RESUMO
UNLABELLED: We studied 7,897 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis to assess factors that influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL). An increased number of comorbidities, fear of falling, and previous vertebral fracture were associated with significant reductions in HRQoL. Understanding the factors that affect HRQoL may improve management of these patients. INTRODUCTION: HRQoL is impaired in women treated for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between clinical characteristics, comorbidities, medical history, patient demographics, and HRQoL in women with PMO. METHODS: Baseline data were obtained and combined from two large and similar multinational observational studies: Prospective Observational Scientific Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience in Europe (POSSIBLE EU®) and in the US (POSSIBLE US™) including postmenopausal women in primary care settings initiating or switching bone loss treatment, or who had been on bone loss treatment for some time. HRQoL measured by health utility scores (EQ-5D™) were available for 7,897 women (94 % of study participants). The relationship between HRQoL and baseline clinical characteristics, medical history and patient demographics was assessed using parsimonious, multivariable, mixed-model analyses. RESULTS: Median health utility score was 0.80 (interquartile range 0.69-1.00). In multivariable analyses, young age, low body mass index, previous vertebral fracture, increased number of comorbidities, high fear of falling, and depression were associated with reduced HRQoL. Regression-based model estimates showed that previous vertebral fracture was associated with lower health utility scores by 0.08 (10.3 %) and demonstrated the impact of multiple comorbidities and of fear of falling on HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: In this large observational study of women with PMO, there was substantial interindividual variability in HRQoL. An increased number of comorbidities, fear of falling, and previous vertebral fracture were associated with significant reductions in HRQoL.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Medo , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/reabilitação , Fraturas por Osteoporose/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Comorbidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/psicologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/psicologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/psicologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/reabilitação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Network meta-analysis techniques (meta-analysis, adjusted indirect comparison, and mixed treatment comparison [MTC]) allow for treatment comparisons in the absence of head-to-head trials. In this study, conditional estimates of relative treatment efficacy derived through these techniques show important differences in the fracture risk reduction profiles of marketed pharmacologic therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: This study illustrates how network meta-analysis techniques (meta-analysis, adjusted indirect comparison, and MTC) can provide comparisons of the relative efficacy of postmenopausal osteoporosis therapies in the absence of comprehensive head-to-head trials. METHODS: Source articles were identified in MEDLINE; EMBASE; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Wiley Interscience; and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) between April 28, 2009 and November 4, 2009. Two reviewers identified English-language articles reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with on-label dosing of marketed osteoporosis agents and fracture endpoints. Trial design, population characteristics, intervention and comparator, fracture outcomes, and adverse events were abstracted for analysis. Primary analyses included data from RCTs with fracture endpoints. Sensitivity analyses also included studies with fractures reported through adverse event reports. Meta-analysis compared fracture outcomes for pharmacological therapies vs. placebo (fixed and random effects models); adjusted indirect comparisons and MTC assessed fracture risk in postmenopausal women treated with denosumab vs. other agents. RESULTS: Using data from 34 studies, random effects meta-analysis showed that all agents except etidronate significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures compared with placebo; denosumab, risedronate, and zoledronic acid significantly reduced the risk for nonvertebral and hip fracture, while alendronate, strontium ranelate, and teriparatide significantly reduced the risk for nonvertebral fractures. MTC showed denosumab to be more effective than strontium ranelate, raloxifene, alendronate, and risedronate in preventing new vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The conditional estimates of relative treatment efficacy indicate that there are important differences in fracture risk reduction profiles for marketed pharmacological therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: European observational 1-year study assessed osteoporosis and fracture patterns in 3,402 postmenopausal women prescribed osteoporosis medication. Almost 40% of patients had a previous fracture, while 25% had neither fracture nor dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) diagnosis and were prescribed medication, probably due to other risk factors. INTRODUCTION: This analysis assessed osteoporosis and fracture prevalence in postmenopausal women prescribed osteoporosis treatment in the Prospective Observational Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience in Europe(POSSIBLE EU). METHODS: Women in this observational, multicenter 1-year study were categorized by fracture history and location at baseline. Baseline characteristics were analyzed according to no DXA and DXA diagnosis (osteoporosis or osteopenia). Fractures occurring during the 1-year follow-up period were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 3,402 women enrolled, 39% had a previous fracture, of whom 30% had ≥ 2 fractures. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-four (52%) patients had a DXA diagnosis (osteoporosis 68%, osteopenia 31%, and unknown 1%). Among the osteoporosis patients, 37% had a previous fracture (hip 2.9%, vertebral 8.8%, and non-hip, non-vertebral 25%) and 35% had fractures associated with major trauma. Of the 3,402 women, 1,476 (43%) had no DXA diagnosis; of these, 57% had no fracture (25% of all women). Risk factors varied across patients with and without DXA diagnosis. During the 1-year follow-up period, the fracture incidence in patients with or without a previous fracture at baseline was 4.7% and 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Almost 40% of patients prescribed osteoporosis medication had a previous fracture, highlighting a population with advanced disease. In contrast, 25% of patients had neither a previous fracture nor DXA diagnosis and were prescribed treatment, probably due to other risk factors. There is a need for continued improvement of disease management in European women.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
UNLABELLED: In Switzerland, the total number and incidence of hospitalizations for major osteoporotic fractures increased between years 2000 and 2007, while hospitalizations due to hip fracture decreased. The cost impact of shorter hospital stays was offset by the increasing cost per day of hospitalization. INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to establish the trends and epidemiological characteristics of hospitalizations for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) between years 2000 and 2007 in Switzerland. METHODS: Sex- and age-specific trends in the number and crude and age-standardized incidences of hospitalized MOF (hip, clinical spine, distal radius, and proximal humerus) in women and men aged ≥45 years were analyzed, together with the number of hospital days and cost of hospitalization, based on data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office hospital database and population statistics. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2007, the absolute number of hospitalizations for MOF increased by 15.9% in women and 20.0% in men, mainly due to an increased number of non-hip fractures (+37.7% in women and +39.7% in men). Hospitalizations for hip fractures were comparatively stable (-1.8% in women and +3.3% in men). In a rapidly aging population, in which the number of individuals aged ≥45 years grew by 11.1% (women) and 14.6% (men) over the study period, the crude and age-standardized incidences of hospitalizations decreased for hip fractures and increased for non-hip MOF, both in women and men. The length of hospital stay decreased for all MOF in women and men, the cost impact of which was offset by an increase in the daily costs of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Between years 2000 and 2007, hospitalizations for MOF continued to increase in Switzerland, driven by an increasing number and incidence of hospitalizations for non-hip fractures, although the incidence of hip fractures has declined.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/tendências , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Distribuição por Sexo , Suíça/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Despite the remarkable increase in medications validated as effective in bipolar disorder, treatment is still plagued by inadequate response in acute manic or depressive episodes or in long-term preventive maintenance treatment. Established first-line treatments include lithium, valproate and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in acute mania, and lithium and valproate as maintenance treatments. Recently validated treatments include extended release carbamazapine for acute mania and lamotrigine, olanzapine and aripiprazole as maintenance treatments. For treatment-resistant mania and as maintenance treatments, a number of newer anticonvulsants, and one older one, phenytoin, have shown some promise as effective. However, not all anticonvulsants are effective and each agent needs to be evaluated individually. Combining multiple agents is the most commonly used clinical strategy for treatment resistant bipolar patients despite a relative lack of data supporting its use, except for acute mania (for which lithium or valproate plus an SGA is optimal treatment). Other approaches that may be effective for treatment-resistant patients include high-dose thyroid augmentation, clozapine, calcium channel blockers and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Adjunctive psychotherapies show convincing efficacy using a variety of different techniques, most of which include substantial attention to education and enhancing coping strategies. Only recently, bipolar depression has become a topic of serious inquiry with the dominant controversy focusing on the place of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar depression. Other than mood stabilizers alone or the combination of mood stabilizers and antidepressants, most of the approaches for treatment-resistant bipolar depression are relatively similar to those used in unipolar depression, with the possible exception of a more prominent place for SGAs, prescribed either alone or in combination with antidepressants. Future work in the area needs to explore the treatments commonly used by clinicians with inadequate research support, such as combination therapy and the use of antidepressants as both acute and adjunctive maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/terapia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletroconvulsoterapia , Humanos , Cloreto de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Psicoterapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ajustamento SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this report was to examine the clinical course following neuroleptic discontinuation of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia who had been receiving maintenance antipsychotic treatment for at least 1 year. METHOD: Fifty-three volunteer patients with recent-onset schizophrenia who had been clinically stabilized on a maintenance regimen of fluphenazine decanoate for a mean of 16.7 months had their antipsychotic medications withdrawn under clinical supervision. Participants initially entered a 24-week, double-blind crossover trial in which fluphenazine and placebo were administered for 12 weeks each. For those who did not experience symptom exacerbation or relapse during this period, fluphenazine was openly withdrawn; participants were then followed for up to 18 additional months. RESULTS: When a low threshold for defining symptom reemergence was used, 78% (N=39 of 50) of the patients experienced an exacerbation or relapse within 1 year; 96% (N=48 of 50) did so within 2 years. Mean time to exacerbation or relapse was 235 days. When hospitalization was used as a relapse criterion, only six of 45 of individuals (13%) experiencing an exacerbation or relapse who continued in treatment in the clinic were hospitalized, demonstrating the sensitivity of the psychotic exacerbation criterion. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of clinically stable individuals with recent-onset schizophrenia will experience an exacerbation or relapse after antipsychotic discontinuation, even after more than a year of maintenance medication. However, clinical monitoring and a low threshold for reinstating medications can prevent hospitalization for the majority of these patients.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Flufenazina/análogos & derivados , Flufenazina/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Flufenazina/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The delayed onset of therapeutic response to antidepressants remains a major problem in the treatment of depression. Among the strategies to accelerate response to treatment, the early addition of thyroid hormone to antidepressants has been suggested as a viable method. The authors performed a meta-analysis of the literature on the use of thyroid hormone supplementation to accelerate the treatment of depression to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the clinical efficacy of this strategy. METHOD: Both a computer-aided search of the National Library of Medicine MEDLINE and an intensive search by hand were conducted to identify all double-blind, placebo-controlled studies assessing the concomitant administration of thyroid hormone and antidepressant to accelerate clinical response in patients with nonrefractory depression. RESULTS: Six studies were identified. All were conducted with triiodothyronine (T(3)) and a tricyclic antidepressant. Five of the six studies found T(3) to be significantly more effective than placebo in accelerating clinical response. The pooled, weighted effect size index was 0.58, and the average effect was highly significant. Further, the effects of T(3) acceleration were greater as the percentage of women participating in the study increased. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of T(3) in accelerating clinical response to tricyclic antidepressants in patients with nonrefractory depression. Furthermore, women may be more likely than men to benefit from this intervention.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Tri-Iodotironina/uso terapêutico , Amitriptilina/farmacologia , Amitriptilina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Imipramina/farmacologia , Imipramina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Placebos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Tri-Iodotironina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines recommend discontinuation of an antidepressant within 3 to 6 months after remission of depression in patients with bipolar illness. Yet few studies directly compare the impact of antidepressant discontinuation versus antidepressant continuation on the risk for depressive relapse in patients with bipolar disorder who have been successfully treated for a depressive episode. METHOD: In a retrospective chart review, patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder who were treated for an index episode of depression by adding antidepressant medication to ongoing mood stabilizer medications were identified. The risk of depressive relapse in 25 subjects who stopped antidepressant medications after improvement was compared with the risk of depressive relapse in 19 subjects who continued antidepressants after improvement. RESULTS: Termination of antidepressant medication significantly increased the risk of a depressive relapse. Antidepressant continuation was not significantly associated with an increased risk of mania. CONCLUSION: While this study may have been limited by the retrospective nature of the chart review, nonrandomized assignment of treatment, and reliance on unstructured progress notes, it suggests that antidepressant discontinuation may increase the risk of depressive relapse in some patients with bipolar disorder. Further research is needed to clarify whether maintenance antidepressant treatment may be warranted in some patients with bipolar disorder, especially in those with frequent recurrent depressive episodes.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Bipolar/etiologia , Transtorno Bipolar/prevenção & controle , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/etiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imipramina/administração & dosagem , Imipramina/efeitos adversos , Imipramina/uso terapêutico , Lítio/administração & dosagem , Lítio/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Placebos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção Secundária , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/etiologia , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Over the last few years, the number of potential pharmacotherapies for bipolar disorder has greatly expanded. Yet the database for virtually all these newer treatments consists of case reports and case series. Among these newer treatments, recently released anticonvulsants are most promising. Lamotrigine has already shown efficacy for treating bipolar depression, while gabapentin's efficacy has yet to be documented in a controlled study. Alone among its medication class, topiramate, another anticonvulsant, is associated with weight loss. Novel antipsychotics are effective in treating acute mania. With the exception of clozapine, their efficacy as true mood stabilizers is still unknown. Utilizing combinations of mood stabilizers is common and appropriate but demands knowledge of potential pharmacokinetic interactions. Other approaches for treatment resistant bipolar disorder include high-dose thyroid hormones, calcium channel blockers, electroconvulsive therapy, and omega-3 fatty acids. Finally, the efficacy of adjunctive psychosocial strategies is a topic of active investigation.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/terapia , Eletroconvulsoterapia , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Psicoterapia , Tiroxina/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Resistência a Medicamentos , Terapia Familiar , Humanos , Psicoterapia/métodosRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to survey the membership of the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine to determine their beliefs about ethical dilemmas in pain management practice. Respondents rated ethical dilemmas for their importance as well as their own competence in dealing with these ethical issues. The survey also included an open-ended question that asked respondents to describe clinical situations in which they had encountered ethical dilemmas. A total of 1,105 surveys were analyzed, with physicians (N = 612), nurses (N = 189), and psychologists (N = 166) representing the professions with the greatest response. Management of pain at the end of life, general undertreatment of pain, and undertreatment of pain in the elderly were the most frequently encountered dilemmas. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify ethical issues in the case examples provided by the respondents. Major themes included inappropriate pain management, barriers to care, interactions and conflicts with others, regulatory/legal issues, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and research issues. We conclude that ethical dilemmas are common in pain management practice and that resolution of these dilemmas requires commitment by individual professionals as well as health systems.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dependência de Heroína/tratamento farmacológico , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Enganação , Revelação/ética , Dependência de Heroína/reabilitação , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Masculino , Médicos/ética , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Centros de Tratamento de Abuso de SubstânciasRESUMO
RATIONALE: The utility of fluphenazine levels during maintenance treatment of schizophrenia is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the relationship between fluphenazine levels and a variety of clinical measures during maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS: Fluphenazine levels, side effects, depression and psychosocial outcome were measured at five time points over approximately 1 year in 59 recent onset schizophrenic patients treated with a maintenance dose of injectable fluphenazine decanoate. Negative symptoms were evaluated at the 1-year endpoint. RESULTS: Fluphenazine levels showed marked intraindividual variability even when measurements were restricted to the second 6 months of treatment, by which time steady state levels should have been achieved. No consistent relationship was found between fluphenazine levels and any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that fluphenazine plasma levels do not routinely add relevant clinical information beyond that of dose in evaluating potential side effects or negative consequences during maintenance treatment with the decanoate form of the medication.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/psicologia , Flufenazina/farmacocinética , Flufenazina/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/metabolismo , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Depressão/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Flufenazina/efeitos adversos , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Individualidade , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Comportamento Social , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Monoaminoxidase/uso terapêutico , Tranilcipromina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: For major depression and schizophrenia, gender differences have been reported in symptom expression and course of illness. Gender differences in bipolar disorder are becoming increasingly apparent, but have been less studied. Research data on these differences will help determine whether gender is important in influencing illness variables such as course, symptom expression, and likelihood of comorbidity. METHOD: Charts of 131 patients (63 women and 68 men) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder admitted to the University of California Los Angeles Mood Disorders Program over a 3-year period were reviewed to gather data on demographic variables and course of illness and to assess differences in the illness across genders. RESULTS: No significant gender differences were found in the rate of bipolar I or bipolar II diagnoses, although women were overrepresented in the latter category. Also, no significant gender differences emerged in age at onset, number of depressive or manic episodes, and number of hospitalizations for depression. Women, however, had been hospitalized significantly more often than men for mania. Further, whereas bipolar men were significantly more likely than bipolar women to have a comorbid substance use disorder, women with bipolar disorder had 4 times the rate of alcohol use disorders and 7 times the rate of other substance use disorders than reported in women from community-derived samples. CONCLUSION: For bipolar disorder, course of illness variables such as age at onset and number of affective episodes of each polarity do not seem to differ across genders. Women, however, may be more likely than men to be hospitalized for manic episodes. While both men and women with the illness have high rates of comorbidity with alcohol and other substance use disorders, women with bipolar disorder are at a particularly high risk for comorbidity with these conditions.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idade de Início , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
This study explored the clinical and psychosocial predictors of work adjustment in 52 Bipolar I patients over a 2-year longitudinal period and examined associations between work functioning and social relationships, personality features, stressful life events, and clinical variables. Analyses indicated that psychosocial variables (personality disorder symptoms and social functioning) added significantly to prediction of work functioning after clinical variables were entered. Stressful life events were not associated with work adjustment. Overall, presence of a good quality supportive relationship was the strongest unique predictor of work. The results highlight the need to study functional outcomes in patients, especially because they appear only modestly associated with clinical status.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/reabilitação , Reabilitação Vocacional/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
By modulating the activity of central neurotransmitters, psychotropic agents may affect reproductive functioning in men and women. Many neurotransmitters influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and can consequently affect menstrual cycling in women and spermatogenesis in men. Emotional state similarly may disrupt reproductive functioning through the effects of stress hormones on the HPG axis. While some data exist on the relationship between stress and menstrual cyclicity in women of reproductive age, little is known regarding the potential effect of emotional state on reproductive function in men. This paper will review: (1) aspects of male reproductive function that may be vulnerable to medication-induced influences; (2) the impact of emotional state on male reproductive function; and (3) the literature on the possible effects of antidepressant medications on male fertility.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Infertilidade Masculina/induzido quimicamente , Infertilidade Masculina/psicologia , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Androgênios/sangue , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Desidroepiandrosterona/farmacologia , Emoções/efeitos dos fármacos , Emoções/fisiologia , Feminino , Fertilidade/fisiologia , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/complicações , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Infertilidade Masculina/terapia , Masculino , Transtornos do Humor/sangue , Transtornos do Humor/complicações , Ratos , Testosterona/sangue , Testosterona/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the treatment efficacy of the 2 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors sertraline and fluoxetine. METHOD: A randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study of 10 weeks' duration comparing the efficacy of sertraline, 50 mg/day; sertraline, 100 mg/day; and fluoxetine, 20 mg/day, was conducted in 44 psychiatric outpatients with DSM-IV unipolar major depressive disorder. Antidepressant dosages were doubled at 6 weeks for subjects who had not achieved remission. Primary outcome measurements included the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), with scores of < or = 7 on the HAM-D and < or = 2 on the CGI-I representing a positive treatment response, i.e., remission. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, significant differences in rate of positive treatment response were noted, with 0% for sertraline, 50 mg; 46% for sertraline, 100 mg; and 31% for fluoxetine, 20 mg (p = .023). At 6 weeks, positive treatment response rates were 21%, 43%, and 31% for subjects taking 50 mg of sertraline, those taking 100 mg of sertraline, and those taking 20 mg of fluoxetine, respectively, with treatment groups no longer differing significantly from each other. In subjects for whom antidepressant dose was doubled at week 6, response rates at week 10 (4 weeks on increased dose) were 40% for sertraline, 100 mg; 43% for sertraline, 200 mg; and 55% for fluoxetine, 40 mg. CONCLUSION: Subjects taking sertraline, 100 mg, and fluoxetine, 20 mg, demonstrated an earlier treatment response compared with subjects taking sertraline, 50 mg. For patients without a positive response at 6 weeks, an increased antidepressant dose resulted in remission for a substantial proportion of patients when assessed 4 weeks later.