Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials: a review of 116 cases.

We reviewed the results of motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring during 116 operations on the spine or spinal cord. We monitored MEPs by electrically stimulating the spinal cord and recording compound muscle action potentials from lower extremity muscles and monitored SEPs by stimulating posterior tibial or peroneal nerves and recording both cortical and subcortical evoked potentials. We maintained anesthesia with an N2O/O2/opioid technique supplemented with a halogenated inhalational agent and maintained partial neuromuscular blockade using a vecuronium infusion. Both MEPs and SEPs could be recorded in 99 cases (85%). Neither MEPs nor SEPs were recorded in eight patients, all of whom had preexisting severe myelopathies. Only SEPs could be recorded in two patients, and only MEPs were obtained in seven cases. Deterioration of evoked potentials occurred during nine operations (8%). In eight cases, both SEPs and MEPs deteriorated; in one case, only MEPs deteriorated. In four cases, the changes in the monitored signals led to major alterations in the surgery. We believe that optimal monitoring during spinal surgery requires recording both SEPs and MEPs. This provides independent verification of spinal cord integrity using two parallel but independent systems, and also allows detection of the occasional insults that selectively affect either motor or sensory systems.

Monitoring of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials under conditions of controlled neuromuscular blockade.

Motor-evoked potentials were recorded after electrical spinal cord stimulation in 19 patients undergoing neurosurgical or orthopedic procedures. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide, opioids, and inhaled anesthetics. Vecuronium was infused sufficient to eliminate 90% of twitch tension. The spinal cord was stimulated using either epidural or subarachnoid electrodes. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded from quadriceps and tibialis anterior muscles. Well-formed, stable motor-evoked potentials were recorded in all but one patient, in whom a preexisting myelopathy was felt to preclude recording. Intraoperative deterioration of motor-evoked potentials occurred in one patient who had a postoperative neurologic deficit. This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of intraoperative motor tract monitoring using direct spinal cord stimulation. Controlled neuromuscular blockade permits recording of compound muscle action potentials while eliminating patient motor activity that could interfere with surgery.