathy selectively affecting a unilateral non-functioning hypoplastic kidney.

Analgesic nephropathy results from chronic abuse of non-narcotic analgesics, most frequently with the use of phenacetin and mixed analgesic preparations. Renal papillary necrosis and chronic interstitial nephritis with progressive scarring are characteristic of the histopathology of analgesic nephropathy. Typically, papillary necrosis in these patients is bilateral and affects almost all renal papillae. This report describes a case of severe analgesic nephropathy that discriminantly affected a unilateral non-functioning kidney and spared the contralateral normally developed kidney. The patient herein consumed therapeutic doses of acetaminophen and naproxen daily and for several years. We estimated the cumulative doses of acetaminophen and naproxen used by the patient during that period to be approximately 1.0 and 0.4 kg, respectively. The cumulative dose of acetaminophen is at the threshold of doses that were traditionally associated with an increased risk for end-stage kidney failure. Simultaneous intake of both analgesics could have had a synergetic adverse effect on renal function. This case also demonstrates that preexisting renal insufficiency is prerequisite to the development of analgesic nephropathy. Conversely, kidneys with normal function are resistant to the chronic nephrotoxicity associated with habitual analgesic use.

Changes in abdominal wounds following treatment with sirolimus and steroids in a rat model.

Wound healing complications have been observed in patients receiving sirolimus (SLR). This study examined the degree and duration of delayed healing in various protocols using SLR. Sprague-Dawley rats underwent a standard midline abdominal incision and wound closure. Groups of 6 rats each were randomized to receive different doses of SLR (2 and 5 mg/kg) with or without loading dose (10 mg/kg x3 days), and with or without steroids (20 mg/kg x3 days followed by 5 mg/kg for 2 weeks). Rats were humanely killed on postoperative days 5, 10, or 15. Wound breaking force was measured using the EHMI BIAX-II instrument and tensile strength was calculated. Wounds in control animals had gradual increase in tensile strength during the 15-day observation. In contrast, high and loading doses of SLR caused reduction in wound strength until day 10, but the wounds' tensile strength became equivalent to control by day 15. The addition of steroids prolonged wound recovery with low doses of SLR until day 15 and had very profound effects on healing in high-dose SLR-treated animals (>50% reduction) that continued beyond the 2 weeks of observation. Low doses of SLR in non-steroid-treated animals had a short-term (5-day) impact on wound healing; high dose and loading doses delayed healing for 10 to 15 days. The addition of steroids had a synergistic effect on delayed wound healing, particularly in animals receiving high-dose SLR, which demonstrated prolonged wound weakness. These results may provide practical guidelines for postoperative introduction of SLR in the context of various clinical protocols.

Serial peripheral blood cytotoxic lymphocyte gene expression measurements for prediction of pancreas transplant rejection.

Acute rejection after pancreas transplantation remains a significant problem and contributes to immunological graft loss. No clinical markers of pancreas rejection have been universally accepted. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of genetic markers; granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA in the peripheral blood of pancreas transplant recipients. These genes have been identified in renal and islet cell transplant recipients as noninvasive tools to predict acute rejection. Blood samples were collected weekly for up to 1 year posttransplant. Surveillance biopsies of the pancreas were scheduled at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 as part of the typical posttransplant protocol for patients with pancreas alone or pancreas after kidney transplantation. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of biopsy-proven chronic rejection alone, pancreatitis, or kidney rejection within 2 months after pancreas biopsy. Gene expression levels of granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA were compared in patients with (n = 7) and without biopsy proven acute rejection (n = 7). Recipients with acute rejection showed increased expression of granzyme B, HLA-DRA, as well as perforin genes compared to patients without biopsy-proven rejection. In addition, we observed that elevation of these genes occurred as early as 4 weeks before the traditional biopsy diagnosis, while the recipients with no rejection showed no change in gene expression. Our data indicated that serial measurements of peripheral blood granzyme B, perforin, and HLA-DRA gene expression can be a useful tool to predict pancreas rejection in its earliest stage.

Pediatric IgA nephropathy: clinical features at presentation and outcome for African-Americans and Caucasians.

AIM: To determine the disease severity at onset and outcome for African-American and Caucasian pediatric patients with IgA nephropathy diagnosed at the Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center since 1990. DESIGN/METHODS: The study population included all patients diagnosed with IgA nephropathy at the Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center from January 1990 through February 2004. All were below age 18 at biopsy. Clinical features assessed at diagnosis were age, gender, presence of hypertension, history of macroscopic hematuria, degree of proteinuria, severity of renal histology and pattern for immunofluorescent reactants. STATISTICS: Student's t-test was used to compare age at biopsy and length of follow-up between the 2 groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare features at presentation and patterns of immunofluorescence. Kidney survival was predicted by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (17 African-American, 29 Caucasian) were studied. Clinical features at diagnosis and pattern for all immunofluorescent reactants did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Mesangial deposition of C1q occurred in 4/17 African-Americans as compared to 1/27 Caucasians (p = 0.06). Four patients (2 African-Americans, 2 Caucasians) progressed to end-stage renal disease. Predicted kidney survival was 96% (94% in African-Americans and 97% in Caucasians) at 1 year and 91% (94% in African-Americans and 89% in Caucasians) at 5 years from diagnosis. Mean time from diagnosis to end-stage renal disease or last follow-up was 3.3 years (3.8 for African-Americans, 3.0 for Caucasians). Macroscopic hematuria occurred prior to diagnosis for 90% of the Caucasian as compared to 61% of the African-American patients (p = 0.03). Urinalysis was normal at last follow-up visit for 24% of African-American patients and 32% of Caucasian patients. CONCLUSION: In a relatively small sample from a single center, except for the difference in macroscopic hematuria, clinical features at diagnosis and outcome of IgA nephropathy appear similar for African-American and Caucasian pediatric patients.

Renal pathology and clinical presentations of polyomavirus nephropathy in simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant recipients compared with kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the renal histopathology and clinical course of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKP) recipients with kidney transplant (KT) recipients with polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). METHODS: Between 1997 and 2002, 20 patients (7 SKP, 13 KT) were diagnosed with PVN. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of PV-N were correlated with histopathologic examinations of renal allograft biopsy and compared between SKP and KT recipients. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics between SKP and KT recipients with PV-N. The mean time to PVN was 611 (172 to 1174) days posttransplant in SKP and 343 (83 to 720) days posttransplant in KT (P =.05). The serum creatinine at the time of diagnosis was similar between SKP and KT recipients. All patients were treated with reduction in immunosuppression. After a median follow-up of 2 years, the patient survival was 71% in SKP and 100% in KT. Four grafts (57%) were lost owing to PVN in SKP group and three grafts (23%) were lost owing to PVN in the KT group. More patients (43%) in SKP had a history of acute rejection prior to diagnosis of PVN compared to KT (8%) and biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity prior to PVN was more common in SKPT (86%) than in KT (8%) patients (P <.05). SKP patients with evidence of diffuse fibrosis and high total sum scores at time of presentation all subsequently lost their grafts. CONCLUSIONS: SKP recipients with PVN had a worse clinical course than KT recipients.

Borderline changes in the Banff schema: rejection or no rejection?

The relationship between acute renal allograft rejection and histopathologic biopsy alterations recognized by the Banff Schema as "borderline changes" is not clear. Some evidence supports the contention that about one third of patients with borderline infiltrates and clinical evidence of graft dysfunction do indeed have acute rejection, which, if left untreated, progresses to a histologically more advanced stage of rejection. Several investigators recognize that not all patients with mild tubulitis respond clinically to antirejection therapy; a significant number of these biopsy specimens display additional histological alterations. The most common concurrent lesions are chronic allograft nephropathy, arteriolar lesions consistent with calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, acute tubular necrosis, and obstructive nephropathy. Management of patients with borderline changes must tightly correlate the pathologic features and the clinical information.

Polyomavirus in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and clinical characteristics of polyomavirus (PV) nephritis in kidney (KTX) and kidney-pancreas transplant (KPTX) recipients. METHODS: Single center retrospective analysis of all cases of PV nephritis in KTX and KPTX patients transplanted between 1994 and 1999. RESULTS: Thirteen (5 KTX and 8 KPTX) patients (2.1%) had PV nephritis diagnosed on multiple biopsies (n = 22) among 504 KTX and 106 KPTX recipients. The incidence of PV nephritis was higher in cadaver donor transplants (2.6% cadaver vs. 0.7% living donors), after KPTX (1% KTX vs. 7.5% KPTX), in males (3.3% male vs. 0.7% female), and in diabetic patients (4.4% diabetic vs. 0.8% nondiabetic). The mean time to diagnosis of PV nephritis was 18 (range 6-48) months after KTX and 17 (range 9-31) months after KPTX. Three KTX patients and 5 KPTX patients had calcineurin inhibitor toxicity on biopsy prior to developing PV nephritis. Reduction in immunosuppression occurred in 100% of KTX and 63% of KPTX patients. Three patients (23%) developed rejection within 3 months of diagnosis of PV, 1 after a reduction in immunosuppression. Despite multiple antiviral treatment regimens, renal allograft failure requiring dialysis occurred in 60% of KTX and 50% of KPTX patients. All KPTX patients remain insulin independent and 2 were successfully retransplanted with living donor kidneys. 2 patients (15%) died but there was no mortality directly related to the virus. CONCLUSIONS: Polyomavirus nephritis may be increasing in incidence and appears to be unresponsive to either conventional antiviral agents or a reduction in immunosuppression. Most of our cases occurred in male diabetic patients undergoing cadaveric donor transplantation and were preceded by biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. Further studies are needed to better define the pathogenesis of PV and effective antiviral treatment.

Observations on the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk renal transplant recipients.

Sirolimus is the first of a group of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to be introduced for clinical use in the United States. At the University of Tennessee in Memphis, we have evolved strategies for the use of sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients; which utilize the drug as a primary immunosuppressant and exploit its potential for preserving renal function. Conversions from the calcineurins to sirolimusbased immunosuppression established the efficacy of calcineurin-free immunosuppressants in selected high-risk patients. The conversion experience stimulated the design of protocols for primary use of sirolimus. Posttransplant use of sirolimus was associated with low incidence of rejection whether sirolimus was used with low-dose Prograf or in calcineurin-free protocols. Primary use with full-dose Prograf was associated with a high incidence of calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity and was abandoned in our program. Hematologic and lipid side effects were manageable, as was an observed increase in wound-healing problems and lymphocele formation. Continuous modifications of the sirolimus protocols to increase our benefit-to-risk ratio are ongoing and indicate a continued role for the drug in posttransplant immune suppression.

Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era.

METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.