American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of the Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors Guidelines: Assessing Their Impact on Brain Tumor Clinical Practice.

Clinical guidelines direct healthcare professionals toward evidence-based practices. Evaluating guideline impact can elucidate information penetration, relevance, effectiveness, and alignment with evolving medical knowledge and technological advancements. As the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors marks its 40th anniversary in 2024, this article reflects on the tumor guidelines established by the Section over the past decade and explores their impact on other publications, patents, and information dissemination. Six tumor guideline categories were reviewed: low-grade glioma, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, progressive glioblastoma, metastatic brain tumors, vestibular schwannoma, and pituitary adenomas. Citation data were collected from Google Scholar and PubMed. Further online statistics, such as social media reach, and features in policy, news, and patents were sourced from Altmetric. Online engagement was assessed through website and CNS+ mobile application visits. Data were normalized to time since publication. Metastatic Tumor guidelines (2019) had the highest PubMed citation rate at 26.1 per year and webpage visits (29 100 page views 1/1/2019-9/30/2023). Notably, this guideline had two endorsement publications by partner societies, the Society of Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, concerning antiepileptic prophylaxis and steroid use, and the greatest reach on X (19.7 mentions/y). Citation rates on Google Scholar were led by Vestibular Schwannoma (2018). Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenoma led Mendeley reads. News, patent, or policy publications were led by low-grade glioma at 1.5/year. Our study shows that the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Tumors guidelines go beyond citations in peer-reviewed publications to include patents, online engagement, and information dissemination to the public.

Simplifying synthesis of the expanding glioblastoma literature: a topic modeling approach.

PURPOSE: Our study aims to discover the leading topics within glioblastoma (GB) research, and to examine if these topics have "hot" or "cold" trends. Additionally, we aim to showcase the potential of natural language processing (NLP) in facilitating research syntheses, offering an efficient strategy to dissect the landscape of academic literature in the realm of GB research. METHODS: The Scopus database was queried using "glioblastoma" as the search term, in the "TITLE" and "KEY" fields. BERTopic, an NLP-based topic modeling (TM) method, was used for probabilistic TM. We specified a minimum topic size of 300 documents and 5% probability cutoff for outlier detection. We labeled topics based on keywords and representative documents and visualized them with word clouds. Linear regression models were utilized to identify "hot" and "cold" topic trends per decade. RESULTS: Our TM analysis categorized 43,329 articles into 15 distinct topics. The most common topics were Genomics, Survival, Drug Delivery, and Imaging, while the least common topics were Surgical Resection, MGMT Methylation, and Exosomes. The hottest topics over the 2020s were Viruses and Oncolytic Therapy, Anticancer Compounds, and Exosomes, while the cold topics were Surgical Resection, Angiogenesis, and Tumor Metabolism. CONCLUSION: Our NLP methodology provided an extensive analysis of GB literature, revealing valuable insights about historical and contemporary patterns difficult to discern with traditional techniques. The outcomes offer guidance for research directions, policy, and identifying emerging trends. Our approach could be applied across research disciplines to summarize and examine scholarly literature, guiding future exploration.

Charting the success of neuronavigation in brain tumor surgery: from inception to adoption and evolution.

PURPOSE: Neuronavigation, explored as an intra-operative adjunct for brain tumor surgery three decades ago, has become globally utilized with a promising upward trajectory. This study aims to chart its success from idea to adoption and evolution within the US and globally. METHODS: A three-pronged methodology included a systematic literature search, impact analysis using NIH relative citation ratio (RCR) and Altmetric scores, and assessment of patent holdings. Data was dichotomized for US and international contexts. RESULTS: The first neuronavigation publication stemmed from Finland in 1993, marking its inception. Over three decades, the cumulative number of 323 studies, along with the significantly increasing publication trend (r = 0.74, p < 0.05) and distribution across 34 countries, underscored its progressive and global adoption. Neuronavigation, mostly optical systems (58%), was utilized in over 19,000 cases, predominantly for brain tumor surgery (84%). Literature impact showed a robust cumulative median RCR score surpassing that for NIH-funded studies (1.37 vs. 1.0), with US studies having a significantly higher median RCR than international (1.71 vs. 1.21, p < 0.05). Technological evolution was characterized by adjuncts, including micro/exo/endoscope (21%), MRI (17%), ultrasound (10%), and CT (7%). Patent analysis demonstrated academic and industrial representation with an interdisciplinary convergence of medical and computational sciences. CONCLUSION: Since its inception thirty years ago, neuronavigation has been adopted worldwide, and it has evolved with adjunct technology integration to enhance its meaningful use. The current neuronavigation innovation pipeline is progressing, with academic and industry partnering to advance its further application in treating brain tumor patients.

Molecular profile and clinical outcome of adult primary spinal cord glioblastoma: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Primary spinal cord glioblastoma (scGB) is a rare and aggressive spinal glioma, making up 7.5% of such cases. Whereas molecular profiles associated with improved overall survival (OS) are well studied for cranial glioblastoma (GB), the molecular characteristics of scGB are less documented. This review sought to document the molecular signatures of scGB, explore current treatment strategies, and evaluate clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines searched the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases (January 1, 2013, to October 14, 2023) using glioblastoma-, spine-, and genetics-related keywords. Inclusion criteria were English-language articles on humans with histologically confirmed primary scGB, excluding drop metastases. Data on demographic characteristics, treatments, molecular profile, and outcome were extracted. RESULTS: Over 10 years, 71 patients with adult primary scGB were reported in 31 papers. Most patients were located in Asia (53%) and the United States (23%). The median (range) age was 32 (24-47) years, with 61% of patients male. Tumors occurred primarily in the thoracic region (42%). Clinical presentation included motor deficits (92%), sensory deficits (86%), neck/back pain (68%), and bowel/bladder dysfunction (59%). Patients underwent subtotal resection (51%), gross-total resection (GTR) (23%), and biopsy (26%). Postoperative adjuvant treatment included concomitant external beam radiation therapy (XRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) in the majority of cases (66%), as well as palliative care without adjuvant treatment (17%). The molecular signature of scGB was similar to its cranial counterpart in terms of MGMT-promoter methylation (40% increased methylation) and higher for mutant TERT (50%) but decreased for wild-type tumor protein p53 (41% decreased mutation). Median (range) OS was 10 (6-18) months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 (3-10) months. PFS was significantly higher in patients treated with XRT/TMZ: median 15 months vs 4.5 months (95% CI -1.32 to 22.56, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary scGB remains a rare disease with notable variations in treatment, potentially influenced by geographical availability. The observed molecular profile, when compared to that of cranial GB, emphasizes the need for further genomic validation and data collection. Surgical advancements to overcome the challenges of accomplishing GTR may contribute to improved OS.

What is the cognitive footprint of insular glioma?

Cognitive impairment has a profound deleterious impact on long-term outcomes of glioma surgery. The human insula, a deep cortical structure covered by the operculum, plays a role in a wide range of cognitive functions including interceptive thoughts and salience processing. Both low-grade (LGG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG) involve the insula, representing up to 25% of LGG and 10% of HGG. Surgical series from the past 30 years support the role of primary cytoreductive surgery for insular glioma patients; however, reported cognitive outcomes are often limited to speech and language function. The breath of recent neuroscience literature demonstrates that the insula plays a broader role in cognition including interoceptive thoughts and salience processing. This article summarizes the vast functional role of the healthy human insula highlighting how this knowledge can be leveraged to improve the care of patients with insular gliomas.

The intersection of race and social determinants of health on clinical outcome of glioblastoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and tumor treating fields significantly increase the overall survival (OS) of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Yet, cost and healthcare disparities might limit access. Multiple studies have attributed more than 80% of the GBM disease burden to White patients. The aim of this study was to explore the intersections of race and social determinants of health (SDoH) with healthcare access and outcomes of GBM patients in a large metropolitan area. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, the tumor registry at the authors' institution (2011-2019) was queried to identify a GBM cohort according to the updated WHO criteria. Data were supplemented by electronic health records to include demographics, outcome, National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index (NCI-CI), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) socioeconomic status (SES) index. RESULTS: A total of 276 unique patients met the study inclusion criteria; 46% of the cohort was female, and 45% was non-White. This racial proportion differs from previous reports indicating that 80% of patients with GBM are White. The proportion of non-White patients in this study was similar to that of the general US population and significantly lower than that of New York City (p < 0.05). Non-White patients predominantly composed the lowest AHRQ SES index quartile, while White patients constituted the highest quartile (p < 0.001). White patients were older at diagnosis compared with non-White patients (63 vs 58 years, p = 0.001). Older age (p = 0.03), higher NCI-CI (p = 0.0006), and lack of insurance (p = 0.03) reduced the odds of a home discharge. Private insurance (p = 0.005), younger age (p = 0.02), and the highest ("wealthiest") AHRQ SES index quartile (p = 0.02) predicted a lower hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients who underwent gross-total resection had greater OS than those who received a subtotal resection or biopsy, independent of race and SDoH (1.68 vs 1.4 years, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to report on race and SDoH of a cohort using the latest WHO criteria for GBM classification. In contrast to previous literature, the study cohort exhibits a higher proportion of non-White patients with GBM, similar to the representation of non-White individuals in the general US population. This study corroborates the impact of SDoH and not race on LOS and discharge location. Initiatives to identify and address these barriers are crucial for enhancing the care of all GBM patients.

Adult neuro-oncology trials in the United States over 5 decades: Analysis of trials completion rate to guide the path forward.

Background: Clinical trials are important to close the gap between therapeutic unmet needs and scientific advances in neuro-oncology. This study analyzes the landscape of neuro-oncology trials to identify completion rates and guide strategies for the path forward. Methods: US-registered adult neuro-oncology clinical trials were extracted from www.clinicaltrials.gov (1966-2019), including funding source, trial type, scope, phase, and subjects' demographics. Completed trials defined as those that had completed participants' examinations or intervention administration for the purpose of the final collection of data for the primary outcome were dichotomized against those that failed to reach completion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to detect differences across factors comparing the last 2 decades (2000-2009, 2010-2019). Results: Our search yielded 4522 trials, of which 1257 are eligible for this study. In 25 US states, neuro-oncology trial availability is <0.85/100,000 population. Comparing the past 2 decades, trial completion rate decreased from 88% to 64% (P < .001) and National Institutes of Health funding decreased from 47% to 24% (P < .001). Inclusion of subjects >65-year-old and women increased, while inclusion of Hispanic subjects decreased (P < .001). The top 2 reasons for lack of completion included accrual and operational difficulties. A larger proportion of women, non-Hispanic subjects, and older adults were enrolled in completed trials than in those that failed completion. Conclusions: Our study is the first report on the neuro-oncology clinical trial landscape in the United States and supports the development of strategies to further improve access to these trials. Additionally, attention is needed to identify and modify other factors contributing to lack of completion.

The Current Landscape of Neurosurgical Oncology in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): Strategies for the Path Forward.

OBJECTIVE: To promote global equity in research, innovation, and care, sharing knowledge and grasping current benchmarks is crucial. Despite LIC/LMIC constituting around 80% of the global population, their contribution to neurosurgery research is less than 5%. This study aims to assess the status of neurosurgical oncology in LIC/LMIC using published data, offering strategic insights for progress. METHODS: Conducting a retrospective bibliometric analysis via PubMed and Scopus databases, we documented reports published (2015-2021) by neurosurgical department-affiliated investigators in LICs/LMICs. World Bank classifications identified LIC and LMIC. Reviewed papers underwent further scrutiny based on independent and associated keyword lists. RESULTS: Our systematic approach revealed 189 studies from LMIC in 10 neurosurgery journals. Of these, 53% were case reports, with 88% focusing on brain pathologies and 12% on the spine. Intra-axial brain tumors (45.8%), extra-axial/skull base (38.4%), and metastasis (3.68%) were prominent. Among noncase report publications, surgical technique and outcome were common themes. India, Egypt, and Tunisia led in publications, with 94% appearing in journals with an impact factor below 5. No papers originated from LIC. CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces existing findings that data from LMIC inadequately represent their populations, impeding a comprehensive understanding of their neurosurgical oncology landscape. Language barriers and data collection difficulties contribute to this gap. Addressing these challenges could significantly enhance progress in shaping the future of neurosurgical oncology in these regions.

The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors: a summary of 40 years of advocacy to advance the care of patients with brain and spine tumors.

The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors was founded 40 years ago in 1984 to assist in the education of neurosurgeons interested in neuro-oncology, and serves as a resource for other national organizations regarding the clinical treatment of nervous system tumors. The Section on Tumors was the first national physicians' professional organization dedicated to the study and treatment of patients with brain and spine tumors. Over the past 40 years, the Section on Tumors has built solid foundations, including establishing the tumor section satellite meetings, founding the Journal of Neuro-Oncology (the first medical journal dedicated to brain and spine surgical oncology), advancing surgical neuro-oncology education and research, promoting neurosurgical involvement in neuro-oncology clinical trials, and advocating for patients with brain and spine tumors. This review provides a synopsis of the Section on Tumors' history, its challenges, and its opportunities, drawing on the section's archives and input from the 17 section chairs who led it during its first 40 years.