Stability of Opened Durvalumab (IMFINZI) Vials. The Beginning of the End of Costly Product Wastage?

Durvalumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of lung, urothelial and biliary tract cancers. Durvalumab is supplied in vials as a solution containing no preservatives. Monographs recommend single use of durvalumab vials, and that any leftovers be discarded within 24 h. Thus, significant portions of unused product from opened vials are wasted on a daily basis, generating considerable financial losses. The objective of the present study was to assess the physicochemical and microbiological stability of durvalumab vials kept at 4 °C or room temperature, at 7 and 14 days after opening. Following pH and osmolality measurements, turbidity and submicronic aggregation of durvalumab solution were evaluated by spectrophotometry and dynamic light scattering, respectively. Moreover, steric exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), ion exchange HPLC (IEX-HPLC) and peptide mapping HPLC were used to respectively assess aggregation/fragmentation, charge distribution and primary structure of durvalumab. Microbiological stability of durvalumab was evaluated by incubation of vial leftovers on blood agar. All experiments showed physicochemical and microbiological stability of durvalumab vial leftovers for at least 14 days when aseptically handled and kept at either 4 °C or at room temperature. These results suggest the possible extension of utilization of durvalumab vial leftovers well beyond 24 h.

Effectiveness of adjuvant carboplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin and vinorelbine given intravenously is a well-established adjuvant chemotherapy regimen after surgery for early non-small cell lung cancer. However, few validated alternatives exist when cisplatin is not indicated or tolerated. Carboplatin is frequently used in this setting. We evaluated the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity in patients treated for stage IB to IIIB resected non-small cell lung cancer receiving adjuvant carboplatin-based chemotherapy compared to cisplatin in association with vinorelbine. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of patients having received adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 at the oncology clinic at Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (Canada). Three sub-groups, cisplatin/vinorelbine, carboplatin/vinorelbine and the substitution of cisplatin/vinorelbine for carboplatin/vinorelbine (cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine), were studied during treatment. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in this study. The median PFS was not significantly different, with 50.4 months for cisplatin/vinorelbine, 57.3 months for cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine and not yet achieved for the carboplatin/vinorelbine group ( p = 0.80). Overall survival also did not differ significantly between the three groups. The 5-year overall survival rates were 66% in cisplatin/vinorelbine group, 55% in carboplatin/vinorelbine group and 70% in cisplatin/vinorelbine/carboplatin/vinorelbine group ( p = 0, 95). No differences were noted between groups concerning high-grade hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effectiveness and hematologic toxicity are comparable between cisplat in and carboplatin in the adjuvant treatment of resected non-small cell lung cancer, the results obtained corroborate the practice used at our oncology clinic. Nevertheless, more prospective studies would be needed to confirm these results.