Repetitive transgenes in C. elegans accumulate heterochromatic marks and are sequestered at the nuclear envelope in a copy-number- and lamin-dependent manner.

Chromatin is nonrandomly distributed in nuclear space, yet the functional significance of this remains unclear. Here, we make use of transgenes carrying developmentally regulated promoters to study subnuclear gene positioning during the development of Caenorhabditis elegans. We found that small transgenes (copy number ≤50) are randomly distributed in early embryonic nuclei, independent of promoter activity. However, in differentiated tissues, these same transgenes occupied specific subnuclear positions: When promoters are repressed, transgenes are found at the nuclear periphery, whereas active, developmentally regulated promoters are enriched in the nuclear core. The absence of specific transgene positioning in embryonic nuclei does not reflect an absence of proteins that mediate perinuclear sequestration: Embryonic nuclei are able to sequester much larger transgene arrays (copy number 300-500) at the periphery. This size-dependent peripheral positioning of gene arrays in early embryos correlates with the accumulation of heterochromatic marks (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3) on large arrays. Interestingly, depletion of nuclear lamina components caused release of arrays from the nuclear envelope and interfered with their efficient silencing. Our results suggest that developmentally silenced chromatin binds the nuclear lamina in a manner correlated with the deposition of heterochromatic marks. Peripheral sequestration of chromatin may, in turn, support the maintenance of silencing.

Long-range silencing and position effects at telomeres and centromeres: parallels and differences.

Most of the human genome is compacted into heterochromatin, a form that encompasses multiple forms of inactive chromatin structure. Transcriptional silencing mechanisms in budding and fission yeasts have provided genetically tractable models for understanding heritably repressed chromatin. These silent domains are typically found in regions of repetitive DNA, that is, either adjacent to centromeres or telomeres or within the tandemly repeated ribosomal DNA array. Here we address the mechanisms of centromeric, telomeric and locus-specific gene silencing, comparing simple and complex animals with yeast. Some aspects are universally shared, such as histone-tail modifications, while others are unique to either centromeres or telomeres. These may reflect roles for heterochromatin in other chromosomal functions, like kinetochore attachment and DNA ends protection.

Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus.

Little is known about the dynamics of chromosomes in interphase nuclei. By tagging four chromosomal regions with a green fluorescent protein fusion to lac repressor, we monitored the movement and subnuclear position of specific sites in the yeast genome, sampling at short time intervals. We found that early and late origins of replication are highly mobile in G1 phase, frequently moving at or faster than 0.5 micrometers/10 seconds, in an energy-dependent fashion. The rapid diffusive movement of chromatin detected in G1 becomes constrained in S phase through a mechanism dependent on active DNA replication. In contrast, telomeres and centromeres provide replication-independent constraint on chromatin movement in both G1 and S phases.

The molecular biology of the SIR proteins.

Silent or heritably repressed genes constitute the major fraction of genetic information in higher eukaryotic cells. Budding yeast has very little consecutively repressed DNA, but what exists has served as a paradigm for the molecular analysis of heterochromatin. The major structural constituents of repressed chromatin in yeast are the four core histones and three large chromatin factors called Silent information regulators 2, 3 and 4. How these components assemble DNA into a state that is refractory to transcription remains a mystery. Nonetheless, there have been many recent insights into their molecular structures. This review examines the impact of these results on our understanding of silencing function in budding yeast.

From snapshots to moving pictures: new perspectives on nuclear organization.

The positioning of chromosomal domains in the interphase nucleus is proposed to facilitate gene regulation in simple cells such as yeasts and to coordinate patterns of gene expression and activation of origins of replication during cell differentiation in complex organisms. Over the past 10-12 years, detailed information on the organization of interphase chromosomes has accumulated from three-dimensional microscopy of fixed cells labeled by in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence techniques. Recently, time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of GFP-tagged domains has shown that interphase chromatin can be highly dynamic, moving distances >0.5 microm within seconds. Novel fluorescence techniques show that most nuclear proteins are also highly mobile. Both the rapid oscillations of chromatin and long-range movements of chromosomes suggest new mechanisms for spatial and temporal control of transcription and other nuclear events.

Turning telomeres off and on.

We envision multiple steps in telomere maintenance, based largely on genetic data from budding yeast. First, the telomere must unfold or open itself such that the free end is accessible to the appropriate enzymatic machinery. Second, telomerase must be recruited, together with the DNA replication machinery that synthesizes the C-rich strand. The processivity of telomerase is regulated both by a length-sensing feedback mechanism and by second-strand synthesis. Finally, the telosome refolds into a protective end structure. If telomerase is nonfunctional, recombination may occur once telomeres are open. Multiple pathways regulate these different steps, producing a highly dynamic chromosomal cap.

Analysis of etoposide binding to subdomains of human DNA topoisomerase II alpha in the absence of DNA.

Epipodophyllotoxins are effective anti-tumor drugs that inhibit eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase II by trapping the enzyme in a covalent complex with DNA. We show that both the recombinant N-terminal ATPase domain and the B'A' core domain of human topoisomerase IIalpha (htopoIIalpha) bind radiolabeled etoposide specifically, even in the absence of DNA. The addition of ATP impairs etoposide binding to the holoenzyme and the N-terminal domain, but not to the core domain. To see if this interference resembles that between novobiocin and ATP in the bacterial GyrB subunit, we modeled the structure of the N-terminal domain of htopoIIalpha and performed molecular docking analysis with etoposide. Mutagenesis of critical amino acids, predicted to stabilize the drug within the N-terminal domain, reveals a less efficient binding of etoposide to the mutated proteins as monitored by direct drug binding assays, although the binding of ATP is not affected.

Ku-deficient yeast strains exhibit alternative states of silencing competence.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, efficient silencer function requires telomere proximity, i.e. compartments of the nucleoplasm enriched in silencing factors. Accordingly, silencers located far from telomeres function inefficiently. We show here that cells lacking yKu balance between two mitotically stable states of silencing competence. In one, a partial delocalization of telomeres and silencing factors throughout the nucleoplasm correlates with enhanced silencing at a non-telomeric locus, while in the other, telomeres retain their focal pattern of distribution and there is no repression at the non-telomeric locus, as observed in wild-type cells. The two states also differ in their level of residual telomeric silencing. These findings indicate the existence of a yKu-independent pathway of telomere clustering and Sir localization. Interestingly, this pathway appears to be under epigenetic control.

The positioning and dynamics of origins of replication in the budding yeast nucleus.

We have analyzed the subnuclear position of early- and late-firing origins of DNA replication in intact yeast cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged chromosomal domains. In both cases, origin position was determined with respect to the nuclear envelope, as identified by nuclear pore staining or a NUP49-GFP fusion protein. We find that in G1 phase nontelomeric late-firing origins are enriched in a zone immediately adjacent to the nuclear envelope, although this localization does not necessarily persist in S phase. In contrast, early firing origins are randomly localized within the nucleus throughout the cell cycle. If a late-firing telomere-proximal origin is excised from its chromosomal context in G1 phase, it remains late-firing but moves rapidly away from the telomere with which it was associated, suggesting that the positioning of yeast chromosomal domains is highly dynamic. This is confirmed by time-lapse microscopy of GFP-tagged origins in vivo. We propose that sequences flanking late-firing origins help target them to the periphery of the G1-phase nucleus, where a modified chromatin structure can be established. The modified chromatin structure, which would in turn retard origin firing, is both autonomous and mobile within the nucleus.

A cytosolic NAD-dependent deacetylase, Hst2p, can modulate nucleolar and telomeric silencing in yeast.

In budding yeast, the silent information regulator Sir2p is a nuclear NAD-dependent deacetylase that is essential for both telomeric and rDNA silencing. All eukaryotic species examined to date have multiple homologues of Sir two (HSTs), which share a highly conserved globular core domain. Here we report that yeast Hst2p and a mammalian Hst2p homologue, hSirT2p, are cytoplasmic in yeast and human cells, in contrast to yHst1p and ySir2p which are exclusively nuclear. Although yHst2p cannot restore silencing in a sir2 deletion, overexpression of yHst2p influences nuclear silencing events in a SIR2 strain, derepressing subtelomeric silencing while increasing repression in the rDNA. In contrast, a form of ySir2p carrying a point mutation in the conserved core domain disrupts both telomeric position effect (TPE) and rDNA repression at low expression levels. This argues that non-nuclear yHst2p can compete for a substrate or ligand specifically required for telomeric, and not rDNA repression.

Ectopic expression of human topoisomerase IIalpha fragments and etoposide resistance in mammalian cells.

Cellular resistance to etoposide has been correlated both with reduced levels and an aberrant cytoplasmic accumulation of the drug's target, topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha). It is not known, however, whether a cytoplasmic pool of topo IIalpha is sufficient to confer drug resistance on cultured mammalian cells. In our study, we have transfected mouse fibroblasts and human 293 cells with truncated forms of human topo IIalpha fused to GFP and have examined the transformants for the subcellular localization of topo IIalpha and their resistance to etoposide. Transient transfection resulted in high-level expression of all GFP-topo IIalpha fusions tested, whereas in stably transfected cells the levels varied significantly. Transfectants expressing a central or a carboxy-terminal topo IIalpha domain (aa 428-1504, 639-1028 or 1028-1504) accumulated high levels of the fusion proteins, while only very low amounts of GFP-topo IIalpha proteins were observed in cell lines expressing constructs that retain the amino-terminus of the enzyme (aa 1-1214, aa 1-939, aa 1-611). Our results suggest that the topo IIalpha amino-terminus affects the stability of truncated forms of the enzyme in mammalian cells, perhaps due to targeted degradation. Assays that screen for cell vitality and DNA synthesis reveal no significant changes in etoposide sensitivity in transfected cells expressing high levels of cytoplasmic or nuclear localized topo II fusion proteins. Retroviral expression of a cytoplasmically anchored domain of human topo IIalpha also failed to confer drug resistance. These results suggest that a cytoplasmic pool of topo IIalpha is not sufficient to render cultured mammalian cells drug resistant.

RecQ-like helicases: the DNA replication checkpoint connection.

The eukaryotic homologues of the Escherichia coli RecQ DNA helicase play conserved roles in the maintenance of genome stability. Results obtained in yeast and mammalian systems are beginning to form a coherent picture about what these helicases do to ensure normal cell division and why humans who lack these enzymes are cancer prone. Recent data suggest that the yeast enzyme Sgs1p, as well as two human homologues, which are encoded by the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, function during DNA replication and possibly in a replication checkpoint specific to S phase.

A sense of the end.

How a cell distinguishes a double-strand break from the end of a chromosome has long fascinated cell biologists. It was thought that the protection of chromosomal ends required either a telomere-specific complex or the looping back of the 3' TG-rich overhang to anneal with a homologous double-stranded repeat. These models must now accommodate the findings that complexes involved in nonhomologous end joining play important roles in normal telomere length maintenance, and that subtelomeric chromatin changes in response to the DNA damage checkpoint. A hypothetical chromatin assembly checkpoint may help to explain why telomeres and the double-strand break repair machinery share essential components.

The dynamics of yeast telomeres and silencing proteins through the cell cycle.

Genes integrated near the telomeres of budding yeast have a variegated pattern of gene repression that is mediated by the silent information regulatory proteins Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p. Immunolocalization and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveal 6-10 perinuclear foci in which silencing proteins and subtelomeric sequences colocalize, suggesting that these are sites of Sir-mediated repression. Telomeres lacking subtelomeric repeat elements and the silent mating locus, HML, also localize to the periphery of the nucleus. Conditions that disrupt telomere proximal repression disrupt the focal staining pattern of Sir proteins, but not necessarily the localization of telomeric DNA. To monitor the telomere-associated pools of heterochromatin-binding proteins (Sir and Rap1 proteins) during mitotic cell division, we have performed immunofluorescence and telomeric FISH on populations of yeast cells synchronously traversing the cell cycle. We observe a partial release of Rap1p from telomeres in late G2/M, although telomeres appear to stay clustered during G2-phase and throughout mitosis. A partial release of Sir3p and Sir4p during mitosis also occurs. This is not observed upon HU arrest, although other types of DNA damage cause a dramatic relocalization of Sir and Rap1 proteins. The observed cell cycle dynamics were confirmed by direct epifluorescence of a GFP-Rap1p fusion. Using live GFP fluorescence we show that the diffuse mitotic distribution of GFP-Rap1p is restored to the interphase pattern of foci in early G1-phase.

Analysis of Sir2p domains required for rDNA and telomeric silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Silent information regulator (Sir) 2 is a limiting component of the Sir2/3/4 complex, which represses transcription at subtelomeric and HM loci. Sir2p also acts independently of Sir3p and Sir4p to influence chromatin organization in the rDNA locus. Deleted and mutated forms of Sir2p have been tested for their ability to complement and/or to disrupt silencing. The highly conserved C-terminal domain of Sir2p (aa 199-562) is insufficient to restore repression at either telomeric or rDNA reporters in a sir2Delta background and fails to nucleate silencing when targeted to an appropriate reporter gene. However, its expression in an otherwise wild-type strain disrupts telomeric repression. Similarly, a point mutation (P394L) within this conserved core inactivates the full-length protein but renders it dominant negative for all types of silencing. Deletion of aa 1-198 from Sir2(394L) eliminates its dominant negative effect. Thus we define two distinct functional domains in Sir2p, both essential for telomeric and rDNA repression: the conserved core domain found within aa 199-562 and a second domain that encompasses aa 94-198. Immunolocalization and two-hybrid studies show that aa 94-198 are required for the binding of Sir2p to Sir4p and for the targeting of Sir2p to the nucleolus through another ligand. The globular core domain provides an essential silencing function distinct from that of targeting or Sir complex formation that may reflect its reported mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase activity.

The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci.

We have examined the cellular function of Sgs1p, a nonessential yeast DNA helicase, homologs of which are implicated in two highly debilitating hereditary human diseases (Werner's and Bloom's syndromes). We show that Sgs1p is an integral component of the S-phase checkpoint response in yeast, which arrests cells due to DNA damage or blocked fork progression during DNA replication. DNA polepsilon and Sgs1p are found in the same epistasis group and act upstream of Rad53p to signal cell cycle arrest when DNA replication is perturbed. Sgs1p is tightly regulated through the cell cycle, accumulates in S phase and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci, even in the absence of fork arrest. The association of Rad53p with a chromatin subfraction is Sgs1p dependent, suggesting an important role for the helicase in the signal-transducing pathway that monitors replication fork progression.