Safety and efficacy of FLAG-Ida-based therapy combined with venetoclax for the treatment for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients with AML - A systematic review.

Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) is increasingly used to treat patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and efficacy outcomes of FLAG-IDA in combination with VEN. The primary safety outcome was infection rate; the primary efficacy outcome was response to treatment (composite complete remission (CRc) and overall response rate (ORR). Risk of bias was assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool. Six studies including 221 patients with newly-diagnosed (ND AML (n = 120)) and R/R AML (n = 101) disease, were included in this systematic review. Pooling of results was not conducted due to major differences between studies. The reported rates of neutropenic fever, bacteremia, pneumonia and invasive fungal infections were at 44-55 %, 24-48 %, 12-30 % and 11-36 % of assessed patients, respectively. Time to ANC and platelet recovery ranged between 23 and 29 and 23-31 days, respectively. Early death rate was 8.7 % (14/160) patients: four patients at 30 days, additional ten in 60 days. CRc rates ranged between 53 % and 78 % for R/R AML. CRc for ND was reported by one study only (89 %). ORR were reported in 60-78 % of patients with R/R AML. Only one study reported an ORR for ND patients of 98 %. In our systematic review, FLAG-Ida plus VEN proved to be a potentially tolerable and effective regimen in ND and R/R AML patients. We suggest further evaluation and confirmation for the safety and efficacy of this new protocol in future RCTs.

Maintenance therapy with hypomethylating agents for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission not eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Older patients encompass about 75 % of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Today therapeutic options to prevent relapse in older patients who managed to achieve complete remission (CR) after intensive chemotherapy are scarce. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have aimed to reduce the risk of relapse by means of post-CR maintenance therapy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of maintenance with hypomethylating agents (HMA) vs. observation, conventional care or placebo in older patients with AML who are not candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (allo-HCT). We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to August 2021. RESULTS: Six trials were included. Treatment with hypomethylating agents significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70 to 0.91, I2 = 30 %), and disease control (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70 to 0.91, I2 = 0). A significant decrease was seen in both one year mortality (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.61, 95 % CI 0.48 to 0.77, I2 = 0) and mortality at the end of follow-up (RR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.67 to 0.88, I2 = 0). The rate of relapse at 6 months and at one-two years was lower in the HMA arm vs. control (RR, 0.59; 95 % CI, 0.47-0.72; RR, 0.74, I2 = 0; 95 % CI 0.69 - 0.91, I2 = 41 %, respectively). HMA were associated with a statistically non-significant increase in the risk of serious adverse events (RR 3.44, 95 % CI 0.93-12.74, I2 = 80 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that in older patients who are not candidates for allo-HCT, maintenance therapy with HMA improves OS and disease control without a statistically significant increase in adverse events.

Incidence of lung cancer following pneumonia in smokers: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is more common in smokers compared with non-smokers. A high 1-year prevalence of lung cancer following hospitalization for pneumonia was demonstrated in heavy smokers. AIM: To assess the association between hospitalization for pneumonia among ever-smokers and subsequent lung cancer risk. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. METHODS: The study cohort included all ever-smokers aged 55-80 hospitalized for pneumonia between the years 2010-15 covered by a large medical insurer in Israel. Controls were matched to cases by age in a 4:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the association between hospitalization for pneumonia and subsequent 1-year incidence of lung cancer, adjusted for gender, smoking status (past/current) and pack years. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses excluded heavy smokers (smoking history of more than 30 pack years) and patients diagnosed with lung cancer within 30 days of hospitalization, as they probably had clinical or radiological findings suggestive of lung cancer, making them ineligible for screening. RESULTS: Lung cancer was identified in 275 of 12 807 (2.1%) patients following hospitalization for pneumonia and in 44 of 51 228 (0.1%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 22.46, 95% CI 16.29-30.96, P < 0.001). Among patients hospitalized for pneumonia, 1-year lung cancer incidence remained high after excluding heavy smokers and patients diagnosed within 30 days of the index date (1.3% and 1.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for pneumonia is associated with high 1-year incidence of lung cancer in ever-smokers, supporting the important role of the widely used practice of performing follow up imaging post-pneumonia to exclude occult malignancy.

The yield of F18 FDG PET-CT for the investigation of fever of unknown origin, compared with diagnostic CT.

BACKGROUND: 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography, with contrast enhanced CT (PET-CT), is recommended as a first or a second-line imaging method for the evaluation of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO). We evaluated the yield of PET-CT vs. contrast enhanced CT (alone) for the diagnosis of classical FUO. METHODS: A single center, 8-year retrospective cohort study. All hospitalized patients who underwent PET-CT for the investigation of classical FUO between 1/2012-1/2020 were included. The final diagnosis, based on clinical, microbiological, radiological and pathological data available at the latest follow-up, at least six months after discharge, was determined. For each case, we determined whether the diagnosis would have been reached based on the CT scan alone, or based on the PET-CT (thus, defining PET-CT as necessary). We compared the overall sensitivity and specificity results for both PET-CT and CT scan. Variables that were found to be significantly associated with PET-CT necessity on univariable analysis were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The results of the regression model were reported in odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULT: A total of 303 patients with classical FUO were referred for PET-CT. The final diagnoses included infectious diseases in 111/303 patients (36.5%), malignancies in 56/303 patients (18.4%) and non-infectious inflammatory conditions in 52/303 patients (17.1%). FUO resolved without diagnosis in 84/303 patients (28%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PET-CT scans were 88.7% and 80.9%, respectively, and for the CT scans were 75.2% and 90.2%, respectively. PET-CT had superior sensitivity vs CT (p=0.00) for all subgroups, with generally decreased specificity than CT for infections and inflammatory conditions. PET-CT was determined as necessary in 26% (79/303) of the patients. Endovascular infection, hematological malignancy and large vessel vasculitis were the only factors associated with PET-CT necessity on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT offers superior sensitivity with slightly decreased specificity for the diagnosis of classical FUO compared to diagnostic CT. We recommend PET-CT as the imaging modality of choice for patients with classical FUO, when endovascular infection, hematological malignancy or large vessel vasculitis are suspected.

Tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19-a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-6 inhibitors showed promising results in observational trials of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To evaluate whether interleukin-6 inhibitor tocilizumab (TCZ) reduces mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TCZ vs. placebo/control, for treatment of adults with COVID-19. Primary outcome was 28-30 days all-cause mortality. Search was conducted up to 1 April 2021. Two independent reviewers screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled. We performed subgroup analysis for patients with critical illness and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included, assessing 6481 patients with mostly severe non-critical COVID-19 infection. TCZ was associated with a reduction in all-cause 28-30-day mortality compared to placebo/control (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96). Among the subgroup of critically ill patients no reduced mortality was demonstrated (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). No mortality benefit with TCZ was demonstrated in trials that used steroids for >80% of patients. TCZ was associated with significantly reduced risk for mechanical ventilation (MV); for combined endpoint of death or MV and for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. No significant difference in adverse events was demonstrated. Risk of serious superinfection was significantly lower with TCZ (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93). CONCLUSION: The treatment with TCZ reduces 28-30 days all-cause mortality, ICU admission, superinfections, MV and the combined endpoint of death or MV. Among critically ill patients, and when steroids were used for most patients, no mortality benefit was demonstrated. Additional research should further define sub-groups that would benefit most and preferred timing of administration of TCZ in severe COVID-19.

Denosumab is not associated with risk of malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The immunomodulatory effects of denosumab have raised concerns for risk of malignancy. This meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials (21,523 patients) shows similar risk of malignancy between denosumab (60 mg every 6 months, up to 48 months) and any comparator. Post-marketing surveillance may detect rare or late-occurring drug effects. Possible increased risk of malignancy in patients treated with denosumab has been concerned due to inhibition of the immune modulator receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-Β ligand (RANKL). We aimed to assess the risk of malignancy associated with denosumab treatment. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 27, 2019 to include all randomized controlled trials of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) versus any comparator. Trials using higher drug doses for prevention of skeletal-related events were excluded. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and analyzed using a fixed-effect model to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-five trials (21,523 patients) were included. The risk of malignancy was similar between denosumab and other comparators (absolute risk difference 0%, RR 1.08 [95% CI, 0.93-1.24], I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment showed similar results. The risk of malignancy did not differ between groups in any of the subgroup analyses, including stratification by race, individual comparators, indications for treatment, and longer drug exposure (≥ 24 months, 9 studies). The risk ratio of malignancy-related death was similar between groups. Early concerns about a potential increased risk of malignancy resulting from an immunomodulatory effect of denosumab are not supported by evidence from this meta-analysis of 25 RCTs with drug exposure of up to 48 months. Since RCTs with longer observation for safety outcomes are not expected, post-marketing surveillance will be the main means for detection of rare or late-occurring events.

Reporting infections in clinical trials of patients with haematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Infections are common among patients treated for haematological malignancies and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The completeness of reporting infectious complications in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for haematological malignancies is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the completeness of reporting infectious complications in RCTs assessing treatments for haematological malignancies. DATA SOURCE: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed database. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND PARTICIPANTS: All primary published phase II/III RCTs between September 2016 and September 2018 evaluating treatments for haematological malignancies in adult patients were included. INTERVENTION: Reporting infectious complications. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the completeness of reporting. Study characteristics and data concerning reporting of infectious complications were collected by two independent reviewers. Quality of reporting was assessed using a modification of the CONSORT extension checklist for harms, including 15 items. RESULTS: One-hundred and seven RCTs were included. Most trials (97; 91%) provided some report on infections. Approximately half reported on each of pneumonia, sepsis and neutropenic fever; 12 trials (11%) reported on fungal infections. Only nine trials (8%) listed infections by type of pathogen (i.e. bacterial, fungal or viral) and 48 (45%) by source/type of infection (i.e. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, etc.). Most trials did not address infections in their title, abstract, introduction or discussion. Median number of items of the CONSORT modification reported was 7 points, (interquartile range (IQR) 6-9) for all included trials, with lower median for 34 acute leukaemia trials (median 6, IQR 5-8). CONCLUSIONS: Most trials evaluating treatment for haematological malignancies provide some data relating to infectious complications. The reports are mostly incomplete and rarely provided in a structured presentation.

Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.

OBJECTIVES: Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov entries and matching publications were previously described in general medicine. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of reporting in trials addressing systemic antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for completed phase III trials comparing antibiotic regimens until May 2017. Matched publications were identified in PubMed. Two independent reviewers extracted data and identified inconsistencies. Reporting was assessed among studies started before and after 1 July 2005, when the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) required mandatory registration as a prerequisite for considering a trial for publication. RESULTS: Matching publications were identified for 75 (70%) of 107 ClinicalTrials.gov entries. Median time from study completion to publication was 26 months (interquartile range 19-42). Primary outcome definition was inconsistent between ClinicalTrials.gov and publications in seven trials (7/72, 10%) and reporting of the primary outcome timeframe was inconsistent in 14 (14/71, 20%). Secondary outcomes definitions were inconsistent in 36 trials (36/66, 55%). Reporting of inclusion criteria and study timeline were inconsistent in 17% (13/65) and 3% (2/65), respectively. Trials started after July 2005 were significantly less likely to have reporting inconsistencies and were published in higher impact factor journals. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower inconsistency rate of outcome reporting compared with other medical disciplines. Reporting completeness and consistency were significantly better after July 2005. The ICMJE requirement for mandatory registration was associated with significant improvement in reporting quality in infectious diseases trials. Prolonged time lag to publication and missing data from unpublished trials should raise a discussion on current reporting and publishing procedures.

Educational interventions encouraging appropriate use of blood transfusions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The integration of a restrictive packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion strategy into daily clinical practice presents a challenge. This study describes the effect of an intervention including educational presentations and computerized alerts on PRBC utilization at a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During December 2014, lectures describing recommended PRBC transfusion indications were presented to all non-intensive care departments. Starting from January 2015, an alert was added to the electronic drug ordering system recommending transfusions at a haemoglobin (Hb) level <7 g/dl or Hb < 8 g/dl in symptomatic patients. The physician was not required to acknowledge the alert. Data regarding measured Hb preceding transfusions were collected. The primary end-point was defined as the percentage of PRBC administered at Hb ≥ 8 g/dl in 2015 compared with 2014. Secondary end-points were the percentage of PRBC administered to patients with Hb < 7 g/dl and the absolute number of PRBC transfused in 2015 compared with 2014. RESULTS: Compared to 2014, in 2015, the percentage of PRBC transfused when the Hb ≥ 8 g/dl was reduced by 18·8% (P < 0·001) and made up 29% of the total PRBC transfused. The absolute number of PRBC transfused decreased by 7·7%. The percentage of PRBC transfused when the Hb < 7 g/dl increased by 25·9% (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Following the described intervention, there was a significant improvement in the appropriateness of PRBC transfusions in our medical centre. These changes occurred despite the lack of interruption of the physician's workflow from the computerized alert. This simple strategy might be of use in implementing a restrictive PRBC transfusion strategy.

Blood pressure response to medical treatment in the emergency department - a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether blood pressure (BP) without target organ damage should be decreased in patients in the emergency department (ED). It is also uncertain whether any certain class of medications has an advantage over the other in this setting. This study addressed both these questions. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients attending a tertiary care ED with elevated BP were evaluated. All patients with target organ damage as well as those with significant active co-morbidities, such as myocardial ischemia, were excluded. Baseline characteristics and response of BP to therapy were compared between those treated and untreated in the ED. In addition, BP response to therapy was compared between different classes of antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: Overall, 438 patients were included in the final analysis (62% female), of which 275 (63%) were treated in the ED. Antihypertensive medications were more commonly prescribed in the ED for those with higher systolic and diastolic BP, but other baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Only systolic BP significantly decreased in those treated with antihypertensive medications compared with those untreated. The most commonly used classes were angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Use of either of these drug classes was not associated with a significant decrease in either systolic or diastolic BP compared with the use of other drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drug therapy is more commonly prescribed in the ED in individuals with both elevated systolic and diastolic BP, but leads to a significant decrease only in systolic BP. Use of either ACEis or CCBs is not associated with a significant decrease in either systolic or diastolic BP compared with other drug classes.

Malignancy associated SIADH: Characterization and clinical implications.

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of etiologies for the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) in hospitalized patients with active malignancies and to characterize them according to the different etiologies. METHODS: A single center retrospective study including all patients with active malignancies diagnosed with SIADH in a large community hospital and tertiary center between 1 January 2007 and 1 January 2013. Two physicians reviewed every patient's medical file for predetermined relevant clinical data. RESULTS: The study cohort included 204 patients. 74.4% of those with solid tumors had metastatic disease. Most patients (149, 73%) had malignancy associated SIADH, while 55 (27%) had SIADH due to other etiologies. All of the major malignancy types were implicated in SIADH. Patients with breast cancer without lung or brain involvement were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with malignancy associated SIADH compared with other malignancies [Odds ratio (OR) 0.031, 95% CI 0.003-0.25, p < 0.001]. Patients with malignancy associated SIADH had lower serum sodium concentrations on short-term follow-up (p = 0.024) and significantly shorter median survival (58 vs. 910 days, p < 0.001). Short-term hyponatremia correction was associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: SIADH is associated with most malignancy types. Physicians caring for patients with breast cancer without lung or brain involvement diagnosed with SIADH without an obvious etiology should consider obtaining lung and brain imaging to rule out undiagnosed metastatic spread. Patients with malignancy associated SIADH have considerably worse outcomes compared to cancer patient with SIADH due to other etiologies. Short-term sodium concentration can be used as a prognostic marker for these patients.

Secondary malignancies following high dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with other treatment modalities to analyze the risk for various secondary malignancies (SMs). Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated and pooled. Our search yielded 36 trials. The median follow-up was 55 (range 12-144) months. Overall, the RR for developing SMs was 1.23 ((0.97-1.55), I(2)=4%, 9870 patients). Subgroup analysis of trials assessing TBI-containing preparative regimens and of patients with baseline lymphoproliferative diseases, showed there was a higher risk for SMs in patients given autografts (RR=1.61 (1.05-2.48), I(2)=14%, 2218 patients and RR=1.62 (1.12-2.33), I(2)=22%, 3343 patients, respectively). Among all patients, there was a higher rate of myelodysplastic syndrome MDS/AML in patients given HCT compared with other treatments (RR=1.71 (1.18-2.48), I(2)=0%, 8778 patients). The risk of secondary solid malignancies was comparable in the short term between patients given HCT and patients given other treatments (RR=0.95 (0.67-1.32), I(2)=0%, 5925 patients). We conclude that overall the risk of secondary MDS/AML is higher in patients given autologous HCT compared with other treatments. In the subgroup of patients given a TBI-based regimen and in those with a baseline lymphoproliferative disease, there was a higher risk of overall SMs.

[18F]FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains a challenging medical problem. We aimed to assess the diagnostic contribution of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of FUO. METHODS: We performed a 4-year retrospective single-center study of all hospitalized patients that underwent FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of FUO. The final diagnosis of the febrile disease was based on clinical, microbiological, radiological and pathological data available at the final follow-up. Predictors for a contributory exam were sought. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients underwent FDG-PET/CT for the investigation of FUO in the years 2008-2012 and were included in the study. A final diagnosis was determined in 83 patients (74%) and included: infectious disease in 49 patients (43%), non-infectious inflammatory disease in 17 patients (16%), malignancies in 15 patients (14%), other diagnoses in 2 patients (1.7%), FUO resolved with no diagnosis and no evidence of disease during a 6-month follow-up in 23 patients (20%), and death with fever and with no diagnosis in 6 patients (5%). Seventy-four FDG-PET/CT studies (66%) were considered clinically helpful and contributory to diagnosis (46% positive contributory value and 20.5% contributory to exclusion of diagnosis). PET/CT had a sensitivity of 72.2%, a specificity of 57.5%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 74.2% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 53.5%. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of a positive PET/CT contributory to diagnosis were a short duration of fever and male gender. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is an important diagnostic tool for patients with FUO.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with anticoagulation in septic patients: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a feared complication during hospitalization. The practice of administering pharmacological prophylaxis is highly endorsed despite failure of studies to show reduction in mortality. AIM: : To determine the benefit of VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with sepsis. METHODS: A prospective cohort, with enrollment between January 2010 and April 2011. Patients were detected in four medicine departments at a university-affiliated hospital and followed for 90 days for pre-specified outcomes. We included all septic patients at high VTE risk defined by Padua score ≥ 4. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Incidence of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or major bleeding episodes at 30 and 90 days, and 90-day mortality were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1540 patients were identified, of which 720 (55%) were at high risk for VTE and included. A total of 213 (29.6%) patients received prophylaxis. VTE occurred in 6 control patients and 2 treated (0.9 and 1.2%, respectively, RR 0.79, CI: 0.16-3.95). Major bleeding events occurred in 4 (0.8%) control and 7 (3.3%) treated patients (RR 4.1, CI: 1.24-14.08, P = 0.01). After adjusting for covariates, VTE prophylaxis conferred no 30- or 90-day mortality benefit (OR 1.24, CI: 0.79-1.93 and OR 1.47, CI: 0.99-2.17, respectively). Lack of significant benefit with prophylaxis persisted after propensity-score matching (OR for 30-day mortality 1.01, CI: 0.66-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: In acutely ill inpatients with sepsis, no significant benefit was demonstrated for VTE prophylaxis, with higher rates of bleeding. The risk-benefit ratio of this intervention should be carefully examined.

Factors associated with influenza vaccination among adult cancer patients: a case-control study.

Influenza vaccination is recommended for cancer patients; however, adherence is low. We aimed to identify predictive factors for vaccination among cancer patients. We conducted a case-control analysis of a patient cohort in the 2010-2011 influenza season. We included adult cancer patients with solid malignancies undergoing chemotherapy, and haematological patients with active disease. Patients who died between October and November 2010 (N = 43) were excluded from analysis. Cases received the 2011 seasonal influenza vaccine, and controls did not. Data were obtained from patients' records, and validated through personal interviews. We collected socio-demographic information, and data on the malignancy and co-morbidities and triggers for vaccination and non-vaccination. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses, in which vaccination status was the dependent variable. Of 806 patients included in analysis, 387 (48%) were vaccinated. Variables associated with vaccination on bivariate analysis were older age, higher socio-economic status, lower crowding index, marital status (widowed > married > single), malignancy type (haematological > solid tumours) and time from diagnosis, low-risk malignancy, diabetes, past vaccination, country of birth (non-Russian origin), and physicians' recommendations. Predictive factors found to be independently associated with vaccination on multivariable analysis were past vaccinations, low-risk malignancy, and country of birth. In the analysis conducted among interviewees (N = 561), recommendations from the oncologist (OR 10.7, 95% CI 5.4-21.2) and from the primary-care physician (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.05-5.49) were strong predictors for vaccination. We conclude that 'habitual vaccinees' continue influenza vaccinations when ill with cancer. Physicians' recommendations, especially the oncologist's, have a major influence on patients' compliance with influenza vaccination.

Clinical characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) are at high risk for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all infections caused by S. maltophilia in HSCT recipients in a single center in Israel during a 4 year period. RESULTS: Of 570 patients undergoing HSCT, 19 patients with an invasive S. maltophilia infection were identified. Sixteen had allogeneic HSCT and 3 had autologous HSCT. Seventeen patients (90%) had an indwelling central venous catheter (CVC) at the time of infection. S. maltophilia infections were detected in three clinical settings: as a complication of prolonged neutropenia (n = 9), as a CVC-related non-neutropenic infection occurring after CVC manipulation (n = 8) and as a respiratory tract infection (n = 2). Eleven patients (58%) had a polymicrobial infection. Ten patients (52.6%) received carbapenems during the previous month. The treatment for all patients included broad spectrum antibiotics, which were switched according to susceptibilities upon identification of the isolates. All isolates were susceptible in vitro to TMP-SMX. CVCs were removed in 12 patients (70%). Six patients, all after allogeneic HSCT, died. The CVC was removed in only two of the five patients with CVCs who died. CONCLUSIONS: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen in HSCT recipients, both in the early neutropenic phase and in the non-neutropenic phase. It is commonly associated with the presence and manipulation of an indwelling CVC. Removal of the CVC in addition to appropriate antibiotic therapy (TMP-SMX) is crucial for infection control.

Prophylaxis regimens for GVHD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Opinions are divided regarding the best prophylactic regimen for GVHD. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential survival benefit of different prophylactic regimens for acute GVHD (aGVHD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients undergoing Allo-SCT. We included trials that assessed the addition of MTX, compared CsA and tacrolimus and evaluated the addition of steroids. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality (ACM) at the longest follow-up, aGVHD, chronic GVHD, TRM, relapse rate and regimen-specific adverse events. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. The regimen of MTX-CsA vs CsA alone (four trials) yielded no statistically significant difference in ACM (RR=0.84 (0.61-1.14)), but a significant decrease in aGVHD (RR=0.52 (0.39-0.7)). There was no difference in ACM for the comparison of MTX-CsA and MTX-tacrolimus (three trials); however, MTX-tacrolimus was superior to MTX-CsA in the reduction of aGVHD (RR=0.62 (0.52-0.75)) and severe aGVHD (RR=0.67 (0.47-0.95)). The addition of steroids did not affect the outcomes (four trials). We conclude that MTX-CsA and MTX-tacrolimus are both acceptable alternatives for GVHD prophylaxis, although MTX-tacrolimus may be superior in terms of aGVHD reduction.

Severe digital ischemia-a presenting symptom of malignancy-associated antiphospholipid syndrome.

The association of the antiphospholipid syndrome with malignancy has been extensively reported. Raynaud's phenomenon has also been reported to be associated with various malignancies. In this report, we describe two patients who presented with severe digital ischemia mimicking Raynaud's phenomenon. The patients were found to have antiphospholipid syndrome, and upon extensive evaluation, a diagnosis of a malignancy was made. This report highlights the importance of malignancy workup in patients with severe digital ischemia associated with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.

BACKGROUND: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is caused by various pathogens, traditionally divided to 'typical' and 'atypical'. Initial antibiotic treatment of CAP is usually empirical, customarily covering both typical and atypical pathogens. To date, no sufficient evidence exists to support this broad coverage, while limiting coverage is bound to reduce toxicity, resistance and expense. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and need of adding antibiotic coverage for atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients with CAP, in terms of mortality and successful treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1) which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Group's specialized register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2007); and EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of adult patients hospitalized due to CAP, comparing antibiotic regimens with atypical antibiotic coverage to a regimen without atypical antibiotic coverage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted the data from included trials. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, assuming an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis for the outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty five trials were included, encompassing 5244 randomized patients. There was no difference in mortality between the atypical arm and the non-atypical arm (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56). The atypical arm showed an insignificant trend toward clinical success and a significant advantage to bacteriological eradication, which disappeared when evaluating methodologically high-quality studies alone. Clinical success for the atypical arm was significantly higher for Legionella pneumophilae (L. pneumophilae) and non-significantly lower for pneumococcal pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of (total) adverse events, or those requiring discontinuation of treatment. However, gastrointestinal events were more common in the non-atypical arm (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99). All but two included trials compared a single atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam, while no trials assessing the addition of an atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No benefit of survival or clinical efficacy was shown to empirical atypical coverage in hospitalized patients with CAP. This conclusion relates mostly to the comparison of quinolone monotherapy to beta-lactams (BL) or cephalosporins. Further trials, comparing BL or cephalosporins therapy to BL or cephalosporins combined with a macrolide in this population, using mortality as its primary outcome, should be performed.