Use of methotrexate-based peptide substrates to characterize the substrate specificity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is a glutamate carboxypeptidase II that is highly expressed by both normal and malignant prostate epithelial cells and by the neovasculature of many tumor types but is not expressed by endothelial cells in normal tissue. PSMA possesses the hydrolytic properties of an N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALADase) and also functions as a pteroyl poly-gamma-glutamyl carboxypeptidase (i.e., folate hydrolase). Therefore, PSMA can be targeted for activation of peptide-based prodrugs within the extracellular fluid of prostate cancers. In this study, methotrexate-based peptide analogs were evaluated to identify PSMA selective substrates that are also stable to nonspecific hydrolysis in human and mouse plasma. These methotrexate analogs were also characterized for in vitro toxicity against PSMA and nonPSMA producing human cancer cell lines. Analogs containing gamma-linked glutamate residues were most efficiently hydrolyzed by PSMA, but were unstable in plasma. Analogs containing both alpha- and gamma-linked acidic amino acids were less efficiently hydrolyzed by PSMA but were most stable in plasma. Analogs were 5-10 fold more selectively toxic in vitro in the presence of active PSMA. These studies have identified PSMA selective, plasma stable peptide substrates that can be incorporated into prodrugs targeted for activation by PSMA within prostate cancer sites.

Anti-tumor effect of combination therapy with intratumoral controlled-release paclitaxel (PACLIMER microspheres) and radiation.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel is one of the few chemotherapeutics effective in patients with advanced protstate cancer. Paclitaxel has also been reported to have radiosensitizing effects in prostate cancer. Local delivery of a controlled-release paclitaxel product may allow for increase local concentrations of paclitaxel at the tumor site and, in conjunction with radiation, may enhance cell kill by its radiosensitization mechanism. METHODS: Orthotopic LNCaP tumors were injected with 40% PACLIMER Microspheres (40% loading; w:w) when tumors were 100-200 mm(3). Twenty-eight days post cell injection, mice were sacrificed, tumors weighed, and serum measured for PSA. TSU-xenografts were injected with PACLIMER Microspheres (10% and 40% loaded; w:w) or placebo microspheres when the tumors were approximately 100 mm(3). Half of xenograft tumors were irradiated with a single dose (10 Gy) of radiation. Tumor volume was followed over time. RESULTS: Forty percent PACLIMER Microspheres significantly reduced tumor growth in the LNCaP orthotopic model. PSA was a good indicator of response. Forty percent PACLIMER Microspheres had a significant effect on slowing TSU growth compared to placebo microspheres. Addition of a single acute dose of radiation significantly enhanced the effect of 10% PACLIMER Microspheres (P < 0.05), had minimal effect on 40% PACLIMER Microspheres, and no enhancing effect on tumors treated with placebo microspheres. CONCLUSIONS: A controlled-release formulation of paclitaxel can be very effective in the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, PACLIMER Microspheres may be effectively used as a radiosensitizer in genitourinary cancers.

Dissociation between androgen responsiveness for malignant growth vs. expression of prostate specific differentiation markers PSA, hK2, and PSMA in human prostate cancer models.

BACKGROUND: A detailed understanding is evolving as to how androgen receptor (AR) functions as a transcriptional regulator via its binding to androgen response elements (ARE) within promoter and enhancer regions of prostate-specific differentiation markers such as PSA, hK2, and PSMA. It has been assumed that an understanding of regulation of expression of these marker proteins would also provide an understanding of the mechanisms whereby AR interactions regulate proliferation and survival of malignant prostate cells. In order to validate this hypothesis, we used a series of human prostate cancer models [i.e., LAPC-4, CWR22Rv1, MDA PCA-2b, LNCaP, and C4-2B (derived from LNCaP)] to test whether there is a consistent concordance between androgen responsive regulation for malignant growth vs. regulation of expression of prostate differentiation specific markers PSA, hK2, and PSMA. METHODS: In order to define androgen growth responsiveness in vivo, human prostate cancer cell lines were inoculated as xenografts into intact vs. surgically castrated adult male nude mice and the subsequent tumor growth response monitored. To assess androgen regulation of PSA and hK2 expression in these cell lines, the concentration of PSA and hK2 in the conditioned standard media and charcoal stripped media +/- androgen from each cell line was determined using an immunoassay system. PSMA enzymatic activity was determined using the PSMA substrate (3)H N-acetylaspartylglutamate ((3)H NAAG). RESULTS: Wild-type AR expressing LAPC-4 cells are androgen responsive for their in vivo growth. This cell line is also androgen sensitive for the expression of both PSA and hK2 in vitro and express PSMA. CWR22Rv1 cells have a mutated AR and are androgen responsive for growth in vivo and androgen sensitive for hk2 but not PSA expression. CWR22Rv1 produce approximately 1.4-fold more PSA, approximately 18-fold more hK2, and have 21-fold higher PSMA activity than LAPC-4 cells. MDA PCA-2b cells are androgen responsive for growth in vivo and androgen sensitive for PSA expression. MDA PCA-2b cells produce approximately 250-fold more PSA but almost equivalent amounts of hK2 compared to LAPC-4 and have approximately 19-fold higher PSMA activity. Both late passage LNCaP and C4-2B are androgen independent for growth in vivo but remain androgen sensitive for both PSA and hK2 expression. LNCaP cells produce approximately 50-fold more PSA, approximately 35-fold more hK2, and have 28-fold higher PSMA activity compared to LAPC-4. C4-2B cells produce approximately 80-fold higher levels of PSA, approximately 250-fold higher levels of hK2. C4-2B also the highest PSMA activity of the cell lines with 105-fold higher PSMA activity than LAPC-4 and approximately 4-fold higher activity than late passage LNCaP cells. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen can coordinately regulate both the tumor growth and expression of prostate specific marker genes as observed for the LAPC-4 human prostate cancer cells. Such coordinated regulation, however, is not universal. In all of the other cell lines, there is a dissociation between androgen responsive regulation of malignant growth vs. regulation of expression of prostate specific markers PSA and hK2. In addition, PSMA activity in these cell lines increases as cells become more androgen independent for growth in vivo. These results emphasize that tumor growth and the expression of the specific secretory genes are independently regulated molecular events even if they share a requirement for androgen and/or AR function. Additional independent mechanisms occur in prostate cancer cells for regulation of expression for even the highly related PSA and hK2 genes. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms for androgen ligand-independent, AR-dependent regulation of the genes that directly effect the growth of androgen (i.e., ligand) independent prostate cancer cells. Unfortunately, the data in this present report do not validate the use of the PSA or hK2 gene as surrogates for a model system for such critically important mechanistic studies. Prostate prostate cancer cells. Unfortunately, the data in this present report do not validate the use of the PSA or hK2 gene as surrogates for a model system for such critically important mechanistic studies.