The impact of brachytherapy boost for anal canal cancers in the era of de-escalation treatments.

PURPOSE: To analyze clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for the treatment of anal canal cancers (ACC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 78 patients with ACC were treated at our institution by ISBT. Local Control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS) and toxicity rates were analyzed. RESULTS: With a median followup (FU) of 59.8 months (95% CI [55.8-64.2]), six (7.7%) local recurrences with 2 patients (2.6%) having persistent disease at 3 months were observed. The 5-year rate of LC for the entire population was 92% [83-96%]. The 5-year DFS rate was 86% [76-93%]. The 5-year OS was 96% [88-99%]. In the univariate analysis, chemotherapy was significantly associated with morbidity grade ≥2. Late digestive toxicity grade ≥3 was reported in 8.9% patients, 1 patient underwent colostomy due to toxicity. The 5-year CFS rate was 88% [79-94%]. CONCLUSIONS: HDR interstitial brachytherapy boost provide excellent rates of tumor control and colostomy-free survival with a favorable profile of GI toxicity. Continence in anal cancer survivors is a challenge and the boost technique must be discussed in a multidisciplinary approach as part of de-escalation treatments.

High-dose-rate vs. low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for anal canal cancers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after EBRT or radio chemotherapy for the treatment of anal canal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred patients with anal canal cancers were treated at our institution by ISBT [LDR (n = 50); HDR (n = 50)]. Chronic toxicity rates, local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival of the two different dose-rate brachytherapy modalities were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: With a median followup of 42.2 months (95% CI, [34.5-48.8]), 9 (9% [4.8-16.2%]) local recurrences were observed, 4 (8% [3.2-18.8%]) in LDR vs. 5 (10% [4.4-21.4%]) in HDR group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28 [0.32-5.07], p = 0.73). The 5-year rate of local control for the entire population was 90% [81-95%], 93% [79-98%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.38). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 82% [71-90%], 88% [73-95%] vs. 72% [44-88%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.21). The 5-year overall survival rate for global population was 94% [84-98%], with no significant differences between LDR (97% [79-100%]) and HDR (93% [80-98%]) (p = 0.27). The 5-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% [83-96%], respectively, 95% [83-99%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR (p = 0.21). Significant differences were found in terms of chronic toxicity rates, with 28 (56% [42.3-68.8%]) patients concerned in low-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. 17 (34% [22.4-47.9%]) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (OR = 0.40 [0.18-0.91], p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence rates were comparable between both groups; HDR brachytherapy seem to have a better toxicity profile. Our data confirmed the finding that HDR can be used to safely administer ISBT without increasing chronic toxicity.

Sarcoidosis Occurring After Solid Cancer: A Nonfortuitous Association: Report of 12 Cases and Review of the Literature.

The association between cancer and sarcoidosis is controversial. Some epidemiological studies show an increase of the incidence of cancer in patients with sarcoidosis but only few cases of sarcoidosis following cancer treatment have been reported. We conducted a retrospective case study from internal medicine and oncology departments for patients presenting sarcoidosis after solid cancer treatment. We also performed a literature review to search for patients who developed sarcoidosis after solid cancer. We describe the clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics and outcome of these patients. Twelve patients were included in our study. Various cancers were observed with a predominance of breast cancer. Development of sarcoidosis appeared in the 3 years following cancer and was asymptomatic in half of the patients. The disease was frequently identified after a follow-up positron emission tomography computerized tomography evaluation. Various manifestations were observed but all patients presented lymph node involvement. Half of the patients required systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 73 months, no patient developed cancer relapse. Review of the literature identified 61 other patients for which the characteristics of both solid cancer and sarcoidosis were similar to those observed in our series. This report demonstrates that sarcoidosis must be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with a history of malignancy who have developed lymphadenopathy or other lesions on positron emission tomography computerized tomography. Histological confirmation of cancer relapse is mandatory in order to avoid unjustified treatments. This association should be consider as a protective factor against cancer relapse.

Gene expression profiling of colon cancer by DNA microarrays and correlation with histoclinical parameters.

Different diagnostic and prognostic groups of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) have been defined. However, accurate diagnosis and prediction of survival are sometimes difficult. Gene expression profiling might improve these classifications and bring new insights into underlying molecular mechanisms. We profiled 50 cancerous and noncancerous colon tissues using DNA microarrrays consisting of approximately 8000 spotted human cDNA. Global hierarchical clustering was to some extent able to distinguish clinically relevant subgroups, normal versus cancer tissues and metastatic versus nonmetastatic tumours. Supervised analyses improved these segregations by identifying sets of genes that discriminated between normal and tumour tissues, tumours associated or not with lymph node invasion or genetic instability, and tumours from the right or left colon. A similar approach identified a gene set that divided patients with significantly different 5-year survival (100% in one group and 40% in the other group; P=0.005). Discriminator genes were associated with various cellular processes. An immunohistochemical study on 382 tumour and normal samples deposited onto a tissue microarray subsequently validated the upregulation of NM23 in CRC and a downregulation in poor prognosis tumours. These results suggest that microarrays may provide means to improve the classification of CRC, provide new potential targets against carcinogenesis and new diagnostic and/or prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.