Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Transplant Direct ; 7(7): e711, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131583

RESUMO

There is an unmet need for noninvasive tools for diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminative value of a combined cellular and molecular biomarker platform in urine for the detection of rejection. METHODS: First, microRNA (miR) molecules were screened in transplant biopsies and urine sediments of patients with acute rejection and patients without rejection and stable graft function. Second, the expression of 15 selected miRs was quantified in an independent set of 115 urine sediments of patients with rejection and 55 urine sediments of patients without histological signs of rejection on protocol biopsy. Additionally, CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 protein levels were quantified in the urine supernatant. RESULTS: Levels of miR-155-5p (5.7-fold), miR-126-3p (4.2-fold), miR-21-5p (3.7-fold), miR-25-3p (2.5-fold), and miR-615-3p (0.4-fold) were significantly different between rejection and no-rejection urine sediments. CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 levels were significantly elevated in urine from recipients with rejection. In a multivariable model (sensitivity: 89.1%, specificity: 75.6%, area under the curve: 0.94, P < 0.001), miR-155-5p, miR-615-3p, and CXCL-9 levels were independent predictors of rejection. Stratified 10-fold cross validation of the model resulted in an area under the curve of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: A combined urinary microRNA and chemokine profile discriminates kidney transplant rejection from stable graft conditions.

2.
Transpl Int ; 33(12): 1626-1642, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981117

RESUMO

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the value of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a noninvasive biomarker in diagnosing kidney allograft rejection. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for original research papers published between January 1994 and May 2020 on dd-cfDNA fractions in blood of kidney allograft recipients. A single-group meta-analysis was performed by computing pooled estimates for dd-cfDNA fractions using the weighted median of medians or quantile estimation (QE) approach. Weighted median differences in medians (WMDMs) and median differences based on the QE method were used for pairwise comparisons. Despite heterogeneity among the selected studies, the meta-analysis revealed significantly higher median dd-cfDNA fractions in patients with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) than patients without rejection or patients with stable graft function. When comparing patients with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and patients with ABMR, our two statistical approaches revealed conflicting results. Patients with TCMR did not have different median dd-cfDNA fractions than patients without rejection or patients with stable graft function. dd-cfDNA may be a useful marker for ABMR, but probably not for TCMR.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Transplante de Rim , Biomarcadores , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Doadores de Tecidos
3.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 35(4): 714-721, 2020 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After transplantation, cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) derived from the donor organ (ddcfDNA) can be detected in the recipient's circulation. We aimed to investigate the role of plasma ddcfDNA as biomarker for acute kidney rejection. METHODS: From 107 kidney transplant recipients, plasma samples were collected longitudinally after transplantation (Day 1 to 3 months) within a multicentre set-up. Cell-free DNA from the donor was quantified in plasma as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA by next generation sequencing using a targeted, multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based method for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. RESULTS: Increases of the ddcfDNA% above a threshold value of 0.88% were significantly associated with the occurrence of episodes of acute rejection (P = 0.017), acute tubular necrosis (P = 0.011) and acute pyelonephritis (P = 0.032). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an equal area under the curve of the ddcfDNA% and serum creatinine of 0.64 for the diagnosis of acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Although increases in plasma ddcfDNA% are associated with graft injury, plasma ddcfDNA does not outperform the diagnostic capacity of the serum creatinine in the diagnosis of acute rejection.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/sangue , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/sangue , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/genética , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/sangue , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Nefropatias/genética , Nefropatias/cirurgia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 14(3): 454-468, 2019 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30602462

RESUMO

MicroRNAs are epigenetic regulators of gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. They are involved in intercellular communication and crosstalk between different organs. As key regulators of homeostasis, their dysregulation underlies several morbidities including kidney disease. Moreover, their remarkable stability in plasma and urine makes them attractive biomarkers. Beyond biomarker studies, clinical microRNA research in nephrology in recent decades has focused on the discovery of specific microRNA signatures and the identification of novel targets for therapy and/or disease prevention. However, much of this research has produced equivocal results and there is a need for standardization and confirmation in prospective trials. This review aims to provide an overview of general concepts and available clinical evidence in both the pathophysiology and biomarker fields for the role of microRNA in AKI and kidney transplantation.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/genética , Função Retardada do Enxerto/genética , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , MicroRNAs/genética , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/genética , Injúria Renal Aguda/metabolismo , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Animais , Função Retardada do Enxerto/metabolismo , Função Retardada do Enxerto/fisiopatologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , MicroRNAs/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/metabolismo , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Transdução de Sinais
5.
PLoS One ; 13(12): e0208207, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30521549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After transplantation, cell-free DNA derived from the donor organ (ddcfDNA) can be detected in the recipient's circulation. We aimed to quantify ddcfDNA levels in plasma of kidney transplant recipients thereby investigating the kinetics of this biomarker after transplantation and determining biological variables that influence ddcfDNA kinetics in stable and non-stable patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 107 kidney transplant recipients, plasma samples were collected longitudinally after transplantation (day 1-3 months) within a multicenter set-up. Cell-free DNA from the donor was quantified in plasma as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA by next generation sequencing using a targeted, multiplex PCR-based method for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. A subgroup of stable renal transplant recipients was identified to determine a ddcfDNA threshold value. RESULTS: In stable transplant recipients, plasma ddcfDNA% decreased to a mean (SD) ddcfDNA% of 0.46% (± 0.21%) which was reached 9.85 (± 5.6) days after transplantation. A ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% (mean + 2SD) was determined in kidney transplant recipients. Recipients that did not reach this threshold ddcfDNA value within 10 days after transplantation showed a higher ddcfDNA% on the first day after transplantation and demonstrated a higher individual baseline ddcfDNA%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, plasma ddcfDNA fractions decreased exponentially within 10 days after transplantation to a ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% or less. To investigate the role of ddcfDNA for rejection monitoring of the graft, future research is needed to determine causes of ddcfDNA% increases above this threshold value.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/sangue , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Doadores de Sangue , Humanos , Cinética , Estudos Longitudinais , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplantados
6.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 5: 358, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30671435

RESUMO

Kidney transplantation is considered the favored treatment for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease, since successful transplantation is associated with longer survival and improved quality of life compared to dialysis. Alloreactive immune responses against the donor kidney may lead to acute rejection of the transplant. The current diagnosis of renal allograft rejection mainly relies on clinical monitoring, including serum creatinine, proteinuria, and confirmation by histopathologic assessment in the kidney transplant biopsy. These parameters have their limitations. Identification and validation of biomarkers, which correlate with or predict the presence of acute rejection, and which could improve therapeutic decision making, are priorities for the transplantation community. There is a need for alternative, less invasive but sensitive markers to diagnose acute graft rejection. Here, we provide an overview of the current status on research of biomarkers of acute kidney transplant rejection in blood and urine. We specifically discuss relatively novel research strategies in biomarker research, including transcriptomics and proteomics, and elaborate on donor-derived cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker.

7.
Pharmacol Ther ; 143(2): 153-67, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24603369

RESUMO

The incidence of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders is highest in well-developed countries which is directly related to their higher hygienic standards: it is suggested that the lack of exposure to helminths contributes to the susceptibility for immune-related diseases. Epidemiological, experimental and clinical data support the idea that helminths provide protection against immune-mediated diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The most likely mechanism for the suppression of immune responses by helminths is the release of helminth-derived immunomodulatory molecules. This article reviews the experimental and clinical studies investigating the therapeutic potential of helminth-based therapy in IBD and also focuses on the current knowledge of its immunomodulatory mechanisms of action highlighting innate as well as adaptive immune mechanisms. Identifying the mechanisms by which these helminths and helminth-derived molecules modulate the immune system will help in creating novel drugs for the treatment of IBD and other disorders that result from an overactive immune response.


Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Imunitário/imunologia , Doenças do Sistema Imunitário/terapia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/imunologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Terapia com Helmintos/métodos , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Imunomodulação/imunologia , Mediadores da Inflamação/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA