Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Public Health Rep ; 121(1): 74-83, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16416701

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to describe the methodology of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), examine recent response rates, determine characteristics associated with response, and track response patterns over time. METHODS: PRAMS is a mixed-mode surveillance system, using mail and telephone surveys. Rates for response, contact, cooperation, and refusal were computed for 2001. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between maternal and infant characteristics and the likelihood of response. Response patterns from 1996 to 2001 were compared for nine states. RESULTS: The median response rate for the 23 states in 2001 was 76% (range: 49% to 84%). Cooperation rates ranged from 86% to 97% (median 91%); contact rates ranged from 58% to 93% (median 82%). Response rates were higher for women who were older, white, married, had more education, were first-time mothers, received early prenatal care, and had a normal birthweight infant. Education level was the most consistent predictor of response, followed by marital status and maternal race. From 1996 to 2001, response to the initial mailing decreased in all states compared, but the decrease was offset by increases in mail follow-up and telephone response rates. Overall response rates remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The PRAMS mail/telephone methodology is an effective means of reaching most recent mothers in the 23 states examined, but some population subgroups are more difficult to reach than others. Through more intensive follow-up efforts, PRAMS states have been able to maintain high response rates over time despite decreases in response to the initial mailing.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Base de Dados , Gravidez , Medição de Risco/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Vigilância da População , Estados Unidos
2.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 54(6): 1-72, 2005 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16292246

RESUMO

PROBLEM: Contraceptive use is an important determinant of unintended pregnancy. In the United States, approximately half of all pregnancies are unintended. Population-based information about contraceptive use patterns is limited at the state level. Information about contraceptive use for states can be used to guide the development of state programs and policies to decrease unintended pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted infections. Information about contraceptive use for specific subpopulations can be used to further refine state efforts to improve contraceptive use and subsequently decrease the occurrence of unintended pregnancy. REPORTING PERIOD: Data were collected in 2002 for men and women. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a random-digit--dialed, telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged > or =18 years. All 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands participated in BRFSS in 2002. These data can be used to track state progress towards the national health objectives for 2010 for responsible sexual behavior. The 2002 BRFSS data represent the first time state data on contraceptive use in all 50 states will be presented and examined by selected sociodemographic characteristics. The 2002 BRFSS also, for the first time, provided an opportunity to examine state-level contraceptive use patterns among men. RESULTS: Variation across states and territories was observed for the majority of contraceptive methods among the different demographics analyzed and among men and women. The percentage of men and women at risk for pregnancy who said they or their partner was using birth control was high overall and ranged from 67% (Guam) to 88% (Idaho). Oral contraceptives (i.e., the pill), vasectomy, tubal ligation, and condoms were the methods most frequently reported by both male and female respondents who said they or their partner was using birth control. Among female respondents using birth control, the pill was the most common method reported. Among men, vasectomy was the most commonly reported method. The prevalence of use for the four most commonly reported methods (pills, vasectomy, tubal ligation, condoms) varied as much as six-fold among states for vasectomy and three- to four-fold for condoms, pills, and tubal ligation. INTERPRETATION: The findings in this report document substantial differences among states and sociodemographic groups within states in contraceptive method use. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: These data can help states identify populations with an unmet need for birth control, barriers to birth control use, and gaps in the range of birth control methods offered by health-care providers. An analysis of the prevalence of birth control use by state and selected population characteristics can help states target contraceptive programs to best meet the needs of their population.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/tendências , Anticoncepção/tendências , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Anticoncepcionais Orais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esterilização Tubária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vasectomia/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Adolesc Health ; 37(3 Suppl): S3-10, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16115568

RESUMO

The Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy (CCPP) was a seven-year (1995-2002) demonstration program funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Division of Reproductive Health conducted in 13 U.S cities. The purpose of the CCPP was to demonstrate whether community partners could mobilize and organize community resources in support of comprehensive, effective, and sustainable programs for the prevention of initial and subsequent pregnancies. This article provides a descriptive overview of the program origins, intentions, and efforts over its planning and implementation phases, including specific program requirements, needs and assets assessments, intervention focus, CDC support for evaluation efforts, implementation challenges, and ideas for translation and dissemination. CDC hopes that the experiences gained from this effort lead to a greater understanding of how to mobilize community coalitions as an intervention to prevent teen pregnancy and address other public health needs.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Gravidez na Adolescência/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública , Adolescente , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Coalizão em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Gravidez , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Medicina Reprodutiva , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 192(2): 580-5, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15696006

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of counseling to wear seat belts during pregnancy and seat belt use among women of reproductive age. STUDY DESIGN: Self-reported data from 2 population-based surveys were used to examine counseling to wear seat belts during pregnancy and seat belt use among reproductive-aged women. RESULTS: The prevalence of counseling to wear seat belts during pregnancy ranged from 36.7% to 56.5% across 19 states. The prevalence of seat belt use among reproductive-aged women ranged from 69.5% to 91.4% across 19 states. Younger, non-Hispanic black, and less educated pregnant women were more likely to report counseling, but reproductive-aged women with these characteristics were less likely than older, non-Hispanic white, and more educated women to use seat belts. CONCLUSION: Most women are not counseled about seat belt use during pregnancy. Providers should ensure that this topic is discussed with each patient.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Aconselhamento , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Cintos de Segurança , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
5.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 5(6): 683-94, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19807611

RESUMO

Teen pregnancy is an important public health issue for all teens, but particularly for low-income teens who rely on the public health safety net for services. Medicaid pays for more than two-thirds of deliveries among teenagers in the USA. To discern how this public program serves pregnant teens (aged 11-19 years), the authors used Medicaid enrollment and claims data for Florida, Georgia and New Jersey in 1995 to examine teens' enrollment duration, service use and average payments relative to 20-24-year-olds on Medicaid. Teens were more likely than the older women to have been enrolled in Medicaid before pregnancy and to have maintained coverage through the third month following delivery. If not enrolled prepregnancy, teens were more likely than older women to enroll later in pregnancy. Teens were less likely to receive early prenatal care and more likely to be hospitalized during pregnancy, usually for preterm labor. While total Medicaid payments for routine prenatal and delivery-related care were equivalent between teens and older women, payments for nonroutine care during pregnancy were modestly higher for teens in Florida and Georgia. Thus, only modest cost savings can accrue from lower average costs per pregnancy and delivery among teens who delay pregnancy. Additional and larger cost savings to the Medicaid program from preventing teen pregnancy would accrue from the expected lower enrollment in Medicaid among the teens as they age.

6.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 36(5): 192-7, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15519961

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Mistimed and unwanted pregnancies that result in live births are commonly considered together as unintended pregnancies, but they may have different precursors and outcomes. METHODS: Data from 15 states participating in the 1998 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were used to calculate the prevalence of intended, mistimed and unwanted conceptions, by selected variables. Associations between unintendedness and women's behaviors and experiences before, during and after the pregnancy were assessed through unadjusted relative risks. RESULTS: The distribution of intended, mistimed and unwanted pregnancies differed on nearly every variable examined; risky behaviors and adverse experiences were more common among women with mistimed than intended pregnancies and were most common among those whose pregnancies were unwanted. The likelihood of having an unwanted rather than mistimed pregnancy was elevated for women 35 or older (relative risk, 2.3) and was reduced for those younger than 25 (0.8); the pattern was reversed for the likelihood of mistimed rather than intended pregnancy (0.5 vs. 1.7-2.7). Parous women had an increased risk of an unwanted pregnancy (2.1-4.0) but a decreased risk of a mistimed one (0.9). Women who smoked in the third trimester, received delayed or no prenatal care, did not breast-feed, were physically abused during pregnancy, said their partner had not wanted a pregnancy or had a low-birth-weight infant had an increased risk of unintended pregnancy; the size of the increase depended on whether the pregnancy was unwanted or mistimed. CONCLUSION: Clarifying the difference in risk between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies may help guide decisions regarding services to women and infants.


Assuntos
Comportamento Materno , Bem-Estar Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Gravidez não Desejada , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Comportamento Materno/psicologia , Relações Mãe-Filho , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/psicologia , Gravidez não Planejada/psicologia , Gravidez não Desejada/psicologia , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Assunção de Riscos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Sex Transm Dis ; 30(9): 719-22, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12972796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of condoms with hormonal contraceptive methods (dual use) is recommended for adolescents at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy. GOAL: The goal was to measure the extent of dual use among adolescents, to estimate trends in dual use 1991-2001, to assess factors associated with dual use in 2001, and to develop information useful for prevention programs. STUDY DESIGN: We used 6 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys of 9th-12th graders conducted 1991-2001. Each survey was an independent, nationally representative sample. Sample sizes ranged from 10,904 to 16,262, and overall response rates ranged from 60-70%. We estimated trends in dual use for the 1991-2001 period using linear logistic regression models of dual use on year of survey controlling statistically for grade, sex, and race/ethnic group, and evaluated correlates of dual use with chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Dual use increased significantly throughout 1991-2001, from 3.2% (95% confidence interval, +/- 0.7%) in 1991 to 7.2% (+/- 0.8%) in 2001. During this period, condom use increased and pill use did not. In 2001, 32% (+/- 2.6%) of all users of hormonal methods (pill or injection) also used condoms. Students in a number of categories had higher rates of dual use: those who were white (8.9% +/- 1.2%), 12th graders (9.2% +/- 1.5%), and those aged 17 and older (8.8% +/- 1.3%). Greater dual use was not associated with increased sexual or drug use risk behaviors. CONCLUSION: Dual use has increased but remains low, especially among those most at risk.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Preservativos , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapêutico , Assunção de Riscos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Pediatrics ; 111(5 Pt 2): 1136-41, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12728126

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between unintended pregnancy resulting in a live birth and binge drinking (having 5 or more alcoholic beverages on 1 occasion) in the 3 months before pregnancy (the preconception period) and to characterize women who are of childbearing age and binge drink. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted of women with pregnancies that resulted in a live birth, comparing those with unintended pregnancies with those with intended pregnancies. Data analyzed were from the 15 states that participated in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 1996-1999. RESULTS: Of 72 907 respondents, 45% of pregnancies were unintended. Compared with women with intended pregnancy, women with unintended pregnancy were more likely to be young and black and to report preconception binge drinking (16.3% vs 11.9%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.54). After adjusting for potential confounders, preconception binge drinking was associated with unintended pregnancy for white women (adjusted OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.47-1.80) but not for black women (adjusted OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77-1.20). Overall, 14% of women reported preconception binge drinking. Women who binge drank in the preconception period were more likely to be white and unmarried; to smoke and be exposed to violence in the preconception period; and to consume alcohol, binge drink, and smoke during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Binge drinking in the preconception period was associated with unintended pregnancies resulting in a live birth among white women but not among black women. Preconception binge drinkers were more likely to engage in other risky behaviors, including drinking during pregnancy. Comprehensive interventions to reduce binge drinking may reduce unintended pregnancies, as well as other adverse maternal and pediatric health outcomes.


Assuntos
Intoxicação Alcoólica , Gravidez não Desejada/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Intoxicação Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Estado Civil , Vigilância da População , Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Matern Child Health J ; 7(1): 31-43, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12710798

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: From self-reports we describe and compare the levels and patterns of physical abuse before and during pregnancy while also describing the demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics of physically abused women, the stressful experiences of abused women prior to delivery, and the relationship of the abused woman to the perpetrator(s). METHODS: We used population-based estimates from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (1996-98) to calculate a multiyear 16-state prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and unadjusted risk ratios for demographic, pregnancy-related, and stressful experiences variables. RESULTS: We found the prevalence of abuse across the 16 states to be 7.2% (95% CI, 6.9-7.6) during the 12 months before pregnancy, 5.3% (95% CI, 5.0-5.6) during pregnancy, and 8.7% (95% CI, 8.3-9.1) around the time of pregnancy (abuse before or during pregnancy). The prevalence of physical abuse during pregnancy across the 16 states was consistently lower than that before pregnancy. For time periods both before and during pregnancy, higher prevalence was found for women who were young, not White, unmarried, had less than 12 years of education, received Medicaid benefits, or had unintended pregnancies, and for women with stressful experiences during pregnancy, particularly being involved in a fight or increased arguing with a husband or partner. For each of these risk groups, the prevalence was lower during pregnancy than before. Abuse was ongoing before pregnancy for three quarters of the women experiencing abuse by a husband or partner during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Women are not necessarily at greater risk of physical abuse when they are pregnant than before pregnancy. Both the preconception period and the period during pregnancy are periods of risk, which suggests that prevention activities are appropriate during routine health care visits before pregnancy as well as during family planning and prenatal care.


Assuntos
Gestantes , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Estado Civil , Bem-Estar Materno/etnologia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez não Desejada/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestantes/etnologia , Gestantes/psicologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/etnologia , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 51(2): 1-27, 2002 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12004983

RESUMO

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Various maternal behaviors and experiences before, during, and after pregnancy (e.g., unintended pregnancy, late entry into prenatal care, cigarette smoking, not breast-feeding) are associated with adverse health outcomes for both the mother and the infant. Information regarding maternal behaviors and experiences is needed to monitor trends, to enhance the understanding of the relations between behaviors and health outcomes, to plan and evaluate programs, to direct policy decisions, and to monitor progress toward Healthy People 2000 and 2010 objectives. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: This report covers data from 1993 through 1999. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is an ongoing, state- and population-based surveillance system designed to monitor selected self-reported maternal behaviors and experiences that occur before, during, and after pregnancy among women who deliver a live-born infant. PRAMS employs a mixed-mode data collection methodology; up to three self-administered surveys are mailed to a sample of mothers, and nonresponders are followed up with a telephone interview. Self-reported survey data are linked to selected birth certificate data and weighted for sample design, nonresponse, and noncoverage to create annual PRAMS analysis data sets. PRAMS generates statewide estimates of various perinatal health topics among women delivering a live infant. Data for 1999 from 17 states are examined. In addition, trend data are examined for 12 states that had at least 3 years of data during 1993-1999. RESULTS: In 1999, the prevalence of unintended pregnancy resulting in a live birth ranged from 33.7% to 52% across the 17 states. During 1993-1999, only one state reported a decreasing trend in the prevalence of unintended pregnancy. Women aged <20 years, black women, women with less than or equal to a high school education, and women receiving Medicaid were more likely to report unintended pregnancy. The prevalence of late or no entry into prenatal care ranged from 16.1% to 29.9%. The prevalence of late or no entry into prenatal care significantly decreased over time in seven of the 12 states with trend data. In general, women aged <20 years, black women, women with less than a high school education, and women receiving Medicaid were more likely to report late or no entry into prenatal care. The prevalence of smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy ranged from 6.2% to 27.2%, and the prevalence decreased in five states from 1993 to 1999. Overall, smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy was associated with younger age (<25 years), non-Hispanic ethnicity, having less than or equal to a high school education, receiving Medicaid, and delivering a low birthweight infant. The prevalence of physical abuse by a husband or partner during pregnancy ranged from 2.1% to 6.3%. No trends were observed for physical abuse from 1996 to 1999, the only years for which these data were available. Across the 17 states, only Medicaid status was consistently associated with experiencing physical abuse during pregnancy. The prevalence of breast-feeding initiation ranged from 48% to 89%. Ten of 12 states with trend data reported increases in the prevalence of breast-feeding initiation. Overall, women aged <20 years, women with less than or equal to a high school education, and women receiving Medicaid were less likely to breast-feed. The prevalence of breast-feeding duration for at least 4 weeks ranged from 34.9% to 78.1%. From 1993 to 1999, increases in levels of breast-feeding for at least 4 weeks were observed in eight states. Women aged <25 years, black women, women with less than or equal to a high school education, and women receiving Medicaid were generally less likely to breast-feed for at least 4 weeks. The prevalence of back sleep position for infants ranged from 35.1% to 74.6%. Increases in the use of the back sleep position were observed in all 12 states with trend data from 1996 to 1999. Black race and having less than or equal to a high school education were consistently associated with not using the back sleep position. INTERPRETATION: For surveillance during 1993-1999, the majority or all states observed increases in breast-feeding initiation, breast-feeding for at least 4 weeks, and back sleep position. Approximately one half of the states observed decreases for late or no entry into prenatal care and smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy. Little or no progress was observed in the prevalence of unintended pregnancy or physical abuse during pregnancy. With few exceptions, the 17 states failed to meet the Healthy People 2000 objectives for the seven reported behaviors in 1999. Certain de


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Comportamento Materno , Gravidez/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Cuidado do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA