The familiarity of Romanian psychiatrists with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis: findings from a web-based survey study.

Background and aims: Psychiatrists are often the first to be consulted in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis. Thus, they need to be aware of clinical features, differential diagnoses, and treatment options for this condition. In this study, we aimed to investigate the familiarity of Romanian psychiatrists with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Methods: We recruited psychiatrists from Romania and conducted a cross-sectional observational study by using a web-based survey. Results: The survey was completed by 111 psychiatrists, of whom 47 (42.34%) were specialists, while 64 (57.66%) were trainees. The median length of training for specialists was ten years (interquartile range - IQR 9.5), while for trainees it was 2.5 years (IQR 3). In total, 31 (27.93%) psychiatrists encountered a case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, with no significant difference between specialists and trainees. 31 (27.93%) psychiatrists were either unaware of the disorder or only knew its name, while 77 (69.37%) had knowledge of an outline of it. Only 3 (2.7%) psychiatrists had comprehensive knowledge of the disorder. Respondents with a higher awareness level had undergone significantly longer training (p=0.014). Unsurprisingly, having encountered a case significantly influenced awareness levels (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between specialists and trainees regarding specific knowledge about anti-NMDAR encephalitis. However, higher awareness levels and having encountered a case significantly influenced answer accuracy for questions regarding psychiatric presentation and epidemiological features. Conclusions: Our study indicates that Romanian psychiatrists have suboptimal knowledge of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, highlighting the need for improved awareness of this disorder.

Neural Antibodies in First-episode Psychosis Patients with Warning Signs for Autoimmune Encephalitis.

Objective: : Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) remains an essential differential diagnosis in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). In this study, we aimed to assess to prevalence of AE in a cohort of FEP patients. Methods: : We used a phenotype-driven algorithm to detect AE in patients with FEP. Initially, we screened patients for warning signs with a low or high pre-test probability for AE, defined as "yellow" and "red flags", respectively. In the next step, patients with red flags underwent cerebrospinal fluid analysis (including neural antibodies), while patients with yellow flags underwent tests for serum neural antibodies, electroencephalography, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Results: : We screened 78 patients with FEP and found that eight (10.3%) had at least one warning sign for AE: four (5.13%) patients had at least one red flag, while four (5.13%) had only yellow flags. Among these, two patients (2.56%) had anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis, while the remaining six (7.69%) received a primary psychiatric disorder diagnosis. Conclusion: : Our study highlights the importance of considering AE in the differential diagnosis of FEP.

The relevance of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis for psychiatrists.

Psychiatrists are often the first to be consulted in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. While this disease is rare, psychiatrists need to be aware of its relevant fundamental, clinical and therapeutic aspects. We begin by reviewing the connection between anti-NMDAR encephalitis and the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia. Next, we focus on the profile of the patient typically afflicted with this disease. Then, we tackle the limited utility of current diagnostic criteria during the early stage of the disease. After reviewing the psychiatric features, we debate the quest for finding specific psychiatric phenotypes that could facilitate early-stage diagnosis. We conclude by discussing the treatment of psychiatric symptoms and disease outcomes. As follows, this paper presents the relevance of anti-NMDAR encephalitis for psychiatrists.

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an essential differential diagnosis in Psychiatry, particularly when dealing with first-episode psychosis.Psychiatrists are often the first to be consulted in patients with NMDAR encephalitis, so they need to be aware of the relevant fundamental, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this disease.

The Importance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Investigation in First-episode Psychosis.

Despite being a reliable first-hand source of data on neuronal pathology, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis remains an often-overlooked evaluation method in first-episode psychosis (FEP). In this paper, we begin by discussing the current role of CSF testing during FEP evaluation in clinical practice. Given that anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis presents with a clinical picture indistinguishable from FEP in >85% of cases, we debate the importance of testing for CSF neuronal antibodies in at least a subset of patients. Then, we continue by reviewing the most important recent studies which sought to identify potential CSF biomarkers in FEP caused by a primary psychiatric disorder. By circumventing traditional psychiatric classifications, characteristic biomarker profiles have the potential to become integral components of early diagnosis, disease stratification, treatment choice, and outcome prediction. Along these lines, we aim to provide an updated perspective on the importance of CSF investigation in FEP.