Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the contemporary management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Insights from a multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Fondaparinux is thought to have the most favorable risk-benefit profile among all anticoagulants in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, conflicting findings exist whether this holds true in current clinical practice. We aimed to assess the net clinical benefit of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in the contemporary management of NSTE-ACS. METHODS: Analysis of prospective multicenter registry data of NSTE-ACS patients who received fondaparinux or enoxaparin from February 2015, through December 2017. Survival models within a competing risks framework including site-specific random effects, were used to assess the composite of clinically relevant bleedings and major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days. RESULTS: Of 2094 patients, 1724 (82%) received enoxaparin and 370 (18%) fondaparinux. Both groups were comparable except for a lower prevalence of diabetes and renal impairment, and greater use of transradial approach in the fondaparinux group. Multivariate analysis revealed a net clinical benefit in favour of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin (Subhazard Ratio [SHR] 0.59; 95%CI 0.37-0.92), mainly driven by a reduction in bleeding (SHR 0.57; 95%CI 0.37-0.89). Exploratory analysis suggested greater reductions in bleeding with fondaparinux among patients undergoing transradial approach, revealing a significant interaction between treatment and vascular access on the multiplicative scale (Pinteraction = 0.0056), but not on an additive scale (P = 0.457). Propensity-score-matching analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary management of NSTE-ACS, fondaparinux seems to provide a favorable net clinical benefit compared with enoxaparin, primarily driven by a bleeding reduction. Effect modification on the safety profile of fondaparinux by the vascular access approach warrants further investigation.

Prevalence and clinical significance of totally occluded infarct-related arteries in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Background Seemingly conflicting findings exist regarding the prognostic impact of totally occluded infarct-related arteries (oIRA) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods Retrospective analysis of prospective multicenter registry data comprising a single-center NSTE-ACS cohort, aimed at assessing the impact of occluded (TIMI flow 0/1) versus patent culprit vessels (pIRA, TIMI flow 2/3) on the composite endpoint of all-cause death and cardiogenic shock events at 30 days. Results Of 568 patients, 183 (32.5%) had oIRA. Male sex, refractory angina, ECG suggestive of multivessel or left main disease, and larger infarct sizes with inferior/posterolateral wall involvement, were identified as highly specific markers of oIRA. Successful culprit-lesion revascularization occurred more frequently in patent than in oIRA (90% vs. 96%; P = 0.013). Conversely, patients with oIRA more frequently achieved successful revascularization of concurrent non-IRAs including chronic total occlusions than did those with pIRA (28% vs. 3%; P = 0.0005). Multivariate analysis revealed neutral effects of oIRA on outcomes and identified incomplete revascularization as a powerful predictor of mortality. Moderation analysis revealed a significant interaction between completeness of revascularization and IRA patency, whereby among the incompletely revascularized patients, those with oIRA enjoyed a significant survival advantage over their counterparts with pIRA (11.8% vs. 28%, adjusted OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-0.73; Pinteraction = 0.012). Conclusions Approximately one third of NSTE-ACS patients in this cohort had oIRA. However, compared with pIRA, the occurrence of oIRA did not portend poor outcomes, likely resulting from the higher rate of incomplete revascularization and increased risk of subsequent mortality in patients with pIRA. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation.

Localization of the culprit artery in inferior myocardial infarction: Influence of the point of measurement of ST segment.

BACKGROUND: There are several approaches widely used in the localization of the responsible artery in inferior myocardial infarction. However, the existing papers show differences in the point where the ST segment is measured. The purpose of our investigation is to analyse the influence of the point at which elevation of the ST segment is measured on the results of these algorithms. METHODS: We analysed the 12­lead electrocardiograms of 90 consecutive patients with inferior myocardial infarction. The ST segment elevation or depression was measured at the J-point and at 80 ms, and three algorithms were applied to predict the culprit artery with both measurements. Sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, and the kappa index of agreement were analysed to compare each algorithm at the J-point and at 80 ms. RESULTS: The area under the curve was better at the J-point than at 80 ms in two algorithms (0.696 vs. 0.635, p < 0.043, and 0.754 vs. 0.661, p < 0.045) and did not change in one. Agreement between the J-point and 80 ms was suboptimal in all three algorithms (0.71, 0.65, and 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The result of different algorithms to detect the culprit artery in inferior STEMI patients can change significantly depending on the point where ST elevation or depression is measured.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a booster dose of a novel combined Haemophilus influenzae type b-Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine given to toddlers of 13-14 months of age with antibody persistence up to 31 months of age.

BACKGROUND: A combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Hib-MenC-TT) may be a convenient alternative to separate Hib and MenC conjugate vaccines. METHODS: Healthy infants randomized in a previous study for priming at 2, 4, and 6 months: Hib-MenC-TT primed group, 3 doses of Hib-MenC-TT + DTPa-HBV-IPV (N = 87); MenC-TT primed group, 2 doses of MenC-TT (NeisVac-C; Baxter Healthcare SA, Zuürich, Switzerland) + 3 doses of DTPa/Hib containing vaccines (N = 178); MenC-CRM primed group, 3 doses of MenC-CRM197(Meningitec; Wyeth Corporation Delaware, Madison, NJ) + DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (N = 93). At 13-14 months of age, Hib-MenC-TT and MenC-TT primed groups received a Hib-MenC-TT booster dose and the MenC-CRM primed group a booster dose of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib. Blood samples were taken before and at 1 and 18 months postbooster. RESULTS: Before the booster dose, persistence of anti-polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody concentration > or =0.15 microg/mL in the Hib-MenC-TT (96.4%) and MenC-TT (96.1%) primed groups and of MenC bactericidal titers > or =1:8 in the Hib-MenC-TT primed group (96.3%) was statistically significantly higher than in the MenC-CRM primed group (86.4% and 85.4%, respectively). One month after the Hib-MenC-TT booster, 99.2% subjects in the Hib-MenC-TT primed + MenC-TT primed pooled groups had anti-PRP levels > or =1 microg/mL, and 99.6% had SBA-MenC titers > or =1:128. The Hib-MenC-TT booster tended to be less reactogenic than the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib control and no serious adverse events related to vaccination were reported. Eighteen months after boosting with Hib-MenC-TT, SBA-MenC titers > or =1:8 persisted in 92.7% subjects and anti-PRP > or =0.15 microg/mL persisted in 99.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary immunization with 3 doses of Hib-MenC-TT coadministered with DTPa-HBV-IPV induced antibodies that persisted up to the second year of life. The Hib-MenC-TT booster administered to primed toddlers induced robust and persistent antibody responses to both the Hib and MenC components and had an acceptable safety profile.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary immunization with a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio-Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine coadministered with two doses of a meningococcal C-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the concurrent use of meningococcal C tetanus conjugate (MenC-TT) vaccine (NeisVac-C) with DTaP-based combinations, according to 2 vaccination schedules, one of which included hepatitis B vaccination at birth (Trial DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib-097). METHODS: Healthy infants were randomized to receive either DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix hexa) at 2, 4, and 6 months (N = 115) or HBV at birth followed by DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib at 2 and 6 months and DTaP-IPV/Hib (Infanrix-IPV Hib) at 4 months (N = 115). In both groups 2 doses of MenC-TT conjugate were coadministered at 2 and 4 months, and compared with 3 doses of MenC-CRM197 conjugate (Meningitec) coadministered at 2, 4, and 6 months with DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (N = 120). Antibody concentrations were measured at 2, 6 and 7 months. Solicited local and general symptoms, unsolicited symptoms, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: All MenC-TT recipients had seroprotective concentrations of anti-PRP antibodies (> or = 0.15 microg/mL) 1 month after the third vaccine dose and all had SBA-MenC titers > or = 1:8 after the second dose of MenC-TT. These responses were noninferior to those seen after 3 doses of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib and MenC-CRM. Anti-PRP antibody GMCs were significantly higher in MenC-TT than MenC-CRM vaccinees (7.9, 7.3, 3.8 microg/mL, respectively). Immune responses to all other coadministered antigens were unimpaired, with seroprotection/seropositivity rates > or = 98.1% in MenC-TT vaccinees. All schedules studied were well tolerated, with no differences in reactogenicity between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib or DTaP-IPV/Hib with 2 doses of MenC-TT conjugate vaccine is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic, with no impairment of the response to the coadministered antigens.

Procalcitonin is not sufficiently reliable to be the sole marker of neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin.

BACKGROUND: It has recently been suggested that serum procalcitonin (PCT) is of value in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, with varying results. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the usefulness of PCT as a marker of neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin. METHODS: One hundred infants aged between 4 and 28 days of life admitted to the Neonatology Services of 13 acute-care teaching hospitals in Spain over 1-year with clinical suspicion of neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin were included in the study. Serum PCT concentrations were determined by a specific immunoluminometric assay. The reliability of PCT for the diagnosis of nosocomial neonatal sepsis at the time of suspicion of infection and at 12-24 h and 36-48 h after the onset of symptoms was calculated by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The Youden's index (sensitivity + specificity - 1) was used for determination of optimal cutoff values of the diagnostic tests in the different postnatal periods. Sensitivity, specificity, and the likelihood ratio of a positive and negative result with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: The diagnosis of nosocomial sepsis was confirmed in 61 neonates. Serum PCT concentrations were significantly higher at initial suspicion and at 12-24 h and 36-48 h after the onset of symptoms in neonates with confirmed sepsis than in neonates with clinically suspected but not confirmed sepsis. Optimal PCT thresholds according to ROC curves were 0.59 ng/mL at the time of suspicion of sepsis (sensitivity 81.4%, specificity 80.6%); 1.34 ng/mL within 12-24 h of birth (sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 80.6%), and 0.69 ng/mL within 36-48 h of birth (sensitivity 86.5%, specificity 72.7%). CONCLUSION: Serum PCT concentrations showed a moderate diagnostic reliability for the detection of nosocomial neonatal sepsis from the time of suspicion of infection. PCT is not sufficiently reliable to be the sole marker of sepsis, but would be useful as part of a full sepsis evaluation.