Real-world outcomes of Italian patients with advanced non-squamous lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-pemetrexed.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multi-center, retrospective/prospective cohort observational study was to evaluate outcomes in routine clinical practice of first-line chemo-immunotherapy with cis/carboplatin, pemetrexed and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 33 Italian centers. METHODS: The outcome measure was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in a real-world patient population. Secondary endpoints were: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: 1068 patients were enrolled at the time of data cut-off (January 31st, 2023), and 812 (76.0%) belonged to the retrospective cohort. Median age was 66 years (27-85), ECOG PS was ≥ 2 in 91 (8.6%) patients; 254 (23.8%) patients had brain metastases at baseline; 38 (3.6%) patients had tumor with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months (95% CI, 16.1-17.9), median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.4-18.8) and PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.8-11.2). Median DoR (n = 493) was 14.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-17.1). ORR was 43.4% (95% CI, 40.4-46.4). Any-grade AEs occurred in 636 (59.6%) patients and grade ≥ 3 in 253 (23.7%) patients. Most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (6.3%) and anemia (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: First-line chemo-immunotherapy was effective and tolerable in this large, real-world Italian study of patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Our results were in line with the KEYNOTE-189 registration study, also considering the low number of PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients included in our study.

A plain language summary of the PHAROS study: the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib for people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of the results of a study called PHAROS. This study looked at combination treatment with encorafenib (BRAFTOVI®) and binimetinib (MEKTOVI®). This combination of medicines was studied in people with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer. Metastatic means that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. All people in this study had a type of NSCLC that has a change in a gene called BRAF termed a BRAF V600E mutation. A gene is a part of the DNA that has instructions for making things that your body needs to work, and the BRAF V600E mutation contributes to the growth of the lung cancer. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In this study, 98 people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC were treated with the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib (called encorafenib plus binimetinib in this summary). Before starting the study, 59 people had not received any treatment for their metastatic NSCLC, and 39 people had received previous anticancer treatment. At the time of this analysis, 44 (75%) out of 59 people who did not receive any treatment before taking encorafenib plus binimetinib had their tumors shrink or disappear. Eighteen (46%) out of 39 people who had received treatment before starting encorafenib plus binimetinib also had their tumors shrink or disappear. The most common side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: These results support the use of encorafenib plus binimetinib combination treatment as a new treatment option in people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. The side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this study were similar to the side effects seen with encorafenib plus binimetinib in people with a type of skin cancer called metastatic melanoma.

Effective retreatment with osimertinib in CNS-relapsed epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patient following resection and adjuvant osimertinib.

For years, adjuvant chemotherapy has been the only standard treatment for resected non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), offering a dismal survival improvement at 5 years. Following the outstanding results of the recent ADAURA trial, osimertinib has become a new standard treatment for resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-squamous NSCLC, regardless of the administration of chemotherapy. For patients whose disease relapses after completion of the adjuvant therapy, there is no consensus about the optimal treatment. Herein, we report the case of a 74-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IIIA non-squamous NSCLC, harboring the EGFR p.L858R mutation. After complete tumor resection, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine, followed by osimertinib 80 mg daily for 3 years within the ADAURA trial. Brain disease relapse was documented 18 months after treatment completion by computed tomography scans. The patient was then retreated with osimertinib obtaining a deep intracranial partial response, which is still lasting after 21 months. The retreatment with osimertinib in patients whose disease relapsed following adjuvant therapy with the third-generation EGFR inhibitor might be a valid option, especially in patients with intracranial disease relapse. Studies are warranted to confirm this finding and to define the impact of the disease-free interval in this regard.

Capmatinib-Induced Liver Injury as Emerging Toxicity of MET Inhibitors in Patients With NSCLC Pretreated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Safety data on MET inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 mutation and treated with frontline immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are still limited. Here, we describe clinical characteristics, liver biopsy features, and management of liver injury of two patients with a diagnosis of MET exon 14-mutant NSCLC receiving capmatinib after ICI failure. On the basis of histologic findings and exclusion of other potential causes, a diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with portal fibrosis was made in both cases. The use of hepatoprotective drugs, in addition to oral ursodeoxycholic acid, resulted in liver blood tests normalization. To provide a global safety perspective, we queried the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and detected a robust disproportionality signal. Out of the 918 total reports with capmatinib from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database, DILI was recorded in 43 cases (4.7%), mostly serious (93.0%) with hospitalization and death recorded in 25.6% and 16.3% of the cases, respectively. The median time to onset was 42 days, with discontinuation and positive dechallenge documented in 41.9% and 39.5% of the cases, respectively. Anti-programmed cell death protein-1 agents were coreported in 11 DILI cases. Only two cases of DILI out of 105 reports were found for tepotinib. Our data support a potential association between capmatinib and DILI in patients who have also been previously exposed to immunotherapy. Considering the potential implications for sequence strategy and timing of ICI and MET inhibitor, further investigation is warranted.

First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Plus Antiangiogenic Drugs Versus Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite significant survival improvement, the emergence of resistance mechanisms represents a common event. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of third-generation EGFR-TKIs, the current standard of care, to first-generation EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic drugs for the first-line treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting survival data published before September 1, 2022, were searched through the MEDLINE databases (PubMed), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (≥3 TRAEs) data were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 3,565 patients. We observed that third-generation EGFR-TKIs and first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with antiangiogenic drugs provided a similar OS benefit over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in any of the subgroups. However, we indirectly observed a greater PFS benefit of third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs in females, never-smokers, in patients harboring exon 19 deletions, and in those with brain metastasis, as compared with using first-generation EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenic drugs. The ORR did not differ between the combination strategy and third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Finally, the risk of developing grade ≥3 TRAEs was higher using the combination of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic drugs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs than third-generation EGFR-TKIs over first-generation EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the combination strategy may provide an alternative to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, but more data are needed to determine the predictive clinicopathologic characteristics that can influence the treatment choice. Until then, third-generation EGFR-TKIs still represent the first choice in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Phase II, Open-Label Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) plus binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) has demonstrated clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with BRAFV600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received oral encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent radiology review (IRR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to response, and safety. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 98 patients (59 treatment-naïve and 39 previously treated) with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received encorafenib plus binimetinib. Median duration of treatment was 9.2 months with encorafenib and 8.4 months with binimetinib. ORR by IRR was 75% (95% CI, 62 to 85) in treatment-naïve and 46% (95% CI, 30 to 63) in previously treated patients; median DOR was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 23.1 to NE) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to NE), respectively. DCR after 24 weeks was 64% in treatment-naïve and 41% in previously treated patients. Median PFS was NE (95% CI, 15.7 to NE) in treatment-naïve and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.2 to NE) in previously treated patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (50%), diarrhea (43%), and fatigue (32%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 24 (24%) and permanent discontinuation of encorafenib plus binimetinib in 15 (15%) patients. One grade 5 TRAE of intracranial hemorrhage was reported. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at the PHAROS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/pharos/). CONCLUSION: For patients with treatment-naïve and previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC, encorafenib plus binimetinib showed a meaningful clinical benefit with a safety profile consistent with that observed in the approved indication in melanoma.

Peripheral nervous system adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an effective cancer immunotherapy yet are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to characterize irAEs involving the peripheral nervous system (PNS-irAEs) in a real-world cohort of ICI-treated patients. METHODS: Cancer patients treated with ICIs between January 2014 and March 2022 were included. Patients with PNS-irAEs were identified and divided into two groups: (1) cranial/peripheral neuropathies and (2) myasthenia gravis (MG) and/or myositis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), were compared among the two groups. RESULTS: Among 920 ICI-treated patients, 20 patients (2.17%) developed a PNS-irAEs. The median latency from ICI exposure was 8.8 weeks and the median time from onset to clinical nadir was 3.5 weeks. Eleven patients developed a neuropathy: polyneuropathy (n = 4), cranial neuropathy (n = 3), small-fiber neuropathy (n = 3), brachial plexopathy (n = 1). Nine patients presented MG and/or myositis: concomitant MG and myositis (n = 6), isolated myositis (n = 2), exacerbation of MG (n = 1). Immunosuppressive treatment and/or ICI withdrawal determined a significant clinical improvement, expressed by a mRS reduction, in the neuropathy group (p = 0.004), but not in the MG/myositis group (p = 0.11). Overall, death due to irAEs occurred in four patients (20%), all with MG/myositis. Compared to patients with neuropathies, those with MG/myositis had a shorter latency onset (p = 0.036), developed more frequently concomitant non-neurologic irAEs (p = 0.028) and showed a higher mortality rate (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In our large cohort of ICI-treated patients, 2.17% developed PNS-irAEs. Compared to ir-neuropathies, ir-MG/myositis tend to occur earlier from ICI exposure and present a worse response to treatment and a higher mortality.

Relatlimab and nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma: insight into RELATIVITY.

With the recent regulatory approvals, the relatlimab-nivolumab combination brings new expectations and opens avenues toward effective immunotherapy combination in advanced melanoma. This work provides a critical insight into the recent phase II-III RELATIVITY-047 trial (NCT03470922), including a comparison with the CheckMate 067 trial on the current standard ipilimumab-nivolumab combination, with a focus on immune-related adverse events. Some imbalances of rare toxicities were noted, deserving careful monitoring and assessment in the upcoming real-world use. The promising efficacy data, although still early, should be carefully balanced against these toxicities, thus making pharmacovigilance and global patient-level data sharing crucial to identify the target population, promote safer prescribing and eventually clarify its place in therapy.

Relatlimab plus nivolumab is a novel immunotherapy combination, recently approved by US and EU regulatory agencies for the treatment of advanced melanoma. In the RELATIVITY-047 trial, this combination demonstrated a favorable benefit­risk profile (notable efficacy data coupled with favorable tolerability), especially compared with published data on ipilimumab­nivolumab combination, the current standard of care. Notwithstanding these promising data, its real-world use will be crucial to better characterize its tolerability and positioning the drug within the pharmacological armamentarium.

Predictors of survival to immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT. RESULTS: A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.

From Development to Place in Therapy of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of ALK and ROS1 Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Following the results of the CROWN phase III trial, the third-generation macrocyclic ALK inhibitor lorlatinib has been introduced as a salvage option after the failure of a first-line TKI in ALK-rearranged NSCLC, while its precise role in the therapeutic algorithm of ROS1 positive disease is still to be completely defined. The ability to overcome acquired resistance to prior generation TKIs (alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, and crizotinib) and the high intracranial activity in brain metastatic disease thanks to increased blood-brain barrier penetration are the reasons for the growing popularity and interest in this molecule. Nevertheless, the major vulnerability of this drug resides in a peculiar profile of related collateral events, with neurological impairment being the most conflicting and debated clinical issue. The cognitive safety concern, the susceptibility to heterogeneous resistance pathways, and the absence of a valid alternative in the second line are strongly jeopardizing a potential paradigm shift in this oncogene-addicted disease. So, when prescribing lorlatinib, clinicians must face two diametrically opposed characteristics: a great therapeutic potential without the intrinsic limitations of its precursor TKIs, a cytotoxic activity threatened by suboptimal tolerability, and the unavoidable onset of resistance mechanisms we cannot properly manage yet. In this paper, we give a critical point of view on the stepwise introduction of this promising drug into clinical practice, starting from its innovative molecular and biochemical properties to intriguing future developments, without forgetting its weaknesses.

The Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score without Clinical Evaluation Predicts Early Mortality among Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with Immunotherapy.

Background: An acceptable risk-benefit ratio may encourage the prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) near the late stage of life. The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was validated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ICIs. The palliative prognostic (PaP) score without clinical prediction of survival (PaPwCPS) predicts early mortality probability in terminal cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 182 deceased advanced NSCLC patients, treated with single-agent ICI at our Institution. Two prognostic categories of high and low mortality risk were identified through ROC curve analysis for PaPwCPS and LIPI scores. Results: Most were >65 years of age (68.3%) and received second-line ICI (61.2%). A total of 29 (15.9%) and 131 (72.0%) patients died within 30 and 90 days from treatment start, respectively. A total of 81 patients (44.5%) received ICI during the last month of life. Baseline PaPwCPS and LIPI scores were assessable for 78 patients. The AUC of ROC curves was significantly increased for PaPwCPS as compared with LIPI score for both 30-day and 90-day mortality. A high PaPwCPS score was associated in multivariate analysis with increased 30-day (HR 2.69, p = 0.037) and 90-day (HR 4.01, p < 0.001) mortality risk. A high LIPI score was associated with increased 90-day mortality risk (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found a tendency towards ICI prescription near the late stage of life. The PaPwCPS score was a reliable predictor of 30- and 90-day mortality.

ADK-VR2, a cell line derived from a treatment-naïve patient with SDC4-ROS1 fusion-positive primarily crizotinib-resistant NSCLC: a novel preclinical model for new drug development of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.

Background: ROS1 fusions are driver molecular alterations in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown high efficacy in patients whose tumors harbour a ROS1 fusion. However, the limited availability of preclinical models of ROS1-positive NSCLC hinders the discovery of new drugs and the understanding of the mechanisms underlying drug resistance and strategies to overcome it. Methods: The ADK-VR2 cell line was derived from the pleural effusion of a treatment-naïve NSCLC patient bearing SDC4-ROS1 gene fusion. The sensitivity of ADK-VR2 and its crizotinib-resistant clone ADK-VR2 AG143 (selected in 3D culture in the presence of crizotinib) to different TKIs was tested in vitro, in both 2D and 3D conditions. Tumorigenic and metastatic ability was assessed in highly immunodeficient mice. In addition, crizotinib efficacy on ADK-VR2 was evaluated in vivo. Results: 2D-growth of ADK-VR2 cells was partially inhibited by crizotinib. On the contrary, the treatment with other TKIs, such as lorlatinib, entrectinib and DS-6051b, did not result in cell growth inhibition. TKIs showed dramatically different efficacy on ADK-VR2 cells, depending on the cell culture conditions. In 3D culture, ADK-VR2 growth was indeed almost totally inhibited by lorlatinib and DS-6051b. The clone ADK-VR2 AG143 showed higher resistance to crizotinib treatment in vitro, compared to its parental cell line, in both 2D and 3D cultures. Similarly to ADK-VR2, ADK-VR2 AG143 growth was strongly inhibited by lorlatinib in 3D conditions. Nevertheless, ADK-VR2 AG143 sphere formation was less affected by TKIs treatment, compared to the parental cell line. In vivo experiments highlighted the high tumorigenic and metastatic ability of ADK-VR2 cell line, which, once injected in immunodeficient mice, gave rise to both spontaneous and experimental lung metastases while the crizotinib-resistant clone ADK-VR2 AG143 showed a slower growth in vivo. In addition, ADK-VR2 tumor growth was significantly reduced but not eradicated by crizotinib treatment. Conclusions: The ADK-VR2 cell line is a promising NSCLC preclinical model for the study of novel targeted therapies against ROS1 fusions and the mechanisms of resistance to TKI therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung tumors with rare histologies and other thoracic malignancies.

In recent years, immunotherapy has significantly changed the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conversely, the role of immunotherapy in NSCLC with uncommon histologies remains unclear, while in other rare thoracic malignancies, such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumors, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is modifying therapeutic strategies with solid hopes for the future. However, larger prospective studies are urgently needed to define the best treatment strategies and the role of immunotherapy in these orphan tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging role of immunotherapy in the treatment of patients affected by these rare thoracic malignancies.

Patterns of renal toxicity from the combination of pemetrexed and pembrolizumab for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (CT) in first-line setting improved survival outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Among the various adverse events, renal toxicity can be a relevant safety issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, observational retrospective study including consecutive patients treated with upfront CT-ICI for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC to investigate incidence and clinical characteristics of acute kidney injury (AKI) using 'Acute Kidney Injury Working Group of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes' (KDIGO) definition. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients received a first-line CT/ICI. The median age was 69 years. 60.7 % were male, and 87.6 % had an ECOG PS of 0-1. 92.1 % had a baseline glomerular filtration rate of at least 60 ml/min. According to KDIGO criteria, 25 (28 %) patients developed AKI. Considering risk factors for AKI onset, patients receiving >10 cycles of CT/ICI were more likely to experience AKI (p < 0.001). No other associations were found with other variables, including concomitant medications. Any component of the treatment was discontinued (pemetrexed pembrolizumab or both) in 10 (40 %) patients, and 9 patients (36 %) were addressed to nephrological consultation. These patients had higher mean creatinine variation from baseline (1 vs 0.6 mg/dl, p = 0.025) and creatine level (1.8 vs 1.4 mg/dl, p = 0.015), but lower eGFR (35.7 vs 54.2 ml/min, p = 0.011) in comparison to patients not addressed. No patients had microscopic hematuria or pyuria, but mild proteinuria (<0.8 g/24 h) was found in 4 patients. A renal biopsy was performed on 3 patients, revealing acute tubule interstitial nephritis (ATIN), karyomegalic interstitial nephritis, and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). CONCLUSION: Renal toxicity represents a challenging adverse event that could negatively impact outcomes of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC patients receiving CT/ICI demanding a multidisciplinary approach.

Impact of Baseline Versus Intercurrent Steroids Administration on Upfront Chemo-Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

The impact of baseline versus intercurrent steroids on the efficacy of upfront chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (CT-ICI) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is unclear. We conducted a retrospective study on metastatic NSCLC patients treated with upfront CT-ICI at our institution between March 2020 and December 2021. The use of steroids was considered as the administration of at least 10 mg of prednisone equivalent. Of 101 patients, 36 (35.6%) received steroid therapy at baseline, and 18 (17.8%) started steroids on treatment. Overall, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9−8.9) and median overall survival (mOS) was 18.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-NR). Patients taking baseline steroids had significantly shorter survival than those not taking them and those assuming intercurrent steroids (mPFS 5.0 vs. 9.2 vs. 7.3 months, p < 0.001; mOS 7.0 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Baseline steroids were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes in the multivariate model (OS HR 2.94, p = 0.02; PFS HR 3.84, p > 0.001). Conversely, intercurrent prescription did not reach a significant value regardless of other pivotal variables included in the model. Baseline steroid administration was associated with a detrimental effect on survival outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with CT-ICI. The role of intercurrent steroid administration should be further explored in larger studies.

A retrospective study for prognostic significance of type II diabetes mellitus and hemoglobin A1c levels in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is common and recognized as a risk factor for developing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while the prognostic evaluation is still controversial. As immunotherapy is widely used in clinical practice, its efficacy and survival should be investigated in patients with DM. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 266 locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC patients who received pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Patients' clinicopathological data, including age, history of DM, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), genetic tumor profiling, and survival data were collected. Associations between clinical characteristics and survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: In this cohort, 15.04% (40/266) of the patients had a history of DM. Fifty-nine (22.2%) patients had a HbA1c level ≥6.5%. A total of 169 (63.5%) patients received 1st-line therapy, and 97 (36.5%) received 2nd- or subsequent-line therapy. Patients with high (≥6.5%) HbA1c and lower (<35 g/L) albumin levels at baseline had worse survivals, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutants significantly associated with worse outcomes at normal HbA1c (<6.5%) levels (all P<0.05). Among the 1st-line therapy patients, a higher HbA1c level (≥6.5%) at baseline indicated a worse overall survival (OS) (2-year survival rate: 31.25% vs. 27.03%, P=0.045), tumor protein p53 (TP53) alternations and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%) were significantly associated with better outcomes (P<0.05). For 2nd- or subsequent-line patients, EGFR mutants and non-squamous carcinomas (non-SCs) indicated worse survivals, and the normal peripheral blood markers of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin levels were favorable prognostic factors for survivals. In non-SCs, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations, high PD-L1 expression, and normal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels favored better progression-free survival (PFS), while EGFR mutants indicated poor PFS (P<0.05). Conclusions: Among patients treated with 1st-line immunotherapy, a higher HbA1c level (≥6.5%) indicated dismal OS, while history of DM, baseline blood glucose levels, and glucose changes during the treatment process were not significantly associated with any of the outcomes.

Genomic Landscape, Clinical Features and Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring BRAF Alterations of Distinct Functional Classes.

BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRAF class 1 alterations are effectively targeted by BRAF inhibitors. Conversely, targeted therapies have very low or absent activity in patients carrying class 2 and 3 alterations. The spectrum of BRAF alterations in NSCLC patients, and their accompanying clinical features, genomic landscape and treatment outcomes have been poorly reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified BRAF alterations of defined functional class across different tumors through a systematic review. Then, we selected NSCLC patients carrying BRAF alterations, according to the systematic review, in the cBioPortal (cBioPortal cohort) to collect and analyze clinical, biomolecular and survival data. Finally, we identified NSCLC patients carrying BRAF non-V600 mutations enrolled in POPLAR and OAK trials (POPLAR/OAK cohort), extracting clinical and survival data for survival analyses. RESULTS: 100 different BRAF non-V600 alterations were identified through the systematic review. In the cBioPortal cohort (n = 139), patients harboring class 2 and 3 alterations were more frequently smokers and had higher tumor mutational burden compared to those carrying class 1 alterations. The spectrum of most frequently co-altered genes was significantly different between BRAF alterations classes, including SETD2, STK11, POM121L12, MUC16, KEAP1, TERT, TP53 and other genes. In the POPLAR/OAK cohort, patients carrying non-V600 BRAF alterations were characterized by poor prognosis compared to BRAF wild-type patients. CONCLUSIONS: Different classes of BRAF alterations confer distinctive clinical features, biomolecular signature and disease behavior to NSCLC patients. Non-V600 alterations are characterized by poor prognosis, but key gene co-alterations involved in cancer cell survival and immune pathways may suggest their potential sensitivity to tailored treatments.