Worse cholecystectomy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: were staff shortages or a change in patient case-mix the culprit?

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted the field of surgery, mostly through infectious risks, staff shortages, reduced hospital capacities, and changed patient pathways. Prompted by an increase in wound complications, we performed an in-depth analysis of an example surgical procedure. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 195 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy was studied retrospectively. Data of patients receiving cholecystectomy before, during, and after the peak of the pandemic were compared. The potential influence of patient characteristics, pandemic phase, and staffing level (surgeons and nurse assistants) was analyzed statistically. In the primary analyses, the composite measure of a 'textbook outcome' was examined, which was defined as no relevant complication, hospital stay < 5 days, and no readmission. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 phase, acute biliary disease was more common than in the pre-COVID-19 phase (62% vs. 30%). In 35% of cases, no qualified operating room nurse was available. Intraoperative features and postoperative complication rates were increased (bile spillage in 46%, wound complications in 24%). A 59-year-old male admitted with acute cholecystitis during COVID-19 died of wound-related septic shock. Multivariate analysis confirmed the acuity of gallbladder inflammation (odds ratio 5.3) and old age (2.6) as risk factors for a non-textbook outcome. The absence of qualified nursing staff was clearly associated with a non-textbook outcome (odds ratio 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: The fact that laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes were worse during COVID-19 can be partly attributed to a change in patient case-mix, but the shortage of qualified nursing staff in the operating room also had a strong negative influence.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1-4, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.

The role of length of oral resection margin and survival in esophageal cancer surgery after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy regimens became the standard of care for patients with esophageal cancer, whereas surgical resection remains at the center of curative treatment modalities. Current guidelines provide no recommendations on the extent of the oral resection margin, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the oral tumor-free resection margin and overall survival. METHODS: Retrospective study with 382 1:1 propensity-matched patients out of 660 patients, operated between 2013 and 2019, with an Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant therapy. Independent pathologists measured the oral resection margin after formalin fixation. RESULTS: The mean oral tumor-free resection margin was 37.2 ± 0.6 mm. The ideal cut-off for survival differences was determined for 33 mm. Patients with an oral resection margin of more than 33 mm had a better median overall survival (≤33 mm: 45.0 months, 95% confidence interval: 22.4-67.6 months, >33 mm: not reached, P = .005). An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm proved to be an independent favorable prognostic factor for patients' overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses (P = .049). CONCLUSION: This study analyzed a patient cohort retrospectively after curative intended Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm is a factor for improved overall survival. Therefore, a minimum resection margin of 34 mm after fixation could be suggested.

Biomarker screen for efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy in patient-derived pancreatic cancer cultures.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumour entity with unmet medical need. To assess the therapeutic potential of oncolytic virotherapy (OVT) against PDAC, different oncolytic viruses (OVs) are currently investigated in clinical trials. However, systematic comparisons of these different OVs in terms of efficacy against PDAC and biomarkers predicting therapeutic response are lacking. METHODS: We screened fourteen patient-derived PDAC cultures which reflect the intra- and intertumoural heterogeneity of PDAC for their sensitivity to five clinically relevant OVs, namely serotype 5 adenovirus Ad5-hTERT, herpes virus T-VEC, measles vaccine strain MV-NIS, reovirus jin-3, and protoparvovirus H-1PV. Live cell analysis, quantification of viral genome/gene expression, cell viability as well as cytotoxicity assays and titration of viral progeny were conducted. Transcriptome profiling was employed to identify potential predictive biomarkers for response to OV treatment. FINDINGS: Patient-derived PDAC cultures showed individual response patterns to OV treatment. Twelve of fourteen cultures were responsive to at least one OV, with no single OV proving superior or inferior across all cultures. Known host factors for distinct viruses were retrieved as potential biomarkers. Compared to the classical molecular subtype, the quasi-mesenchymal or basal-like subtype of PDAC was found to be more sensitive to H-1PV, jin-3, and T-VEC. Generally, expression of viral entry receptors did not correlate with sensitivity to OV treatment, with one exception: Expression of Galectin-1 (LGALS1), a factor involved in H-1PV entry, positively correlated with H-1PV induced cell killing. Rather, cellular pathways controlling immunological, metabolic and proliferative signaling appeared to determine outcome. For instance, high baseline expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) correlated with relative resistance to oncolytic measles virus, whereas low cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) expression was associated with exceptional response. Combination treatment of MV-NIS with a cGAS inhibitor improved tumour cell killing in several PDAC cultures and cells overexpressing cGAS were found to be less sensitive to MV oncolysis. INTERPRETATION: Considering the heterogeneity of PDAC and the complexity of biological therapies such as OVs, no single biomarker can explain the spectrum of response patterns. For selection of a particular OV, PDAC molecular subtype, ISG expression as well as activation of distinct signaling and metabolic pathways should be considered. Combination therapies can overcome resistance in specific constellations. Overall, oncolytic virotherapy is a viable treatment option for PDAC, which warrants further development. This study highlights the need for personalised treatment in OVT. By providing all primary data, this study provides a rich source and guidance for ongoing developments. FUNDING: German National Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG), German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe), German National Academic Scholarship Foundation (Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes), Survival with Pancreatic Cancer Foundation.

Surgical and multimodal treatment of metastatic oesophageal cancer: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-established multimodal therapy for localized oesophageal cancer, the metastatic stage is commonly treated only with systemic therapy as current international guidelines recommend. However, evidence suggesting that multimodal therapy including surgery could benefit selected patients with metastasized oesophageal cancer is increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic oesophageal cancer after different treatment regimens. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus with synchronous or metachronous metastases who underwent Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy between 2010 and 2021. Each patient received an individual treatment for their metastatic burden based on an interdisciplinary tumour board conference. Survival differences between different treatments were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Out of 1791 patients undergoing Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy, 235 patients diagnosed with metastases were included. Of all of the included patients, 42 (17.9%) only underwent surgical resection of their metastatic disease, 37 (15.7%) underwent multimodal therapy including surgery, 78 (33.2%) received chemotherapy alone, 49 (20.9%) received other therapies, and 29 (12.3%) received best supportive care. Patients who underwent resection or multimodal therapy including surgery of their metastatic burden showed superior overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone (median overall survival of 19.0, 18.0, and 11.0 months respectively) (P < 0.001). This was confirmed in subcohorts of patients with metachronous solid-organ metastases and with a single metastasis. In multivariable analyses, resection with or without multimodal therapy was an independent factor for favourable survival. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection could be a feasible treatment option for metastasized oesophageal cancer, improving survival in selected patients. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and define reliable selection criteria.

Combined score of Y chromosome loss and T-cell infiltration improves UICC based stratification of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Background: Staging, especially clinical lymph node staging in esophageal adenocarcinoma has only moderate sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, we evaluated combined molecular markers to predict prognosis. Patients and methods: 890 tumor tissue samples were obtained from patients who underwent surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma with curative intent. These were stained by tissue micro array for 48 markers which are associated with tumorigenesis and correlated with clinical data (TNM-staging, overall survival) by multivariate Cox regression. Results: Two markers (preserved Y chromosome and high grade of (CD3+) T-cell infiltration) were found to be significantly and independently associated with better overall survival. We formed a score (called CY score) from the two markers. The more markers are positive and thus the higher the score (ranging from 0 to 2), the better the overall survival, independently of UICC. Moreover, we developed a combination score of the UICC and CY score based on cluster analysis. Patients with a UICC stage of III with the presence of both traits (CY=2) can be assigned to a better prognosis group (group II), whereas patients with a UICC stage of I without both traits (CY=0) must be assigned to a worse prognosis group (group II). Therefore, patients in stage I with adverse molecular signature might benefit of multimodal therapy. Conclusion: In summary, the CY score adds prognostic information to the UICC stage based on tumor biology in esophageal adenocarcinoma and warrants further evaluations in independent clinical cohorts.

Parameters predicting postoperative pain and quality of life after hemorrhoidectomy: follow-up results from a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Pain and reduced quality of life (QoL) are major subjects of interest after surgery for hemorrhoids. The aim of this study was to find predictive parameters for postoperative pain and QoL after hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: This is a follow-up analysis of data derived from a multicenter randomized controlled trial including 770 patients, which examines the usefulness of tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy. Different pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were correlated with pain level assessed by NRS and QoL by the EuroQuol. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, relevant (NRS > 5/10 pts.) early pain within 48 h after surgery was associated with young age (≤ 40 years, p = 0.0072), use of a tamponade (p < 0.0001), relevant preoperative pain (p = 0.0017), pudendal block (p < 0.0001), and duration of surgery (p = 0.0149). At multivariate analysis, not using a pudendal block (OR 2.64), younger age (OR 1.55), use of a tamponade (OR 1.70), and relevant preoperative pain (OR 1.56) were significantly associated with relevant early postoperative pain. Relevant pain on day 7 was significantly associated only with relevant early pain (OR 3.13, p < 0.001). QoL overall remained at the same level. However, n = 229 (33%) patients presented an improvement of QoL and n = 245 (36%) an aggravation. Improvement was associated with a reduction of pain levels after surgery (p < 0.0001) and analgesia with opioids (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early relevant pain affects younger patients but can be prevented by avoiding tamponades and using a pudendal block. Relevant pain after 1 week is associated only with early pain. Relief in preexisting pain and opioids improve QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00011590 12 April 2017.

Tumour area infiltration and cell count in endoscopic biopsies of therapy-naive upper GI tract carcinomas by QuPath analysis: implications for predictive biomarker testing.

Guidelines regulate how many (tumour-bearing) tissue particles should be sampled during gastric cancer biopsy to obtain representative results in predictive biomarker testing. Little is known about how well these guidelines are applied, how the number of tissue particles correlates with the actual tumour-infiltrated area and how many absolute tumour cells are captured. The study included endoscopic biopsies of untreated carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal (GI)-tract during the 2016-2020 review period. Archival (H&E)-stained histological sections were digitised and the tumour areas were manually annotated. The tumour-bearing tissue area and absolute carcinoma cell count per case were determined by image analysis and compared with a reference primary surgical specimen. Biopsies from 253 patients were analysed. The following mean values were determined: (a) tumour tissue particle number: 6.5 (range: 1-25, standard deviation (SD) = 3.33), (b) number of tumour-bearing tissue particles: 4.7 (range: 1-20, SD = 2.80), (c) tumour-infiltrated area: 7.5 mm2 (range: 0.18-59.46 mm2, SD = 6.67 mm2), (d) absolute tumour cell count: 13,492 (range: 193-92,834, SD = 14,185) and (e) tumour cell count in a primary surgical specimen (tumour size: 6.7 cm): 105,200,176. The guideline-recommended tissue particle count of 10 was not achieved in 208 patients (82.2%) and the required tumour-bearing tissue particle count of 5 was not achieved in 133 patients (52.6%). Tissue particle count, tumour-infiltrated area and tumour cell count were only weakly correlated. Most cases featured an infiltrated area ≥ 4.5 mm2 (156, 61.7%). Cases with more tissue particles showed only a moderate increase in infiltrated area and tumour cells compared to cases with fewer particles. Biopsies are often used to determine predictive biomarkers, particularly Her2/neu and PD-L1. Diagnostic standards to ensure representative material have been suggested in guidelines to reduce false-negative predictions. However, the real-world practice seems to substantially deviate from recommended standards. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic study describing the relationships between endoscopic tissue fragment number, actual infiltrated tumour area and carcinoma cell number. The data question the tissue particle number as a quality assessment parameter. We advocate histopathological reports indicating on which basis statements on therapy-relevant biomarkers were made. Digital pathology has the potential to objectively quantify the tissue for documentation, quality assessment and future clinical studies.

Failure of a Multi-Centric Clinical Trial Investigating Neoadjuvant Radio-Chemotherapy in Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma (NEOPA-NCT01900327)-Which Lessons Are Learnt?

BACKGROUND: A significant number of clinical trials must be prematurely discontinued due to recruitment failure, and only a small fraction publish results and a failure analysis. Based on our experience on conducting the NEOPA trial on neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (NCT01900327-funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research-BMBF), we performed an analysis of potential reasons for recruitment failure and general problems in conducting clinical trials in Germany. METHODS: Systematic analysis of environmental factors, trial history, conducting and funding in the background of the published literature. RESULTS: The recruitment failure was based on various study-specific conceptional and local environmental aspects and in peculiarities of the German surgical study culture. General reservations against a neo-adjuvant study concept combined with game changing scientific progresses during the long-lasting planning and funding phase have led to a reduced interest in the trial design and recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Trial planning and conducting should be focused, professionalized and financed on a national basis. Individual interests must be subordinated to reach the goal to perform more relevant and successful clinical trials in Germany. Bureaucratic processes must be further fastened between a trial idea and the start of a study.

Syndecan­1 expression is an independent favourable prognostic marker in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and represents a potential therapeutic target.

Because of the poor prognosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), there is an urgent need for additional therapeutic approaches. Syndecan-1 (CD138) is a cell-surface heparan sulphate that is overexpressed in multiple myeloma cells and several carcinomas. Specific drugs targeting CD138 [e.g. antibody-linked drug conjugates (ADCs)] are currently being assessed; however, the significance and implication of CD138 expression in EAC is mostly unknown. In the present study, CD138 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry, and its association with histopathological parameters and ERBB2 (Her2/neu) amplification status in patients treated with primary resection and neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy was investigated. Of the 723 cases of EAC included, 232 tumours (32.1%) expressed CD138, with 96 tumours displaying strong expression (13.3%). Patients with CD138-positive tumours had less invasive carcinoma, fewer lymph mode metastases and a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with CD138-negative tumours (P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, strong CD138 expression was an independent favourable prognostic factor (P=0.02). Patients who received neoadjuvant CROSS (carboplatin, paclitaxel and intensity modulated radiotherapy) therapy and had CD138-positive tumours lived significantly longer (P=0.04). In tumours without Her2/neu amplification, CD138 expression was associated with a longer OS (P=0.02). In conclusion, CD138 in cancer is already used as a target for ADCs, such as indatuximab ravtansine, the effectiveness of which depends on the extent of CD138 on tumour cells. This indicates that CD138 is also a predictive, therapeutically relevant biomarker. Regardless of the favourable prognostic effect of CD138 in EAC, there is an urgent clinical need for personalized therapeutics in relapse. Future clinical trials now need to show how effective the corresponding ADCs are in CD138-positive EACs.

The tight junction protein claudin 6 is a potential target for patient-individualized treatment in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma and is associated with poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) remains poor, and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Claudin 6 (CLDN6) is an oncofetal antigen that is largely absent in healthy tissues and upregulated in several cancers, making it a promising therapeutical target. In this study, the expression of CLDN6 was assessed in an large Caucasian EAC and GAC cohort. METHODS: RNA-Seq data from 89 EACs and 371 GACs were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project and EAC/GAC cases were stratified by CLDN6 mRNA expression based on a survival-associated cutoff. For groups with CLDN6 expression above or below this cutoff, differential gene expression analyses were performed using DESeq, and dysregulated biological pathways were identified using the Enrichr tool. Additionally, CLDN6 protein expression was assessed in more than 800 EACs and almost 600 GACs using a CLDN6-specific immunohistochemical antibody (clone 58-4B-2) that is currently used in Phase I/II trials to identify patients with CLDN6-positive tumors (NCT05262530; NCT04503278). The expression of CLDN6 was also correlated with histopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: EACs and GACs with high CLDN6 mRNA levels displayed an overexpression of pathways regulating the cell cycle, DNA replication, and receptor / extracellular matrix interactions. CLDN6 protein expression was associated with shorter OS in EAC and GAC, both in treatment-naïve subgroups and cohorts receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In multivariate analysis, CLDN6 protein expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor in EAC associated with a shorter OS (HR: 1.75; p = 0.01) and GAC (HR: 2.74; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: High expression of CLDN6 mRNA is associated with the dysregulation of distinct biological pathways regulating cell growth, proliferation, and cell-matrix interactions. Clinically, the expression of CLDN6 protein is a valuable adverse prognostic marker in EAC and GAC.

Morphological, clinical and molecular characteristics in ARID1a­deficient microsatellite­stable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Publications describe the relevance of the AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1a) mutation in gastric adenocarcinoma, which occurs predominantly in the microsatellite instable (MSI)- and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated subtypes. It is unclear whether potential therapeutic, prognostic or morphologic descriptions are not epiphenomena of MSI (or EBV). Since personalised therapeutics are largely lacking for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), clinical trials investigating the efficacy of these therapeutics specifically in this subgroup are useful. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study analysing the relevant tumour subset of microsatellite-stable (MSS) EAC with loss of function of ARID1a. A total of 875 patients with EAC and data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analysed. Statistical analyses associating previously known molecular characteristics of the present tumour cohort, overall survival, morphological growth patterns and tumour heterogeneity issues were considered. Subsequently, 10% of EAC were ARID1a-deficient, the majority of which were MSS (7.5%). There was no characteristic growth pattern. Approximately 60% of tumours were PD-L1 positive to varying degrees. TP53 mutations occurred together with ARID1a defective EAC in the present cohort and in the TCGA collective. The extent of 7.5% MSS-EAC with ARID1a loss was unaffected by neoadjuvant therapy. ARID1a loss was often detected to be homogeneous (92%). ARID1a loss is not an epiphenomenon of MSI in EAC. The high homogeneity of ARID1a loss tumour clones could be considered an argument for the effectiveness of potential therapeutics. Since the majority of genomic ARID1a alterations result in protein loss, immunohistochemistry is a useful screening technique, especially in the absence of morphological characteristics.

Long-Term Postsurgical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation (CROSS) Versus Chemotherapy (FLOT) for Multimodal Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction.

BACKGROUND: The question of the ideal neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma has not been answered to date. Multimodal treatment has become a standard treatment for these adenocarcinomas. Currently, perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) is recommended. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective analysis compared long-term survival after CROSS versus FLOT. The study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) or the esophagogastric junction type I or II undergoing oncologic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary objective was to determine the long-term outcome in terms of overall survival. The secondary objectives were to determine differences regarding the histopathologic categories after neoadjuvant treatment and the histomorphologic regression. RESULTS: The findings showed no survival advantage for one or the other treatment in this highly standardized cohort. All the patients underwent open (CROSS: 9.4% vs. FLOT: 22%), hybrid (CROSS: 82% vs. FLOT: 72%), or minimally invasive (CROSS: 8.9% vs. FLOT: 5.6%) thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. The median post-surgical follow-up period was 57.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2-109.7 months), and the median survival was longer for the CROSS patients (54 months) than for the FLOT patients (37.2 months) (p = 0.053). The overall 5-years survival was 47% for the entire cohort (48% for the CROSS and 43% for the FLOT patients). The CROSS patients showed a better pathologic response and fewer advanced tumor stages. CONCLUSION: The improved pathologic response after CROSS cannot be translated into longer overall survival. To date, the choice of which neoadjuvant treatment to use can be made only on the basis of clinical parameters and the patient's performance status.

Artificial intelligence for tumour tissue detection and histological regression grading in oesophageal adenocarcinomas: a retrospective algorithm development and validation study.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction are among the most common malignant epithelial tumours. Most patients receive neoadjuvant therapy before complete tumour resection. Histological assessment after resection includes identification of residual tumour tissue and areas of regressive tumour, data which are used to calculate a clinically relevant regression score. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for tumour tissue detection and tumour regression grading in surgical specimens from patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. METHODS: We used one training cohort and four independent test cohorts to develop, train, and validate a deep learning tool. The material consisted of histological slides from surgically resected specimens from patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction from three pathology institutes (two in Germany, one in Austria) and oesophageal cancer cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). All slides were from neoadjuvantly treated patients except for those from the TCGA cohort, who were neoadjuvant-therapy naive. Data from training cohort and test cohort cases were extensively manually annotated for 11 tissue classes. A convolutional neural network was trained on the data using a supervised principle. First, the tool was formally validated using manually annotated test datasets. Next, tumour regression grading was assessed in a retrospective cohort of post-neoadjuvant therapy surgical specimens. The grading of the algorithm was compared with that of a group of 12 board-certified pathologists from one department. To further validate the tool, three pathologists processed whole resection cases with and without AI assistance. FINDINGS: Of the four test cohorts, one included 22 manually annotated histological slides (n=20 patients), one included 62 sides (n=15), one included 214 slides (n=69), and the final one included 22 manually annotated histological slides (n=22). In the independent test cohorts the AI tool had high patch-level accuracy for identifying both tumour and regression tissue. When we validated the concordance of the AI tool against analyses by a group of pathologists (n=12), agreement was 63·6% (quadratic kappa 0·749; p<0·0001) at case level. The AI-based regression grading triggered true reclassification of resected tumour slides in seven cases (including six cases who had small tumour regions that were initially missed by pathologists). Use of the AI tool by three pathologists increased interobserver agreement and substantially reduced diagnostic time per case compared with working without AI assistance. INTERPRETATION: Use of our AI tool in the diagnostics of oesophageal adenocarcinoma resection specimens by pathologists increased diagnostic accuracy, interobserver concordance, and significantly reduced assessment time. Prospective validation of the tool is required. FUNDING: North Rhine-Westphalia state, Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany, and the Wilhelm Sander Foundation.

Tumor cell integrin ß4 and tumor stroma E-/P-selectin cooperatively regulate tumor growth in vivo.

BACKGROUND: The immunological composition of the tumor microenvironment has a decisive influence on the biological course of cancer and is therefore of profound clinical relevance. In this study, we analyzed the cooperative effects of integrin ß4 (ITGB4) on tumor cells and E-/P-selectin on endothelial cells within the tumor stroma for regulating tumor growth by shaping the local and systemic immune environment. METHODS: We used several preclinical mouse models for different solid human cancer types (xenograft and syngeneic) to explore the role of ITGB4 (shRNA-mediated knockdown in tumor cells) and E-/P-selectins (knockout in mice) for tumor growth; effects on apoptosis, proliferation and intratumoral signaling pathways were determined by histological and biochemical methods and 3D in vitro experiments; changes in the intratumoral and systemic immune cell composition were determined by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry; chemokine levels and their attracting potential were measured by ELISA and 3D invasion assays. RESULTS: We observed a very robust synergism between ITGB4 and E-/P-selectin for the regulation of tumor growth, accompanied by an increased recruitment of CD11b+ Gr-1Hi cells with low granularity (i.e., myeloid-derived suppressor cells, MDSCs) specifically into ITGB4-depleted tumors. ITGB4-depleted tumors undergo apoptosis and actively attract MDSCs, well-known to promote tumor growth in several cancers, via increased secretion of different chemokines. MDSC trafficking into tumors crucially depends on E-/P-selectin expression. Analyses of clinical samples confirmed an inverse relationship between ITGB4 expression in tumors and number of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a distinct vulnerability of ITGB4Lo tumors for MDSC-directed immunotherapies.

Dissecting the inflammatory tumor microenvironment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: mast cells and natural killer cells are favorable prognostic factors and associated with less extensive disease.

PURPOSE: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains a challenging and lethal cancer entity. A promising target for new therapeutic approaches, as demonstrated by the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are tumor-associated immune cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the understanding of the TME in esophageal cancer remains limited and requires further investigation. METHODS: Over 900 EAC samples were included, including patients treated with primary surgery and neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy. The immune cell infiltrates of mast cells (MC), natural killer cells (NK cells), plasma cells (PC), and eosinophilic cells (EC) were assessed semi-quantitatively and correlated with histopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A high presence of all four immune cell types significantly correlated with a less extensive tumor stage and a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis, and, in case of NK cells, with less distant metastasis. The presence of MC and NK cells was favorably associated with a prolonged OS in the total cohort (MC: p < 0.001; NK cells: p = 0.004) and patients without neoadjuvant treatment (MC: p < 0.001; NK cells: p = 0.01). NK cells were a favorable prognostic factor in the total cohort (p = 0.007) and in the treatment-naïve subgroup (p = 0.04). Additionally, MC were a favorable prognostic factor in patients with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a complex and important role of mast cells, NK cells, and the other assessed immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of EAC. Therefore, they are one further step to a better understanding of the immune cell environment and the potential therapeutic implications in this cancer entity.

Predicting the HER2 status in oesophageal cancer from tissue microarrays using convolutional neural networks.

BACKGROUND: Fast and accurate diagnostics are key for personalised medicine. Particularly in cancer, precise diagnosis is a prerequisite for targeted therapies, which can prolong lives. In this work, we focus on the automatic identification of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) patients that qualify for a personalised therapy targeting epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). We present a deep-learning method for scoring microscopy images of GEA for the presence of HER2 overexpression. METHODS: Our method is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on a rich dataset of 1602 patient samples and tested on an independent set of 307 patient samples. We additionally verified the CNN's generalisation capabilities with an independent dataset with 653 samples from a separate clinical centre. We incorporated an attention mechanism in the network architecture to identify the tissue regions, which are important for the prediction outcome. Our solution allows for direct automated detection of HER2 in immunohistochemistry-stained tissue slides without the need for manual assessment and additional costly in situ hybridisation (ISH) tests. RESULTS: We show accuracy of 0.94, precision of 0.97, and recall of 0.95. Importantly, our approach offers accurate predictions in cases that pathologists cannot resolve and that require additional ISH testing. We confirmed our findings in an independent dataset collected in a different clinical centre. The attention-based CNN exploits morphological information in microscopy images and is superior to a predictive model based on the staining intensity only. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that our approach not only automates an important diagnostic process for GEA patients but also paves the way for the discovery of new morphological features that were previously unknown for GEA pathology.

FGFR2-amplified tumor clones are markedly heterogeneously distributed in carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: FGFR2 is a therapy-relevant target in tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and clinical trials are currently underway to test the efficacy of FGFR2 inhibitors. Tumor heterogeneity is one of the relevant causes of treatment failure. Almost nothing is known about the heterogeneous distribution of FGFR2-amplified clones in adenocarcinomas of the upper GIT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To assess FGFR2 gene copy number alteration and intratumoral heterogeneity of upper GIT adenocarcinomas, we analyzed 893 patient-derived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens, including primary operated and neoadjuvant-treated tumors (462 gastric carcinomas and 429 esophageal adenocarcinomas) as well as complementary lymph node and distant metastasis by fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Twenty-six gastric tumors (5.6%) and 21 esophageal adenocarcinomas (4.9%) showed FGFR2 amplification. Overall, 93% of gastric carcinomas and 83% of esophageal carcinomas showed heterogeneous amplification. FGFR2 amplification was found in different histological growth patterns, including intestinal and diffuse type according to the Lauren classification. In the primary gastric carcinoma group, FGFR2 amplification was associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Homogeneous FGFR2 amplification in tumors of the upper GIT is the exception. This has highly relevant implications in the nature of FGFR2 diagnostics (sufficient tumor cell number, determination of amplification at metastasis versus primary tumor, etc.) and on the response probability of appropriate inhibitors. It is relevant that the often poorly treatable and aggressive subtype of diffuse carcinomas (poorly cohesive carcinomas) also shows FGFR2 amplification and that an individualized therapy option with FGFR2 inhibitors could be an option in this group.

Integrin beta1 (ITGB1) as a prognostic marker in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Today, individual prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) is based on post-surgical TNM staging and valid biomarkers are still not implemented. Integrin beta1 (ITGB1) is widely expressed in epithelial cells and promotes cell adhesion and growth. Its impact on tumor progression was described for different tumor entities before, data on its function as a potential biomarker in EAC is not available. Aim of the study is to evaluate the expression level of ITGB1 in a large collective of EAC and its impact on patients´ prognosis. 640 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were analyzed immunohistochemically for ITGB1. The data was correlated with long term outcome, clinical, pathological and molecular data (TP53, HER2/neu, c-myc, GATA6, PIK3CA and KRAS). Of 640 patients to be analyzed, 127 (19.8%) showed expression of ITGB1. ITGB1 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis, expression of integrin alphaV and KRAS mutation status. Patients with high ITGB1 expression showed impaired overall survival (22.5 months (95% CI 15.3-29.7 months), vs. 34.1 months (95% CI 25.3-42.4 months), P = 0.024). This effect was particularly evident in the group of patients undergoing primary surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy (10.2 months (95% CI 1.9-41.7 months) vs. 31.4 months (95% CI 21.1-144.2 months, P = 0.008). ITGB1 was also an independent prognostic marker in multivariable analysis (HR 1.696 (95% CI 1.084-2.653, P = 0.021) in patients that underwent primary surgery. We demonstrate for the first time the prognostic significance of ITGB1 expression in a large EAC patient population.