Assuntos
Coinfecção/complicações , Síndromes Compartimentais/etiologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/complicações , Leptospirose/complicações , Rabdomiólise/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Adulto , Animais , Emergências , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Ouriços/microbiologia , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologiaRESUMO
We report two cases of septic shocks due to Salmonella non typhi infection on sickle cell patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Such patients should enforce food hygiene measures, especially under tropical settings, to avoid potentially deadly severe infections.
Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Infecções por Salmonella/complicações , Salmonella enteritidis/isolamento & purificação , Salmonella typhimurium/isolamento & purificação , Choque Séptico/etiologia , Adolescente , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Colecistectomia , Colecistite/complicações , Colecistite/cirurgia , Infecções por Clostridium/complicações , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/complicações , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Osteomielite/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Reunião/epidemiologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Salmonella/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/prevenção & controle , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Choque Séptico/terapia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/etiologia , Adulto Jovem , Talassemia beta/complicaçõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the opinions of intensivists regarding pleural effusions in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1,032 intensivists, who were members of the French Society of Critical Care. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-one questionnaires (41.7%) were returned. Overall, the respondents' estimated the incidence of pleural effusion in ICU patients to be 22.19 +/- 17%, whereas 37 +/- 27% considered that exploratory thoracentesis was likely to determine the cause of the effusion, and 17.36 +/- 16% considered that its results were likely to result in a change in their therapeutic attitude. Sixty-five (15%) physicians, chiefly pulmonologists, performed exploratory thoracentesis routinely (Group 1). Compared with those who did not perform routine thoracentesis (Group 2), they ascribed a higher proportion of pleural effusions to infection (31.3% vs. 13.5%) and were more likely to consider that exploratory thoracentesis had a diagnostic and therapeutic contribution (51.2% vs. 34% and 23% vs. 16%, respectively). In addition to the respiratory medicine subspecialty, the practice of routine exploratory thoracentesis was significantly related to seniority, to the frequency of the suspicion of an infectious cause in the physician's practice, and to his or her appreciation of the risks associated with exploratory thoracentesis. Physicians from Group 1 were also more likely to describe exploratory thoracentesis as a noninvasive procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The beliefs and attitudes of intensivists regarding pleural effusions and exploratory thoracentesis are divergent. This may be due to the lack of precise guidelines on the topic and prompt the design of further studies to establish precisely the epidemiology and causes of pleural effusions in ICU patients.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , França , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Derrame Pleural/cirurgia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Reagent strips have not yet been tested for use in the diagnosis of infectious pleural effusions. A reagent strip was used to evaluate 82 patients with pleural effusions: 20 patients had transudative effusions, 35 had infectious exudative effusions (empyema in 14 and parapneumonic effusion in 21), and 27 had noninfectious exudative effusions. Pleural fluid protein, as evaluated by the reagent strip, proved accurate for the detection of exudative effusions (sensitivity, 93.1%; specificity, 50%; positive predictive value, 84.3%; negative predictive value, 71.5%; odds ratio [OR], 6.77; and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-24). The reagent strip leukocyte esterase test effectively detected infectious exudative effusions (sensitivity, 42.8%; specificity, 91.3%; positive predictive value, 88.2%; negative predictive value, 51.2%; OR, 4.46; and 95% CI, 1.2-16.4). Pleural pH was significantly predicted by the reagent strip but was of no assistance in categorization of exudative effusions as infectious or noninfectious. Compared with physical, laboratory, and microbiological data, the reagent strip was as accurate for estimation of percentages of infectious and noninfectious exudative effusions. Thus, reagent strips may be a rapid, easy-to-use, and inexpensive technique for discriminating transudative from exudative pleural effusions and for categorizing exudative pleural effusions as infectious or noninfectious.