Early Real-World Patient and Staff Experience with an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert.

Purpose: To evaluate both the early experience of real-world patients treated with dexamethasone ophthalmic insert (0.4 mg; DEXTENZA®), hereafter referred to as DEX, after cataract surgery as well as staff/practice integration of DEX relative to eyedrops. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study of 23 cataract practices in the United States. Respondents were patients and practice staff who had experience with DEX following cataract surgery. Both patients and practice staff completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey responses to portray the experience of the respondents. Results: Surveys were completed by 62 patients and 19 practice staff. Almost all patients (93%) were satisfied or extremely satisfied with DEX. Patients highly preferred DEX (93%) to topical steroid drops (7%) based on past experiences with topical steroid drops. Most practice staff (95%) were satisfied or highly satisfied with DEX, reporting a 45% reduction in time spent educating patients on postoperative drop use and a 46% decrease in time spent addressing calls from pharmacies regarding postoperative medications. Conclusion: Incorporating the DEX insert into clinical practice in cataract surgery practices can improve patient adherence, while potentially providing significant savings to practices in terms of time spent educating patients and responding to patient and pharmacy call-backs.

Cost-Effectiveness of eRAPID eHealth Intervention for Symptom Management During Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: A randomized controlled trial of online symptom monitoring during chemotherapy with electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID) system found improved symptom control and patient self-efficacy, without increasing hospital admissions and visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the eRAPID eHealth intervention compared with usual care for patients receiving systemic treatment for colorectal, breast, or gynecologic cancers in the United Kingdom. METHODS: An embedded economic evaluation was conducted alongside the trial evaluating the effectiveness of eRAPID from health care provider and societal perspectives. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients were compared over 18 weeks of the trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated and compared with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold. Uncertainty around the ICER was explored using nonparametric bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses. Follow-up data were collected 12-months after random assignment for a subset of the study sample to conduct exploratory analysis of potential longer-term effects. RESULTS: Patients in the eRAPID group had the highest QALY gain and lowest costs over 18 weeks. Although differences were small and not statistically significant, eRAPID had a 55%-58% probability of being more cost-effective than usual care. Patient out-of-pocket costs were lower in the eRAPID group, indicating eRAPID may help patients access support needed within the National Health Service. Exploratory 12-months analysis showed small differences in costs and QALYs, with higher QALY gains in the eRAPID group but also higher costs. Exploratory subgroup analysis by disease status indicated that the eRAPID intervention was cost-effective for patients with early-stage cancers but not for patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Despite small differences in QALYs and costs, the analyses show potential cost-effectiveness of online symptom monitoring, when added to usual care, particularly during adjuvant systemic treatment for early-stage cancers.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor dosing frequency and visual outcomes in macular oedema following branch retinal vein occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between treatment frequency with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in eyes with macular oedema (MO) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in US clinical practice. METHODS: Study eyes that initiated anti-VEGF injections between January 2012 and May 2016 were followed for ≥1 year in a retrospective analysis of medical records (Vestrum Health database). Eyes were analysed in 2 cohorts by treatment duration (years 1 and 2) and then in 2 subcohorts by injection frequency (≤6 or ≥7 injections/year). RESULTS: Among 3099 eyes with MO secondary to BRVO, 1197 (38.6%) received ≤6 injections (mean injections, 4.6; baseline mean VA, 53 letters) and 1902 (61.4%) received ≥7 injections through 1 year (mean injections, 8.8; baseline mean VA, 52 letters). At year 1, mean VA gain from baseline was 10.4 versus 13.9 letters in eyes receiving ≤6 versus ≥7 injections (p < 0.001). At year 2, mean VA in eyes receiving ≤6 (n = 42) versus ≥7 injections (n = 227) was 64 versus 68 letters, respectively (p = 0.19). Mean VA change between the start and end of year 2 in eyes receiving ≥7 injections in year 1 and ≤6 in year 2 differed significantly from that of eyes receiving ≥7 injections in both years (-3.0 vs 0.7 letters, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, more frequent dosing with anti-VEGF agents was associated with greater visual benefits in eyes with MO secondary to BRVO.

Safety, adherence and discontinuation in varenicline solution nasal spray clinical trials for dry eye disease.

Aim: Herein, we report safety outcomes for varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS) within the context of clinical trial discontinuation, contrasting those with discontinuation outcomes from topical cyclosporine and lifitegrast clinical trials. Materials & methods: 1061 subjects were randomized across three clinical trials to receive either VNS 0.06 mg, VNS 0.03 mg, VNS 0.006 mg or vehicle control. Subjects who discontinued from treatment were noted and assigned to their appropriate categories. Results: Despite treatment emergent adverse events, 93.5% of subjects receiving VNS completed the treatment period. By comparison, only 80% of subjects in the integrated clinical trials for cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion and 91% of subjects in the integrated trials for lifitegrast ophthalmic solution completed the full treatment period, respectively. Conclusion: In clinical trials, VNS demonstrated improvements in dry eye disease signs and symptoms, was well-tolerated, and had an overall completion rate >93%. Conventional dry eye treatments (e.g., cyclosporine and lifitegrast) noted considerably higher discontinuation rates in their clinical trials.

OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Signs and Symptoms in Subjects with Autoimmune Disease: Integrated Data from ONSET-1 and ONSET-2.

Purpose: We evaluate the treatment effect of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray (VNS) in dry eye disease (DED) subjects from two randomized trials who self-reported autoimmune disease (AID). Patients and Methods: Post hoc subgroup analysis of subjects reporting a history of AID from the integrated OC-01 VNS 0.03 or 0.06 mg and vehicle control (VC) treatment groups of the ONSET-1 and ONSET-2 trials. Mean change in Schirmer test with anesthesia score (STS, mm) and Eye Dryness Score (EDS) from baseline to 28 days was compared between OC-01 VNS and VC groups. Consistency of treatment effect in subjects with and without AID was evaluated using treatment-subgroup interaction terms in ANCOVA models for mean changes from baseline STS and EDS, and in a logistic regression model for proportion achieving ≥10 mm STS improvement. Results: Of the 891 participants, 31 reported comorbid AID. In all models, the treatment-subgroup interaction terms were not significant (p>0.05), indicating consistency of therapeutic effect of OC-01 VNS in subjects with and without AID. In subjects with AID, the treatment difference for STS was 11.8 mm and -9.3 for EDS and difference for proportion of subjects with ≥10 mm STS improvement was 61.1%. The most common adverse event was sneeze (82-84%), graded as mild by 98% of subjects. Conclusion: OC-01 VNS demonstrated consistency in improving both tear production and patient-reported symptoms in subjects with AID, consistent with pivotal ONSET-1 and 2 trial results. Further investigation is warranted, and results may further support use of OC-01 VNS for DED in AID patients.

Does Dry Eye Disease Severity Impact Efficacy of Varenicline Solution Nasal Spray on Sign and Symptom Treatment Outcomes?

SIGNIFICANCE: There is a clinical necessity for dry eye disease treatments that perform across a broad range of presenting patient severities. Varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS), a unique cholinergic agonist ocular surface-sparing nasal spray therapy, demonstrated significant improvement in both signs and symptoms of dry eye disease in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms as the clinical studies enrolled a more real-world patient population. PURPOSE: This study evaluated efficacy outcomes for VNS in patients with mild-moderate and severe dry eye disease. METHODS: An analysis of integrated data from two randomized clinical trials, ONSET-1 (NCT03636061) and ONSET-2 (NCT04036292) (vehicle control [VC], n = 294; VNS 0.03 mg, n = 308), was performed. Adults 22 years or older with dry eye disease, Ocular Surface Disease Index score of ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥2 in ≥1 regions/≥4 all regions, and Schirmer Test Score (STS) of ≤10 mm (no restrictions on Eye Dryness Score [EDS]) were included in this study. Efficacy was evaluated using analysis of covariance among pre-specified subgroups of mild-moderate and severe baseline disease severity defined by STS (≤5 vs. >5) and EDS (<60 vs. ≥60). Consistency of effect was evaluated by interaction tests. RESULTS: No treatment-subgroup interactions were observed for all end points ( P > .05). The odds of achieving a ≥10-mm improvement in STS for VNS versus VC for patients with baseline STS ≤5 and >5 were 3.4(95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 5.6) and 2.3(1.3 to 4.0) and for EDS of <60 and ≥60 were 3.4(1.9 to 6.1) and 2.5(1.5 to 4.0). Least-squares mean treatment/VC differences in change from baseline in EDS for patients with baseline STS ≤5 or >5 were -7.4(95% confidence interval, -12.5 to -2.4) and -2.8(-8.7 to 3.1); EDS of <60 and ≥60 were -2.9(-8.3 to 2.5) and -8.1(-13.6 to -2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VC, VNS improved tear production and patient-reported symptoms in patients with dry eye disease, demonstrating consistency of effect regardless of initial presenting severity.

Does Menopausal Status Affect Dry Eye Disease Treatment Outcomes with OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray? A Post Hoc Analysis of ONSET-1 and ONSET-2 Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare the efficacy of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray for treatment of dry eye disease (DED) in postmenopausal women (PM+) versus women who were not postmenopausal (PM-). METHODS: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of data integrated from two prior randomized controlled clinical trials, ONSET-1 and ONSET-2. Women randomized to treatment with OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray 0.03 mg or vehicle control (VC) whose self-reported menopausal status (PM+ versus PM-) was known were included. Outcomes included the treatment difference (the OC-01 [varenicline solution] nasal spray change from baseline [CFB] minus VC CFB) in Schirmer test score (STS, mm) with anesthesia and the eye dryness score (EDS) measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 = no discomfort, 100 = maximal discomfort). Least-squares mean treatment differences were derived from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. RESULTS: Overall, 449 female participants in the ONSET-1 and ONSET-2 trials randomized to the OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray 0.03 mg or VC groups were included in this analysis. The treatment-menopausal status interaction terms in the STS and EDS ANCOVA and logistic regression models were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), indicating consistency of treatment effect between the PM- and PM+ groups. The treatment difference in STS was similar in the PM- and PM+ groups (6.7 and 5.5 mm, respectively). The treatment difference in EDS was similar in the PM- and PM+ groups (- 5.5 and - 4.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray demonstrated similar efficacy in promoting natural tear production and improving symptoms in both PM- and PM+ groups. As menopausal-related hormonal changes may be associated with more severe DED, these results may support OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray as an effective treatment for DED in women regardless of presenting menopausal status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Post hoc subgroup analysis of data integrated from ONSET-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03636061) and ONSET-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04036292).

Online Symptom Monitoring During Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Randomized Pilot Trial of the eRAPID Intervention.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) and chemoRT for pelvic cancers increase survival but are associated with serious treatment-related symptoms. Electronic-patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID) is a secure online system for patients to self-report symptoms, generating immediate advice for hospital contact or self-management. This pilot study aimed to establish feasibility and acceptability of the system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective 2-center randomized parallel-group pilot study, patients undergoing radical pelvic RT for prostate cancer (prostateRT) or chemoRT for lower gastrointestinal and gynecological cancers were randomized to usual care (UC) or eRAPID (weekly online symptom reporting for 12, 18, and 24 weeks). Primary outcomes were recruitment/attrition, study completion, and patient adherence. Secondary outcomes were effect on hospital services and performance of patient outcome measures. Missing data, floor/ceiling effects, and mean change scores were examined for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ C-30), self-efficacy, and EuroQol (EQ5D). RESULTS: From 228 patients approached, 167 (73.2%) were consented and randomized (83, eRAPID; 84, UC; 87, prostateRT; 80, chemoRT); 150 of 167 completed 24 study weeks. Only 16 patients (9.6%) withdrew (10, eRAPID; 6, UC). In the eRAPID arm, completion rates were higher in patients treated with prostateRT compared with chemoRT (week 1, 93% vs 69%; week 2, 93% vs 68%; week 12, 69% vs 55%). Overall, over 50% of online reports triggered self-management advice for milder adverse events. Unscheduled hospital contact was low, with no difference between eRAPID and UC. Return rates for outcome measures were excellent in prostateRT (97%-91%; 6-24 weeks) but lower in chemoRT (95%-55%; 6-24 weeks). Missing data were low (1%-4.1%), ceiling effects were evident in EQ5D-5L, self-efficacy-scale, and FACT-Physical Wellbeing. At 6 weeks, the chemoRT-eRAPID group showed less deterioration in FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EQ5D-Visual Analogue Scale than UC, after baseline adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: eRAPID was successfully added to UC at 2 cancer centers in different patient populations. Acceptability and feasibility were confirmed with excellent adherence by prostate patients, but lower by those undergoing chemoRT for gynecological cancers.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of phase 3 clinical trial outcomes of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray and lifitegrast 5% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye disease.

BACKGROUND: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a methodology for cross-study comparisons after adjusting for baseline characteristic imbalances. It is a comparative analytical approach used across therapeutic areas absent head-to-head trial outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of OC-01 (varenicline solution) 0.03 mg nasal spray (OC-01 VNS) to lifitegrast 5% ophthalmic solution on tear production and patient-reported eye dryness in patients with dry eye disease (DED) using data from phase 3 clinical trials via MAIC analysis. METHODS: Individual patient data (IPD) from the phase 3 registrational trial of OC-01 VNS and aggregate data from 2 phase 3 trials of lifitegrast in the publicly available XIIDRA New Drug Application were used. Using unanchored MAIC methods, IPD were weighted on clinically relevant baseline variables (age, race, sex, baseline Schirmer's test score [STS], and Eye Dryness Score [EDS]) to produce weighted OC-01 VNS datasets matched to the same lifitegrast datasets' variables. Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline (CFB) in STS for OC-01 VNS was calculated using the identical analysis of covariance model and covariates used to calculate the same values for lifitegrast in the XIIDRA New Drug Application and was then compared. LS mean EDS (based on a 100- point Visual Analogue Scale) was compared via analysis of covariance in the weighted OC-01 VNS and lifitegrast datasets. OC-01 VNS at 2 and 4 weeks compared to lifitegrast data at 2 and 6 weeks. RESULTS: Data from 511 subjects (n = 260 treated; 251 vehicle control [VC]) in the OC-01 VNS phase 3 trial, 588 (n = 293 treated, 295 VC) in the lifitegrast phase 3 OPUS-1 trial, and 718 (n = 358 treated, 360 VC) in the lifitegrast phase 3 OPUS-2 trial were analyzed. The LS mean STS CFB for OC-01 VNS at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly greater than that for lifitegrast at 2 and 6 weeks in OPUS-1 and OPUS-2 (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). The LS mean EDS CFB for OC-01 VNS at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly greater than that for lifitegrast at 2 and 6 weeks in OPUS-1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons) and at 4 weeks vs lifitegrast at 6 weeks in OPUS-2 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This MAIC analysis demonstrates OC-01 VNS produced significantly greater improvement in mean STS and comparable or greater improvement in EDS compared with lifitegrast in phase 3 trials. These findings suggest a potentially greater magnitude of improvement achieved with OC-01 VNS compared with lifitegrast for the treatment of DED within the conditions of the analysis methodology. DISCLOSURES D White is a consultant for Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. L Hendrix, M Macsai, and A Gibson are employees and shareholders for Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. L Sun was an employee of COEUS, Clinical Research at the time of study conduct and received funding from Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. I Tam is an employee of COEUS, Clinical Research and received funding from Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, and preparation of the manuscript and is the manufacturer/licensee of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., sponsored the phase 3 OC-01 (varenicline solution) clinical study from which analysis data were obtained.

OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray Demonstrates Consistency of Effect Regardless of Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Artificial Tear Use.

Purpose: To evaluate OC-01 [varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS)] tear production and symptom outcomes in patients with dry eye disease by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and artificial tear use status. Patients and Methods: Adults ≥22 years of age diagnosed with dry eye disease, with Ocular Surface Disease Index score ≥23, corneal fluorescein staining score ≥2 in ≥1 region or ≥4 for all regions, and baseline Schirmer Test Score (STS) ≤10 mm, with no restrictions on eye dryness score (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using integrated data from ONSET-1 and ONSET-2 [vehicle control (VC), n=294; OC-01 VNS 0.03 mg, n=308]. Subgroups included age (≤55, 56-65, >65 years), gender (male, female), race (White, Black or African American), ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, Not Hispanic or Latino), and artificial tear use (yes, no). Analysis of covariance models, with the covariates treatment, study site, and baseline severity measures, were used to calculate treatment-VC differences. Consistency of effect among subgroups was evaluated by conducting interaction tests. Results: Consistency of treatment effect across subgroups was observed for all endpoints, with P value for all treatment-subgroup interaction terms >0.05. For % of patients with ≥10mm improvement in STS and least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in STS and EDS, there was improvement in tear production across demographic group categories. Artificial tear use did not change STS or EDS outcomes with OC-01 VNS. Conclusion: OC-01 VNS improved tear production and patient-reported symptom outcomes across a broad range of patients by age, gender, race, and ethnicity, and regardless of artificial tear use status at baseline. OC-01 VNS demonstrated a consistent benefit across an extensive range of patients with dry eye disease.

Early Real-World Physician Experience with an Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert.

Purpose: To describe the early real-world experience of physicians with an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (DEX) in patients undergoing cataract surgery and to capture the clinical impact of adopting this therapy. Patients and Methods: 23 United States sites including Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting (ASC) and Outpatient Clinical settings. Respondents were physicians who had early experience with DEX in cataract surgery patients. This was a Phase 4 experiential cross-sectional survey study comprised of 3 sequential online physician surveys. Descriptive statistics summarized the surveys' responses to determine the early impressions of the respondents. Results: Forty-two physicians completed surveys. On average, physicians reported feeling comfortable administering DEX after placing 3 inserts (mean 2.7; standard deviation 1.9). Most physicians (92%) were satisfied with DEX, and all physicians (100%) reported that DEX improved patient compliance. Most physicians (62.5%) indicated they would highly prefer DEX over traditional steroid eyedrops for the management of post-surgical inflammation and pain. Conclusion: The surveys exploring the early use of DEX suggest that DEX is a clinically effective treatment with a rapid initial learning curve and integrates well into clinical use. Physicians had a very positive early experience with DEX, including comfort with insertion and satisfaction. DEX shows promise as a primary treatment choice of physicians for ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery by offering patients a hands-free innovative therapy that delivers a preservative-free steroid to the ocular surface over approximately 30 days.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of phase 3 clinical trial outcomes: OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray and cyclosporine a 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion for the treatment of dry eye disease.

BACKGROUND: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a validated and widely accepted statistical method that derives indirect comparisons between treatments when head-to-head studies have not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of OC-01 varenicline nasal spray (OC-01 VNS) 0.03 mg to cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion on tear production in patients with dry eye disease based on data from the respective phase 3 clinical trials using the MAIC technique. METHODS: Individual patient data were drawn from the phase 3 registry trial of OC-01 VNS; aggregate data were drawn from 2 phase 3 trials of CsA in the publicly available New Drug Application for CsA 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion (RESTASIS). Using unanchored MAIC methods, the individual patient data were weighted based on 4 clinically relevant baseline variables (age, race, sex, and baseline Schirmer test score [STS]) to produce a weighted OC-01 VNS dataset matched to the key demographics of the CsA dataset. Least-squares mean change from baseline in STS for OC-01 VNS was calculated using the identical analysis of variance model used to calculate the same value for CsA in the RESTASIS New Drug Application, which were then compared. Proportions of subjects with improvement of 10 mm or more from baseline in STS were compared in the weighted OC-01 VNS and CsA dataset. Time points available for comparisons were CsA trials at 3 and 6 months and OC-01 data at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Data from 511 subjects in the OC-01 VNS phase 3 trial and 585 in the CsA phase 3 trials were analyzed. The least-squares mean STS change from baseline for OC-01 VNS at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly higher than that for CsA at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Mean STS improvements were approximately 6-7 mm for OC-01 VNS and approximately 1 mm for CsA. The proportion of subjects with improvement of 10 mm or more from baseline in STS was significantly higher for OC-01 VNS (50.2%) than CsA (11.7 and 17.1% in the 2 CsA studies; P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: This MAIC analysis demonstrates OC-01 VNS produces significantly greater improvement in mean STS and results in significantly greater numbers of patients with substantial improvement in STS (percentage ≥ 10 mm) compared with CsA. Together, absent more robust data from head-to-head trials, findings may suggest a potentially greater magnitude of improvement achieved with OC-01 VNS compared with CsA for the treatment of dry eye disease within conditions of the analysis methodology. DISCLOSURES: Dr Visco was a consultant for Novartis, Allergan, and Oyster Point, Inc. Ms Hendrix and Drs Macsai and Gibson are employees and shareholders for Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. Drs Sun and Tam participated in clinical research and received funding from Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc sponsored the Phase 3 OC-01 (varenicine solution) clinical study from which analysis data are obtained.

Bilateral Effect of OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray for Treatment of Signs and Symptoms in Individuals with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Dry Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: This study compares outcomes of therapy with OC-01 (varenicline solution) for dry eye disease in study eyes and nonstudy fellow eyes of participants in 2 pivotal clinical trials. METHODS: All 891 patients randomized to receive OC-01 (varenicline solution) 0.03 mg, OC-01 (varenicline solution) 0.06 mg, or vehicle control (VC) in each nostril twice daily for 28 days in the Phase IIb ONSET-1 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of OC-01 Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease) and Phase III ONSET-2 trials were included in this post hoc analysis. One eye was designated as the study eye. The mean change from baseline in anesthetized Schirmer test score (STS) and the percentage of eyes achieving a ≥10-mm STS improvement were compared between treatments in study and fellow eyes overall and by baseline Eye Dryness Score. FINDINGS: In the study eyes, the mean STS improvement from baseline to day 28 was 10.4 mm, 10.5 mm, and 4.9 mm in the 0.03 mg, 0.06 mg, and VC groups, respectively; comparable values in nonstudy fellow eyes were 8.7 mm, 8.8 mm, and 2.7 mm, respectively. The percentages of study eyes achieving a ≥10-mm STS improvement were 48.1%, 48.4%, and 25.9%, respectively, whereas the comparable values in nonstudy eyes were 42.9%, 43.9%, and 19.7%, respectively. No significant treatment-subgroup interactions were observed in study or fellow eye STS outcomes by baseline Eye Dryness Scores <40 and ≥40 (p > 0.05 for all). IMPLICATIONS: OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray had significant tear film production improvements compared with VC in both study and fellow eyes. These findings suggest efficacy across a broad spectrum of presenting disease severity.

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Events in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analysis of VISTA and VIVID Trials.

Purpose: This work aimed to assess the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) events and improvement to mild non-PDR (NPDR) or better after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser treatment (control) in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: PDR events in the VISTA (NCT01363440) and VIVID (NCT01331681) phase 3 clinical trials were evaluated in a combined IAI-treated group (IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks or 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses; n = 475) and a macular laser control group (n = 235) through week 100 in eyes without PDR at baseline (Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale [DRSS] score ≤ 53). Improvement in the DRSS score to 35 or better was evaluated in those with a baseline DRSS score of 43 or greater. Results: A lower proportion of eyes in the IAI group than in the laser group developed a PDR event through week 100 (4.4% vs 11.1%; adjusted difference, -6.7%; 97.5% CI, -11.7 to -1.6; nominal P = .0008). All PDR events occurred in eyes with a baseline DRSS score of 43, 47, or 53 and not in those with a score of 35 or less. A greater proportion of eyes in the IAI group than in the control group achieved a DRSS score of 35 or less (20.0% vs 3.8%; nominal P < .0001). Conclusions: Fewer eyes with NPDR and DME treated with IAI than eyes treated with a laser had a PDR event. More eyes treated with IAI improved to mild NPDR or better (DRSS score ≤ 35) through 100 weeks.

Phase 3 Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone intracanalicular ocular insert for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects with allergic conjunctivitis were randomized 1:1 to receive a dexamethasone insert or a placebo insert in both eyes and were evaluated using a modified version of the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model. After inserts were placed in office, a series of 4 closely spaced post-insertion CACs were conducted at weeks 1, 2, and 4 across approximately 30 days. Primary efficacy endpoints, assessed at week-1 CAC-day 8, were reported by subjects of ocular itching at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post CAC and investigator-evaluated conjunctival redness at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post CAC. RESULTS: For the primary endpoints, dexamethasone inserts showed statistically significantly lower mean ocular itching scores than placebo at all time points (P <.001), with differences favoring dexamethasone inserts over placebo (0.86, 0.98, and 0.96 units at 3, 5, and 7 minutes, respectively) and statistically significantly lower conjunctival redness scores at 20 minutes (P <.05) but not at 7 or 15 minutes (P ≥.05). Results also showed statistically significantly less itching and conjunctival redness at 31 and 29 of 33 other time points, respectively (P <.05). There were no serious adverse events; 1 subject had elevated intraocular pressure in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented in this study demonstrate the potential for a single, physician-administered dexamethasone intracanalicular insert to provide relief of ocular itching for up to 4 weeks in subjects with allergic conjunctivitis, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID) is an online eHealth system for patients to self-report symptoms during cancer treatment. It provides automated severity-dependent patient advice guiding self-management or medical contact and displays the reports in electronic patient records. This trial evaluated the impact of eRAPID on symptom control, healthcare use, patient self-efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) in a patient population treated predominantly with curative intent. METHODS: Patients with colorectal, breast, or gynecological cancers commencing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to usual care (UC) or the addition of eRAPID (weekly online symptom reporting for 18 weeks). Primary outcome was symptom control (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, Physical Well-Being subscale [FACT-PWB]) assessed at 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Secondary outcomes were processes of care (admissions or chemotherapy delivery), patient self-efficacy, and global quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, EQ5D-VAS, and EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score). Multivariable mixed-effects repeated-measures models were used for analyses. Trial registration: ISRCTN88520246. RESULTS: Participants were 508 consenting patients (73.6% of 690 eligible) and 55 health professionals. eRAPID compared to UC showed improved physical well-being at 6 (P = .028) and 12 (P = .039) weeks and no difference at 18 weeks (primary end point) (P = .69). Fewer eRAPID patients (47%) had clinically meaningful physical well-being deterioration than UC (56%) at 12 weeks. Subgroup analysis found benefit in the nonmetastatic group at 6 weeks (P = .0426), but not in metastatic disease. There were no differences for admissions or chemotherapy delivery. At 18 weeks, patients using eRAPID reported better self-efficacy (P = .007) and better health on EQ5D-VAS (P = .009). Average patient compliance with weekly symptom reporting was 64.7%. Patient adherence was associated with clinician's data use and improved FACT-PWB at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Real-time monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes improved physical well-being (6 and 12 weeks) and self-efficacy (18 weeks) in a patient population predominantly treated with curative intent, without increasing hospital workload.

Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Dosing Frequency and Visual Outcomes in Macular Edema Following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Purpose: We evaluated the relationship between dosing frequency of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and visual acuity (VA) outcomes over 2 years in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in the US routine clinical practice setting. Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed electronic medical records of eyes with ME secondary to CRVO that received their first anti-VEGF injection January 1, 2012, to May 31, 2016, and were followed for 1 year or more in the US-based Vestrum Health Treatment and Outcomes database. Eyes were divided into 2 injection frequency subcohorts (≤6 or ≥7 injections/year). Results: Overall, 851 (34.6%) of 2458 eyes with ME secondary to CRVO received 6 or fewer injections, and 1607 (65.4%) received 7 or more injections through 1 year. The mean number of injections in patients receiving 6 or fewer injections and 7 or more injections was 4.7 and 8.8, respectively, and baseline mean VA was 35 and 37 letters, respectively. At year 1, mean letter gain from baseline was less in eyes receiving 6 or fewer injections vs in those receiving 7 or more injections (7.0 vs 12.2, P < .001). Mean VA at year 2 was 50 letters in eyes receiving 6 or fewer injections (n = 50) and 55 letters in eyes receiving 7 or more injections (n = 157). Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, more frequent dosing with anti-VEGF agents was associated with greater visual benefits in eyes with ME secondary to CRVO.

Outcomes by Baseline Choroidal Neovascularization Features in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Studies.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of baseline choroidal neovascularization (CNV) features on visual change and fluid resolution after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 52-week data from the phase 3 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Studies (VIEW) 1 and 2 clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eight hundred four patients with nAMD. METHODS: Integrated data from VIEW 1 and 2 of 1804 eyes receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs) 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAIs 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses, and ranibizumab every 4 weeks with documented baseline CNV type, total area, and leakage area were analyzed. Time to an event and cumulative incidence were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and relative risks were estimated using proportional hazards analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Cumulative incidence of time to first sustained vision gain of 15 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, vision loss of more than 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters from baseline, as well as first sustained absence of retinal fluid and intraretinal fluid as evaluated by OCT with respect to CNV type, total CNV, and leakage area. RESULTS: Eyes with predominantly classic CNV (mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 48.2 letters at baseline) showed a higher incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more than eyes with occult CNV (mean BCVA, 57.9 letters at baseline; P < 0.01). Eyes with occult CNV at baseline showed higher incidence rates of first sustained absence of retinal fluid and of intraretinal fluid than eyes with predominantly classic CNV (both P < 0.01). With increasing baseline CNV total area and leakage area, the incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis provided additional evidence for the role of baseline CNV features (CNV type, total area, and leakage area) in influencing visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes with nAMD after anti-VEGF treatment.

Dropless cataract surgery: modernizing perioperative medical therapy to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in pharmacology offer freedom from topical medical therapy without compromise of anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial coverage in the perioperative period. In this review, we describe the basis for dropless cataract surgery with the goal of improving outcomes and the patient experience. RECENT FINDINGS: Phacoemulsification outcomes depend largely on surgeon skill but also on adherence to a complex multidrug regimen of perioperative anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial therapy to prevent sight-threatening complications such as cystoid macular edema or endophthalmitis. Successful administration of this regimen can be limited by noncompliance, difficulty administering eye drops, bioavailability, and side effects, among others. The recent development of sustained-release formulations of dexamethasone - one an intracanalicular insert and the other an intraocular suspension - can provide sustained tapering doses of dexamethasone while reducing or eliminating the need for anti-inflammatory eye drop therapy. Similarly, mounting evidence compellingly demonstrates that intracameral antibiotic use intraoperatively is at least as effective as topical antibiotics in preventing endophthalmitis. SUMMARY: Sustained-release dexamethasone coupled with intracameral antibiotics at the time of phacoemulsification can provide antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory prophylaxis without the need for topical eye drop medications. This approach has the potential to improve compliance with therapy, visual acuity outcomes, and the overall patient experience.