Diagnosis, management and outcome of splenic torsion; a systematic review of published studies.

INTRODUCTION: Splenic torsion is a rare condition but one that many surgeons will encounter once in their career. Management options are varied but due to the rarity of the condition there are no contemporary evidence-based summaries to inform a treating clinician. We aim to describe patterns of presentation and provide an evidence-based guide to the management. METHODS: A PRISMA structured meta-analysis was conducted of all published cases of splenic torsion and a recent case added from our institution. RESULTS: 408 cases were identified between 1888 and 2021 and a single case added from our institution, 312 cases were sourced from case reports and 96 from 40 case series. 8% of patients had a co-existing congenital anomaly and 28% an identified risk factor for splenic torsion. 82% required emergency surgery. A preoperative diagnosis is becoming more common, reaching 80% in 2020's. While spleen conserving surgery is feasible using a variety of techniques. splenectomy was the definitive management for the majority (82%). On histopatholy no occult disease was identified and a significant number of resected spleens were potentially viable; 32% were reported to be normal or congested and 14% demonstrated only partial or focal necrosis. DISCUSSION: Despite the significant publication bias implied by the methodology this is a large dataset in a rare condition. Splenic torsion frequently occurs in a premorbid population. The presence of a palpable mass in the context of abdominal pain should increase suspicion and trigger cross sectional imaging. Conservation of the spleen, using the techniques discussed, should be seriously considered.

Education of parents in Pavlik harness application for developmental dysplasia of the hip using a validated simulated learning module.

BACKGROUND: The Pavlik harness is the most common initial treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip worldwide. During treatment, parents are required to re-apply the harness at home. Teaching parents how to apply the harness is therefore paramount to success. While simulated learning for medical training is commonplace, it has not yet been trialed in teaching parents how to apply a Pavlik harness. METHODS: A group of parents underwent a simulated learning module for Pavlik harness application. Parents were evaluated pre- and post-exposure and at one month after testing. A validated objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) and a global rating scale (GRS) specific to Pavlik harness application were used for evaluation. A control group of parents was also tested at both time points. A clinical expert group was used to determine competency. ANOVA and t tests were used to assess differences between groups and over time. RESULTS: Parent scores on the OSATS improved to the level of expert clinicians both immediately post-intervention and at retention testing. However, on the GRS, only half were considered competent due to their inability to achieve the required hip positions. The control group did not improve nor were they considered competent. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a simulated learning module improves both the confidence and skill level of parents in the application of the Pavlik harness. However, the challenges parents face in understanding the more detailed subtleties of medical care suggest that they still require an appropriate level of supervision by clinicians to ensure effective treatment.