Paving the way to tumor budding assessment using digital pathology: a pilot study in Timisoara City (Romania).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The outcome for some colorectal cancer patients correlates poorly with classical prognostic factors, like tumor stage. Tumor budding (TB) is a promising and intensely studied new prognostic factor. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of bud counting on Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE)-stained and immunohistochemically (IHC)-stained scanned slides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 21 cases of robotic surgery colorectal cancer specimens that were submitted to the Department of Pathology, Emergency County Hospital, Timisoara, Romania. TB was assessed by one experienced (R3) and two junior pathologists (R1, R2), in 10 circular areas at 20× (0.785 mm²) on scanned HE-stained and IHC-stained [cytokeratin (CK) AE1∕AE3] slides. Interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: In the case of HE-stained slides, the inter-item correlation matrix showed values between 0.632 and 0.84, while the ICC on average measures for consistency showed very good correlation [ICC: 0.887, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.765-0.95)]. The inter-item correlation matrix for IHC-stained slides comprised values between 0.864 and 0.921, while the ICC for average measures for consistency yielded an excellent value (ICC: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.896-0.978). We identified higher values for budding scores on IHC-stained slides, in comparison to the HE-stained slides: in 19∕21 cases for R1 (average increase of 234.85%), 16∕21 cases for R2 (average increase of 114.14%), and 20∕21 cases for R3 (average increase of 66.92%). CONCLUSIONS: We consider the method of buds counting in 10 microscopic fields on scanned slides to be reliable and valuable. TB counts are higher on IHC-stained slides and associate a better interobserver agreement.

Histopathological findings regarding oncological feasibility of laparoscopic versus open approach for rectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies. Due to oncological safety concerns, data regarding the laparoscopic surgical treatment of rectal cancer is scarce. Our study's main aim was investigate the oncological adequacy of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer by comparing its oncological reliability with the oncological results obtained after open surgery for rectal cancer. In this retrospective study, 80 patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer, admitted in our Clinic between January 1, 2014-November 31, 2015 were enrolled. The studied group was stratified according to the way of approach chosen: classic surgery (59 cases) and laparoscopic surgery (21 cases), respectively. Based on the histopathological examination, we analyzed the histological grading of rectal neoplasms, TNM staging, resection margins, lymphovascular and perineural invasion and the number of regional lymph nodes identified in the perirectal adipose tissue. The average number of isolated lymph nodes demonstrated non-significant differences between the two types of approaches: 20 lymph nodes in the classical approach versus 18 lymph nodes in the laparoscopic approach (p=0.109). Lymph nodes affected by metastases were associated in the majority of cases with stage IIIB and stage IIIC rectal cancers (100% and 83.3%, respectively). The laparoscopic approach proved to be efficient in terms of reaching oncological resection limits. On the resection specimens extracted by laparoscopic surgery, the residual tumor (R1) was encountered in 5% of the cases versus in 6.7% of the cases after classic surgery. The laparoscopic approach is oncologically feasible in the rectal cancer surgical treatment.