Tumor-informed ctDNA assessment as a valuable prognostic and predictive biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Background: A novel approach for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment monitoring is needed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to identify patients with a poor prognosis. We performed a retrospective evaluation of commercial ctDNA testing in patients with stage I-IV DLBCL to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of tumor-informed ctDNA assessment. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera™ bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for ctDNA detection and quantification. Results: In total, 50 patients (median age: 59 years; median follow-up: 12.68 months) were analyzed, of which 41 had pretreatment time points with ctDNA detected in 95% (39/41). Baseline ctDNA levels correlated with R-IPI scores and stage. ctDNA clearance during first-line therapy was predictive of improved therapy responses and outcomes (EFS, HR: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.9-22, p=0.003 and OS, HR: 22, 95% CI: 2.5-191, p=0.005). Furthermore, 48% (13/27) of patients cleared their ctDNA following the first cycle of treatment. Patients who cleared their ctDNA, irrespective of their R-IPI score, had superior outcomes compared to ctDNA-positive patients. ctDNA clearance outperformed other factors associated with EFS in multivariate analysis (HR: 49.76, 95% CI:1.1-2225.6, p=0.044). Finally, ctDNA clearance predicted complete response (CR)/no evidence of disease (NED) on average 97 days (range: 0-14.7 months) ahead of imaging/biopsy. Conclusion: ctDNA testing in patients with DLBCL is predictive of patient outcomes and may enable personalized surveillance, intervention, and/or trial options.

Association of personalized and tumor-informed ctDNA with patient survival outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Personalized and tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing is feasible and allows for molecular residual disease (MRD) identification in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of commercial cases from multiple US institutions, personalized, tumor-informed, whole-exome sequenced, and germline-controlled ctDNA levels were quantified and analyzed in patients with PDAC. Plasma samples (n = 1329) from 299 clinically validated patients were collected at diagnosis, perioperatively (MRD-window; within 2-12 weeks after surgery, before therapy), and during surveillance (>12 weeks post-surgery if no ACT or starting 4 weeks post-ACT) from November 2019 to March 2023. RESULTS: Of the initially diagnosed patients with stages I-III PDAC who went for resection, the median follow-up time from surgery was 13 months (range 0.1-214). Positive ctDNA detection rates were 29% (29/100) and 29.6% (45/152) during the MRD and surveillance windows, respectively. Positive ctDNA detection was significantly associated with shorter DFS within the MRD window (median DFS of 6.37 months for ctDNA-positive vs 33.31 months for ctDNA-negative patients; HR: 5.45, P < .0001) as well as during the surveillance period (median DFS: 11.40 months for ctDNA-positive vs NR for ctDNA-negative; HR: 12.38, P < .0001). Additionally, DFS was significantly better with KRAS wildtype status followed by KRASG12R (HR: 0.99, P = .97), KRASG12D (HR: 1.42, P = .194), and worse with KRASG12V (HR: 2.19, P = .002) status. In multivariate analysis, ctDNA detection at surveillance was found to be the most significant prognostic factor for recurrence (HR: 24.28, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative tumor-informed ctDNA detection in PDAC is feasible across all stages and is associated with patient survival outcomes.

Clonally unrelated primary large B-cell lymphomas separated by over a decade involving the central nervous system and testicle: Possible predisposition to lymphomas of immune-privileged sites?

Primary large B-cell lymphomas of immune-privileged sites (IP-LBCLs) comprise LBCLs arising within "immune sanctuaries," including the central nervous system (CNS), vitreoretina, and testes. Although patients present with localized disease, the prognosis remains poor with high relapse rates, either at the originating site or within another immune-privileged site. Generally, in the presence of an antecedent IP-LBCL, subsequent LBCLs are expected to be clonally related. However, we present a primary CNS LBCL and later primary testicular LBCL in a middle-aged man, diagnosed over a decade apart, which proved to be clonally unrelated by targeted ultra-deep next-generation sequencing of the IgH locus.

Resolving Discrepancies in Idylla BRAF Mutational Assay Results Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.

BRAF mutation identification is important for the diagnosis and treatment of several tumor types, both solid and hematologic. Rapid identification of BRAF mutations is required to determine eligibility for targeted BRAF inhibitor therapy. The Idylla BRAF mutation assay is a rapid, multiplex allele-specific PCR test designed to detect the most common oncogenic BRAF V600 mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Here, we describe the validation of the Idylla BRAF mutation assay in our laboratory. During routine clinical practice, we noticed cases in which BRAF V600 mutations were identified with unusual amplification curves, with three cases displaying a delayed amplification within a double amplification pattern and two false-positive calls. We therefore initiated a quality improvement effort to systematically and retrospectively evaluate next-generation sequencing (NGS)-tested cases with BRAF mutations identified within five amino acids of BRAF codon V600 and did not identify additional false-positive cases. We hypothesize that late amplification in a double amplification pattern may represent non-specific amplification, whereas cases displaying single delayed amplification curves may stem from the presence of either non-V600 variants, very low-level V600 variants, cytosine deamination artifacts, and/or non-specific amplification by an allele-specific PCR primer. Regardless, we recommend that Idylla BRAF cases with non-classical amplification curves undergo reflex NGS testing. These findings are likely relevant for other Idylla assays interrogating hotspot mutations in genes such as EGFR, IDH1/2, KRAS, and NRAS.

Gamma-delta T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia: a report of a rare entity.

Gamma delta (γδ) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL) is a rare, aggressive subtype of T-lymphoid leukemia that accounts for only 9-12% of all T-ALL cases. Herein, we report the case of an 8-year-old boy who presented with facial swelling, shortness of breath, and progressive cervical and axillary lymphadenopathy. Pathological examination, flow cytometry (Navios, Beckman Coulter ClearLLab 10C 10-color T-cell panel [containing FITC-labeled TCR γδ antibody]), chromosomal analysis, interphase FISH, and targeted DNA-based NGS (34-gene Illumina TruSeq Myeloid Panel) were performed. Flow cytometry evaluation of a lymph node biopsy specimen revealed an immature T-cell population positive for CD4, CD3, CD2 (subset positive), CD5, CD7, CD38, CD1a, cytoplasmic terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (cyto-TdT), CD30 (subset positive), and T-cell receptor (TCR) gamma delta (γδ). Microscopic examination of an enlarged lymph node and bone marrow showed involvement by a dense, diffuse, neoplastic infiltrate. Interphase FISH revealed a copy number loss of PDGFRB (5q32) in 90.5% of interphase nuclei. Targeted DNA-based NGS detected a tier II oncogenic variant in NOTCH1 (c.7375C > T, p.Gln2459Ter) at a VAF of 21%. This case of γδ T-ALL highlights a rare entity and adds to the literature, albeit scant, which may aid in better recognition and classification.

Efficient Lung Cancer Molecular Diagnostics by Combining Next Generation Sequencing with Reflex Idylla Genefusion Assay Testing.

Molecular diagnostics for lung cancer is a well-established standard of care, but how to use the available diagnostic tools for optimal and cost-effective patient care remains unresolved. Here, we show that DNA-only, small gene next-generation sequencing (sNGS) panels (<50 genes) combined with ultra-rapid reflex testing for common fusion transcripts using the Idylla Genefusion assay provide a cost-effective and sufficiently comprehensive testing modality for the majority of lung cancer cases. We also demonstrate the need for additional reflex testing capability on larger DNA and fusion panels for a small subset of lung cancers bearing rare single-nucleotide variants, indels and fusion transcripts and secondary, post-treatment resistance mutations. A similar testing workflow could be adopted for other solid tumor types for which extensive gene/fusion variant profiles are available both in the treatment-naïve and post-therapy settings.

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA to Predict Risk of Recurrence in Patients With Esophageal and Gastric Cancers.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses allow for postoperative risk stratification in patients with curatively treated colon and breast cancers. Use of ctDNA in esophagogastric cancers (EGC) is less characterized and could identify high-risk patients who have been treated with curative intent. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of real-world data, ctDNA levels were analyzed in the preoperative, postoperative, and surveillance settings in patients with EGC using a personalized multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based next-generation sequencing assay. Plasma samples (n = 943) from 295 patients at > 70 institutions were collected before surgery, postoperatively, and/or serially during routine clinical follow-up from September 19, 2019, to February 21, 2022. ctDNA detection was annotated to clinicopathologic features and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients with EGC were analyzed, and 212 patients with stages I-III disease were further explored. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 96% (23/24) of patients with preoperative time points. Postoperative ctDNA was detected in 23.5% (16/68) of patients with stage I-III EGC within 16 weeks (molecular residual disease window) after surgery without receiving systemic therapy. ctDNA detection at any time point after surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 23.6; 95% CI, 10.2 to 66.0; P < .0001), within the molecular residual disease window (HR, 10.7; 95% CI, 4.3 to 29.3; P < .0001), and during the surveillance period (HR, 17.7; 95% CI, 7.3 to 50.7; P < .0001) was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival. In multivariable analysis, ctDNA status and clinical stage of disease were independently associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using real-world data, we demonstrate that postoperative tumor-informed ctDNA detection in EGC is feasible and allows for enhanced patient risk stratification and prognostication during curative-intent therapy.

Circulating tumor DNA monitoring for early recurrence detection in epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. We examined the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker for EOC by assessing its relationship with patient outcome and CA-125, pre-surgically and during post-treatment surveillance. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from patients with stage I-IV EOC. Cohort A included patients with pre-surgical samples (N = 44, median follow-up: 2.7 years), cohort B and C included: patients with serially collected post-surgically (N = 12) and, during surveillance (N = 13), respectively (median follow-up: 2 years). Plasma samples were analyzed using a tumor-informed, personalized multiplex-PCR NGS assay; ctDNA status and CA-125 levels were correlated with clinical features and outcomes. RESULTS: Genomic profiling was performed on the entire cohort and was consistent with that seen in TCGA. In cohort A, ctDNA-positivity was observed in 73% (32/44) of presurgical samples and was higher in high nuclear grade disease. In cohort B and C, ctDNA was only detected in patients who relapsed (100% sensitivity and specificity) and preceded radiological findings by an average of 10 months. The presence of ctDNA at a single timepoint after completion of surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy and serially during surveillance was a strong predictor of relapse (HR:17.6, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively), while CA-125 positivity was not (p = 0.113 and p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of ctDNA post-surgically is highly prognostic of reduced recurrence-free survival. CtDNA outperformed CA-125 in identifying patients at highest risk of recurrence. These results suggest that monitoring ctDNA could be beneficial in clinical decision-making for EOC patients.

Feasibility of Longitudinal ctDNA Assessment in Patients with Uterine and Extra-Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Background: Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are aggressive malignancies with a propensity for early relapse. Current surveillance modalities include physical exam and imaging; however, radiological response to therapy may only manifest after 4-6 cycles of treatment. Herein, we evaluated the feasibility of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment in LMS patients to identify disease progression. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with LMS who underwent treatment at Stanford Cancer Center between September 2019 and May 2022. ctDNA detection was performed using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Genomic analysis was conducted to characterize tumor mutation burden (TMB) and known driver mutations. Results: A total of 148 plasma samples were obtained from 34 patients with uterine (N = 21) and extrauterine (N = 13) LMS (median follow-up: 67.2 (19-346.3) weeks] and analyzed for ctDNA presence. Nineteen patients had metastatic disease. The most frequently mutated driver genes across sub-cohorts were TP53, RB1, and PTEN. Patients were stratified into four sub-cohorts (A-D) based on ctDNA kinetics. ctDNA levels tracked longitudinally with progression of disease and response to therapy. Conclusion: Our results indicate that while undetectable ctDNA may suggest a lower likelihood of relapse, ctDNA positivity may indicate progressive disease, enabling closer monitoring of patients for early clinical intervention.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 1.2021.

The NCCN Guidelines for Older Adult Oncology address specific issues related to the management of cancer in older adults, including screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), assessing the risks and benefits of treatment, preventing or decreasing complications from therapy, and managing patients deemed to be at high risk for treatment-related toxicity. CGA is a multidisciplinary, in-depth evaluation that assesses the objective health of the older adult while evaluating multiple domains, which may affect cancer prognosis and treatment choices. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines providing specific practical framework for the use of CGA when evaluating older adults with cancer.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among men and women in the United States. A major challenge in treatment remains patients' advanced disease at diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma provides recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although survival rates remain relatively unchanged, newer modalities of treatment, including targeted therapies, provide hope for improving patient outcomes. Sections of the manuscript have been updated to be concordant with the most recent update to the guidelines. This manuscript focuses on the available systemic therapy approaches, specifically the treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic disease.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2021.

The NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with soft tissue sarcomas. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including the development of a separate and distinct guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); reconception of the management of desmoid tumors; inclusion of further recommendations for the diagnosis and management of extremity/body wall, head/neck sarcomas, and retroperitoneal sarcomas; modification and addition of systemic therapy regimens for sarcoma subtypes; and revision of the principles of radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas.