The Psychological Science Accelerator's COVID-19 rapid-response dataset.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterization, and demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73,223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore coping, framing, and self-determination across a diverse, global sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data.

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries.

The COVID-19 pandemic (and its aftermath) highlights a critical need to communicate health information effectively to the global public. Given that subtle differences in information framing can have meaningful effects on behavior, behavioral science research highlights a pressing question: Is it more effective to frame COVID-19 health messages in terms of potential losses (e.g., "If you do not practice these steps, you can endanger yourself and others") or potential gains (e.g., "If you practice these steps, you can protect yourself and others")? Collecting data in 48 languages from 15,929 participants in 84 countries, we experimentally tested the effects of message framing on COVID-19-related judgments, intentions, and feelings. Loss- (vs. gain-) framed messages increased self-reported anxiety among participants cross-nationally with little-to-no impact on policy attitudes, behavioral intentions, or information seeking relevant to pandemic risks. These results were consistent across 84 countries, three variations of the message framing wording, and 560 data processing and analytic choices. Thus, results provide an empirical answer to a global communication question and highlight the emotional toll of loss-framed messages. Critically, this work demonstrates the importance of considering unintended affective consequences when evaluating nudge-style interventions.

Refining the Definition of Polypharmacy and Its Link to Disability in Older Adults: Conceptualizing Necessary Polypharmacy, Unnecessary Polypharmacy, and Polypharmacy of Unclear Benefit.

The term polypharmacy in older adults is generally used in a pejorative context in the medical literature. Because of its link to geriatric syndromes and disability, the avoidance of polypharmacy is usually recommended in older adults as a strategy to optimize functional status. However, there are many polypharmacy regimens based on high-quality trials that clearly reduce the risk of disability in older adults. Other guidelines for older adults recommend the use of additional medications that may or may not be evidence based and that may or may not reduce disability. Therefore, we propose that, in the geriatric literature, polypharmacy now be categorized as "necessary polypharmacy," "unnecessary polypharmacy," or "polypharmacy of unclear benefit." In this article, we discuss the 3 categories of polypharmacy and give examples on each polypharmacy regimen and its potential relationship to disability in older adults.

The Risk of Pneumonia in Older Adults Using Nonbenzodiazepine Hypnotics.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an increased risk of pneumonia with benzodiazepines (BZD) and an increased risk of any infection with non-BZD hypnotics, but no analysis has specifically investigated the risk of pneumonia with non-BZD hypnotic use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of pneumonia associated with non-BZD hypnotic use in the elderly. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of members aged 65 years and older enrolled in an integrated health care system. Cases were identified as patients aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of pneumonia from January 2011 to December 2012. Controls were matched in a 4:1 ratio to cases based on age, gender, and active enrollment. Non-BZD hypnotic exposure was evaluated for all cases and controls 1 year before the index date. Proximity of exposure to index date and duration of use were analyzed. Conditional logistic regression adjusted for covariates was performed. RESULTS: We identified 51,029 cases with pneumonia and matched 188,391 controls without pneumonia. Of the cases with pneumonia, 5.5% (2,790) of cases had exposure to a non-BZD hypnotic, compared with 3.4% (6,345) of controls. Non-BZD hypnotic exposure was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.08-1.20). When exposure was stratified by proximity to index date, only current exposure was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.18-1.36). Short-term exposure was associated with a relatively higher risk of pneumonia (OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.39-1.77) compared with long-term use (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.06-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Current use of non-BZD hypnotics in older adults is associated with an increased risk of pneumonia. The findings of this study provide additional support for reducing the use of non-BZD hypnotics in older adults and for pursuing safer alternatives for treating insomnia. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. At the time of this study, Jung was a PGY2 resident in drug information at Kaiser Permanente Drug Information Services. All authors are employed by Kaiser Permanente and report no other potential financial conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Jung, Spence, Lee, and Gibbs. Jung, Spence, and Hui were responsible for data collection, and data interpretation was performed by Jung and Spence, with assistance from Escasa, Lee, and Hui. The manuscript was primarily written by Jung, along with Spence and Escasa, and revised by Spence, Escasa, and Lee, along with the other authors.

Improving Care in Older Patients with Diabetes: A Focus on Glycemic Control.

Diabetes affects more than 25% of Americans older than age 65 years. The medical care of older patients must differ from the care of their younger counterparts. Older patients are at high risk of drug toxicity. A hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level less than 7.0% has historically been the goal of all patients with diabetes, regardless of age. Recent research has demonstrated that using medications to achieve such tight glycemic control is not necessary and is often not safe.This article discusses the seminal research findings that strongly suggest that HbA1c goals should be relaxed in older patients. The authors then recommend an age-specific and functionally appropriate HbA1c reference range for patients receiving medications to improve glycemic control. Other interventions are suggested that should make diabetes care safer in older patients receiving hypoglycemic medications.

Risk of Injury in Older Adults Using Gastrointestinal Antispasmodic and Anticholinergic Medications.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of injury associated with gastrointestinal (GI) antispasmodic and anticholinergic use in elderly adults. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Integrated healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare system members aged 65 and older (N = 260,010; 54,152 cases, 205,858 controls). MEASUREMENTS: Cases were identified as individuals with an injury resulting in a hospitalization, emergency department, or urgent care visit (index date) from January 2009 through December 2010. Cases and controls were matched in a 1:4 ratio based on age and sex. GI antispasmodic and anticholinergic current and past exposure for cases and controls was evaluated. Individuals were classified as current users if the days' supply of the GI prescription overlapped the index date and past users if the days' supply ended more than 60 days before the index date. Duration of use for current users was analyzed for short- and long-term use. Conditional logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the total population, 1,068 (0.4%) had current exposure to a GI antispasmodic or anticholinergic (302 (0.6%) cases, 766 (0.4%) controls). Current users had a small but significantly greater risk of injury than nonusers (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = .03). Past use was not significantly different from no use. Short-term users had a significantly greater risk of injury (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.01-1.70, P = .04) than nonusers. Long-term use was associated with greater risk, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Older adults using GI antispasmodic and anticholinergic drugs have greater risk of injury. These findings support recommendations to limit the prescribing of GI antispasmodics and anticholinergics in elderly adults.

Making hospitals safer for older adults: updating quality metrics by understanding hospital-acquired delirium and its link to falls.

The medical care of hospitalized geriatric patients must differ from the care of younger adults. Because of reduced "reserve capacity," hospitalized older adults are at high risk of development of geriatric syndromes such as delirium and falls. Geriatric syndromes often lead to functional decline and dependence. Patients who experience geriatric syndromes in the hospital are more likely to have a longer length of stay, higher risk of readmissions, and worse medical outcomes. Incident delirium in hospitalized geriatric patients has been shown to be preventable by intervening in established risk factors. Prevention of hospital-related falls has not been consistently demonstrated. Analysis from Kaiser Permanente data demonstrated a correlation with delirium and hospital-related falls. We propose that age-specific quality metrics should be made to reduce the risk of the development of geriatric syndromes in hospitalized older adults. By preventing delirium, we believe that health care practitioners can reduce hospital-related falls in geriatric patients and improve the quality of care delivered to hospitalized older adults. An illustrative fictional case study is presented.

Risk of injury associated with skeletal muscle relaxant use in older adults.

BACKGROUND: The use of skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) among older adults is associated with sedation and confusion, which may lead to an increased risk of falls and injuries. SMRs continue to be used among older adults, although they are on the Beers list as drugs to avoid in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between SMR use and subsequent risk of injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of members aged 65 years or older enrolled in an integrated health care system. Cases were defined as patients with a documented injury resulting in either a hospitalization or an emergency department or urgent care visit from January 2009 through December 2010. Cases were matched to controls in a 1:4 ratio by age and sex. Patients had to be enrolled and alive on the date of an injury (index date). SMR exposure for all cases and controls was evaluated within 60 days prior to the index date. Conditional logistic regression adjusted for covariates was performed, with risk estimates presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: From a base population of 322,806 older adults, we identified 27,974 cases of injury and 104,303 matched controls. Among the cases, 365 (1.30%) used an SMR; among the controls, 801 (0.77%) used an SMR in the 60 days prior to the index date. After adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates, risk of injury was significantly increased for patients using an SMR compared to no use (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16-1.50; p < 0.001). Carisoprodol was associated with an increased risk of injury (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.04-2.88; p = 0.036), as were methocarbamol (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75; p = 0.001) and cyclobenzaprine (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.45; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults using SMRs have an increased risk of injury. These findings provide evidence to support current recommendations to avoid the use of SMRs in elderly patients.

From hospital to home: a brief nurse practitioner intervention for vulnerable older adults.

A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of a brief nurse practitioner (NP) intervention on care transitions among older hospitalized adults discharged to home (N = 199). Immediately following discharge, participants randomly assigned to the intervention received up to three home visits and two telephone calls from a registered NP that included medication review, care coordination, assessment of medical care needs, and brief coaching in self-management skills. Usual care participants received all standard medical care, including access to case management services. Intervention participants reported improved satisfaction with medical care (p = 0.008) and self-efficacy in managing medical conditions (p = 0.001) and had fewer primary care visits (p = 0.036) but no change in hospital readmissions at 6 months following enrollment. These findings suggest that intervening at the point of transition may extend the reach of the primary care physician by improving patient outcomes through nursing support at a high-risk period of care-the transition from hospital to home.