RESUMO
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy, that despite an unprecedented increase in overall survival, lacks truly risk-adapted or targeted treatments. A proportion of patients with MM depend on BCL-2 for survival and recently the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax has shown clinical efficacy and safety in t(11;14) and BCL-2 overexpressing MM. However, only a small proportion of MM patients rely on BCL-2 (~20%), there is a need to broaden the patient population outside of t(11;14) that can be treated with venetoclax. Therefore, we took an unbiased screening approach and screened epigenetic modifiers to enhance venetoclax sensitivity in two non-BCL-2 dependent MM cell lines. The demethylase inhibitor 5-azacytidine was one of the lead hits from the screen, and the enhanced cell killing of the combination was confirmed in additional MM cell lines. Using dynamic BH3 profiling and immunoprecipitations we identified the potential mechanism of synergy is due to increased NOXA expression, through the integrated stress response. Knockdown of PMAIP1 or PKR partially rescues cell death of the venetoclax and 5-azacytidine combination treatment. The addition of a steroid to the combination treatment did not enhance the cell death and interestingly we found enhanced death of the immune cells with steroid addition, suggesting that a steroid-sparing regimen may be more beneficial in MM. Lastly, we show for the first time in primary MM patient samples, that 5-azacytidine enhances the response to venetoclax ex-vivo, across diverse anti-apoptotic dependencies (BCL-2 or MCL-1) and diverse cytogenetic backgrounds. Overall, our data identifies 5-azacytidine and venetoclax as an effective treatment combination and this could be a tolerable steroid-sparing regimen, particularly for elderly MM patients.
RESUMO
We report the findings of a climate study of a liberal arts college in Pennsylvania. This climate assessment was comprehensive in content (heterosexual and cisgender individuals' attitudes, and LGBTQ individuals' experiences), participants (faculty, staff, and students), and methodology (qualitative and quantitative). We found low levels of sexual prejudice and generally positive perceptions of the campus, but positive attitudes were more strongly endorsed by heterosexual and cisgender than LGBTQ participants. We consider the impact of these perceptions on LGBTQ students' co-curricular involvement and discuss the institutional changes that are underway as a result of our study.
