Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Two Treatment Protocols for Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common vertigo of labyrinthine origin, its social and healthcare impact is remarkable. It has recently been shown that single session treatment is as safe and effective as weekly treatment, which could have impact on direct and indirect costs related to the disease. The objective of this study is to determine whether single session treatment of unilateral posterior canal BPPV canalolithiasis is more efficient than conventional treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in 53 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral posterior canal BPPV canalolithiasis previously untreated: 26 patients were assigned to single session treatment and 27 patients to weekly treatment. Average and total cost of care, consultation time and the impact in terms of temporary disability and loss of productivity for the company due to patients' medical visits were compared. RESULTS: Average and total cost of care and loss of productivity for the company due to patients' medical visits were significantly lower in the single session group. Consultation time was also better in this group when travelling time was considered. CONCLUSIONS: The single session protocol is fast, effective and reduces direct and indirect cost of care related to disease justifying high resolution consultations.

Comparative analysis of the efficiency of two treatment protocols for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. / Análisis comparativo de la eficiencia de dos protocolos de tratamiento del vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno del conducto semicircular posterior.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common vertigo of labyrinthine origin, its social and healthcare impact is remarkable. It has recently been shown that single session treatment is as safe and effective as weekly treatment, which could have impact on direct and indirect costs related to the disease. The objective of this study is to determine whether single session treatment of unilateral posterior canal BPPV canalolithiasis is more efficient than conventional treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in 53 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral posterior canal BPPV canalolithiasis previously untreated: 26 patients were assigned to single session treatment and 27 patients to weekly treatment. Average and total cost of care, consultation time and the impact in terms of temporary disability and loss of productivity for the company due to patients' medical visits were compared. RESULTS: Average and total cost of care and loss of productivity for the company due to patients' medical visits were significantly lower in the single session group. Consultation time was also better in this group when travelling time was considered. CONCLUSIONS: The single session protocol is fast, effective and reduces direct and indirect cost of care related to disease justifying high resolution consultations.