RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 leads to high response rates and improved survival in advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM). Less is known about the efficacy of this combination in acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM). OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 in a real-world, diverse population of ALM. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective study analyzed patients with histologically confirmed ALM treated with the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors between 2010-2022. The primary objective of the study was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST criteria. The secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 109 patients with advanced ALM treated with combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade in any line of treatment were included. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n=81, 74.2%). The ORR for the entire cohort was 18.3% (95% CI 11.6-26.9%), with 9 (8.3%) complete responses (CR) and 11 (10.1%) partial responses (PR). An additional 22 patients (20.2%) had stable disease (SD), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 38.5%. The median PFS was 4.2 months [95% CI 3.25-5.62], while the median OS was 17 months [95% CI 12.4%-23.1%]. A total of 95 patients (87.2%) had a treatment-related adverse event, with 40.4% (n=44/109) experiencing at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Elevated LDH (p=.04), 2+ lines of prior therapy (p=.03), and Asian race/ethnicity (p=.04) were associated with worse OS, while Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity was associated with better OS (p=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade is less effective for ALM, as compared to CM, despite similar toxicity. Asian patients, in particular, appear to derive lower benefit from this regimen. Novel treatment approaches are needed for this rare melanoma subtype.
RESUMO
OPINION STATEMENT: Head and neck osteosarcoma (HNOS) is a rare subtype of sarcoma that most commonly arises in the mandible or maxilla. Treatment for HNOS typically involves a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach depending on the size, grade, and histological subtype. Surgery by sarcoma-experienced head and neck surgeons and orthopedic oncologists remains a crucial component of treatment in all subtypes of HNOS, particularly for those with low-grade histology, which can be treated definitively with surgical resection if negative margins are obtained. Negative surgical margins are of utmost prognostic importance, and neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation should be considered in patients with positive (or anticipated positive) margins/residual postoperative disease. Current data favors the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade HNOS to improve overall survival but must be individualized to weigh benefits and risks of the short- and long-term effects of treatment. Our center uses a multidisciplinary treatment plan and notes anecdotal improvement in treatment outcomes with a combined surgical and ifosfamide-containing chemotherapeutic approach with radiotherapy for local control if positive margins. Large volume cohorts and adequate randomized control trials assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy in HNOS are scant and additional research and multi-institutional collaboration are needed to study polychemotherapeutic and radiation treatment regimens and outcomes more adequately.