Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Case Rep Orthop ; 2023: 4104127, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38090676

RESUMO

Introduction: Proximal tibia physeal fractures in children are not very common but can be dangerous because they can harm popliteal fossa structures, especially the popliteal artery. Popliteal artery injuries (PAI) are most commonly the result of trauma to the lower extremity, including blunt force, hyperextension injuries, complex fractures, and knee dislocations that can compromise popliteal neurovascular structures. Case Presentation. A 14-year-old boy presents to the emergency department after being transferred from an outside hospital 24 hours after a left lower extremity hyperextension injury. Radiographs demonstrated a Salter-Harris III proximal tibia fracture with posterior displacement. ABIs were deferred due to palpable distal pulses and no evidence of compartment syndrome. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning were planned to correct the fracture. Intraoperatively, it was discovered that knee extension decreased lower extremity perfusion while knee flexion returned perfusion. An angiography revealed a popliteal artery occlusion with no distal flow. Based on this, an above-knee to below-knee popliteal bypass using the contralateral great saphenous vein was performed followed by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of the proximal tibia. Conclusion: Proximal tibia physeal injuries, especially the Salter-Harris III and IV injuries, warrant a high index of suspicion of popliteal artery injuries. Palpable pulses and delayed presentation in the distal lower extremity do not rule out a PAI because collateral flow to the anterior and posterior tibial arteries may mask signs of an avascular limb, highlighting the need for a thorough history and physical exam. The authors present this case to reaffirm the importance of an ankle-brachial index when evaluating hyperextension injuries with proximal tibial epiphyseal fractures.

2.
Orthop Res Rev ; 12: 75-87, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801951

RESUMO

Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) instability is a rare condition and results from either a traumatic high energy impact, such as a motor vehicle crash or contact sports injury, or non-traumatically as a result of structural pathology. The infrequency of this injury has contributed to its diagnosis being missed as well as the paucity of literature on treatment and outcomes. Patients with SCJ instability often report diminished range of motion as well as shoulder girdle pain. The presentation of instability in the sternoclavicular joint can vary in severity and anterior or posterior directionality. Variation in severity of the instability changes the course of treatment regarding either operative or non-operative interventions to stabilize the SCJ. In general, anterior instability of the SCJ (the medial clavicle is displaced anterior to the sternum) is less urgent and generally manageable by symptom alleviation and rehabilitation, although some anterior instability cases require surgical intervention. In the case of posterior SCJ instability (the medial clavicle is displaced posterior to the sternum), patients require prompt joint reduction as they are at the greater risk of life-threatening injury due to the location of critical structures of the mediastinum posterior to the SCJ. Computed tomography visualization is useful to confirm dislocation or subluxation direction to better formulate a proper treatment plan. The purpose of this review is to report the clinical presentation and management of SCJ instability including pertinent symptoms, the diagnostic approaches to evaluating SCJ instability, as well as operative and non-operative management of the joint instability.

3.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng ; 3(9): 2110-2119, 2017 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31289747

RESUMO

The major concern of pancreatic islet transplantation is that the implanted islets are exposed to the immune system of the recipient. To overcome this challenge, the peptide amphiphile (PA) nanomatrix gel was used for immunoisolation of islets through microencapsulation. The PA can self-assemble to form a nanomatrix gel with an extracellular matrix-mimicking, islet nurturing microenvironment and a semipermeable immune barrier. In this study, the islet protective effect of the PA nanomatrix gel was evaluated by coculture of PA-encapsulated human islets with differentiated U937 cells (human monocyte cell-line) for 3 and 7 days. The coculture of the bare islets with the differentiated U937 cells stimulated proinflammatory cytokine (IL-1ß and TNF-α) secretion and caused islet death after 7 days, which simulated an early inflammatory response environment after islet transplantation. The PA-encapsulated islets, however, did not stimulate proinflammatory cytokine secretion and maintained islet viability up to 7 days. More insulin-producing ß cells were observed when islets were PA-encapsulated than control islets with the differentiated U937 cells for 7 days compared to the bare islets. This result was also confirmed by dithizone staining analysis. Further evaluation of islet functionality was assessed by a glucose-stimulated insulin secretion test. The PA-encapsulated islets showed greater insulin secretion response to glucose stimulation than the bare islets with the differentiated U937 cells after 3 and 7 days. These results demonstrated that islet encapsulation with the PA nanomatrix gel was able to improve islet survival and function in the presence of inflammatory responses, which will increase the success rate of islet engraftment and the efficacy of islet transplantation.

4.
Nano Converg ; 3(1): 28, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28191438

RESUMO

Pancreatic islet transplantation has been validated as a treatment for type 1 diabetes since it maintains consistent and sustained type 1 diabetes reversal. However, one of the major challenges in pancreatic islet transplantation is the body's natural immune response to the implanted islets. Immunosuppressive drug treatment is the most popular immunomodulatory approach for islet graft survival. However, administration of immunosuppressive drugs gives rise to negative side effects, and long-term effects are not clearly understood. A bioartificial pancreas is a therapeutic approach to enable pancreatic islet transplantation without or with minimal immune suppression. The bioartificial pancreas encapsulates the pancreatic islets in a semi-permeable environment which protects islets from the body's immune responses, while allowing the permeation of insulin, oxygen, nutrients, and waste. Many groups have developed various types of the bioartificial pancreas and tested their efficacy in animal models. However, the clinical application of the bioartificial pancreas still requires further investigation. In this review, we discuss several types of bioartificial pancreases and address their advantages and limitations. We also discuss recent advances in bioartificial pancreas applications with microfluidic or micropatterning technology.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA