Death With a Functioning Graft Kidney: A Single-Center Experience of More Than 4 Decades.

OBJECTIVES: Death with graft function is one of the most catastrophic events after kidney transplant. Various pre and posttransplant risk factors have been linked to death with graft function. Characterization of this event is crucial to set successful preventive measures. Here, we reported on death with graft function among living donor kidney transplant recipients seen at the Urology and Nephrology Centre at Mansoura University (Mansoura, Egypt) throughout a period of >4 decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center study included 2953 patients who received living donor kidney transplant between March 1976 and December 2018. Patient data were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had death with graft function were compared with other patients with regard to pre- and posttransplant data. Causes of death with graft function were also studied. RESULTS: Among our patients (1654 male [56%] and 1299 female [44%] patients), death with graft function was reported in 9.9% of patients and responsible for 58.3% of deaths and 24.6% of graft losses. Male sex, pretransplant dialysis and blood transfusion, pre- and posttransplant diabetes and hypertension, high HLA mismatches, antithymocyte globulin induction, steroid and cyclosporine use, steroid dose, acute rejection episodes, and posttransplant infections and malignancy were significantly higher among the death with graft function group. However, multivariate analyses showed that only pretransplant diabetes, steroid dose, and posttransplant infections were risk factors for death with graft function. The most common causes of death with graft function were cardiovascular disease, infections, and malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Death with graft function remains a significant hindrance to competent kidney transplant outcomes. We found that the most common contributors to this major event were cardiovascular disease, infections, and malignancy. More attention is needed to modify risk factors of cardiovascular disease, to update implementation policies for posttransplant vaccinations, and to conduct increased malignancy surveillance, as well to adopt less aggressive immunosuppression regimens.

Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury and Prophylactic Stent Use in Veterans Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is an uncommon complication in colorectal surgery. Prophylactic ureteral stenting (PUS) gained acceptance to aid in intraoperative identification of the ureter. Despite its use, the benefit of pus to avoid IUI remains debatable. We sought to analyze the rates of IUI after colorectal surgery in veterans and to compare the outcomes after PUS using a large matched cohort. METHODS: The veterans affairs surgical quality improvement program database was queried for patients who underwent colorectal surgery from 2008-2015. To analyze the outcomes of PUS, we created two matched groups using propensity-score matching accounting for demographical and clinical cofactors to assess variable outcomes. Cross-tabulation was used to calculate rates of IUI and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors associated with IUI. RESULTS: 27,448 patients were identified and 458 underwent PUS placement (1.6%). The majority of procedures were performed electively and with an open approach. Mean age was 65 y, 96.3% were male, and colorectal cancer was the most common indication. 45 patients (0.2%) were diagnosed with IUI. IUI incidence was higher in female patients, after left-sided colorectal resection, and in those undergoing open procedures. After matching, PUS use was associated with longer length of stay and operative time and increased creatinine levels from baseline. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the use of PUS is independently associated with increased operative time and change in creatinine levels. Although no IUI occurred in the PUS group, this finding was not statistically significant. The risk and/or benefit ratio of PUS should be considered for each individual case, with its selective use based on the presence of risk factors for IUI, such as female patients and left-sided resections.

Study of red blood cell alloimmunization risk factors in multiply transfused thalassemia patients: role in improving thalassemia transfusion practice in Fayoum, Egypt.

BACKGROUND: ß-Thalassemia is considered the most common chronic hemolytic anemia in Egypt. Alloimmunization can lead to serious clinical complications in transfusion-dependent patients. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and types of alloantibodies, and, in addition, to study the risk factors that might influence alloimmunization in multiply transfused thalassemia patients in Fayoum, Egypt, with the goal that this study could help minimize some of the transfusion-associated risks in those patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 188 multiply transfused thalassemia patients attending Fayoum University Hospital were analyzed. Alloantibody identification was performed by DiaMed-ID microtyping system. RESULTS: Alloimmunization prevalence was 7.98%. The most common alloantibody was D-related; anti-D was the most frequent alloantibody found in eight of the 188 patients (4.25 %), followed by anti-C in two patients (1.1%), anti- E in two (1.1 %), anti-c in two (1.1 %), anti-Fya in two (1.1%), anti-K in one (0.53 %), and an unknown antibody in one patient (0.53%). Higher rates of alloimmunization were found in female patients, in patients with ß-thalassemia intermedia, in splenectomized patients, in D- patients, and in patients who started blood transfusion after 3 years of age. CONCLUSION: The study reemphasizes the need for cost-effective strategy for thalassemia transfusion practice in developing countries. Red blood cell antigen typing before transfusion and issue of antigen-matched or antigen-negative blood can be made available to alloimmunized multiply transfused patients. Early institution of transfusion therapy after diagnosis is another means of decreasing alloimmunization.

Influence of the Resected Gastric Volume on the Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The relation between the resected gastric volume and the weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy appears conflicting in the literature. Both the residual and the resected volumes represent the total gastric volume, and if the weight loss is related to one of the two volumes, it should be related to the other. While some reports indicate that the weight loss is related to the resected gastric volume, others state that the weight loss is not related to the residual volume. The aim is to investigate the influence of the resected gastric volume on the weight loss after surgery. METHODS: The study included 287 consecutive patients. Gastrectomy was performed encroaching over a 38-Fr calibrating tube all the way to the angle of His. Filling volume of the resected stomach, with tap water, was measured. Patients were analyzed into group 1 with BMI ≤50 kg/m(2) and group 2 >50 kg/m(2). RESULTS: Females represented 74 % of cases. Mean age was 32.9 ± 9.5 years; preoperative BMI = 48.7 ± 7.9 kg/m(2). The mean resected gastric volume was 1525 ± 408 ml, and it was significantly lower in females compared to that in males (1443 ± 311 vs 1824 ± 502 ml, p < 0.001). Data were analyzed in two groups: group 1 with BMI ≤5050 kg/m(2) and group 2 >50 kg/m(2). Both groups were similar in preoperative BMI (p = 0.399) and excess weight percent (EW%) (p = 0.33). Group 2 had a resected gastric volume (1663 ± 424.7 ml) greater than that of group 1 (1440 ± 347 ml; p < 0.001). The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) was 57.9 ± 14.5 % at 6 months (62.7 ± 13.5 % vs 48.34 ± 11.29 %, p < 0.001), 77 ± 19 % at 12 months (84 ± 19.6 % vs 68 ± 14.2 %, p = 0.001), 76.6 ± 7.4 % at 18 months (79.7 ± 4.8 vs 74.7 ± 8.2 %, p = 0.5), and 75.8 ± 11.5 % at 24 months (81.7 ± 11.17 vs 70 ± 11 %, p = 0.8) (group 1 vs group 2, respectively). At 12 months, 86 % patients achieved more than 50 % EWL% (100 % of group 1 vs 60 % of group 2). Preoperative BMI correlated with resected gastric volume (r = 0.239, p = 0.004). In multiple regression, the initial BMI was a predictor of EWL% at 6 and 12 months (r partial = -0.65, p < 0.0001) while the resected gastric volume was not. CONCLUSIONS: The resected gastric volume is related to the total gastric volume when the technique is standardized and the residual volume is calibrated using a consistent technique. It is not in itself a predictor of weight loss, but it is related to the initial BMI which predicts the weight loss.