Activation of cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic activity occurs at different skin temperatures during face cooling.

Sufficiently cold-water temperatures (<7°C) are needed to elicit the sympathetic response to the cold pressor test using the hand. However, it is not known if stimulating the trigeminal nerve via face cooling, which increases both sympathetic and cardiac parasympathetic activity, also has a threshold temperature. We tested the hypothesis that peak autonomic activation during a progressive face cooling challenge would be achieved when the stimulus temperature is ≤7°C. Twelve healthy participants (age: 25 ± 3 yr, four women) completed our study. Six pliable bags, each containing water or an ice slurry (34°C, 28°C, 21°C, 14°C, 7°C, and 0°C) were applied sequentially to participants' forehead, eyes, and cheeks for 5 min each. Mean arterial pressure (photoplethysmography; index of sympathetic activity) and heart rhythm (3-lead ECG) were averaged in 1-min increments at the end of baseline and throughout each temperature condition. Heart rate variability in the time [(root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD)] and frequency [high-frequency (HF) power] domains was used to estimate cardiac parasympathetic activity. Data are presented as the increase from baseline ± SD. Mean arterial pressure only increased from baseline in the 7°C (13.1 ± 10.3 mmHg; P = 0.018) and 0°C (25.2 ± 7.8 mmHg; P < 0.001) conditions. Only the 0°C condition increased RMSSD (160.6 ± 208.9 ms; P = 0.009) and HF power (11,450 ± 14,555 ms2; P = 0.014) from baseline. Our data indicate that peak increases in sympathetic activity during face cooling are initiated at a higher forehead skin temperature than peak increases in cardiac parasympathetic activity.

A comparison of methods used to quantify the work of breathing during exercise.

The mechanical work of breathing (Wb) is an insightful tool used to assess respiratory mechanics during exercise. There are several different methods used to calculate the Wb, however, each approach having its own distinct advantages/disadvantages. To date, a comprehensive assessment of the differences in the components of Wb between these methods is lacking. We therefore sought to compare the values of Wb during graded exercise as determined via the four most popular methods: 1) pressure-volume integration; 2) the Hedstrand diagram; 3) the Otis diagram; and the 4) modified Campbell diagram. Forty-two participants (30 ± 15 yr; 16 women) performed graded cycling to volitional exhaustion. Esophageal pressure-volume loops were obtained throughout exercise. These data were used to calculate the total Wb and, where possible, its subcomponents of inspiratory and expiratory, resistive and elastic Wb, using each of the four methods. Our results demonstrate that the components of Wb were indeed different between methods across the minute ventilations engendered by graded exercise. Importantly, however, no systematic pattern in these differences could be observed. Our findings indicate that the values of Wb obtained during exercise are uniquely determined by the specific method chosen to compute its value-no two methods yield identical results. Because there is currently no "gold-standard" for measuring the Wb, it is emphasized that future investigators be cognizant of the limitations incurred by their chosen method, such that observations made by others may be interpreted with greater context, and transparency.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The measurement of the work of breathing (Wb) during exercise provides us with deep insights into respiratory (patho)physiology, and sheds light on the putative factors which lead to respiratory muscle fatigue. There are 4 popular methods available to determine the Wb. Our study demonstrates that no two of these methods produce identical values of Wb during exercise. This paper also discusses the practical and theoretical limitations of each method.

Thoracic gas compression during forced expiration is greater in men than women.

Intrapleural pressure during a forced vital capacity (VC) maneuver is often in excess of that required to generate maximal expiratory airflow. This excess pressure compresses alveolar gas (i.e., thoracic gas compression [TGC]), resulting in underestimated forced expiratory flows (FEFs) at a given lung volume. It is unknown if TGC is influenced by sex; however, because men have larger lungs and stronger respiratory muscles, we hypothesized that men would have greater TGC. We examined TGC across the "effort-dependent" region of VC in healthy young men (n = 11) and women (n = 12). Subjects performed VC maneuvers at varying efforts while airflow, volume, and esophageal pressure (POES ) were measured. Quasistatic expiratory deflation curves were used to obtain lung recoil (PLUNG ) and alveolar pressures (i.e., PALV  = POES -PLUNG ). The raw maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFVraw ) curve was obtained from the "maximum effort" VC maneuver. The TGC-corrected curve was obtained by constructing a "maximal perimeter" curve from all VC efforts (MEFVcorr ). TGC was examined via differences between curves in FEFs (∆FEF), area under the expiratory curves (∆AEX ), and estimated compressed gas volume (∆VGC) across the VC range. Men displayed greater total ∆AEX (5.4 ± 2.0 vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 L2 ·s-1 ; p < .001). ∆FEF was greater in men at 25% of exhaled volume only (p < .05), whereas ∆VGC was systematically greater in men across the entire VC (main effect; p < .05). PALV was also greater in men throughout forced expiration (p < .01). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that men display more TGC, occurring early in forced expiration, likely due to greater expiratory pressures throughout the forced VC maneuver.

Renal Hemodynamics During Sympathetic Activation Following Aerobic and Anaerobic Exercise.

We tested the hypotheses that prior aerobic (Study 1) or anaerobic (Study 2) exercise attenuates the increase in renal vascular resistance (RVR) during sympathetic stimulation. Ten healthy young adults (5 females) participated in both Study 1 (aerobic exercise) and Study 2 (anaerobic exercise). In Study 1, subjects completed three minutes of face cooling pre- and post- 30 min of moderate intensity aerobic exercise (68 ± 1% estimate maximal heart rate). In Study 2, subjects completed two minutes of the cold pressor test pre- and post- the completion of a 30 s maximal effort cycling test (Wingate Anaerobic Test). Both face cooling and the cold pressor test stimulate the sympathetic nervous system and elevate RVR. The primary dependent variable in both Studies was renal blood velocity, which was measured at baseline and every minute during sympathetic stimulation. Renal blood velocity was measured via the coronal approach at the distal segment of the right renal artery with pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound. RVR was calculated from the quotient of mean arterial pressure and renal blood velocity. In Study 1, renal blood velocity and RVR did not differ between pre- and post- aerobic exercise (P ≥ 0.24). Face cooling decreased renal blood velocity (P < 0.01) and the magnitude of this decrease did not differ between pre- and post- aerobic exercise (P = 0.52). RVR increased with face cooling (P < 0.01) and the extent of these increases did not differ between pre- and post- aerobic exercise (P = 0.74). In Study 2, renal blood velocity was 2 ± 2 cm/s lower post- anaerobic exercise (P = 0.02), but RVR did not differ (P = 0.08). The cold pressor test decreased renal blood velocity (P < 0.01) and the magnitude of this decrease did not differ between pre- and post- anaerobic exercise (P = 0.26). RVR increased with the cold pressor test (P < 0.01) and the extent of these increases did not differ between pre- and post- anaerobic exercise (P = 0.12). These data indicate that 30 min of moderate intensity aerobic exercise or 30 s of maximal effort anaerobic exercise does not affect the capacity to increase RVR during sympathetic stimulation following exercise.