5-(3,3-Dimethyle-1-Triazeno) Imidazole-4-Carboxamide and Interleukin-2 Adjuvant Therapy in Resected High-Risk Primary and Regionally Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: In the precheckpoint inhibitor era, high-dose interferon was the only approved adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. In this manuscript, we analyze the recurrence-free survival, overall survival and toxicity profile of adjuvant treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5-(3,3-dimethyle-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) for resected high-risk melanoma patients. METHODS: All patients with stage IIB, IIC or stage III melanoma who were treated with DTIC/IL-2 combination therapy at a single institution from 2000 to 2010 were identified from the University of Louisville Hospital medical record. Patients received 6 months of subcutaneous IL-2 (12 × 106 units days 1-4) and intravenous DTIC (750 mg/m2 day 1 of each cycle) every 28 days for 6 cycles. Individual medical records were accessed to collect the data. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients treated, all underwent surgical resection and then received adjuvant treatment. A total of 58.7% of the patients were male, 42.2% female; 99% were Caucasian. A total of 79 (72.5%) of the patients were alive at the time of analysis and 57 (47.7%) patients were currently event free. A total of 69 (63.3%) patients completed all 6 months of adjuvant combination treatment with 13.8% of the patients requiring IL-2 and 21.1% of the patients requiring DTIC dose reduction. Five year overall survival was 75.57% with recurrence-free survival of 53.05%. CONCLUSIONS: For several decades, there has not been an ideal adjuvant treatment for patients with resected high risk melanoma. Our retrospective analysis suggests that combination therapy with DTIC/IL-2 is beneficial and relatively well tolerated as an alternative adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk melanoma.

Management of immunotherapy toxicities in older adults.

Advanced age is a risk factor for cancer and is attributed to dysregulation of the immune system. Historically, treatment of advanced cancer has primarily involved systemic chemotherapy that is associated with high treatment related toxicity especially in older adults. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide an exciting treatment option for older adults in terms of efficacy and safety as compared to systemic chemotherapy. Given the pace of approval of ICIs for multiple cancers, there is an increase in both the use of ICIs and the associated immune-related adverse events. In this article, we address how to approach immunotherapy related toxicities in older adults given the availability of limited data.

Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the Elderly.

Most common thyroid cancers are differentiated thyroid cancers (DTCs) and have papillary, follicular, or Hürthle cell morphology. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common malignant tumor of the thyroid gland. The incidence of DTC increases with age. While most of the patients with DTC have an excellent prognosis, the outcome can be poor when diagnosed in elderly patients. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current treatment approach for DTC includes surgery, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression, radioactive iodine, external beam radiotherapy, or systemic treatments such as kinase inhibitors. Radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) is the primary first-line systemic treatment for advanced DTC. However, during the course of treatment, the tumor may become refractory to RAI. Elderly patients are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease that can be refractory to RAI. RECENT FINDINGS: The advent of TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and their usage in RAI refractory disease has shown improved progression-free survival. These agents are, however, associated with increased toxicity. The variable nature of disease and toxicity associated with the systemic therapy makes it important to have an individualized approach to management, especially in the elderly population who can be more susceptible to toxicities.

"Lost to Follow-up" Among Adult Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up cancer care is important for patients who have received IV chemotherapy but some patients discontinue their care and are lost to follow-up (LFU) at the cancer center where they were treated. The purpose of this study was to determine what proportion of cancer survivors are LFU at 5 years after treatment, the timing of LFU, and the characteristics of those who do not continue survivorship care. METHODS: Adult patients with cancer who were treated with chemotherapy at a large community teaching hospital in 2006 and 2007 were identified and linked with State tumor registry data. Hospital medical records were reviewed to obtain information on demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and date of last follow-up visit. Characteristics of patients with ≥5 years of follow-up care were compared with those who were LFU. RESULTS: In total, 487 patients received chemotherapy and 304 died (62%) during the 5-year follow-up period. Among the 183 cancer patients who were known to be alive at 5 years, 92 (50%) were LFU and 50% (46/92) of this LFU group were LFU within 1 year of diagnosis. At 5 years, follow-up care was continuing for 55% of women, compared with 39% of men. The highest proportion of follow-up was observed among lung cancer patients (84%), followed by patients with breast cancers (63%) and gastrointestinal cancers (40%). Patients with hematological cancers had the lowest follow-up proportion at 5 years (29%) (P<0.05). Follow-up was not significantly associated with age (P=0.48), insurance status(P=0.29), and race(P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: It is estimated that 65% of the cancer survivors in the United States are ≥5 years beyond their diagnosis but there is little data on oncology follow-up rates. In our retrospective study of 183 patients who were treated with chemotherapy only 49.7% continue to follow-up at their treatment center. LFU has important implications in planning long-term care strategies for cancer survivors and in survivorship research.

Gemcitabine and carfilzomib induced thrombotic microangiopathy: eculizumab as a life-saving treatment.

Drug-induced aHUS is rare; however, early diagnosis is vital to reduce morbidity and mortality. With confirmation of the diagnosis, eculizumab appears to be a viable treatment option to suppress the pro-inflammatory surge. Furthermore, adverse side effects of medications such as carfilzomib and gemcitabine should be considered in the appropriate settings.