Chemoprevention in Inherited Colorectal Cancer Syndromes.

Cancer prevention in hereditary gastrointestinal predisposition syndromes relies primarily on intensive screening (e.g., colonoscopy) or prophylactic surgery (e.g., colectomy). The use of chemopreventive agents as an adjunct to these measures has long been studied both in the general population and in hereditary cancer patients, in whom the risk of malignancy, and therefore the potential risk reduction, is considerably greater. However, to date only few compounds have been found to be effective, safe, and tolerable for widespread use. Furthermore, many of the studies involving these rare syndromes suffer from small sample sizes, heterogeneous patient cohorts, short follow-up duration, and lack of standardized endpoints, creating challenges to draw generalizable conclusion regarding efficacy. The following review summarizes the current data on various chemopreventive compounds used in Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis in addition to several agents that are currently being investigated.

Risk perception and surveillance uptake in individuals at increased risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is recommended for high-risk individuals with genetic variants in PDAC-associated genes and/or family history. Surveillance uptake and adherence may depend on the perception of PDAC risk and cancer worry. We aimed to determine PDAC risk perception in at-risk individuals and assess factors associated with PDAC surveillance uptake. METHODS: At-risk individuals identified from a prospective academic registry were sent a survey electronically. PDAC risk perception, cancer worry and surveillance uptake were surveyed. Factors associated with increased risk perception and surveillance were assessed. Five-year PDAC risk was calculated using the PancPRO risk assessment model, and correlation with subjective risk assessment was assessed. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 34% (279/816). The median perceived PDAC risk was twofold (IQR 1-4) above respondents' estimates of general population risk. Factors significantly associated with higher perceived PDAC risk included non-Hispanic white race, post-graduate education level, PDAC-affected first-degree relative, genetic variants and lack of personal cancer history. Cancer worry had a very weak correlation across PDAC risk estimates (r=0.16). No correlation between perceived PDAC risk and 5-year calculated PDAC risk was found. Older age, having a first-degree relative with PDAC, meeting with a medical provider about PDAC cancer risk and awareness of surveillance modalities were significant predictors of undergoing PDAC surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at risk for PDAC do not report risk perception that correlates with calculated risk. This presents an opportunity for counselling of at-risk patients to individualise management and improve surveillance uptake for eligible individuals.

Surveillance and Management of Pouch Neoplasia in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis often require prophylactic colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to treat and/or reduce to risk of colorectal neoplasia. However, after surgery, patients are still at some risk of developing pouch polyps and even cancer in both handsewn or stapled anastomoses. Management relies mainly on endoscopic or surgical interventions, while chemopreventive agents have a limited role in the management and prevention of pouch neoplasia. Novel endoscopic techniques are evolving and may gradually overtake surgical intervention in selected cases. Since familial adenomatous polyposis is relatively rare, there is scarcity of data regarding the natural history of pouch polyps and cancer in this population. OBJECTIVE: This systematic literature review aims to describe the evolution, characteristics, various treatment modalities and their outcomes as well as recommended surveillance strategies of pouch neoplasia. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Cochrane databases, the international pouch consortium (for expert opinion). STUDY SELECTION: Studies between 1990 and 2023, in English were included. Studies reporting neoplastic outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease pouch patients only were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of pouch neoplasia and its outcomes (successful resections, surgical complications, mortality). RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. LIMITATIONS: Most studies focus on inflammatory bowel diseases pouch patients, there is scarce data regarding polyposis patients only. Most cohorts are small and retrospective. Data on interventions is mainly descriptive and no randomized controlled trials are available. CONCLUSIONS: Pouch adenoma are common and well managed by endoscopic resections, as advanced-endoscopic techniques are becoming more available. Additional data are required for defining updated recommendations for either endoscopic or surgical intervention. Pouch cancer is a very rare event and may arise despite surveillance. Continued endoscopic surveillance is key in cancer prevention and early detection. Outcome of cancer cases is poor and management in a referral center should be advised with tumor board discussions.

Efficacy of Wholistic Turmeric Supplement on Adenomatous Polyps in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Several studies have demonstrated that curcumin can cause the regression of polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), while others have shown negative results. Wholistic turmeric (WT) containing curcumin and additional bioactive compounds may contribute to this effect. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of WT in FAP patients. Ten FAP patients were randomly assigned to receive either WT or placebo for 6 months. Colonoscopies were performed at baseline and after 6 months. The polyp number and size, as well as the cumulative polyp burden, were assessed. No differences were noted between the groups in terms of changes from the baseline's polyp number, size, or burden. However, stratifying the data according to the right vs. left colon indicated a decrease in the median polyp number (from 5.5 to 1.5, p = 0.06) and polyp burden (from 24.25 mm to 11.5 mm, p = 0.028) in the left colon of the patients in the WT group. The adjusted left polyp number and burden in the WT arm were lower by 5.39 (p = 0.034) and 14.68 mm (p = 0.059), respectively. Whether WT can be used to reduce the polyp burden of patients with predominantly left-sided polyps remains to be seen; thus, further larger prospective trials are required.

Adenomatous Polyposis Phenotype in BMPR1A and SMAD4 Variant Carriers.

INTRODUCTION: Variants in SMAD4 or BMPR1A cause juvenile polyposis syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by multiple gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps. A phenotype of attenuated adenomatous polyposis without hamartomatous polyps is rare. METHODS: We describe a retrospective cohort of individuals with SMAD4 or BMPR1A heterozygous germline variants, having ≥10 cumulative colorectal adenomas and/or colorectal cancer without hamartomatous polyps. All individuals had multigene panel and duplication/deletion analysis to exclude other genetic syndromes. RESULTS: The study cohort included 8 individuals. The pathogenic potential of the variants was analyzed. Variants detected included 4 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, 1 splice site variant, and 2 genomic deletions. Features of pathogenicity were present in most variants, and cosegregation of the variant with polyposis or colorectal cancer was obtained in 7 of the 8 families. Three of 8 individuals had colorectal cancer (age less than 50 years) in addition to the polyposis phenotype. Two individuals had extraintestinal neoplasms (pancreas and ampulla of Vater). DISCUSSION: The clinical phenotype of SMAD4 and BMPR1A variants may infrequently extend beyond the classical juvenile polyposis syndrome phenotype. Applying multigene panel analysis of hereditary cancer-related genes in individuals with unexplained polyposis can provide syndrome-based clinical surveillance for carriers and their family members.

Management of pouch related symptoms in patients who underwent ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery for adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Adenomatous polyposis syndromes (APS) patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) suffer frequent symptoms with scarce signs of inflammation, distinct from ulcerative colitis patients. While the management of pouchitis in ulcerative colitis patients is well established, data regarding response to treatment modalities targeting pouch-related disorders in APS patient population is scarce. AIM: To assess clinical, endoscopic and histologic response to various treatment modalities employed in the therapy of pouch related disorders. METHODS: APS patients who underwent IPAA between 1987-2019 were followed every 6-12 mo and pouch-related symptoms were recorded at every visit. Lower endoscopy was performed annually, recording features of the pouch, cuff and terminal ileum. A dedicated gastrointestinal pathologist reviewed biopsies for signs and severity of inflammation. At current study, files were retrospectively reviewed for initiation and response to various treatment modalities between 2015-2019. Therapies included dietary modifications, probiotics, loperamide, antibiotics, bismuth subsalicylate, mebeverine hydrochloride, 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds and topical rectal steroids. Symptoms and endoscopic and histologic signs of inflammation before and after treatment were assessed. Pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) and its subscores was calculated. Change of variables before and after therapy was assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous variables and using McNemar's test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Thirty-three APS patients after IPAA were identified. Before treatment, 16 patients (48.4%) suffered from abdominal pain and 3 (9.1%) from bloody stools. Mean number of daily bowel movement was 10.3. Only 4 patients (12.1%) had a PDAI ≥ 7. Mean baseline PDAI was 2.5 ± 2.3. Overall, intervention was associated with symptomatic relief, mainly decreasing abdominal pain (from 48.4% to 27.2% of patients, P = 0.016). Daily bowel movements decreased from a mean of 10.3 to 9.3 (P = 0.003). Mean overall and clinical PDAI scores decreased from 2.58 to 1.94 (P = 0.016) and from 1.3 to 0.87 (P = 0.004), respectively. Analyzing each treatment modality separately, we observed that dietary modifications decreased abdominal pain (from 41.9% of patients to 19.35%, P = 0.016), daily bowel movements (from 10.5 to 9.3, P = 0.003), overall PDAI (from 2.46 to 2.03, P = 0.04) and clinical PDAI (1.33 to 0.86, P = 0.004). Probiotics effectively decreased daily bowel movements (from 10.2 to 8.8, P = 0.007), overall and clinical PDAI (from 2.9 to 2.1 and from 1.38 to 0.8, P = 0.032 and 0.01, respectively). While other therapies had minimal or no effects. No significant changes in endoscopic or histologic scores were seen with any therapy. CONCLUSION: APS patients benefit from dietary modifications and probiotics that improve their pouch-related symptoms but respond minimally to anti-inflammatory and antibiotic treatments. These results suggest a functional rather than inflammatory disorder.

Determinants of Pouch-Related Symptoms, a Common Outcome of Patients With Adenomatous Polyposis Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is performed in patients with adenomatous polyposis syndromes (APSs). Data regarding pouch outcomes in APS are scarce. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of pouch-related symptoms in patients with APS and to identify the contributing factors. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Demographic, surgical, and clinical data were collected. Endoscopy was performed, and biopsies from the terminal ileum, pouch, and cuff were obtained in all patients and reviewed by a dedicated pathologist. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with APS after IPAA were followed. Twenty patients (39.2%) had pouch-related symptoms. Single-stage IPAA had better outcomes than 2-stage IPAA: fewer daily bowel movements (42.9% vs 13.8% with ≤5 daily bowel movement, P = 0.02), more solid consistency (52.4% vs 6.9%, P < 0.001), and less abdominal pain (19% vs 48.3%, P = 0.034). Younger age at IPAA (<20) was also associated with better outcomes: fewer daily bowel movement (58.3% vs 17.9% with ≤5 daily bowel movement, P = 0.011), less watery consistency (8.3% vs 53.8%, P = 0.005), and abdominal pain (8.3% vs 43.6%, P = 0.037). Eighteen patients (35.3%) had endoscopic signs of inflammation, and 22 patients (43.1%) had histologic signs of pouchitis. However, no correlation was found between symptoms and endoscopic or histologic findings. The median pouchitis disease activity index was low (2, interquartile range 1-4) and did not correlate with clinical symptoms. DISCUSSION: Pouch-related symptoms are common in patients with APS after IPAA. One-stage IPAA and younger age at surgery are associated with better clinical outcomes. However, symptoms do not correlate well with endoscopic or histologic findings or with pouchitis disease activity index and might be attributed to a functional pouch disorder.

Clinical and Histologic Overlap and Distinction Among Various Hamartomatous Polyposis Syndromes.

INTRODUCTION: Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are rare autosomal-dominant inherited disorders associated with gastrointestinal (GI) tract and other cancers. HPS include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), and phosphatase and tensin homolog hamartomatous tumor syndromes (PHTS). Diagnosis, management, and outcome prediction of HPS pose a clinical challenge. To characterize genotype, phenotype, histology and outcomes of individuals with HPS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (2004-2017) of consecutive patients that were clinically diagnosed with HPS that visited a specialized GI oncology clinic. Demographic, clinicopathological, and genetic data were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Fifty-two individuals from 34 families were included. Common clinical manifestations were GI bleeding (40% JPS, 23% PJS, and 25% PHTS) and bowel obstruction (46.15% PJS and 11.4% JPS). Twenty patients (38.4%) underwent surgery, 5 of whom required multiple procedures. Higher polyp burden was associated with the need for surgery (P = 0.007). Polyp histology varied widely with 69.2% of patients exhibiting histology different from the syndrome hallmark. GI cancer history was positive in 65%, 40%, and 50% of JPS, PJS, and PHTS families, respectively. Five (9.6%) patients developed cancers (one patient each had small bowel-1, colon-1, and thyroid-1, one patient had both small bowel adenocarcinoma and breast cancer, and one had both breast cancer and liposarcoma). Twenty (38.4%) patients tested positive for STK11, PTEN, SMAD4, BMPR1A, or AKT1 mutations: Sanger sequencing and multi-gene next generation sequencing panels detected mutations in 40.9% and 100% of tested cases, respectively. DISCUSSION: HPS patients present versatile phenotypes with overlapping clinical and histological characteristics. Polyp burden is associated with the need for surgery. Next-generation sequencing increases mutation detection.