Lack of observed interference by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in select commonly utilized immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory. METHODS: Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 µg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits. RESULTS: None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between -2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.

Pitfalls in Diagnosing Hypoglycemia Due to Exogenous Insulin: Validation and Utility of an Insulin Analog Assay.

OBJECTIVE: To overcome the limitations of commercially available insulin immunoassays which have variable detection of analog insulin and can lead to clinically discordant results and misdiagnosis in the workup of factitious hypoglycemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed analytical validation of a liquid chromatography high resolution accurate mass (LC-HRAM) immunoassay to detect insulin analogs. We completed clinical assessment using a large cohort of human serum samples from 78 unique individuals, and subsequently used the assay in the evaluation of eight individuals with high diagnostic suspicion for factitious hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The performance characteristics show that the LC-HRAM immunoassay can be applied to detect five commonly used synthetic insulin analogs (lispro, glulisine, aspart, glargine metabolite, and detemir) in human serum. Our clinical cases show that this assay could be used in the diagnosis of factitious hypoglycemia by identifying the analog insulin(s) in question. CONCLUSION: The LC-HRAM immunoassay reported here overcomes a gap in our diagnostic pathway for hypoglycemia. The results obtained from our studies suggest that this method is appropriate for use in clinical laboratories when factitious hypoglycemia is considered as a differential diagnosis.

Flower lose, a cell fitness marker, predicts COVID-19 prognosis.

Risk stratification of COVID-19 patients is essential for pandemic management. Changes in the cell fitness marker, hFwe-Lose, can precede the host immune response to infection, potentially making such a biomarker an earlier triage tool. Here, we evaluate whether hFwe-Lose gene expression can outperform conventional methods in predicting outcomes (e.g., death and hospitalization) in COVID-19 patients. We performed a post-mortem examination of infected lung tissue in deceased COVID-19 patients to determine hFwe-Lose's biological role in acute lung injury. We then performed an observational study (n = 283) to evaluate whether hFwe-Lose expression (in nasopharyngeal samples) could accurately predict hospitalization or death in COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients with acute lung injury, hFwe-Lose is highly expressed in the lower respiratory tract and is co-localized to areas of cell death. In patients presenting in the early phase of COVID-19 illness, hFwe-Lose expression accurately predicts subsequent hospitalization or death with positive predictive values of 87.8-100% and a negative predictive value of 64.1-93.2%. hFwe-Lose outperforms conventional inflammatory biomarkers and patient age and comorbidities, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.93-0.97 in predicting hospitalization/death. Specifically, this is significantly higher than the prognostic value of combining biomarkers (serum ferritin, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio), patient age and comorbidities (AUROC of 0.67-0.92). The cell fitness marker, hFwe-Lose, accurately predicts outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This finding demonstrates how tissue fitness pathways dictate the response to infection and disease and their utility in managing the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Challenges with At-home and Mail-in Direct-to-Consumer Testing: Preanalytical Error, Reporting Results, and Result Interpretation.

Companies that offer direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing on specimens such as saliva, blood, or urine, allow consumers to order laboratory tests without the involvement of a health care provider. This approach allows individuals to have direct access to their own laboratory results, interpret them, and make decisions regarding their health care. However, as with conventional clinical laboratory testing, there are factors that will impact the accuracy of DTC test results and limitations that consumers need to be aware of. This article focuses on challenges with DTC testing specifically related to preanalytical errors, result reporting, and result interpretation.