RESUMO
Multiple-targeted ligands can have certain advantages for the management of hypertension which has multiple controls. Molecules with dual bioactivities are available in literature for treating metabolic disorders like diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. After scrutinizing the SAR of prazosin-type α1-blockers and AII-antagonists it was planned to develop dual α1- and AII-antagonists. Five series of quinazoline derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as dual α1- and AII-antagonists on rat aortic strips for the blockade of known α1- and AII-agonist mediated contractions. Many compounds showed balanced activity on both the receptors but compound (22) was found to be the most active derivative having higher antagonistic activity on both the receptors. In the in vivo experiments the chosen compound (22) was slightly less active than prazosin but was found to be equipotent to losartan. These findings shed a new light on the structural requirements for both α1- as well as AII-receptor antagonists.
Assuntos
Desenho de Fármacos , Quinazolinas/farmacologia , Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/metabolismo , Receptores de Angiotensina/metabolismo , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Ligantes , Estrutura Molecular , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinazolinas/síntese química , Ratos , Relação Estrutura-AtividadeRESUMO
CONTEXT: The problem of hypertension has gained enormous proportions in the past decade. Multifactorial etiology and complex pathophysiology of the disease has rendered the treatment of the disease a hard task. Sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are primary contributors of blood pressure homeostasis. OBJECTIVE: Structural similarities were identified among AT(1) and α(1)-antagonists, initiating a speculation that α(1)-antagonists could possibly block the AT(1) receptor and vice-versa. METHODS: To corroborate this speculation, we screened prototypical α(1)-antagonists such as prazosin, doxazosin, and terazosin for antagonism of angiotensin II on rat aortic strips. We also examined the AT(1) antagonists losartan, valsartan, and olmesartan for their possible antagonistic effect, on contractions of rat aortic strips induced by phenylephrine. RESULTS: To our astonishment, we found that prazosin and its analogs which have been reported to have α(1)-antagonistic activity only, were able to shift concentration response curves of angiotensin II. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the potent antihypertensive effect of prazosin-type α(1)-antagonists is not purely due to α(1)-receptor blocking activity of these compounds but also due to blockade of AT(1) receptors. This finding may lead to the development of more potent dual inhibitors which would prove to be of immense value in the control of the scourge of hypertension.