Defining the Learning Health Care System: An International Health System Leadership Perspective.

PURPOSE: Over the past 2 decades, many academic health centers (AHCs) have implemented learning health systems (LHSs). However, the LHS has been defined with limited input from AHC leaders. This has implications because these individuals play a critical role in LHS implementation and sustainability. This study aims to demonstrate how an international group of AHC leaders defines the LHS, and to identify key considerations they would pose to their leadership teams to implement and sustain the LHS. METHOD: A semistructured survey was developed and administered in 2022 to members of the Association of Academic Health Centers President's Council on the Learning Health System to explore how AHC leaders define the LHS in relation to their leadership roles. The authors then conducted a focus group, informed by the survey, with these leaders. The focus group was structured using the nominal group technique to facilitate consensus on an LHS definition and key considerations. The authors mapped the findings to an existing LHS framework, which includes 7 components: organizational, performance, ethics and security, scientific, information technology, data, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen AHC leaders (100%) completed the survey and 10 participated in the focus group. The AHC leaders developed the following LHS definition: "A learning health system is a health care system in which clinical and care-related data are systematically integrated to catalyze discovery and implementation of new knowledge that benefits patients, the community, and the organization through improved outcomes." The key considerations mapped to all LHS framework components, but participants also described as important the ability to communicate the LHS concept and be able to rapidly adjust to unforeseen circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: The LHS definition and considerations developed in this study provide a shared foundation and road map for future discussions among leaders of AHCs interested in implementing and sustaining an LHS.

Concept mapping: An aid to teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 157.

Concept maps are graphic representations that learners draw to depict their understanding of the meaning of a set of concepts. Concept maps can be a useful learning strategy in medical education. The purpose of this guide is to provide an understanding of the theoretical basis and instructional use of concept mapping in health professions education. The guide describes the key elements of a concept map and underscores the critical components of the implementation process, from the introduction of the activity to the use of different mapping techniques, based on purpose and context. This guide also examines the learning opportunities offered by collaborative concept mapping, including co-construction of knowledge, and provides suggestions for the use of concept mapping as an assessment for learning. Implications for the use of concept mapping as a tool for remediation are mentioned. Finally, the guide describes some of the challenges related to the implementation of this strategy.

Gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical education: perspectives gained by a 14-school study.

PURPOSE: The authors attempted to determine male and female medical students' exposures to and perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment (GD/SH) in selected academic and nonacademic contexts. METHOD: An anonymous, self-report questionnaire was administered in the spring of 1997 to senior medical students at 14 U.S. medical schools. Data were collected about students' exposures to GD/SH during undergraduate medical education and outside the medical training environment. Students' perceptions of GD/SH in various medical specialties and practice settings were also measured. RESULTS: Of the 1,911 questionnaires administered, 1,314 were completed (response rate, 69%). Both men and women reported exposures to GD/SH. More women than men reported all types of exposures to GD/SH across all academic and nonacademic contexts. Differences between men and women in the frequencies of exposures were greatest outside the medical training environment (t = 15.67, df = 1171, p