Features of gut microbiota in patients with anorexia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychological disorder, which is characterized by the misunderstanding of body image, food restriction, and low body weight. An increasing number of studies have reported that the pathophysiological mechanism of AN might be associated with the dysbiosis of gut microbiota. The purpose of our study was to explore the features of gut microbiota in patients with AN, hoping to provide valuable information on its pathogenesis and treatment. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, from August 2020 to June 2021, patients with AN who were admitted into Peking University Third Hospital and Peking University Sixth Hospital ( n   =  30) were recruited as the AN group, and healthy controls (HC) were recruited from a middle school and a university in Beijing ( n   =  30). Demographic data, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores of the two groups, and length of stay of the AN group were recorded. Microbial diversity analysis of gut microbiota in stool samples from the two groups was analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. RESULTS: The weight (AN vs. HC, [39.31 ±â€Š7.90] kg vs. [56.47 ±â€Š8.88] kg, P  < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI, AN vs. HC, [14.92 ±â€Š2.54] kg/m 2vs. [20.89 ±â€Š2.14] kg/m 2 , P  < 0.001) of patients with AN were statistically significantly lower than those of HC, and HAMD scores in AN group were statistically significantly higher than those of HC. For alpha diversity, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups; for beta diversity, the two groups differed obviously regarding community composition. Compared to HC, the proportion of Lachnospiraceae in patients with AN was statistically significantly higher (AN vs. HC, 40.50% vs. 31.21%, Z  = -1.981, P  = 0.048), while that of Ruminococcaceae was lower (AN vs. HC, 12.17% vs. 19.15%, Z  = -2.728, P  = 0.007); the proportion of Faecalibacterium (AN vs. HC, 3.97% vs. 9.40%, Z  = -3.638, P  < 0.001) and Subdoligranulum (AN vs. HC, 4.60% vs. 7.02%, Z  = -2.369, P  = 0.018) were statistically significantly lower, while that of Eubacterium_hallii_group was significantly higher (AN vs. HC, 7.63% vs. 3.43%, Z  = -2.115, P  = 0.035). Linear discriminant effect (LEfSe) analysis (LDA score >3.5) showed that o_Lachnospirales, f_Lachnospiraceae, and g_Eubacterium_hallii_group (o, f and g represents order, family and genus respectively) were enriched in patients with AN. Microbial function of nutrient transport and metabolism in AN group were more abundant ( P  > 0.05). In AN group, weight and BMI were significantly negatively correlated with the abundance of Bacteroidota and Bacteroides , while positively correlated with Subdoligranulum . BMI was significantly positively correlated with Firmicutes; HAMD scores were significantly negatively correlated with Faecalibacterium. CONCLUSIONS: The composition of gut microbiota in patients with AN was different from that of healthy people. Clinical indicators have correlations with the abundance of gut microbiota in patients with AN.

Efficacy of adenosylmethionine combined with Si Mo Tang in treatment of neonatal jaundice.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) combined with Si Mo Tang in the treatment of neonatal jaundice and its effect on liver function, cardiac enzymes, immune function, serum transferrin (TRF) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. METHODS: The clinical data of 149 infants with neonatal jaundice were collected retrospectively. The infants were grouped according to the treatment methods. All neonates were treated with blue light phototherapy. Besides, group A was treated with SAM-e, group B was treated with Si Mo Tang, and group C was treated with SAM-e combined with Si Mo Tang. The treatment efficacy, serum bilirubin level, neonatal behavioral neurological assessment (NBNA) score, liver function, cardiac enzymes, immune function, serum TRF and CRP level were compared among the three groups before and after treatment. RESULTS: The total effective rate of treatment in group C was 96.00%, which was higher than group A (73.47%) and group B (78.00%) (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between groups A and B (P > 0.05). Compared with groups A and B, group C had higher NBNA scores, lower serum bilirubin levels, and lower serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels (all P < 0.05); however, there was no statistical differences in NBNA scores, serum bilirubin levels, serum AST and ALT, LDH, CK and CK-MB levels between group A and group B (all P > 0.05). Compared with groups A and B, group C showed higher CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, TRF levels and lower serum CRP levels (P < 0.05), while there was no statistical differences in CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, CD8+, TRF levels and serum CRP levels between group A and group B (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SAM-e combined with Si Mo Tang promoted the regression of jaundice, improved liver function, neurodevelopmental conditions and the myocardial enzyme spectrum, reduced the level of inflammation, and improved the immunity of newborns with neonatal jaundice.

Clinical efficacy, onset time and safety of bright light therapy in acute bipolar depression as an adjunctive therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bright light therapy (BLT) is an effective treatment for seasonal affective disorder and non- seasonal depression. The efficacy of BLT in treating patients with bipolar disorder is still unknown. AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy, onset time and clinical safety of BLT in treating patients with acute bipolar depression as an adjunctive therapy (trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02009371). METHODS: This was a multi-center, single blind, randomized clinical trial. Seventy-four participants were randomized in one of two treatment conditions: BLT and control (dim red light therapy, dRLT). Sixty-three participants completed the study (33 BLT, 30 dRLT). Light therapy lasted for two weeks, one hour every morning. All participants were required to complete several scales assessments at baseline, and at the end of weeks 1 and 2. The primary outcome measures were the clinical efficacy of BLT which was assessed by the reduction rate of HAMD-17 scores, and the onset time of BLT which was assessed by the reduction rate of QIDS-SR16 scores. The secondary outcome measures were rates of switch into hypomania or mania and adverse events. RESULTS: 1) Clinical efficacy: BLT showed a greater ameliorative effect on bipolar depression than the control, with response rates of 78.19% vs. 43.33% respectively (p < 0.01). 2) Onset day: Median onset day was 4.33 days in BLT group. 3) BLT-emergent hypomania: No participants experienced symptoms of hypomania. 4) Side effects: No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: BLT can be considered as an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for patients with acute bipolar depression.