Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Ann Oncol ; 26(7): 1353-62, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25851629

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphopenia is a predictive factor for hematological toxicity, progression and early death in advanced cancers including metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CYT107 is a recombinant interleukin 7 (IL-7) (Cytheris, now Revimmune), well tolerated and able to expand lymphocyte pool in humans. The aims of this study were to determine the optimal schedule to deliver CYT107 and to assess its effect on clinical end points. PATIENT AND METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double blind, phase IIa was conducted in MBC patients with <1500/µl lymphocytes treated with capecitabine. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, 20 patients were randomly allocated to four arms to receive (i) before chemotherapy: CYT107 or placebo; then (ii) during chemotherapy: CYT107 or placebo. The primary end point was CD4+ count changes before and during chemotherapy. Secondary end points were hematological toxicity, safety, overall response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Quantification and functional competence of circulating immune cells were also assessed. RESULTS: When administered before chemotherapy, CYT107 induced a significant increase of CD4+ [+148.1% in CYT107 versus +9.9% in placebo groups, (Wilcoxon, P = 0.002)] and CD8+ T-cell counts, including both naïve and memory subsets. When CYT107 was administered during chemotherapy, the magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+ increase was less important. No modulation of immune cell functional competence was observed. CYT107 was well tolerated with no related ≥grade 3 adverse events except 1 fatal suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (SUSAR) of uncertain relationship. Of the 12 cases evaluable for response, 6 of 7 patients (86%) receiving CYT107 before chemotherapy achieved a response or stabilization, whereas two of five patients (40%) receiving placebo achieved the same result. No significant difference was observed for PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: In lymphopenic MBC, CYT107 increases CD4+ and other T-cell subset counts without altering their function. A larger clinical trial to demonstrate its impact on clinical outcome is warranted. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01362107.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Interleucina-7/uso terapêutico , Linfopenia/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundário , Carcinoma Lobular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Lobular/secundário , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Metástase Linfática , Linfopenia/mortalidade , Linfopenia/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 18(1): 37-45, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21422148

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the levels of environmental contamination before and after the introduction of PhaSeal® (closed-system drug transfer device) in two hospital pharmacies. Our secondary objective was to assess the impact of the device on the duration of drug preparation compared to procedures involving the use of needles and syringes. METHODS: The study involved two French hospitals, which prepared antineoplastic chemotherapy using a biological safety cabinet and an isolator. Five skilled pharmacy technicians at each hospital prepared a total of 100 chemotherapy preparations using the standard procedure and 100 using the PhaSeal® system. To control for possible contamination occurring in the course of the procedure, we used fluorescein which becomes fluorescent when exposed to UV light. To reply the second objective, we timed the duration of the different steps of the manipulation. RESULTS: Our findings showed a major reduction in the contamination of the work environment when using the PhaSeal® system for drug preparation. Reduction rates higher than 93% were obtained, whatever the type of protection used. On the duration of preparation, our results indicate that this duration would be approximately 1 h longer for the preparation of 100 samples. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study clearly establishes the benefit of using PhaSeal® for protecting the staff members who work with hazardous agents. It also indicates that the duration of drug preparation is not impacted by the use of the system.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/química , Composição de Medicamentos/métodos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/métodos , Composição de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Monitoramento Ambiental , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Fluoresceína/química , Corantes Fluorescentes/química , França , Humanos , Técnicos em Farmácia/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA