RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic shortening and elevation of the first metatarsal (MT1) is a common complication of hallux valgus surgery, inducing metatarsalgia underneath the lesser rays, a reason for patient dissatisfaction. For resolving this problem, different types of revision surgery are described, of which lengthening MT1 by distraction osteogenesis is underreported and therefore undervalued. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present three cases with iatrogenic shortening after hallux valgus surgery treated by distraction osteogenesis of MT1 using a custom-made frame, made of Ilizarov equipment. To evaluate the amount of lengthening, the length of the first and second metatarsal (MT2) and the parabolic distribution of the metatarsal heads were compared before and after distraction. To evaluate correction in the sagittal plane, Meary's angle was measured pre- and post-lengthening. Pain was noted by a visual analogic score during follow-up. RESULTS: In our series of three cases, lengthening of MT1 between 7 mm and 18 mm, resulted in an improved parabolic distribution of the MT heads. The average difference between the second and first MT-head, relative to the SM4 axis (M2-M1) improved from 9.4 mm (± 0.9 mm) to 2.8 mm (± 0.7 mm) resolving corresponding pain in all patients. Meary's angle was normalized in one case. The average duration of treatment was 116 days (± 9 days). Minimal follow up was 11 years. CONCLUSION: Using Ilizarov equipment for distraction osteogenesis of MT1 is a low-cost and effective method. Over time, this technique has proven its utility in pronounced iatrogenic shortening of MT1. The possibility to lengthen more than 1 cm, to correct in multiple planes, as well as early mobilization and weight bearing are additional advantages, but one must be careful to avoid overcorrection. The need for strict follow-up with multiple radiographs and rigorous patient selection is mandatory.
RESUMO
We retrospectively analyzed outcome and risk factors of developing Charcot foot (CF) in 100 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who underwent a simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. Patients who developed CF after SPK transplantation had significantly higher mortality (56% vs. 18%) and more frequently graft failure (44% vs. 13%). Recipients with CF also experienced acute rejections more frequently (78% vs. 41%). They furthermore had higher pre-transplant values of HbA1c , received cyclosporine and azathioprine more often, and had significantly higher cumulative corticosteroid use. Patients transplanted in an earlier era (1992-1998) received cyclosporine and azathioprine more often and had a significantly higher cumulative corticosteroid use with the higher prevalence of CF. Conversely, patients with diabetes transplanted more recently (1999-2012) received lower doses of corticosteroids as part of their tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy, resulting in fewer CF attacks. In conclusion, development of CF after SPK is associated with poor patient and graft outcome. Poor pre-transplant diabetic control and the use of high-dose corticosteroids are risk factors for the development of CF. We recommend reduction in or even total avoidance of corticosteroids after SPK transplantation. Given the importance of the diagnosis of CF on outcome, a systematic examination of SPK patients' feet is recommended.