Optimizing maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand in the year 2024?

INTRODUCTION: Despite the prognosis of patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improved in the last decade, most patients relapse. Maintenance therapy after a chemotherapy approach with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be a way to control the undetectable residual burden of leukemic cells. Several studies are being carried out as maintenance therapy in AML. Some critical points need to be defined, how the physician can choose among the various drugs available. AREAS COVERED: This reviewdiscusses the advances and controversies surrounding maintenance therapy forAML patients. EXPERT OPINION: Patients withFLT3-positive AML should receive midostaurin or quizartinib in the first-linesetting. For a patient initially receiving midostaurin, consider switching tosorafenib in the post-transplant setting. Because of the improved safetyprofile and potency, many experts will lean toward using a second-generationFLT3 inhibitor such as quizartinib or gilteritinib. Finally, no data indicatewhether maintenance therapy should be prolonged until progression or for adefined period.

Case Report: CAR-T cells and subsequent maintenance with ponatinib in an adult Philadelphia acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient with hematological and extramedullary relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Relapsed or refractory (r/r) Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) still represent an unmet clinical need despite the new immune therapies available for these patients. We report the case of a Ph + ALL relapsed one year after allogeneic stem cell transplant. After one DLI was started CAR-T program with brexucabtageneautoleucel, using as bridging treatment ponatinib, vincristine and prednisone. Brexu-cel infusion was performed in 2023, without CRS or ICANS onset. One month after Brexu-cel infusion BM aspirate and CT-PET showed recovery of full donor chimerism, MRD negativity and complete metabolic remission. Subsequently was started maintenance with ponatinib: at last follow-up, the patient persisted in leukemia-free status. CAR-T cells represent the most powerful treatment for r/r Ph + ALL but there is no consensus about the optimal bridging strategy and also regarding the management algorithm during "post CAR-T phase". Here, we report the efficacy of ponatinib as a bridge to anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy and as post CAR-T maintenance. Our experience suggests that a preserving approach with TKI associated to low-dose chemotherapy can be the optimal bridging therapy prior to CAR-T and that an "MRD-guided" and "TKI-based" maintenance strategy can represent the best choice for Ph + ALL which satisfactorily responds to CAR-T.

Integrating CAR-T cell therapy into the management of DLBCL: what we are learning.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric Antigen Receptor ;(CAR) T cells therapies have become part of the standard of care for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The weakness of CAR-T therapies is that there are no comparative clinical trials, although many publications based on real-life data have confirmed the results obtained in pivotal studies. After several years of the commercialization of CAR-T, some points still need to be fully clarified. Healthcare professionals have questions about identifying patients who may benefit from therapy. There are aspects inherent in the accessibility of care related to improved relationships between CAR-T-delivering and referral centers. AREAS COVERED: Open questions are inherent in the salvage and bridge therapy, predictive criteria for response and persistence of CAR-T after infusion. Managing toxicities remain a top priority and one of the points on which further knowledge is needed. EXPERT OPINION: This review aims to describe the current landscape of CAR-T cells in DLBCL, outline their outcomes and toxicities, and explain the outstanding questions that remain to be addressed.

Identifying and managing CAR T-cell-mediated toxicities: on behalf of an Italian CAR-T multidisciplinary team.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies in which other therapies have failed. AREAS COVERED: The review provides an overview for recognizing and managing the most acute toxicities related to CAR-T cells. EXPERT OPINION: The development of immune-mediated toxicities is a common challenge of CAR-T therapy. The mechanism that determines this toxicity is still unclear, although an unfavorable tumor microenvironment and a pro-inflammatory state put patients at risk. The monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of post-CAR-T toxicities must be determined and based on international guidelines and internal clinical practice. It is urgent to identify biomarkers that can identify patients at greater risk of developing complications. The adoption of consistent grading criteria is necessary to improve toxicity management strategies continually. The first-line therapy consists of supportive care and treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids. An early start of cytokine blockade therapies could mitigate toxicity. The plan will include cytokine release prophylaxis, a risk-adapted treatment, prevention of on-target/off-tumor effect, and a switch on/off CAR-T approach.