Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 10(1): 94-101, 2021 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580774

RESUMO

AIMS: The implementation of the 2013 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Core Curriculum guidelines for acute cardiovascular care (acc) training among European countries is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the current status of acc training among cardiology trainees and young cardiologists (<40 years) from ESC countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The survey (March-July 2019) asked about details of cardiology training, self-confidence in acc technical and non-technical skills, access to training opportunities, and needs for further training in the field. Overall 614 young doctors, 31 (26-43) years old, 55% males were surveyed. Place and duration of acc training differed between countries and between centres in the same country. Although the majority of the respondents (91%) had completed their acc training, the average self-confidence to perform invasive procedures and to manage acc clinical scenarios was low-44% (27.3-70.4). The opportunities for simulation-based learning were scarce-18% (5.8-51.3), as it was previous leadership training (32%) and knowledge about key teamwork principles was poor (48%). The need for further acc training was high-81% (61.9-94.3). Male gender, higher level of training centres, professional qualifications of respondents, longer duration of acc/intensive care training, debriefings, and previous leadership training as well as knowledge about teamwork were related to higher self-confidence in all investigated aspects. CONCLUSIONS: The current cardiology training program is burdened by deficits in acc technical/non-technical skills, substantial variability in programs across ESC countries, and a clear gender-related disparity in outcomes. The forthcoming ESC Core Curriculum for General Cardiology is expected to address these deficiencies.


Assuntos
Cardiologistas , Cardiologia , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
QJM ; 114(9): 642-647, 2021 Nov 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has challenged the health system organization requiring a fast reorganization of diagnostic/therapeutic pathways for patients affected by time-dependent diseases such as acute coronary syndromes (ACS). AIM: To describe ACS hospitalizations, management, and complication rate before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. DESIGN: Ecological retrospective study. Methods: We analyzed aggregated epidemiological data of all patients > 18 years old admitted for ACS in twenty-nine hub cardiac centers from 17 Countries across 4 continents, from December 1st, 2019 to April 15th, 2020. Data from December 2018 to April 2019 were used as historical period. RESULTS: A significant overall trend for reduction in the weekly number of ACS hospitalizations was observed (20.2%; 95% confidence interval CI [1.6, 35.4] P = 0.04). The incidence rate reached a 54% reduction during the second week of April (incidence rate ratio: 0.46, 95% CI [0.36, 0.58]) and was also significant when compared to the same months in 2019 (March and April, respectively IRR: 0.56, 95%CI [0.48, 0.67]; IRR: 0.43, 95%CI [0.32, 0.58] p < 0.001). A significant increase in door-to-balloon, door-to-needle, and total ischemic time (p <0.04 for all) in STEMI patents were reported during pandemic period. Finally, the proportion of patients with mechanical complications was higher (1.98% vs. 0.98%; P = 0.006) whereas GRACE risk score was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant decrease in ACS hospitalizations rate, an increase in total ischemic time and a higher rate of mechanical complications on a international scale.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , COVID-19 , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 9(8): 993-1001, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31976740

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe. METHODS: A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14). RESULTS: A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Morbidade/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Pol Arch Med Wewn ; 105(4): 297-302, 2001 Apr.
Artigo em Polonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11761801

RESUMO

Two electrocardiographic types of inferior wall infarct were isolated based on angiographic localization of right coronary artery occlusion. In proximal occlusion of RCA before right ventricular branch there is no depression or more rarely elevation of ST segment in V1-V3 especially in V1 (the first morphological type). ST segment depression in V1-V3 (second morphological type) is characteristic for distal segment of RCA occlusion.


Assuntos
Estenose Coronária/complicações , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Angiografia , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA