Thrombus architecture is influenced by the antiplatelet loading treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary thrombus formation is a main cause of acute myocardial infarction triggered by platelet activation. However, there are no data on the impact of different treatment strategies with antiplatelet agents before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on histological characteristics of thrombus formation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate the impact of preinterventional administration of the P2Y12-inhibitors clopidogrel and prasugrel on thrombus composition, highlighting significant changes associated with the antiplatelet pre-treatment. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing immediate PCI and thrombus aspiration by immunohistochemical staining along with RNA-sequencing employing Nanostring analysis. Fifty-two patients were treated with either prasugrel loading (60 mg) or clopidogrel loading (600 mg) prior to PCI, respectively. RESULTS: In Patients with STEMI, intracoronary thrombus architecture was significantly altered between patients pre-treated with prasugrel when compared to clopidogrel. Fibrin content of thrombi was significantly decreased (41.8 % versus 66.7 %, p = 0.009) after pre-treatment with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel. Furthermore, levels of MPO positive cells in intracoronary thrombi were significantly decreased in patients with prasugrel pre-treatment (90.5 versus 201.1, p = 0.014) indicating an association of antiplatelet pre-treatment and the inflammatory responses during thrombus formation. Most strikingly, we observed significant differences among both pre-treatment groups regarding altered RNA expression and signaling pathways of thrombo-inflammatory processes within the thrombotic material, which were independently associated with antiplatelet strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study elucidates the impact of antiplatelet pre-treatment on thrombus remodeling and architecture, thereby lowering the risk of recurrent adverse cardiovascular events in prasugrel-treated patients.

Recovery of systemic hyperinflammation in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and acute SARS-CoV-2 infection might show an altered immune response during COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with CVD and SARS-CoV-2 infection were prospectively enrolled and received a cardiological assessment at study entry and during follow-up visit. Inclusion criteria of our study were age older than 18 years, presence of CVD, and acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age of the patient cohort was 69 (IQR 55-79) years. 12 (52.2%) patients were men. Peripheral monocytes and chemokine/cytokine profiles were analysed. RESULTS: Numbers of classical and non-classical monocytes were significantly decreased during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to 3-month recovery. While classical monocytes reached the expected level in peripheral blood after 3 months, the number of non-classical monocytes remained significantly reduced. DISCUSSION: All three monocyte subsets exhibited changes of established adhesion and activation markers. Interestingly, they also expressed higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines like macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) at the time of recovery, although MIF was only slightly increased during the acute phase. CONCLUSION: Changes of monocyte phenotypes and increased MIF expression after 3-month recovery from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection may indicate persistent, possibly long-lasting, pro-inflammatory monocyte function in CVD patients.

Platelet Activation and Plasma Levels of Furin Are Associated With Prognosis of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and COVID-19.

[Figure: see text].

Numbers and phenotype of non-classical CD14dimCD16+ monocytes are predictors of adverse clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

AIMS: To elucidate the prognostic role of monocytes in the immune response of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) at risk for life-threatening heart and lung injury as major complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: From February to April 2020, we prospectively studied a cohort of 96 participants comprising 47 consecutive patients with CAD and acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (CAD + SARS-CoV-2), 19 CAD patients without infections, and 30 healthy controls. Clinical assessment included blood sampling, echocardiography, and electrocardiography within 12 h of admission. Respiratory failure was stratified by the Horovitz Index (HI) as moderately/severely impaired when HI ≤200 mmHg. The clinical endpoint (EP) was defined as HI ≤200 mmHg with subsequent mechanical ventilation within a follow-up of 30 days. The numbers of CD14dimCD16+ non-classical monocytes in peripheral blood were remarkably low in CAD + SARS-CoV-2 compared with CAD patients without infection and healthy controls (P < 0.0001). Moreover, these CD14dimCD16 monocytes showed decreased expression of established markers of adhesion, migration, and T-cell activation (CD54, CD62L, CX3CR1, CD80, and HLA-DR). Decreased numbers of CD14dimCD16+ monocytes were associated with the occurrence of EP. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrate that CAD + SARS-CoV-2 patients with numbers below the median of CD14dimCD16+ monocytes (median 1443 cells/mL) reached EP significantly more often compared to patients with numbers above the median (log-rank 5.03, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Decreased numbers of CD14dimCD16+ monocytes are associated with rapidly progressive respiratory failure in CAD + SARS-CoV-2 patients. Intensified risk assessments comprising monocyte sub- and phenotypes may help to identify patients at risk for respiratory failure.

Myocardial expression of the anaphylatoxin receptor C3aR is associated with cardiac inflammation and prognosis in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure.

AIM: The aim of this study is to analyse the prognostic value of complement anaphylatoxin receptors in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing endomyocardial biopsy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 102 patients (72.5% male patients, median age 54 years) with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial expression of C3aR was assessed among other parameters. The primary study endpoint was a composite of death, heart transplantation, heart failure-related re-hospitalization, and deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction within a mean follow-up of 11.9 months. The number of cells, which stained positive for C3aR, was significantly increased in patients with inflammatory compared with non-inflammatory cardiomyopathy (1.75 ± 0.31 cells in inflammatory cardiomyopathy vs. 0.94 ± 0.26 in non-inflammatory cardiomyopathy, P = 0.049). Subsequently, positive expression for C3aR was judged based on a semi-quantitative scoring system. Significantly, more patients with positive MHCII and CD68 expression showed an increased number of C3aR-positive cells. C3aR expression based on this score was more pronounced in patients with human herpesvirus 6 viral genome detection. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrate that the C3aR-negative group reached the primary endpoint significantly more often (mean follow-up 11.9 months, log rank 5.963, P = 0.015). Lack of C3aR expression was a strong independent predictor for the primary endpoint in Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio 0.46 (0.26-0.82, P = 0.009)]. CONCLUSIONS: C3aR-positive cells are found more often in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The relevance of C3aR-positive cells in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy should be further evaluated as potential predictors or modulators of adverse cardiac remodelling, the substrate of progressive heart failure.