Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Syst Rev ; 12(1): 77, 2023 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37143159

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Quality assessment is a critical component of determining the value of medical services, including palliative care. The utilisation of palliative care quality measures could assist in assessing the degree to which patients living with cancer conform to best practice of palliative care, identifying gaps and monitoring changes in cancer care delivery models in different setting. This scoping review aims to map the available data on the usage of palliative care quality indicators that are relevant to cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: To structure this study, we will use the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, the Levac et al. recommendations and the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. We will search EBSCOHost, Web of Science, ProQuest One Academic, MEDLINE and Google Scholar for evidence on palliative care quality measures applicable for patients living with cancer published from inception till 2022. We will search grey literature in the form of dissertations, conference proceedings and websites of international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) reporting palliative care quality measures applicable to patients living with cancer in LMICs. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study is to establish the extent of existing research on the palliative care quality measures in LMICs. Although palliative care is still a new phenomenon, understanding of the palliative care quality measures applicable for cancer patients will assist to improve care across all components of health systems. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for the study as the data collection and results of the proposed scoping review will be conducted and disseminated electronically using peer-reviewed journals, print and presentations at scientific conferences and stakeholder presentations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
2.
BMC Womens Health ; 22(1): 486, 2022 12 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36461001

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer mortality. We aimed to identify what is currently known about barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in LMICs and propose remedial actions. DESIGN: This was a systematic review using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms in Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We also contacted medical associations and universities for grey literature and checked reference lists of eligible articles for relevant literature published in English between 2010 and 2020. We summarized the findings using a descriptive narrative based on themes identified as levels of the social ecological model. SETTING: We included studies conducted in LMICs published in English between 2010 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: We included studies that reported on barriers to cervical cancer screening among women 15 years and older, eligible for cervical cancer screening. RESULTS: Seventy-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified individual, cultural/traditional and religious, societal, health system, and structural barriers to screening. Lack of knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer in general and of screening were the most frequent individual level barriers. Cultural/traditional and religious barriers included prohibition of screening and unsupportive partners and families, while social barriers were largely driven by community misconceptions. Health system barriers included policy and programmatic factors, and structural barriers were related to geography, education and cost. Underlying reasons for these barriers included limited information about cervical cancer and screening as a preventive strategy, poorly resourced health systems that lacked policies or implemented them poorly, generalised limited access to health services, and gender norms that deprioritize the health needs of women. CONCLUSION: A wide range of barriers to screening were identified across most LMICs. Urgent implementation of clear policies supported by health system capacity for implementation, community wide advocacy and information dissemination, strengthening of policies that support women's health and gender equality, and targeted further research are needed to effectively address the inequitable burden of cervical cancer in LMICs.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Países em Desenvolvimento , Renda , Pobreza
3.
J Public Health Afr ; 13(3): 2111, 2022 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36313926

RESUMO

Background: Lung cancer remains the number one cause of cancer mortality estimated at 1.8 million deaths. There are limited studies in resource poor countries regarding knowledge, attitudes and practices towards lung cancer. Objective: This study aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding lung cancer in selected communities in KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa. Methods: An observational, analytic cross-sectional study design was conducted using a standardized questionnaire. A stratified random cluster sampling method was applied across five communities. A regression model was developed to identify the predictors of the level of knowledge. Results: About 59.9% (95% CI 52.0-67.3) of the participants reported to have heard of lung cancer. The mean knowledge score was 41.8% (95% CI 35.7-47.9%). Coughing blood was the most recognized symptom (61.0%, 95% CI 52.1-69.1). About 17% (95% CI 14.7-21.5) of participants reported to be smokers. Many respondents reported that they would go to a health centre or clinic in case they were coughing blood (72.4%, 95% CI 93.9-79.5). Less than 10% (95% CI 3.9-8.1) of participants was screened for lung cancer at the time. Gender, history of working in the chemicals industry, screening for lung cancer, and time taken to seek health care when sick were significant predictors of lung cancer knowledge. Conclusions: Public health interventions should be explored to increase the levels of community awareness regarding lung cancer, particularly focusing on the importance of screening, early diagnosis and treatment. Keywords: Lung cancer, community awareness, screening, prevention.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA