Causes and temporal trends in procedural deaths after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The causes of procedural deaths after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been scarcely detailed. AIMS: To assess these causes and their temporal trends since the beginning of the TAVI era. METHODS: From October 2006 to April 2014, 601 consecutive high-risk/inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVI using the Edwards SAPIEN or SAPIEN XT or the Medtronic CoreValve. The transfemoral route was the default approach; the transapical or left subclavian approaches were alternative options. Patients were divided into three tertiles according to the date of the procedure. RESULTS: Procedural death occurred in 45 patients (7.5%), with a median±standard deviation age of 83±7 years; 23 were men (51%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 26±16%. The main cause of death was heart failure (n=19, 42%), followed by cardiac rupture (n=12, 27%), intensive care complications (n=9, 20%) and vascular complications (n=5, 11%). The mortality rate was higher after transapical than transfemoral TAVI (17% vs. 5%; P<0.001). The mortality rate decreased over time (11.9% in the first tertile, 6.0% in the second and 4.5% in the third [P=0.007]), driven by a reduction in heart failure-related deaths (6.5% in the first tertile vs. 1.5% in the third; P=0.011). Vascular complication-related deaths disappeared in the third tertile. However, there was no decrease in deaths related to cardiac ruptures and intensive care complications. CONCLUSIONS: The procedural mortality rate of TAVI decreased over time, driven by the decrease in heart failure-related deaths. However, efforts should continue to prevent cardiac ruptures and improve the outcomes of patients requiring intensive care after TAVI.

Suprasternal brachiocephalic approach as an alternative route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre experience.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcomes of TAVI performed via the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach in selected patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk who are not eligible for transfemoral or subclavian TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2014 to March 2016, 26 high-risk patients without transfemoral or subclavian access options were considered for TAVI via a suprasternal brachiocephalic approach. The feasibility of the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach was determined according to computed tomography findings. In 23 (88.4%) patients the procedure was performed as intended, whereas in three (11.5%) patients the approach was converted to a right carotid access. Both self-expanding (n=20, 76.9%) and balloon-expandable prostheses (n=6, 23.1%) were used. At 30 days, no patient had died; there was one major stroke (3.8%) and there were three major vascular access site-related complications (11.5%). After a median follow-up of 317 days (57-705), two patients had died, both from cardiovascular causes, and 19 out of 24 survivors (79.2%) were in New York Heart Association functional Class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre case series suggests that TAVI using the suprasternal brachiocephalic approach is feasible in selected patients and may represent an additional alternative route in patients who are not eligible for other approaches.