Surgical Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Insight from a High-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted hiatal hernia (HH) repair is safe and effective; however, it is unclear whether hernia size affects perioperative outcomes and whether a watch-and-wait strategy is appropriate for patients with asymptomatic large HHs. We aimed to investigate these issues. METHODS: After IRB approval, we queried our prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent primary laparoscopic HH repair at our center between August 2016 and December 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (SKM). According to the intraoperative findings, HHs were divided into four groups: small (S-HH), medium (M-HH), large (L-HH), or giant (G-HH) when the percentage of herniated stomach was 0% (sliding), < 50%, 50-75%, or > 75%, respectively. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were grouped: S-HH (n = 46), M-HH (n = 69), L-HH (n = 20), and G-HH (n = 35) with mean age of 58.5.6 ± 11.0, 61.9 ± 11.3, 70.7 ± 10.3, and 72.6 ± 9.7 years (p < 0.001), respectively. Compared to M-HH patients, L-HH patients had significantly longer hospital stays (mean 2.8 ± 3.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.91 days; p = 0.001) and more postoperative complications (6/20 [30.0%] vs 3/69 [4.3%]; OR 6.9, 95% CI 5.4-8.4, p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up time of 43.1 ± 25.0 and 43.5 ± 21.6 months for the combined S/M-HH and L/G-HH groups, GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life scores were comparable (S/M-HH: 6.5 ± 10.9 vs L/G-HH: 7.1 ± 11.3; p = 0.63). There was no perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HHs likely grow with age, reflecting their progressive nature. Laparoscopic L-HH repair was associated with higher morbidity than M-HH repair. Thus, patients with M-HH, even if less symptomatic, should be evaluated by a foregut surgeon. Regardless of HH size, good mid- and long-term quality of life outcomes can be achieved.

Association Between Antibodies Against Lung Self-Antigens and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Lung Transplant Candidates.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and pretransplant antibodies against lung self-antigens (SAbs) collagen-V and/or k-alpha 1 tubulin are both independently associated with allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation (LTx). The role of GER in inducing lung injury and SAbs is unknown. We aimed to study the association between pre-LTx GER and SAbs. After IRB approval, we retrieved SAb assays conducted between 2015 and 2019 and collected 24 hour GER data for these patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: no reflux (GER-) and pathologic reflux (GER+) to compare the prevalence of SAbs. Multivariate analysis was used to study the association between GER and SAbs in the whole cohort and in restrictive lung disease (RLD) and obstructive lung disease (OLD) subsets. Proximal esophageal reflux (PER) events ≥5 was considered abnormal. Patients (n = 134; 73 men) were divided into groups: GER- (54.5%, n = 73) and GER+ (45.5%, n = 61). The prevalence of GER was higher in the RLD than in the OLD subset (p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of SAbs was 53.7% (n = 72), higher in the GER+ than the GER- group (65.6% vs 43.8%, p = 0.012), but comparable between RLD and OLD subsets. Overall, SAbs were associated with GER (p = 0.012) and abnormal PER (p = 0.017). GER and abnormal PER increased the odds of SAbs in the RLD subset (OR [95% CI]: 2.825 [1.033-7.725], p = 0.040 and OR [95% CI]: 3.551 [1.271-9.925], p = 0.014, respectively) but not in the OLD subset. LTx candidates have a high prevalence of SAbs, which are significantly associated with GER and abnormal PER in patients with RLD.

Association of Bolus Transit Time on Barium Esophagram With Esophageal Peristalsis on High-resolution Manometry and Nonobstructive Dysphagia.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to correlate upright and prone bolus transit time (BTT) on barium esophagography (BE) with esophageal peristalsis on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and self-reported dysphagia in patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters on HRM. BACKGROUND: BTT on BE could be the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of esophageal peristalsis if it can be quantified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters and standard-protocol BE from 2017 to 2020 were included. Patients were divided, based on the number of normal swallows (distal contractile integral >450 mm Hg-s-cm), into 11 groups (10 normal swallows to 0 normal swallows). Liquid barium swallows in prone position were objectively evaluated for prone BTT. Patients reported difficulty in swallowing on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). Fractional polynomial and logistic regression analysis were used to study the association (along with the rate of change) between BTT, peristalsis, and dysphagia. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included. Prone BTT increased as the number of normal swallows decreased ( P <0.001). Two deflection points were noted on the association between peristalsis and prone BTT at 50% normal swallows, 40 seconds and 30% normal swallows, 80 seconds, after which peristaltic function declined independently of prone BTT. Patients with prone BTT>40 seconds had nearly 6-fold higher odds of 0% normal swallows on HRM than patients with prone BTT<40 seconds ( P =0.002). Increasing prone BTT was associated with increasing dysphagia grades 1 and 2 ( P ≤0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal motility can be quantified by BE. Prone BTT correlates with the proportion of normal esophageal swallows and dysphagia.

Factors associated with esophageal motility improvement after bilateral lung transplant in patients with an aperistaltic esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: We reported that esophageal peristalsis can improve after lung transplant (LTx), even in patients with pretransplant esophageal aperistalsis. This improvement was associated with better outcomes. We analyzed preoperative factors and sought to predict persistent aperistalsis or motility improvement in patients with pre-LTx esophageal aperistalsis. METHODS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis who underwent LTx between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Preoperative barium esophagrams were blinded and re-examined; subjective scores were assigned to motility and dilation patterns. Postoperative high-resolution manometry was used to divide patients into 2 groups: persistent esophageal aperistalsis (PEA) or improved esophageal peristalsis (IEP). RESULTS: We identified 29 patients: 20 with restrictive lung disease, 7 with obstructive lung disease, and 2 with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Post-LTx, 10 patients had PEA and 19 had IEP (mean age, 53.3 ± 6.6 years and 61.2 ± 10.6 years, respectively; P = .04). All 9 patients (100%) with obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension but only 10 of 20 patients (50%) with restrictive lung disease had IEP post-LTx (P = .01). All 4 patients with scleroderma had PEA. Nearly absent contractility on preoperative esophagrams was more prevalent in the PEA group than in the IEP group (100% vs 58.8%; P = .06). No further differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with esophageal aperistalsis and obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not patients with restrictive lung disease and scleroderma, are likely to have IEP post-LTx. Additional studies may determine whether subjective esophagram assessment can help predict IEP post-LTx in patients with restrictive lung disease without scleroderma.

Redo fundoplication and early Roux-en-Y diversion for failed fundoplication: a 3-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Redo fundoplication (RF) and Roux-en-Y diversion (RNY) are both accepted surgical treatments after failed fundoplication. However, due to higher reported morbidity, RNY is more commonly performed only after several surgical failures. In our experience, RNY at an earlier point of the disease progression seems to be related with better outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate this aspect by comparing the results between RF and RNY performed by a single surgeon over 3 years at our institution. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent RF or RNY at our institution between 2016 and 2019 by a single surgeon (author SKM). Patients with previous bariatric surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Of 43 patients, 28 underwent RF and 15 underwent RNY (mean body mass index 28.6 and 32.7 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.01). The number of previous antireflux surgeries for the RF and RNY groups was 1 (82% vs 80%, p > 0.99), 2 (18% vs 7%, p = 0.4), and more than 2 (0% vs 13%, p = 0.1). RNY took longer than RF (median, 165 vs 137 min, p = 0.02), but both groups had a median estimated blood loss of 50 ml (p = 0.82). There was no difference in intraoperative complications (25% vs 20% for RF and RYN, respectively, p > 0.99). Postoperative complications were more common in the RF than in the RYN group (21% vs 7%, p = 0.39). Median hospital stay was 3 days for both groups (p = 0.78). At short-term follow-up, the mean quality of life score was similar for the RF and RYN groups (11.5 vs 12.2, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: RNY diversion, if performed by experienced hands and at an earlier point of disease progression, has comparable perioperative morbidity to RF and should be considered as a feasible and safe option for definitive treatment of failed antireflux surgery.

Bilateral Lung Transplant for a Connective Tissue Disorder: Esophageal Motility and 3-year Survival.

Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) are associated with esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease, which may diminish survival after lung transplantation (LTx). We studied LTx outcomes in patients with a CTD stratified by esophageal motility. We identified patients who underwent bilateral LTx from 2012 to 2017. Patients with a CTD were classified by pre-LTx diagnosis: absent esophageal motility (AEM), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), or preserved esophageal motility (PEM). The primary endpoint was 3-year survival. Sub-analysis compared survival between the AEM group and a propensity-matched (lung allocation score), non-CTD control group. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. In total, 495 patients underwent LTx; 33 (6.7%) had a CTD. Median (IQR) age was 62 years (55.5-67.0); 24 (72.7%) were women. Survival trended lower for recipients with a CTD than without a CTD at 1-year (84.8% vs 91.8%; p = 0.2) and 3-years (66.7% vs 73.5%; p = 0.5). Within the CTD cohort, 1- and 3-year survival was significantly higher in the PEM (100%, 87.5%) and IEM (100%, 85.7%) groups than in the AEM group (50%, 20%; p < 0.001). The AEM group had significantly lower survival at 1-year (50% vs 92.5%) and 3-years (20% vs 65%) than a lung allocation score-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. LTx recipients with a CTD and AEM had significantly lower survival than those with PEM or IEM as well as significantly lower survival than that of a propensity-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. Patients with a CTD and AEM should be considered for LTx with extreme caution and counseled appropriately.

Minimally Invasive Conversion of a Gastric Bypass into Sleeve Gastrectomy for Postprandial Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia.

The treatment of postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia following gastric bypass surgery for obesity can be challenging despite dietetic and medical treatment and eventually surgical treatment remains the exclusive treatment to resolve the problem for the patient. In the following, the experience with a conversion surgery from a complicated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to sleeve gastrectomy using the Da Vinci robotic system will be reported.

Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Robotic-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer has been increasingly employed worldwide; however, the benefits of this technique compared to conventional minimally invasive oesophagectomy are unclear. Since 2016, hybrid robotic minimally invasive oesophagectomy (R-HMIE) has increasingly replaced hybrid laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy (HMIE) as the standard of care in our institution. The aim of this study was to compare these procedures. METHODS: Over a 10-year period, 686 patients underwent oesophagectomy at our institution. Out of these patients, 128 patients with cancer were treated with a hybrid minimally invasive technique. Each patient who underwent R-HMIE was matched according to gender, age, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Union International Contre le Cancer stage, localization, histology and neoadjuvant treatment with a patient who underwent HMIE. Perioperative parameters were extracted from our database and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: After the matching procedure, 88 patients were included in the study. Between HMIE and R-HMIE, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in operating time (median 281 vs 300 min), R0 resection rate (n = 42 vs 42), harvested lymph nodes (median 28 vs 24), hospital stay (median 19 vs 17 days) and intensive care unit stay (median 7 vs 6.5 days). Regarding surgical complications, no difference could be observed either (n = 42 vs 44). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy remains a challenging operation with high morbidity even in a high-volume institution. According to our intra- and short-term results, we have found no difference between R-HMIE and HMIE.

Traumatic oesophageal perforation: a successful management based on the Pittsburgh Perforation Severity Score.

Oesophageal perforation is a severe life-threatening clinical condition with high mortality and morbidity needing rapid interdisciplinary approach to be effectively managed. Recently, on the basis of multicentric retrospective data, we proposed a decision tree for the treatment of oesophageal perforations based on the Pittsburgh Perforation Severity Score (PSS). We now report the first case of a traumatic oesophageal perforation, which was successfully treated according to the application of the PSS decision tree.

Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy are a significant cause of morbidity and death. Early detection and timely management are crucial. This study evaluates the effectiveness of daily drain amylase levels in detecting early leaks after esophagectomy compared with C-reactive protein (CRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2015 and September 2017, 126 esophagectomies were performed in our department. Amylase levels were collected in 80 of these patients, as long right-sided chest tubes were in place. Mostly, chest tubes were removed before postoperative day (POD) 5. CRP levels were measured daily. Early leaks were defined as occurring with the chest tubes in place. According to the obtained receiver operating characteristics curves, amylase levels >335 U/L, and CRP >30 mg/dL were considered positive. Sensitivity and specificity for both drain amylase and CRP were calculated. RESULTS: Overall anastomotic leak rate was 7.5% (6/80). An early disruption occurred in 4 of 80 patients (5%). Three patients had a positive amylase level and none a positive CRP on POD 1. These 3 patients had on POD 2 a positive CRP. The fourth patient presented at POD 2 bilious secretion in the chest tubes. He showed normal amylase and CRP levels on POD 1. Sensitivity and specificity for amylase level and CRP within the first 3 PODs were 0.75 and 0.98 versus 0.75 and 0.85, respectively. The patients with leak were reoperated at POD 2. They were all discharged between PODs 15 and 19. CONCLUSIONS: Amylase level after esophagectomy is a more accurate screening tool for detection of early leaks than CRP. It could facilitate their detection up to 24 hours earlier than CRP.