Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Waste Manag ; 119: 235-241, 2021 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075620

RESUMO

In this research Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris growth was tested on digestate sludge obtained from the anaerobic co-digestion treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) together with waste activated sludge (WAS). Digestate was diluted 1:10 and tested in three batch experimental conditions: with no pre-treatments (noPT), after centrifugation (AC) and after filtration (AUF), in order to evaluate microalgae limiting growth factors. The best growth was obtained by C. vulgaris on digestate AC compared to S. obliquus, reaching 479 ± 31 cell million ml-1 and 131 ± 12 cell million ml-1 respectively. Ammonia removal evaluated in C. vulgaris and S. obliquus cultures was 99.2% ± 0.3 and 98.146% ± 0.008 in AC condition, respectively. Considering that AUF showed similar microalgae growth values, the digestate pretreatment for microalgae growth, could be limited to centrifugation.


Assuntos
Chlorella vulgaris , Microalgas , Scenedesmus , Esgotos , Resíduos Sólidos , Águas Residuárias/análise
2.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 80(8): 913-21, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24346226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several methods are reported in the literature to analyze medically undesirable events during hospital care. Each method has several limitations, so no one has been defined as the standard tool to be able to detect failure during a medical process. The aim of this study was to compare an anesthesiological perioperative checklist with traditional Regional Incident Reporting (RIR) form in detecting and describing failures. METHODS: We analyzed RIR number of reports, seriousness and contributing factors. We also analyzed anesthesiological checklist data for: number of reports, seriousness of incident, contributing factors and distribution in macro-phases. RESULTS: We screened 2681 patients who underwent gynecological and obstetrical surgeries. RIR showed only the most harmful events in 0.4% of surgeries. Conversely, we recorded 135 failures with anesthesiological checklists (3.3%), of which 123 (91.1%) were solved. Categories of incident in checklists were: failures for medical device/equipment (N.=30, 22.2%), for treatment/procedures (N.=25, 18.5%), for clinical assessment (N.=22, 16.2%), for consent/communication (N.=19, 14%), for medication (N.=16, 11.8%) and for documentation (N.=8, 5.9%). Ninety-four failures (69.6%) resulted in no harm for the patient, 41 (30.3%) in reversible damage and there were no cases of permanent damage/death. Contributing factors in checklists were mainly related to team (43.7%), task factors (28.1%) and work environment (22.2%). Failures detected in macro-phases were related to: clinical assessment (31.8%), presurgical re-assessment (23.7%), preparation for anesthesia (30.3%), anesthesia conduction (8.8%) and awakening (5.1%). CONCLUSION: An anesthesiological checklist compared with traditional RIR provided a more sensible and complete framework for incident analysis during the perioperative period in patients undergoing gynecological and obstetrical surgeries.


Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , Lista de Checagem , Adulto , Anestesia/métodos , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Falha de Tratamento
3.
Thromb Haemost ; 72(1): 33-8, 1994 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7974372

RESUMO

This study updates estimates of the cumulative incidence of AIDS among Italian patients with congenital coagulation disorders (mostly hemophiliacs), and elucidates the role of age at seroconversion, type and amount of replacement therapy, and HBV co-infection in progression. Information was collected both retrospectively and prospectively on 767 HIV-1 positive patients enrolled in the on-going national registry of patients with congenital coagulation disorders. The seroconversion date was estimated as the median point of each patient's seroconversion interval, under a Weibull distribution applied to the overall interval. The independence of factors associated to faster progression was assessed by multivariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of AIDS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 17.0% (95% CI = 14.1-19.9%) over an 8-year period for Italian hemophiliacs. Patients with age greater than or equal to 35 years exhibited the highest cumulative incidence of AIDS over the same time period, 32.5% (95% CI = 22.2-42.8%). Factor IX recipients (i.e. severe B hemophiliacs) had higher cumulative incidence of AIDS (23.3% vs 14.2%, p = 0.01) than factor VIII recipients (i.e. severe A hemophiliacs), as did severe A hemophiliacs on less-than-20,000 IU/yearly of plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates, as opposed to A hemophiliacs using an average of more than 20,000 IU (18.8% vs 10.9%, p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference in progression was observed between HBsAg-positive vs HBsAg-negative hemophiliacs (10.5% vs 16.4%, p = 0.10). Virological, immunological or both reasons can account for such findings, and should be investigated from the laboratory standpoint.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/fisiopatologia , Soropositividade para HIV/fisiopatologia , Hemofilia A/virologia , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Análise Multivariada , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatística como Assunto , Reação Transfusional
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA