Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Gefapixant (MK-7264), a P2X3 Receptor Antagonist, and the OATP1B1 Drug Transporter Substrate Pitavastatin.

Gefapixant (MK-7264, AF-219), a first-in-class P2X3 antagonist, is being developed as oral treatment for refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Based on in vitro data, gefapixant exerts inhibitory activity on the organic anion transporter (OAT) P1B1 transporter. Therefore, a drug-drug interaction study evaluating the potential effects of gefapixant on the OATP1B1 drug transporter, using pitavastatin as a sensitive probe substrate, was conducted. An open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study in 20 healthy adults 18 to 55 years old was conducted. In period 1, a 1-mg oral dose of pitavastatin was administered to each participant. After a ≥4-day washout, in period 2 participants received a 45-mg oral dose of gefapixant twice daily on days 1 through 4. On day 2 of period 2, pitavastatin was coadministered with the morning dose of gefapixant. Pitavastatin exposures following single-dose administration with and without multiple doses of gefapixant were similar: geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of pitavastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) (pitavastatin + gefapixant/pitavastatin alone) was 0.97 (0.93-1.02). The ratio of pitavastatin lactone AUC0-∞ to pitavastatin AUC0-∞ was also comparable between treatments. Administration of gefapixant and pitavastatin was generally well tolerated, with no safety findings of concern. These results support that gefapixant has a low potential to inhibit the OATP1B1 transporter.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) is a persistent allergic inflammation of the upper respiratory tract due to year-round allergen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast for the treatment of PAR. METHODS: Protocol 265 was a 2-arm study performed during the winter. After a placebo run-in period, adults with perennial allergen sensitivity and active symptoms of PAR were randomized to receive 10 mg of montelukast (n=1002) or placebo (n=990) once daily during a 6-week, double-blind, active-treatment period. The primary end point was the daytime nasal symptoms score, defined as the average of scores for nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing rated daily by patients. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in PAR symptoms were seen in patients treated with montelukast. Their daytime nasal symptoms scores were reduced during treatment compared with those of the placebo group: the difference between treatments in least squares mean change from baseline was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.12 to -0.04; P < .001). Montelukast treatment also improved global evaluations of allergic rhinitis by patients and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores: differences vs the placebo group were -0.15 (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.04; P < .01) and -0.15 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.06; P < .001), respectively. Other end points that showed statistically significant improvement with montelukast treatment were nighttime symptoms and each of the 4 nasal symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching). The treatment effects of montelukast were stable and persistent during the entire 6 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provided statistically significant relief of PAR symptoms during 6 weeks of treatment.