Effectiveness and safety of safinamide in routine clinical practice in a Belgian Parkinson's disease population: an open-label, levodopa add-on study.

BACKGROUND: Safinamide is a recent multimodal antiparkinsonian drug that inhibits monoamine oxidase B and modulates the glutamatergic system with positive effects on motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). This post-hoc analysis of the European SYNAPSES study provides first-time data on the use of safinamide in routine clinical practice in Belgium. OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy and safety of safinamide in Belgian PD patients in real-life conditions. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of the Belgian cohort from the European SYNAPSES trial, which was an observational, multicenter, retrospective-prospective cohort study. Patients were followed up to 12 months. Analyses were performed in the overall population and according to different criteria such as the age limit (> 75 years), presence or absence of relevant comorbidities, presence or absence of psychiatric conditions such as depression and anxiety, patients on levodopa monotherapy or levodopa in combination with other treatments, patients on rasagiline before inclusion or not. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients included, 29.2% were > 75 years, 58.9% had relevant comorbidities and 32.7% had psychiatric conditions. Almost all the patients reported motor (98.8%) or non-motor (86.3%) symptoms. During the study, 36.3% of patients reported drug-related reactions. The adverse drug reactions were those already described in the patients' information leaflet. The majority were mild or moderate and completely resolved and no differences were detected between the subgroups of patients. Almost 35% of the patients demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in the UPDRS and 50% of the patients with wearing-off at baseline, did not report wearing-off anymore after one year of treatment. Patients under levodopa monotherapy compared to patients receiving levodopa combined with other antiparkinsonian treatments benefit more from safinamide treatment. Patients switched from rasagiline to safinamide seemed also to benefit more from safinamide treatment. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the excellent safety and efficacy profile of safinamide, particularly in more vulnerable groups of patients such as the elderly and patients with significant comorbidities or psychiatric conditions such as depression or anxiety.

Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in Belgian multiple sclerosis patients: subgroup analysis of the natalizumab observational program.

Natalizumab (Tysabri(®)) is highly efficacious in controlling disease activity in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. As it is one of the more recent therapies for MS, there remains a need for long-term safety and efficacy data of natalizumab in a clinical practice setting. The Tysabri observational program (TOP) is an open-label, multicenter, multinational, prospective observational study, aiming to recruit up to 6,000 patients with relapsing-remitting MS from Europe, Canada and Australia. The objectives of this study are to collect long-term safety and efficacy data on disease activity and disability progression. We report here the interim results of the 563 patients included in TOP between December 2007 and 2012 from Belgium. This patient cohort was older at baseline, had longer disease duration, higher neurological impairment, and a higher baseline annualized relapse rate, when compared to patients included in the pivotal phase III AFFIRM trial. Nevertheless, the efficacy of natalizumab was comparable. The annualized relapse rate on treatment was reduced by 90.70 % (p < 0.0001) with a cumulative probability of relapse of 26.87 % at 24 months. The cumulative probabilities of sustained disability improvement and progression at 24 months were 25.68 and 9.01 %, respectively. There were no new safety concerns over the follow-up period. Two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were diagnosed. Our results are consistent with other observational studies in the post-marketing setting.

Development of an electronic decision tool to support appropriate treatment choice in adult patients with epilepsy--Epi-Scope(®).

BACKGROUND: Given the continuous knowledge progression and the growing number of available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), making appropriate treatment choices for patients with epilepsy is increasingly difficult. While published guidelines help for separate clinical aspects, patients with a combination of specific characteristics may escape proper guidance. This study aimed to determine the appropriateness of AEDs for particular clinical variables and to offer treatment recommendations for adult patients with epilepsy in a user-friendly format for practicing neurologists. METHODS: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the appropriateness of AEDs as initial/second mono-therapy and combination therapy was assessed in relation to selected clinical variables by a Belgian panel of 13 experts in epilepsy. Panel recommendations for particular patient profiles were determined by the outcome of these separate ratings. RESULTS: The appropriateness outcome of individual AEDs was not substantially different between first and second mono-therapy; valproate was considered appropriate for all types of generalised and partial seizures. The outcome for combination therapy was highly dependent on the type of AED and seizures. With respect to co-morbidities and co-treatments, levetiracetam and pregabalin proved to have the least contra-indications. For the elderly and with respect to factors related to the female reproductive system the appropriateness of AEDs showed a more diffuse pattern. Although caution was deemed necessary for some combinations, the AEDs were never considered inappropriate regarding their drug interaction profile. CONCLUSIONS: The Epi-Scope(®) tool that displays appropriateness recommendations for highly specific, possibly complex cases, supports optimal treatment choices for adult patients with epilepsy in daily practice.