Pain Extent Is Associated with the Emotional and Physical Burdens of Chronic Tension-Type Headache, but Not with Depression or Anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: Earlier studies suggest that pain extent, extracted from the patients' pain drawings, can help clinicians to identify people with central sensitization or worse clinical features. Our aim was to investigate possible associations between perceived pain extent and clinical pain features, burden of headache, psychological outcomes, and pressure sensitivity in people with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). METHODS: Ninety-nine people (27% men) with CTTH reported their pain on four different body charts representing the head and neck. Pain extent and frequency maps were obtained using customized software. Clinical features of headache, burden related to headache (Headache Disability Inventory [HDI]), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale [HADS]), and anxiety state/trait (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]) levels were assessed. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were assessed over the temporalis muscle (trigeminal area), the cervical spine (extratrigeminal area), and the tibialis anterior muscle (distant pain-free area) to determine widespread pressure sensitivity. Associations between pain extent and all outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Pain extent showed significant positive associations with age (r = 0.221, P = 0.029) and burden of the headache (emotional: r = 0.213, P = 0.030; physical: r = 0.208, P = 0.039), but no other significant association was found. CONCLUSIONS: Pain extent weakly correlated with older age as well as with higher emotional and physical burden of the headache in CTTH. In this population, there was no relationship between pain extent and PPT, indicating that larger pain areas were not associated with signs of central sensitization. Pain drawings can complement other clinical pain features for better characterization of CTTH, but further studies are needed.

Can parameters of the helical axis be measured reliably during active cervical movements?

Convex hull area (CHA) and mean angle (MA) have been proposed to describe the behaviour of the helical axis during joint kinematics. This study investigates the intra- and inter-session reliability of CHA and MA during active movements of the cervical spine. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers (19 women) aged 23 ± 2.8 years participated. Each volunteer was tested on two sessions. All participants were instructed to perform the following active movements of the cervical spine: rotation, flexion/extension and lateral bending, each performed to full range and repeated ten consecutive times. Cervical movements were registered with an electromagnetic tracking system. For each participant, each movement and each session, range of motion (ROM), CHA and MA were extracted. ROM showed high intra- and inter-session reliability during all cervical spine movements using this method. Overall, the intra- and inter-session reliability of the helical axis parameters varied depending on the movement direction and ranged from fair to almost perfect. The intra- and inter-session reliability of CHA and MA were almost perfect during rotation whereas the intra- and inter-session reliability of CHA was substantial during lateral bending and intra- and inter-session reliability of MA ranged from fair to substantial during flexion/extension and lateral bending. This is the first study to evaluate the reliability of helical axis measures during active movements of the cervical spine. The results show that CHA and MA are promising descriptors of cervical kinematics which could be applied in future studies to evaluate neck function in patients with cervical spine disorders.