RESUMO
This study demonstrates real-world effectiveness of teriparatide in reducing the risk of hip and other fragility fractures. Fracture incidence significantly decreased as adherence and persistence increased for any clinical, vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures among patients who were observed for 2 years after teriparatide initiation. INTRODUCTION: Examine the relationship of treatment adherence and persistence to teriparatide with hip and other fractures. METHODS: Truven MarketScan Research Databases, 2004 through 2014, provided teriparatide users ≥18 years old with continuous coverage 12 months pre- and 24 months post-teriparatide prescription. Adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR) groups were defined as high (≥0.80), medium (0.50 ≤ MPR < 0.80), and low (<0.50). Persistence, allowing for ≤90-day gaps between prescriptions, was defined as 1-6, 7-12, 13-18, and 19-24 months. Fracture incidence was summarized and compared by using ANOVA and logistic regression models; the effects of adherence were examined with Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent covariates for teriparatide exposure. RESULTS: Among 14,284 teriparatide subjects, mean age was 68.4 years, 89.8% were female, and 29.6% had a fracture in the previous year; these characteristics were similar across MPR and persistence groups. The effects of adherence and persistence to teriparatide were statistically significant (P < .001) for all fracture types except wrist (P ≥ .125). By logistic regression, high vs low adherence was associated with reduced risk for any (OR = 0.67; P < .001); vertebral (OR = 0.64; P < .001); nonvertebral (OR = 0.71; P < .001); and hip fractures (OR = 0.52; P < .001) and longer (19-24 months) vs shorter persistence (1-6 months) was associated with reduced risk for any (OR = 0.63, P < .001); vertebral (OR = 0.56, P < .001); nonvertebral (OR = 0.69, P < .001); and hip fractures (OR = 0.48, P < .001). Cox models revealed a significantly reduced risk between high and low adherence for any (OR = 0.69, P < .001); vertebral (OR = 0.60, P < .001); nonvertebral (OR = 0.77, P < .001); and hip fractures (OR = 0.55, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Fracture incidence significantly decreased as persistence and adherence to teriparatide increased.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/prevenção & controle , Teriparatida/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The study investigated the real-world relationship between teriparatide adherence and persistence and fracture outcomes in a US claims database. Fracture risk was estimated to decrease as adherence and persistence increased for any clinical, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures. Greater emphasis on programs to increase patient adherence may improve clinical outcomes. INTRODUCTION: Adherence to osteoporosis treatment is essential for achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes. Previous findings from clinical trials and observational studies demonstrate that longer teriparatide (TPTD) exposure is associated with fewer fractures. The study aim was to investigate real-world relationships between TPTD adherence and persistence and fracture outcomes. METHODS: The Thomson Reuters MarketScan® database, 2004-2008, was used to identify TPTD users with continuous enrollment 12 months pre- and 24 months post-TPTD initiation. Post-index fractures included vertebral and non-vertebral. Adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR) groups were defined as high (MPR ≥ 0.80), medium (0.5 ≤ MPR < 0.8), and low (MPR < 0.5). Persistence groups were defined by periods 1-6, 7-12, 13-18, and 19-24 months. Logistic regressions modeled fracture risk for any clinical, hip, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures, controlling for patient characteristics, insurance and healthcare provider types, Charlson comorbidity index, bone mineral density screening, medication use, and fracture history. RESULTS: Among 3,587 TPTD patients (mean age 68.9 years; 91% female), fracture risk was lowest in high MPR patients in all models except hip (OR = 1.17; p = 0.64). Medium versus high MPR was a significant risk factor for any fracture (OR = 1.49; p = 0.004) and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.45; p = 0.014); low-MPR was a significant risk factor for any fracture (OR = 1.64; p < 0.01), vertebral fracture (OR = 2.56; p = 0.001), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.44; p = 0.013). Persistence of 1-6 months versus 19-24 months was associated with higher risk for any clinical (OR = 1.88, p < 0.001), vertebral (OR = 3.69; p < 0.001), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.51; p = 0.011), but not hip (OR = 1.93; p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Fracture risk decreased as TPTD adherence and persistence increased for any clinical, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures.