Visual Function in Eyes with Intermediate AMD with and without Retinal Pigment Abnormalities.

SIGNIFICANCE: In intermediate AMD, a simple, clinically feasible vision test of sensitivity to radial deformation is significantly more impaired in eyes with hyperpigmentation than in eyes with large drusen but normal retinal pigmentation, consistent with the former's increased risk of progression to advanced AMD. This ongoing longitudinal study will determine whether this vision measure is predictive of progression to advanced AMD. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether simple, clinically feasible psychophysical measures distinguish between two levels of intermediate AMD that differ in their risk of progression to advanced AMD: eyes with large macular drusen and retinal pigment abnormalities versus eyes with large macular drusen without pigment abnormalities. Abnormal pigmentation in the presence of large drusen is associated with a higher risk of development of advanced AMD. METHODS: Each eye of 39 individuals with the same form of intermediate AMD in both eyes was tested monocularly on a battery of vision tests. The measures (photopic optotype contrast sensitivity, discrimination of desaturated colors, and sensitivity to radial deformation [shape discrimination hyperacuity]) were compared for both dominant and nondominant eyes. ANOVA with eye (dominant or nondominant) as a within-subject factor and retinal status (pigmentary abnormalities present or absent from the macula) as a between-subject factor was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Sensitivity to radial deformation was significantly reduced in eyes with large drusen and pigment changes compared with eyes with large drusen and normal retinal pigmentation (-0.40 ± 0.04 vs. -0.61 ± 0.02, respectively; F = 13.31, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of large macular drusen, performance on a shape discrimination task is related to the presence versus absence of abnormal retinal pigmentation, being poorer in the higher-risk group, supportive of the measure's potential to predict progression to advanced AMD.

Simple Vision Function Tests that Distinguish Eyes with Early to Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To present and compare baseline vision findings in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration (E-AMD), intermediate AMD (I-AMD), and age-similar participants with normal aging changes to the retina (No-AMD). METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-seven eyes of 125 individuals (66.4% female, mean age 75.3 years) were tested monocularly using several simple, rapid psychophysical tests: high contrast visual acuity, low contrast visual acuity at reduced luminance, contrast sensitivity, shape discrimination hyperacuity, colour vision, reading rate, and glare recovery. Retinal status was determined using colour fundus photographs that were graded according to the Beckman Initiative for Macular Research Classification Committee scale. Logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between each vision variable and AMD category, while taking into account the correlation between the two eyes. RESULTS: Three vision measures (contrast sensitivity [CS], shape discrimination hyperacuity [SDH], and colour discrimination [DesatCCS]) were significantly and independently associated with intermediate AMD. Relative Risk Ratios (RRR), 95% Confidence Intervals (in parentheses), beta coefficients, and significance (p) for the I-AMD vs. No-AMD model are: CS: RRR = 6.5 (1.91-22.0), beta = 1.87, p < .01; SDH: RRR = 2.34 (1.24-4.44), beta = 0.85, p < .001; DesatCCS: RRR = 1.43 (1.22-1.68), beta = 0.36, p < .001. Performance on these measures was significantly poorer for participants with I-AMD vs. No-AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Simple screening tests distinguish eyes with intermediate AMD from eyes with less severe AMD or normal aging changes. This suggests that these vision measures may be significant predictors of which participants will go on to develop advanced AMD.