Working with private hospital midwives in Victoria, Australia to identify practice change priorities: Outcomes of a Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE/AIM: In this study, we invited midwives working at one metropolitan private hospital in Victoria, Australia to identify their workplace change needs and priorities for research. METHODS: In this two-round Delphi study, all midwifery staff within the maternity unit of a private hospital in Melbourne, Australia were invited to participate. In round one, participants joined face-to-face focus groups to put forward their ideas for workplace change and research ideas, and these data were developed into themes. In round two, participants ranked the themes in priority order. FINDINGS: The top four themes identified by this cohort of midwives were: 'Ways of working - investigating alternate ways of working to enable greater flexibility and opportunities'; 'Understanding midwifery - working with the executive team to highlight the nuances of maternity care'; 'Education - increase in staff in the education team to provide a greater presence and opportunity for education'; and 'Postnatal specific - review ways of working in postnatal areas'. KEY CONCLUSIONS: A number of priority research and change areas were identified which, if implemented, would strengthen both midwifery practice and midwife retention in this workplace. The findings will be of interest to midwife managers. Further research to evaluate the process and success of implementing the actions identified in this study would be valuable.

The accuracy of spot urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio in confirming proteinuria in pre-eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for diagnosis of proteinuria in pre-eclampsia is traditionally a 24-h urine collection. Current Australian guidelines advocate use of the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR); however, there is controversy in the international literature about its accuracy and little recent Australian data exists. AIM: To clarify the accuracy of the spot urine PCR in a cohort of Australian women with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Women with pre-eclampsia over a 52-month period from a single obstetric unit were included in the study. Spot urine PCR, 24-h urine collection, gestation at delivery, severe hypertension in labour and magnesium sulphate requirement were recorded. Primary analysis of predictive values was performed on women who had had both a spot urine PCR and a 24-h collection. Continuous data were assessed using least squares analysis with Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot and receiver operator characteristics curve. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen women had pre-eclampsia, and 121 of these underwent both tests. The two tests were highly correlated (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001). The urine PCR had a positive predictive value of 94% and a sensitivity of 95% for predicting proteinuria. There were no significant increases in the diagnosis of severe hypertension in labour nor the need for magnesium sulphate infusion in labour in those women in whom the 24-h collection was omitted. CONCLUSIONS: The urine PCR is highly accurate in predicting significant proteinuria in women with pre-eclampsia using the recommended cut-off of 30 mg/mmol. Our findings support current guidelines suggesting the use of a 24-h urine collection is now rarely required.